Japan Election: Severe blow to PM Shigeru Ishiba as ruling coalition loses upper house majority — what we know so far
It will mark the first time in the LDP's 70-year history that it leads a coalition that does not control either house, Japan's NHK media reported. Despite this, PM Ishiba indicated he intends to stay on in his role.
Here's all you need to know about Japan Elections:
As many as 248 members of the Upper House are elected for six-year terms. Elections are held every three years, with half of the seats up for grabs.
This time, there are 124 seats plus one extra to fill a vacancy, Japanese media NHK reported. It said 75 seats will be decided based on electoral districts. The remaining 50 seats will be filled by people elected through proportional representation from across Japan.
The ruling coalition needs a total of 125 seats for a majority. They already have 75 uncontested seats, but NHK projections suggest it may be difficult for the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and Komeito to get the additional 50 needed.
The cards are stacked against PM Ishiba, with all major opposition parties ruling out joining the Liberal Democratic Party and its partner Komeito in an expanded coalition.
According to reports, Ishiba's LDP and coalition partner Komeito returned 47 seats, short of the 50 seats it needed to ensure a majority in the 248-seat upper chamber in an election. The main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party finished second with 22 seats.
If the ruling bloc fails to get a majority, it would be the first time in the LDP's 70-year history for the party to lead a coalition that does not control either house of the Diet.
The fringe far-right Sanseito party emerged as one of the biggest winners in Japan's upper house election on Sunday. It, however, won't join coalition for now.
The party won 14 seats, up from one seat, giving it a significant presence in the upper house. It has only three seats in the more powerful lower house.
"Sanseito has become the talk of the town, and particularly here in America, because of the whole populist and anti-foreign sentiment. It's more of a weakness of the LDP and Ishiba than anything else," said Joshua Walker, head of the U.S. non-profit Japan Society.
Meanwhile, the leader of the opposition Sanseito party, Kamiya Sohei, said in an interview that he doesn't plan to join the ruling coalition at this point. He expressed concern that Sanseito's tiny size renders it liable to be crushed if it becomes part of the ruling bloc.
The party broke into mainstream politics with its "Japanese First" campaign. It gained support with warnings of a "silent invasion" of immigrants, and pledges for tax cuts and welfare spending.
It was born on YouTube in 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, spreading conspiracy theories about vaccinations and a cabal of global elites, Reuters reported.
While the ballot does not directly determine whether Ishiba's minority government falls, it heaps pressure on the embattled leader, who also lost control of the more powerful lower house in October.
That comes on top of its worst showing in 15 years in October's lower house election, a vote which has left Ishiba's administration vulnerable to no-confidence motions and calls from within his own party for leadership change.
The result further weakens Ishiba's position just days before the country needs to negotiate a deal with the Trump administration to avert the imposition of punishing tariffs in its largest export market.
If Ishiba goes, it was unclear who might step up as the LDP's 11th premier since 2000 now that the government needs opposition support in both chambers.
'Ishiba may be replaced by someone else, but it's not clear who will be the successor,' Hidehiro Yamamoto, politics and sociology professor at the University of Tsukuba, told Agence France-Presse.
Speaking late on Sunday evening after exit polls closed, Ishiba told NHK he "solemnly" accepted the "harsh result".
"We are engaged in extremely critical tariff negotiations with the United States...we must never ruin these negotiations. It is only natural to devote our complete dedication and energy to realizing our national interests," he later told TV Tokyo.
His statement came as Japan, the world's fourth largest economy, faces a deadline of August 1 to strike a trade deal with the US or face punishing tariffs in its largest export market.
Asked whether he intended to stay on as prime minister and party leader, he said: 'That's right. It's a difficult situation, and we have to take it very humbly and seriously.'
(With inputs from agencies)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Love in the time of partisan politics: No, opposites don't attract
Whoever came up with the adage that 'opposites attract' clearly wasn't trying to date in a democracy. It's a theory best confined to magnets, where it's at least literally true. Sorry about the outburst. Perhaps it stems from my spectacular failure to match with someone who has actually read all 1,000 pages of Das Kapital — never mind that I barely made it through the first seven minutes of Karl Marx's ENTIRE Theory Explained in 48 Minutes on YouTube. Or maybe I'm still reeling from this weekend, when my mum insisted during lunch that she set me up with the daughter of someone from her power-walking gang. When I asked, 'Does she follow the news?' she snapped, 'That shouldn't matter.' I nearly let a fish bone take me out, just to end the conversation. The obsession with finding someone who thinks like me isn't about romanticising some grand union of love and politics — at this point, I might even settle for someone who thinks voting is hot. And I'm not disputing the fact that people tend to seek partners with similar political views — that's well documented across numerous studies and surveys; for example, as recently as April, an NBC News poll in the United States found that the partisan divide between Gen Z women (largely pro-Democrat) and Gen Z men (leaning Republican) is the widest of all generations. The real question, then, is: Why, in the pursuit of love, does this factor appear to be non-negotiable today, rather than just a bonus point? The truth is, if there's any life advice worth heeding over 'opposites attract,' it's the far less glamorous, but infinitely more reliable 'Be practical'. After all, socialism, liberalism, conservatism — these aren't just political theories taught in textbooks; they're perspectives (except apoliticism, which is supposedly a lack of interest in politics or political neutrality, but really, it's just what LinkedIn bros call a personality). Politics isn't just how I vote. It's how I interpret my world, and how I make sense of the people I let into it. Having a friend who disagrees with me on secularism in Political Philosophy class is one thing, but spending the rest of my life with someone who doesn't share a basic vision of the country we want our children to grow up in? That's not so simple. Can you imagine the endless squabbling? I'm just trying to eat rice and dal. She's mid-rant: 'You Leftists and your reservations ruined Saxena ji's son's medical dreams!' I chew, nod, and go, 'Yes, because god forbid we ask why 'merit' always looks like Saxena ji's son.' She can't resist: 'One Marxist book and now you think you're Che Guevara?' Even if we somehow managed to follow a strict 'no-politics' rule — no debates, no shouting matches, no Rumble in the Jungle — how comfortable would we really be knowing that our partner, the so-called love of our life, holds diametrically opposite ideas about society, justice, government, and humanity? About how people should be treated by the State? About whose lives matter, and whose don't? How do I look someone in the eye and say 'I love you' with full sincerity, knowing that they genuinely believe in a socialist world, the poor would be handed free iPhones? Can I really love someone who thinks like that? Isn't it more likely for those much-talked-about sparks to fly with someone who, too, has lost sleep over Donald Trump's return to power and teared up during Zohran Mamdani's celebratory speech? I'm not saying the world should be free of Conservatives and Liberals, and I hope they don't wish the same fate on us Leftists. As Hegel argued with his Dialectics, contradiction is essential; without it, there's no movement, no progress. Society needs an ideological back-and-forth to evolve. But in dating or marriage? That kind of contradiction isn't evolutionary, it's exhausting. Love is hard enough without having to argue the basics, like whether billionaires should exist or not (they shouldn't).
The Wire
10 minutes ago
- The Wire
Why Hany Babu Writes From Prison
July 28, 2025 marks the fifth year of Babu's arrest. In the past five years, he has written several times to his wife, daughter and other family members. Hany Babu. In the background are excerpts from his letters. Photos: By arrangement. The best way to harm an academic is to simply lock them out of their computer and deny them access to their years of research. This is exactly what had happened to Hany Babu M.T, a professor at the Delhi University, when the Pune police had first raided his house on September 10, 2019. Ten months later, on July 28, 2020, Babu was arrested, as one of the 16 persons implicated in the Elgar Parishad case. July 28, 2025 marks the fifth year of Babu's arrest. In the past five years, he must have exchanged hundreds of letters with his wife, daughter and other family members. Babu's wife Jenny Rowena, also a professor at DU, and daughter Farzana are both Delhi-based, and letters have been their primary mode of staying in touch, alongside bimonthly court visits and phone calls. Babu, who is lodged in Taloja Central jail, and is awaiting release on bail, reflects on some concerns in the letters he has exchanged with his family. Earlier this month, the Supreme Court allowed Babu to approach either the trial or the high court for bail. 'My academic writings and research were almost wiped clean when the Pune police came and took away my electronic devices,' he narrates in one such letter written to his family. The police took the passwords of all his emails, cloud (virtual storage) accounts, and shut him out from all his accounts, making all the data and research works inaccessible to him. 'I remember how difficult it was even to teach without access to all the notes and materials I had prepared,' Babu recalls the pre- arrest days in one of his letters to his family. The time between the raid and the arrest, he writes, were only spent in the apprehension of incarceration and it took him a long long time before he could get back to academic activities. At Taloja, like most of his co-defendants in the Elgar Parishad case, Babu too has immersed himself in reading and writing. One of his articles on pre-trial detention, co-authored along with his co-defendant Surendra Gadling, was recently cited in one of the Bombay high court's orders. 'Quarantine' Babu's arrest was in the thick of the COVID-19 pandemic. By then, the case had already been transferred to the National Investigations Agency (NIA). As soon as he was sent to jail, he was shunned in a solitary cell as a way to 'quarantine' a new prisoner before moving into a regular barrack. For the first few days, he wrote that he had no access to books, pen and papers. And days later, when pen and paper were made available to him, he said his happiness knew no bounds. 'Writing, in a place like prison, is the only outlet you have at times,' he shares in one of his letters. For the first few days, his writings were all about his new experiences as an incarcerated person, the memories and, 'of course the letters', he says. During the pandemic, courts were the first ones to shut down and move to virtual mode. This also meant that the incarcerated persons were no longer being ferried to courts for regular hearings. Outside of the laborious jail visits, families would only meet their loved ones in court. The environment there would also be relatively relaxed. But the outbreak of the coronavirus changed this in 2020. 'In those days, letters sent weekly were the only way of communication. And the replies to those letters would reach only after a month,' he writes. 'When you interact with an average prisoner...' Although a teaching faculty in the English department of the Delhi University, Babu's interest in social justice has been evident through his writings. He spent a large part of his academic years studying the many ways in which the academic spaces kept Bahujan students away. In one of his letters, Babu recalls how he always had interest in law and human rights. And when he began his work for the defence committee set up for the release of his colleague G.N. Saibaba, his knowledge moved from the realm of books to the real. Babu was a part of the core team that was formed after Saibaba, a 90% disabled and wheelchair-bound academic, was arrested in 2014 under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA). In March 2024, Saibaba was finally released from jail but within months, he died of the many complications he had developed due to prolonged incarceration. Reflecting on his journey, first as a rights activist and now as an incarcerated person himself, Babu says that as a part of the defence committee, all his knowledge was 'bookish'. 'Of course, that knowledge helped, but prison experiences have given me lessons for a lifetime. Reading about looking at prisoners without being prejudiced by the crime that they are said to have committed is one thing, but when you interact with an average prisoner you understand how important it is to be able to look at people without being affected by their alleged crime,' he says in one of his letters. Also read: How Long Is Too Long for an Undertrial Prisoner To Be Detained? Prions, he says, have taught him to look at issues of law more from the perspective of those who are caught in its crosshairs. 'I have witnessed so many people getting acquitted after a long period of incarceration, sometimes after close to a decade or sometimes even more,' he writes. 'Hapless prisoners spending months or even years in prison even after being granted bail as they are unable to meet the bail conditions.' Equality before law and political prisoners He draws attention to the differential treatment meted to those belonging to the privileged class. Without naming, he refers to the 2020 case of TV anchor and editor Arnab Goswami's and how the prison staff had worked 'overtime' to ensure he was released the very same day as the Supreme Court's order. 'Sadly, such laws don't apply to everyone,' he writes in his letter. In one of his writings, he delves deeper into his understanding of the term political prisoners, which has come to be associated, especially in the mainstream discourse, with those arrested for their left leaning politics. 'Sometimes, I feel all prisoners are political prisoners at some level. If you think of it, it is the society that labels certain acts as 'crime',' he writes. He adds that, 'many of the so-called crimes are, in a sense, statements against the inequalities, oppression and discrimination in the society.' He talks of how often it is the 'powerless' who end up being on the 'wrong side of the law'. 'When you heard the stories of the police or even some lawyers behaving towards the prisoners, you would feel they are the bigger criminals, but they just happen to be on the side of the power,' in one of his letters, Babu writes. He refers to American Marxist and feminist political activist Angela Davis's powerful correlation between black slavery and incarceration. 'According to Angela Davis', he writes, 'as long as slavery was in place, prisons in America hardly had black persons. I think the same would have been true of the Dalits in India, if untouchability were still practiced.' He further writes that as long as our society practices discrimination and marginalisation on the basis of caste and religion, 'we will have our prisons filled with Dalits, Adivasis, Backward Classes and Muslims'. Prisons Prisons, he writes in one of his communications to the family, 'doesn't treat the inmates as humans or individuals, let alone as being capable of reading or writing'. Even a simple act of accessing the prison library, he writes, is viewed as a 'security threat' and therefore, unnecessary. Accessing reading material has been a struggle, he shares. 'But thanks to the collective effort of my co-defendants over the years, the prison administration has become more accommodative when it comes to books and reading materials, especially towards us,' he says. But for an average prisoner, the struggle still continues, according to him. Over the years, the government has started calling prisons a 'correctional facility'. 'But hardly anything is being done to achieve those aims,' he writes. The several educational courses run inside prison are 'farcical', he writes, citing examples of the digital photography course that he enrolled himself for. 'The instructor kept assuring us that we will be given the certificate and needn't worry about anything else.' Teaching English to other incarcerated persons, Babu writes, has been 'more of a learning experience for me about my inadequacy as an adult educator'. As an academic and a rights activist, Babu continues to write while in jail, but he also says that it comes from a place of complete awareness that 'one will be allowed to voice one's views only insofar as it is not too critical of the state.' 'But then, I don't know how much of that is not true of the 'free' world outside prison,' he thinks aloud. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Why were Tablighi Jamaat members given a clean chit?
The story so far: The Delhi High Court last week acquitted all 70 Tablighi Jamaat members accused of housing foreign participants of a congregation during the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 in violation of lockdown protocol. The court ruling came in the Mohammed Anwar versus State of NCT of Delhi case. What happened in March 2020? The Tablighi Jamaat members, who came in for heavy criticism in media and political circles for attending a jod (religious congregation) in Nizamuddin Markaz (Jamaat's headquarters in New Delhi), were given a clean chit by Justice Neena Bansal Krishna who noted that the said jod was planned before COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO). Incidentally, the jod which began on March 12, 2020 concluded on March 15, a day before the Delhi government capped all religious gatherings above the size of 50 and imposed the Delhi Epidemic Diseases, COVID Regulations-2020. Earlier, on March 13, 2020, the Union Health Ministry had stated that the coronavirus was not a national health emergency as there were only 81 cases in India at that time. It all changed after the imposition of the lockdown on March 24 at midnight. While most Indian participants had dispersed by then, foreign nationals were still at the Jamaat headquarters, awaiting resumption of international flights to their respective destinations. The congregation included participants from Indonesia, Malaysia, Kuwait, Ghana and Sri Lanka. However, soon after the imposition of the nationwide lockdown, the Delhi Police had filed FIRs against hundreds of Indian and foreign participants of the Tablighi Jamaat congregation for allegedly violating the lockdown and orders prohibiting the assembly of people. The men were booked under provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Epidemic Diseases Act, the Disaster Management Act and the Foreigners Act. These FIRS accused Indian nationals of either hosting foreigners in mosques or accommodating them at their homes. They were challenged before the High Court which dismissed them last week, a little over five years after the incident. What did the court state? 'There is nothing on record to show that they had congregated after the promulgation of the Notification under Section 144 Criminal Penal Code. These petitioners were already present in the Markaz. After the imposition of the lockdown, there was no way possible for them to have dispersed; rather their stepping out of the houses would have been a violation of the complete lockdown and also of the potential of spreading of communicable disease of COVID-19,' the court stated. The court also noted that the imposition of Section 144 banning large gatherings was not announced through a gazette notification nor was it properly published. Hence, the Tablighi Jamaat preachers were possibly unaware of such a notification. 'There is no averment to show that any information was actually conveyed to the petitioners,' the court stated. It also observed there was no whisper in the chargesheets that the accused were COVID-positive or had defied the government order by stepping out during the pandemic. Incidentally, eight foreign participants had been acquitted back in August 2020 by the south-east districts court in Saket, New Delhi. Later in December, 36 more foreign participants were acquitted. What was the media's role? A large section of the media had then accused the Tablighi Jamaat volunteers of being the principal reason for the spread of the disease in the country. Terms like Corona Jehad, Islamic Insurrection and Corona Terrorism were loosely bandied about and many fake videos were shared accusing the Tablighi members of spitting on food to spread the disease. The Delhi government, in its daily medical dispatches, used to have a separate column for Tablighi Jamaat COVID cases.
