
It is a wonder that only Hindu Traditions face scrutiny
Unlike Judaism, Christianity and Islam, which are based on prophetic monotheism and singular sacred texts, Hindutva weaves a vibrant tapestry of diverse practices and philosophies that resist rigid categorisation. Yet, Hindu traditions face a unique challenge: an expectation to justify their rituals through science, a burden rarely imposed on other faiths. This scrutiny, rooted in colonial legacies and an internalised sense of inferiority, stems from a historical compulsion to rationalise sacred practices. By affirming Hindu as a religion, not a mere 'way-of-life,' Hindus can safeguard its sanctity, resolve the tension between science and faith, and reclaim its unapologetic religious identity. This article explores the historical origins of this scrutiny, its modern manifestations, and a path forward to preserve Hindutva's heritage with confidence.
Sanatana Dharma- Not a way of Life:
The claim that Sanatana Dharma (Hindutva), is a way of life rather than a religion self-defeating undermining its spiritual depth. Hindu is unequivocally a religion, rich with sacred texts, rituals, and philosophies. While its flexible, non-dogmatic framework differs from the rigid prescriptions of Christianity or Islam, this distinction does not diminish its religious character. In fact, Abrahamic faiths, with their strict doctrines, are more rigid ways of life. Labelling Hindutva a way of life invites misinterpretation, exposing its practices to unwarranted scepticism.
For example, claiming puja enhances mental clarity shifts its devotional purpose to a scientific claim, inviting critique it was never meant to face. This urge to rationalise stems from a historical inferiority complex, forged over centuries of marginalisation under Muslim and British rule. Embracing Hindutva as a religion, equal in legitimacy to others, is essential to end this cycle of external judgment.
The word 'religion' has no equivalent in Indian languages, just as there is no English equivalent for 'Dharma.' A profound Sanskrit non-translatable, Dharma's meaning varies contextually, yet in spiritual contexts, it undeniably means religion. Many Hindus, hesitant to embrace Dharma as religion, fall into the trap of rationalising Hindu traditions with scientific justifications. This compulsion to align sacred practices with rationality inflicts self-imposed wounds, diluting the spiritual depth of Hindu traditions and exposing them to unwarranted scrutiny. By recognising Dharma as equivalent to religion in spiritual contexts, Hindus can liberate their traditions from the need for external validation.
Colonial narratives and cultural defensiveness:
The unique scrutiny faced by Hindu traditions traces back to colonialism, which portrayed them as exotic, superstitious, or backward to justify colonial rule as a 'civilising mission.' Orientalists like William Jones depicted Hindutva as chaotic, while accounts of the Kumbh Mela focused on crowds rather than its spiritual significance as a pilgrimage for purification. These narratives conflated social issues, like caste, with religious theology, painting Hindutva as flawed. Hindu reformers, internalising this critique, sought to align their traditions with Abrahamic frameworks. Dayananda Saraswati's Arya Samaj, for instance, promoted monotheism, rejected Hindu texts except the Vedas, and condemned murti puja, mimicking Christianity and Islam.
This was not a reform but an 'Abrahamisation' of Hindutva. Similarly, at the 1893 Parliament of the World's Religions, Vivekananda presented yoga and Vedanta as rational and scientific, downplaying their spiritual essence to gain Western approval. Colonial education further drove intellectuals like Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan to re-interpret Hindu texts as scientific, a trend that persists in modern Hindu apologetics. Post-independence, anglicised Gurus and organisations like the sangh parivar have continued this rationalisation, notably claiming during International Yoga Day since 2015 that yoga is neither Hindu nor spiritual. Centuries of foreign rule fostered a defensive mindset, compelling Hindus to justify their practices empirically, unlike Christian and Muslim rituals, which rest on faith alone. This historical pressure explains why Hindutva faces demands for rational validation that no religion, Hindutva included, was designed to meet.
Rationalising the sacred in modern manifestations:
Today, Hindus' tendency to justify sacred practices with scientific claims undermines their spiritual essence and invites scepticism. Three examples illustrate this trap:
• Fasting in Festivals: Practices like Navratri and Ekadashi fasts, rooted in devotion, are often recast as health trends, such as detoxification. This overshadows their sacred purpose, unlike Christian Lent or Muslim Ramzan, where fasting is embraced as an act of faith without scientific justification.
• Cow Reverence: The cow's sanctity is diluted by dubious claims, like cow urine curing cancer, which invite ridicule. In contrast, Islam's doctrinal aversion to pigs avoids debate by asserting divine will, not empirical proof.
• Vedic Chanting and Homa: These rituals, meant for spiritual transcendence, falter under scientific scrutiny they were never intended to face. Christian carols or the Muslim azan face no such demand for validation, as they make no scientific claims.
By tying sacred practices to science, Hindus expose them to standards they cannot meet, fuelling external critique and diminishing their spiritual depth. Unlike Christianity and Islam, which rest on belief alone, Hindus' compulsive obsession with rationalising their sacred practices invites a self-inflicted vulnerability Reclaiming these practices as acts of faith, beyond empirical validation, is crucial to preserving their sanctity.
The science-faith divide-A fundamental distinction:
The root of this issue lies in a misunderstanding of science-faith separation. Science relies on empirical experiments, data, and testable hypotheses to uncover physical truths, while religion uses rituals and scriptures to address questions of meaning and transcendence. Judging faith by scientific standards does not align with its spiritual purpose, just as judging scientific theories by religious principles stifles inquiry. Hindu discourse often overlooks this distinction, driven by a colonial legacy that demands empirical justification. Christianity and Islam avoid this trap by grounding their rituals belief, not science. For example, no one questions the validity of Islamic salat or Christian communion with demands for scientific proof. By recognising this divide, Hindus can liberate their traditions from unwarranted scrutiny, allowing rituals to stand as expressions of faith, not scientific hypotheses.
Reclaiming Hindutva's religious identity:
To navigate this science-faith dilemma, Hindus must reject the compulsion to rationalise their practices and affirm Hindu as a religion, not a way-of-life, rooted in faith and tradition. Three strategies can guide this path:
• Affirm Hindutva as a Faith-Based Tradition: By framing Hindu as a religion like other faiths, Hindus can present practices like puja and festivals as acts of devotion, not scientific tools, deflecting demands for rational validation. For instance, puja fosters mindfulness and gratitude, akin to Christian prayer or Islamic salat. This approach counters the historical pressure to prove Hindutva's validity.
• Reclaim Narrative Control: Hindus must assert that their traditions are religious practices, not requiring scientific validation. While yoga's health benefits are documented, its spiritual goal of self-realisation should remain paramount. Rejecting claims like 'homa purifies air' preserves the sacred purpose of rituals and breaks the cycle of self-inflicted critique rooted in colonial pressures.
• Educate the NextGeneration: Hindu gurus, parents, and educators should foster pride in Hindutva's traditions without resorting to rationalisations. Cultural workshops, temple progr ams, and school curricula can teach youth the spiritual significance of Hindu festivals and traditions, building confidence in their heritage.
These steps counter the historical pressure to rationalise Hindu traditions and practices, allowing its rituals to stand as acts of faith, not subjects of scientific debate. By distinguishing religion from science, Hindus can honour their traditions' timeless wisdom without the burden of external validation.
Conclusion
Hindutva (Sanatana Dharma) stands as a unique religion, defined by its diverse practices and rich spiritual heritage. Yet, it faces unparalleled scrutiny, driven by colonial narratives and a compulsive tendency among modern Hindus to justify its rituals through science. From Christian British portrayals of Hindu practices as backward to reformers' attempts to align them with rational or Abrahamic frameworks, this scrutiny has persisted, intensified by modern rationalisations like claiming health benefits for fasting or cosmic effects for Vedic chanting. These efforts invite skepticism and erode spiritual depth, creating a science-faith dilemma. By affirming Hindu traditions as religious beliefs, rejecting empirical justifications, and educating future generations, Hindus can preserve the sanctity of their heritage.This approach liberates Hindu traditions from the colonial legacy of validation, allowing it to navigate modernity with confidence and fostering a deeper appreciation for its traditions among Hindus and observers alike.
(The author is a retired IPS officer and former Director, CBI. Views are personal)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Thailand-Cambodia border clashes: 14 Thais killed; "could lead to war," says acting Thai PM
At least 14 Thais have been killed while over 100,000 people have fled amid escalating border clashes between Thailand and Cambodia , Bangkok said on Friday, as per local media reports. Bangkok Post cited the Thai interior ministry as saying that over 100,000 people from four border provinces of the country had been moved to nearly 300 temporary shelters, while the kingdom's health ministry announced that the death toll had risen to 14- thirteen civilians and one soldier. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category MBA Management Product Management PGDM Data Science Healthcare Cybersecurity Operations Management Public Policy Finance Design Thinking Digital Marketing Technology healthcare Leadership Data Analytics Others MCA Artificial Intelligence Project Management others Data Science CXO Degree Skills you'll gain: Financial Management Team Leadership & Collaboration Financial Reporting & Analysis Advocacy Strategies for Leadership Duration: 18 Months UMass Global Master of Business Administration (MBA) Starts on May 13, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Analytical Skills Financial Literacy Leadership and Management Skills Strategic Thinking Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Online MBA Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai has warned that clashes with Cambodia "could develop into war", but added, "for now it remains limited to clashes." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Thailand's Royal Army has denied reports from Cambodia that it targeted an ancient Hindu Temple in the Cambodian province of Preah Vihear, which has been listed as a UNESCO World Heritage site. "The accusation by the Cambodian side that Preah Vihear Temple was damaged by the Thai attack is a clear distortion of the facts," the Thai-language statement posted on X by the military said, as per Al Jazeera. Live Events "The Royal Thai Army would like to state that the operations of the Thai military forces have a clear goal of retaliating only against the Cambodian military forces, and are not targeting civilian areas or any locations unrelated to the military operation in any way," it added. In 2013, a UN court ruled in favour of Cambodia in a long-running dispute with Thailand over the jurisdiction of land around the ancient temple, fuelling tensions between Phnom Penh and Bangkok. Exchanges of gunfire, shelling and rocket fire marked the fighting that began on July 24 in the long-disputed border areas. Both nations accused each other of starting the military clashes and have downgraded their diplomatic relations since Wednesday. The UN Security Council is set to hold an emergency meeting on the crisis on Friday, with UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres urging both countries to exercise maximum restraint, as per a UN spokesperson. Thailand and Cambodia have frequently clashed over their shared land border, a dispute that remains unresolved due to competing territorial claims dating back to the French colonial era. The Cambodian Senate has expressed its strongest condemnation of the "intentional and illicit military aggression" by Thailand, stating that the Thai strikes were reported to have caused widespread damage to pagodas and temples. In a statement released on July 24 late night, and citedx in the PhnomPenh Post, the Cambodian Senate said the hostile acts, which took place near the sacred temples of Ta Mone Thom, Ta Mone Touch, Ta Krabey, Mom Bei, and other locations within Cambodia's internationally recognised borders, constitute a direct violation of Cambodia's sovereignty and a grave breach of international law, including the UN Charter. It noted Cambodia's inherent right to self-defence, as stated under Article 51 of the UN Charter, adding that Cambodian armed forces acted with professionalism and restraint in exercising this right, defending national territory and the safety of Cambodian citizens. They also called upon the international community including the UN, ASEAN and "all peace-loving nations" to take urgent and decisive action in response to this grave violation. According to the Cambodian news outlet, PhnomPenh Post, there have been no official reports of casualties in Cambodia, but a 70-year-old Buddhist clergyman was reportedly killed when a Thailand F-16 fighters dropped bombs on Oddar Meanchey province's Ta Mone Senchey pagoda, in Banteay Ampil district. The US-made fighter jet also reportedly bombed a nearby health centre, Phnom Penh Post reported. Thailand's National Broadcasting Service said that the Thai government is ordering all agencies to provide urgent assistance to citizens affected by the border conflict, with schools being closed and an agricultural war room established. Meanwhile, Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, as ASEAN Chair, wrote on his Facebook page yesterday that he had contacted Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet and Thai Deputy Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai to express Malaysia's concern over rising tensions along the border. Malaysia's The Star news outlet cited Anwar as saying, "This is a very worrying matter, and tonight, I will speak to both prime ministers of Thailand and Cambodia. These two countries are members of Asean and are also countries that are close to Malaysia. I have sent messages to both Prime Ministers, and I am expecting to speak to both of them tonight (via phone). "The least we can expect is for them to stand down and hopefully enter negotiations. Peace is the only option available," Anwar was cited as saying on the sidelines of an event. In 1962, the International Court of Justice recognised Cambodian sovereignty over the temple area in a ruling that became a major irritant in the relations between the two countries. Cambodia went to court in 2011, following several military clashes that killed about 20 people. The court reaffirmed the ruling in 2013.


United News of India
2 hours ago
- United News of India
BJP hits out at Akhilesh over mosque meeting, clerics object to Dimple Yadav's attire
Lucknow, July 25 (UNI) The controversy surrounding former Uttar Pradesh chief minister Akhilesh Yadav's political meeting inside a mosque refuses to die down, as the BJP and clerics continue their attacks on the Samajwadi Party chief. On the other hand, Maulana Shahabuddin Razvi Barelvi, national president of the All-India Muslim Jamaat, condemned Dimple Yadav's conduct and attire during the meeting, alleging that it violated the sanctity of the mosque. He referred to her as a 'political Hindu woman' and claimed she failed to maintain the appropriate decorum expected within a mosque. 'A mosque is the house of God, and no political party meeting should take place there,' Razvi said. The gathering was reportedly arranged by Maulana Mohibullah Nadvi, the Imam of the mosque at Parliament Street in Delhi. Razvi also alleged that, along with Akhilesh Yadav, SP leaders such as Dharmendra Yadav, Zia Ur Rehman Barq, and several other Hindu individuals were present inside the mosque during the meeting. The presence of two women, he noted, was against Sharia principles. He demanded that Maulana Mohibullah seek forgiveness and apologize to the Muslim community for his actions, accusing him of turning a sacred space into a political platform. 'If he does not seek forgiveness, Muslim organizations will launch protests against him and appeal to the mosque committee to dismiss him from his position as Imam,' he added. The BJP also launched a sharp attack on the Samajwadi Party chief, saying that 'writing slogans on posters does not change one's deeds.' The criticism came in response to a poster displayed outside the SP headquarters, which claimed that Akhilesh Yadav refrains from divisive politics and avoids using religious sites like temples and mosques for political purposes. BJP spokesperson Manish Shukla said, 'Samajwadi Party's politics is deeply entrenched in religion. Akhilesh Yadav's attempts to mix politics with religion are well known. His wife, Dimple Yadav, accompanied him on one such visit, drawing criticism from several clerics.' Shukla said, 'During a meeting near the Parliament complex, Dimple Yadav was questioned by a cleric over her attire and behaviour inside the mosque. The cleric even demanded an apology. Had a Hindu priest made such remarks, SP's online supporters would have erupted in anger against the Hindu community. But since the criticism came from within their vote bank, there has been complete silence.' UNI XC-MBD AAB PRS


The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court extends stay on summons to Rahul Gandhi in Savarkar case
The Supreme Court on Friday (July 25, 2025) extended the stay of summons issued to Congress party leader and leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case accusing him of making derogatory remarks against Hindutva ideologue V.D. Savarkar during his Bharat Jodo Yatra in Maharashtra last year. A Bench headed by Justices Dipankar Datta listed the case after four weeks, giving the complainant, Nripendra Pandey, a Lucknow resident, a fortnight's time to file his response to the challenge filed by Mr. Gandhi in the apex court. The Court had stayed an Uttar Pradesh trial court summons issued to the Congress leader in an order in May while cautioning him from making 'statements against our freedom fighters who gave us freedom'. 'This is not the way to treat our freedom fighters. They have given us freedom,' Justice Datta had said. The Judge had even asked what prompted Mr. Gandhi to make these statements in Maharashtra, where Savarkar was 'worshipped as God'. Referring to Mr. Gandhi's remarks that Savarkar addressed himself as 'most obedient servant' in a communication to the British authorities, Justice Datta had at the time asked Mr. Gandhi's lawyers whether 'your client knows that even Mahatma Gandhi used 'your faithful servant' while addressing the Viceroy? Does he know that his grandmother, while she was Prime Minister, sent a letter to somebody praising this gentleman, the freedom fighter?' Justice Datta said Mr. Gandhi had a 'good point in law' which would entitle him to an order of stay on the summons. In his petition, Mr. Gandhi said the freedom of expression was essential for a dignified life and guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution. The Congress leader said the proceedings against him were 'clearly frivolous, vexatious and designed to inflict the criminal process as a virtual punishment to and deterrent for the free exercise of his freedoms and from freely performing his duty as a responsible Opposition political leader at the national level'. The trial court, while summoning Mr. Gandhi, had observed that he had spread hatred and ill-will in society through his speech in which he had said that Savarkar was a servant of the British and that he took a pension from the British. Mr. Gandhi was charged with offences under Section 153A (promoting enmity) and 505 (public mischief) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).