Koike-backed party gains seats as LDP dealt setback in Tokyo assembly poll
Tomin First no Kai (Tokyoites First), supported by Koike as a special adviser, remained the biggest party, taking 31 seats, up from 26.
Meanwhile, the LDP secured just 21 seats — down from 30 in the previous assembly. The party, which together with Komeito makes up the ruling bloc in national politics, had never had fewer than 23 seats in the assembly.
Komeito was also dealt a blow, winning 19 seats, down from 23. It was the first time since 1993 that every Komeito candidate running for the assembly had not managed to win a seat.
Still, the three parties supporting Koike — Tomin first, the LDP and Komeito — managed to maintain their combined majority of 127 total seats in the assembly.
Two smaller parties, the Democratic Party for the People and Sanseito, also won seats for the first time, securing nine and three spots, respectively.
Despite fielding 42 candidates, the Path to Rebirth, the new regional party set up by Shinji Ishimaru — runner-up to Koike in last year's gubernatorial election — all failed to win a seat.
Turnout across 42 voting districts in Tokyo was 47.59%, 5.2 percentage points higher than the previous election in 2021 and the fifth lowest in history.
A main focus of voters were measures to combat rising prices in Tokyo.
The election results were seen as an indicator for the Upper House election which is expected to be held July 20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Will Ishiba's critics be able to garner enough support for a leadership race?
Weeks after the Liberal Democratic Party's poor performance in an Upper House election, it remains unclear if Shigeru Ishiba can resist rising calls for him to quit as party president and subsequently as prime minister. His political survival likely hinges on whether a party leadership race will take place following the LDP's decision to have its election committee canvass the opinions of party members and prefectural chapters on the subject. There is only one clear way to force an election midway through Ishiba's term as party president, which ends in September 2027 — the recall clause in the LDP presidential election rules. He could also resign voluntarily but so far, he has insisted that he will remain in office. The focus now is on whether Ishiba's critics can gather enough support to meet the requirements of the recall clause. Here's what the rules say, and what can be expected in the coming weeks. What are the rules? Under Article 6, a presidential election can be held before the president's term ends if a majority of the LDP's parliamentary members and representatives of prefectural chapters call for it. The LDP currently has 295 parliamentarians. The additional 47 prefectural representatives means there are a total of 342 eligible votes, making 172 the magic number needed for a presidential election to be held. Who wants Ishiba out? Ishiba is facing intense pressure from former members of a party faction once led by the late Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and another previously headed by former Secretary-General Toshimitsu Motegi, both of which have been disbanded. He is also feeling the heat from members of former Prime Minister Taro Aso's faction — the only group that remains active in the LDP. The former Abe faction members in particular are Ishiba's most vocal critics. But they were also deeply involved in a slush funds scandal that is seen as one of the reasons for the LDP's Upper House election defeat last month. Despite calls for him to step down, Ishiba insists he will remain in office. Those seeking to replace him, however, forced the party to hold a meeting of parliament members on Friday. During the meeting, it was decided the party's election committee would seek the opinions of all party lawmakers and prefectural chapter representatives on whether or not to hold an election. What are the prospects for a presidential election? While much uncertainty remains, it is clear that not everyone wants to oust Ishiba. When the party's youth division met online with its counterparts in the prefectural chapters Tuesday, they were split on whether to hold an election or not. 'Everyone shared the opinion that the responsibility does not lie solely with the president. But there were also voices saying the party needs to start afresh,' said Yasutaka Nakasone, who heads the division. An NHK poll released Tuesday showed 49% of respondents supported Ishiba's decision to continue while 40% were against it; 11% either said they were undecided or didn't respond. Among LDP supporters who responded to the poll, 69% agreed with Ishiba's decision to stay on while 23% opposed it. There were also voices among supporters saying it was not just Ishiba's leadership but also the LDP's money scandals that led to the party's election defeat. The NHK poll, conducted over the weekend, also showed an approval rate of 38% for the Ishiba Cabinet, a 7-percentage-point increase from July. What are the next steps? How and when the election committee asks party members and prefectural chapters for their opinions remain undecided, although media reports say the first meeting may be held as early as next week, after the Bon holiday is over. The anti-Ishiba camp is expected to rally support for the leadership race during the holiday when they return to their constituencies. Political tensions between the pro- and anti-Ishiba camps could also further complicate things when, at the end of the month, the party compiles a report on why it performed poorly in the July Upper House election. LDP Secretary-General Hiroshi Moriyama has said that he will decide whether to remain or step down at that time. Ishiba also said last week that he will decide on his course of action after listening to various opinions. Information from Jiji added
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
South Korean President Lee to visit Japan for summit with Ishiba, Seoul says
South Korean President Lee Jae Myung will visit Japan between Aug. 23 and Aug. 24 and hold a summit with Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Lee's office said at a briefing on Wednesday. The leaders will discuss ways to improve regional peace and boost trilateral cooperation with Washington, Kang Yu-jung, Lee's spokesperson, told reporters. Kang did not specify the date of the summit during Lee's two-day visit. Lee has in the past been critical of efforts by administrations in Seoul to improve ties with Tokyo, though when he met Ishiba for their first summit on the sidelines of a Group of Seven meeting in Canada in June they vowed to deepen the relationship. Ties between the U.S. allies have often been strained, rooted in historical disputes stemming from Japan's colonial rule over the Korean peninsula from 1910 to 1945. Their second summit meeting will also take place as the Asian economic powerhouses grapple with the implications of U.S. tariffs imposed by the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump. Lee's trip to Japan comes just ahead of his visit to the United States, where he is scheduled to hold a summit with Trump on Aug. 25.
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Dispelling the myth of Yasukuni Shrine
Of all the historical issues surrounding Japan and the war period, Yasukuni Shrine is the one that continues to generate the most controversy. For decades, the shrine has been a lightning rod — especially as it has been used by some of Japan's neighbors as a convenient means to shift attention away from their domestic issues. Beijing and Seoul have falsely spun visits by Japanese leaders to the shrine — particularly around Aug. 15 — as an attempt to glorify Japan's wartime deeds, citing the fact that 14 individuals convicted as Class-A war criminals are enshrined there among the millions of Japanese and non-Japanese who fought for the country. Many in the Western media have resorted to simplistically describing it as a 'war shrine,' as if to fit the false narrative that the place is a symbol of Japan's past militarism. Some others criticize the presence of the Yushukan Museum on the premises, which detractors argue is further proof of ulterior motives. Much of the controversy stems from a lack of understanding of Japanese culture and the Shinto religion. So, what is Yasukuni Shrine? Shinto beliefs Emperor Meiji established Yasukuni Shrine in 1869 in Tokyo, very close to the current Imperial Palace, expressly to honor the eirei, or spirits, of those who died in civil wars beginning in 1853 that ended the 250-year-old reign of the Tokugawa shogunate to restore political power to the emperor. Those who died fighting for the pro-imperial side were enshrined in Yasukuni, as they perished for their country. The name Yasukuni literally means "to preserve peace for the entire nation." The shrine's founding objective was to promote peace within the nation and cultivate a peaceful society. Japanese Shinto priests attend a ritual during an autumn festival at Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo on Oct. 17. | REUTERS In Japan, a division of labor has existed between religious groups for over 1,500 years. Buddhist temples assumed primary responsibility for conducting rituals for the dead and offering burial plots within temple grounds for the remains of the deceased. On the other hand, Shinto shrines became holy grounds to obtain blessings for newly born children, mark the transition to adulthood, secure the safe construction of new homes and buildings and offer prayers for a new job, good health and a bountiful harvest (though less common, some Japanese choose to perform Shinto funerals). From the 1900s, they also began to conduct weddings. As a Shinto shrine, there have never been, nor will there ever be, graves, burial plots or any physical human remains present within the grounds of Yasukuni Shrine. Instead, Yasukuni enshrines, through a Shinto ritual process, the spirits of over 2,466,000 individuals who died from 1853 to today while in service to Japan, primarily in the military, but also civilians on government assignment. All of these spirits are treated as completely equal, regardless of their rank or standing in life and irrespective of the war in which they sacrificed their lives, which side or how well they fought or whether they died on the battlefield or later in a military hospital. There is also an ancient belief that the spirits of the dead should be honored with purification through prayer and offerings. For those killed suddenly in war, the need becomes more urgent to pacify and purify the spirits of the dead so they can move forward. The primary role of Yasukuni Shrine is to honor and appease the spirits of all who have died in service to Japan through daily prayer and ritual offerings so that they may rest in peace. And, with their support, Japan may remain at peace. Postwar controversy After World War II, Gen. Douglas MacArthur, the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers in Japan, issued orders to halt government recognition and support of all religious organizations, instructing them to be privately managed and funded. In essence, he imposed a separation of church and state. Since 1946, there has been no government oversight or financial support for any shrine or temple in the nation, including Yasukuni. The shrine was nearly shut down permanently by MacArthur's General Headquarters, or GHQ, after the war ended. Yasukuni was allowed to continue as a registered private religious organization funded by private donations after the intervention of two Roman Catholic priests, Father Bruno Bitter of the Roman Curia and Father Patrick Byrne of the Maryknoll order, who argued that honoring war dead is the right and duty of all citizens. But according to Japanese constitutional law, the government has no authority over how it or any other religious organization conducts its rituals or spiritual practices. Most importantly, Yasukuni is perhaps the only place where the bereaved families of over one million Japanese who died during the war and whose remains remain unrecovered can pay their respects. People visit Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo on the 77th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II on Aug. 15, 2022. | REUTERS Japan experienced an estimated 2.4 million military related deaths from 1931 to 1952. The record-keeping did not end in 1945, as the spirits of some 60,000 Japanese who died in Josef Stalin's postwar slave labor camps could only be accounted for until the last of the captives returned home in 1952. The remains of 1.12 million war casualties scattered across a vast area from Russia to distant Pacific atolls have yet to be recovered. Half of those were lost at sea or in locations that refuse ongoing efforts by Japan to search for and retrieve them, namely Russia and China. There are no graves for the one million fallen whose remains are unrecovered. Instead, their names appear in the registry of Yasukuni Shrine as eirei, and prayers are offered daily to appease their spirits. And so, we reach the crux of the political controversy that has yet to be addressed forthrightly and consistently by Japanese political leadership: the 1978 enshrinement of 14 Japanese civilian and military wartime leaders selected, tried and convicted as "Class-A" war criminals by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, better known as the Tokyo Trials. The Class-A defendants were tried under the then-newly established charges of "crimes against peace" and "crimes against humanity," first adjudicated in the Nuremberg Trials in Europe. Yet the Tokyo Trials were the mirror opposite of the well-structured Nuremberg Trials. It had numerous flaws, particularly in the trial design, the unwieldy prosecutorial and judicial staffing, the comparatively lower level of professional competence of justices and prosecutors and the inefficient administration of the trial from start to completion. The Tokyo Trials, which took as much time as the 13 Nuremberg trials, ended with only one main trial. Part of the issues inherited by Yasukuni Shrine were created by the Tokyo Trials failing to achieve the level of universal closure that the Nuremberg Trials delivered. Much focus remains on the 14 Class-A defendants who were included in the registry at Yasukuni in 1978. Yet, at the time Beijing and Seoul did not aggressively level complaints about their inclusion. Their criticism curiously and conveniently coincides with South Korea and China's rise from developing-country status in the 1980s and 1990s, especially when the latter launched its 'patriotic education' that focused on Japan's wartime behavior to foment loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party, which partially claims its legitimacy for fighting off the Japanese Imperial Army. Since the war, Yasukuni Shrine has not arbitrarily selected those who are enshrined. In the past, the Imperial Army and Navy reviewed who would be honored at Yasukuni, including details such as names, ranks, military units, dates and places of death. After the war, separation of church and state became law and the Japanese government was prohibited from directing Yasukuni to take any action. The evidence required for enshrinement was then received by Yasukuni either by a carbon copy of the official death notice sent to bereaved families or presented directly by bereaved family members when they learned their loved one was not enshrined. Yasukuni views its mission as appeasing the spirits of the war dead and honoring the sacrifices made. On May 22, 1980, the Roman Catholic Church joined in that effort. Pope John Paul II officiated at a mass in St. Peter's Basilica, offering prayers for the repose of the souls of all 1,618 Japanese convicted of Class-A, -B and -C war crimes. Yushukan Museum Within the grounds of Yasukuni Shrine, a museum called Yushukan has existed since 1882. Its name translates to a place to learn the stories of those who gave their lives for their country. Yushukan has undergone several transformations over the decades from its original purpose as a war museum to what it has now become in the 21st century: a 'repository of the relics of those who died in war; its sole purpose being to honor the memory of Japanese war dead.' It was closed by the GHQ in 1945, but was later renovated and fully reopened to the public in 1986. It is dedicated solely to telling the stories of the individuals who gave their lives in wars since 1853 and whose names are inscribed in Yasukuni, featuring over 100,000 photos, personal effects, documents and artifacts they left behind. There is no sense that this is a place glorifying war or the weapons that were used, nor to justify any war. A Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero Model 52 fighter aircraft is displayed inside the Yushukan Museum in February 2015. | Bloomberg What stirred controversy — and led to the notoriety of the museum — was that some of the display boards in the 1980s laid out why Japan went to war with the United States from the Japanese perspective. It was an era when outsiders wanted to see what is still in U.S. history books; that Imperial Japan was an evil fascist empire; and that it attacked Pearl Harbor without notice or reason — which is hardly a nuanced or accurate depiction of history. The boards have since been removed or toned down, so the focus is on the individuals, not whose version of history is correct. It is a humbling place, a solemn place and one leaves with a sense of melancholy at the loss one feels. And if you are lucky, you will have a shared commitment to achieving the mission of Yasukuni in building a peaceful country. 'Shrine for peace' Today, Yasukuni sees itself as a "shrine for peace" and not just for Japan's war dead, says Umio Otsuka, the chief priest of Yasukuni Shrine. Mostly unknown within the Yasukuni Shrine precincts, but symbolically sited just to the left (south) exactly in between the main worship hall and the main sanctuary where the spirits reside, is a separate memorial with the appearance of a shrine that was established in 1965 to offer prayers daily to the spirits of everyone who perished in wars around the world, including enemy combatants who died fighting against Japan. The chief priest of Yasukuni and the priests on duty offer prayers there every day. Its name is "Chinreisha," which means "spirit pacifying shrine." Though little known, when Shinzo Abe visited Yasukuni in 2013, he also visited Chinreisha to offer prayers for those who died fighting against Japan. As Yasukuni is dedicated to pacifying the spirits of all those who died in war in service to their country, Chinreisha fits perfectly within its mission. This mission continues with a special prayer service conducted every July for all those who died in the past year, including in the Middle East and Ukraine. In the 21st century, Yasukuni Shrine can be both a place to celebrate the peace that every Japanese has cherished for the past 80 years by remembering those who gave their lives for their country, but also one of the few places in Japan where its citizens can confront the harsh realities of the wartime period that inflicted such pain and suffering on our neighbors. There are two sides to many mirrors. When it comes to the war period, one side reflects what the Japanese tend to see: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, the Tokyo fire bombings and the over one million dead whose remains are yet to be repatriated. The reverse side reflects what others see: invasions, bombings, atrocities and human rights abuses. Both were real. For 80 years, Yasukuni Shrine has made sure that Japan never loses sight of what the war period inflicted on our neighbors while honoring the sacrifices of those who gave their precious lives for Japan. This nation is one of only nine countries in the world that existed in 1945 and has not been a participant in a war since. Japan has been a nation at peace. Imagine a time in the near future when the emperor and empress, a Japanese prime minister and other world leaders visit Yasukuni during the Spring and Autumn festivals, the two most important dates in the year for Yasukuni (not Aug. 15) to give a prayer for peace as they do at other war memorials around the world. It is time. Edo Naito is a commentator on Japanese politics, law and history. He is a retired international business attorney and has held board of director and executive positions at several U.S. and Japanese multinational companies.
