logo
Poles on cooperation between Nawrocki and Tusk: 'Two different worlds'

Poles on cooperation between Nawrocki and Tusk: 'Two different worlds'

Euronews2 days ago

The victory of conservative Karol Nawrocki's victory in Poland's weekend presidential runoff is likely to cause further division and political instability between the centrist government and the new president, according to analysts and citizens alike.
Nawrocki, who was backed by the right-wing Law and Justice (PiS) party at home and endorsed by US President Donald Trump, won 50.89% of votes in Sunday's race against Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who received 49.11%, according to election commission data published on Monday.
The 42-year-old nationalist has pledged to hinder Prime Minister Donald Tusk's centrist, pro-EU government until its term ends in late 2027, just as the outgoing President, Andrzej Duda, has done during his presidency. Nawrocki is set to take office on 6 August.
Tusk announced on Monday that he will call for a parliamentary vote of confidence in his coalition government.
While his government exists separately from the presidency, the president holds power to veto laws, and Nawrocki's victory will make it extremely difficult for Tusk to press his pro-European agenda and push through key promises including a civil union law for same-sex couples and a less restrictive abortion law. Nawrocki opposes such measures.
Euronews spoke to several residents of Warsaw about whether relations between Tusk's government and the new president-elect would improve compared to the current reality.
"There is no agreement between the government and the president. There are two different worlds," one resident of Warsaw told Euronews.
Another person said: "They are on opposite sides and don't agree. But Nawrocki is a big unknown."
However, another individual said: "I hope, however, that wisdom will win out and somehow these relations will settle down. And this nation will not be as divided as it is at the moment."
'Deeply divided'
Election data results show that he difference between Nawrocki and Trzaskowski was fewer than 370,000 votes, or 1.78 percentage points — the smallest gap in a presidential run-off since 1989.
"Poland remains a deeply divided country," said Jacek Kucharczyk, the president of the Polish Institute of Public Affairs.
"Although the electoral turnout was highest ever in history of presidential elections, Nawrocki's margin of victory is very small, which means that half of Poland will be cheering his presidency, whereas half of Poland, the other half, remains deeply worried or even disturbed," he added.
Nawrocki, a conservative historian and amateur boxer with no prior political experience, had presented the election as a referendum on Tusk's 18-month-old government. In his first public comments since his victory was announced, Nawrocki thanked those who voted for him and said he would work for the causes that are important to them
"We want to live in a safe country with a strong economy, one that cares for the most vulnerable. A country that matters in international, European, and transatlantic relations. A country that cherishes its centuries-old traditions and respects its history," he wrote on social media.
Trzaskowski conceded defeat and congratulated Nawrocki. "I fought for us to build a strong, safe, honest, and empathetic Poland together," he wrote on social media.
Speaking on Monday, President Duda said he hoped the election result would be "an unambiguous signal" to Tusk and the government that the majority of Poles expect to see the "kind of policy ... that Nawrocki proposes and preached during his campaign".
Following the election result, Nawrocki has received congraulations from leaders including Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Glastonbury controversy: Police investigate Kneecap and Bob Vylan sets
Glastonbury controversy: Police investigate Kneecap and Bob Vylan sets

Euronews

time7 minutes ago

  • Euronews

Glastonbury controversy: Police investigate Kneecap and Bob Vylan sets

This year's Glastonbury, Britain's biggest summer music festival which draws some 200,000 music fans each year to Worthy Farm in southwest England, has come to an end. And it's been one of the most controversial editions in recent memory. Controversial Belfast rappers Kneecap and their weekend slot made headlines in the lead-up to the festival, after several MPs, including Prime Minister Keir Starmer, called on Glastonbury to pull the band from the line-up, due to their defiant pro-Palestinian remarks and band member Mo Chara being charged with a terror offence. Still, the band played and were supported by Glastonbury co-organiser Emily Eavis, who said that 'everyone is welcome.' Her father, festival founder Michael Eavis, added: 'People that don't agree with the politics of the event can go somewhere else!' Still, controversy was inevitable... Kneecap cause a ruckus As predicted, Kneecap delivered an incendiary set at Glastonbury, on the West Holts stage, to a huge crowd waving countless Palestinian flags. The BBC, the festival's broadcaster partner, said in a statement just hours before the band took to the stage that their set wouldn't be streamed live and would instead be made available as an on-demand version after the end of the gig. Previously, Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch said she thought the BBC "should not be showing" Kneecap's performance at the festival: "The BBC should not be showing Kneecap propaganda. One Kneecap band member is currently on bail, charged under the Terrorism Act. As a publicly funded platform, the BBC should not be rewarding extremism. The trio, DJ Próvaí, Mo Chara and Móglaí Bap, came on stage with screens showing their usual message: 'Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people, aided by the UK government. Free Palestine.' This message was galvanized during the set when the band said: 'There's no f*cking hiding it, Israel are war criminals.' 'Glastonbury, I'm a free man,' also declared Chara, referring to being given unconditional bail from his appearance on his terror charge. 'Mo Chara was in court this month,' said Bap. 'Was anyone there? Mo Chara's in court for a trumped up terrorism charge. It's not the first time there was a miscarriage of justice for an Irish person in the British justice system'. Chara then mentioned Keir Starmer – who argued that it was 'not appropriate' for the band to be playing at Glastonbury: 'The Prime Minister of your country said he didn't want us to play, so f*ck Keir Starmer.' They echoed this sentiment when introducing their fan favourite song 'Get Your Brits Out', with Chara telling the crowd: 'We f*cking love the English people, it's the English government we can't stand. F*ck Keir Starmer.' The band ended their set by thanking Glastonbury festival for their support of the band and for Palestine, with Bap stating: 'One day it will be controversial for the people that didn't speak about Palestine,' with Chara agreeing: 'Remember those c*nts, we will remember them.' However, their set was not the only controversial moment of this year's highly politicised edition... In fact, their lightning may have been stolen by an earlier act. Bob Vylan: Controversy before Kneecap's set Before the Kneecap set, rap-punk duo Bob Vylan also caused controversy by leading the crowd in chants of: "Free, free Palestine" and "Death, death to the IDF (Israel Defence Forces)." The BBC said it issued a warning on screen about 'very strong and discriminatory language' during the live stream. Still, that wasn't the end of it. Une publication partagée par @celebrities4palestine The Israeli Embassy to the UK said on social media that it was 'deeply disturbed by the inflammatory and hateful rhetoric expressed on stage at the Glastonbury Festival," while the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) said it will be formally complaining to the BBC over its "outrageous decision" to broadcast the performance. In a statement, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: "There is no excuse for this kind of appalling hate speech." The Prime Minister also reiterated his previous argument that Kneecap should have been removed from the line-up: "I said that Kneecap should not be given a platform and that goes for any other performers making threats or inciting violence. The BBC needs to explain how these scenes came to be broadcast." Even Emily Eavis posted a response to Bob Vylan's performance. "Their chants very much crossed a line and we are urgently reminding everyone involved in the production of the Festival that there is no place at Glastonbury for antisemitism, hate speech or incitement to violence," she wrote. She added that while "as a festival, we stand against all forms of war and terrorism - we will always believe in - and actively campaign for - hope, unity, peace and love", adding a performer's comments "should never be seen as a tacit endorsement of their opinions and beliefs". Eavis added: "With almost 4,000 performances at Glastonbury 2025, there will inevitably be artists and speakers appearing on our stages whose views we do not share." Une publication partagée par Glastonbury Festival (@glastofest) British Police said that they were assessing footage of the performance to decide whether any offences may have been committed. Who are Bob Vylan? Bob Vylan are a punk-rap duo known for their politically charged lyrics which tackle racism, homophobia, police brutality and far-right politics. The two members keep their real names secret and are known as Bobby Vylan and Bobbie Vylan. Formed in Ipswich in 2017, the band has released five albums – 'Vylan' (2017), 'Dread' (2019), 'We Live Here' (2020), 'Bob Vylan Presents The Price Of Life' (2022), and last year's 'Humble As The Sun'. They have won several awards, including Best Alternative Act at the MOBOs in 2022. Like Kneecap, the duo has been outspoken on the war in Gaza. A UN report has found that Israel's military actions are consistent with genocide, and at least 56,000 Palestinians have been killed, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. Israel has continually denied that their actions in Palestine can be equated to genocide and argued that it has not partaken in any war crimes.

China's top diplomat visits Europe pitching closer ties in 'volatile' world
China's top diplomat visits Europe pitching closer ties in 'volatile' world

France 24

time4 hours ago

  • France 24

China's top diplomat visits Europe pitching closer ties in 'volatile' world

Wang Yi's tour will take him to the European Union's headquarters in Brussels as well as France and Germany as China seeks to improve relations with the bloc as a counterweight to superpower rival the United States. But deep frictions remain over the economy -- including a yawning trade deficit of $357.1 billion between China and the EU -- and Beijing's close ties with Russia despite Moscow's war in Ukraine. "The world is undergoing an accelerated evolution of a century-old change, with unilateralism, protectionism and bullying behaviour becoming rampant," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Guo Jiakun said on Friday -- a thinly veiled swipe against the United States under President Donald Trump. In that context, Guo said, Beijing and the European bloc must "keep the world peaceful and stable, safeguard multilateralism, free trade, international rules, fairness and justice, and act firmly as anchors of stability and constructive forces in a volatile world". Wang will meet with his EU counterpart, Kaja Kallas, at the bloc's headquarters in Brussels for "high-level strategic dialogue". In Germany, he will hold talks with Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on diplomacy and security -- his first visit since Berlin's new conservative-led government took power in May. And in France, Wang will meet minister for Europe and foreign affairs Jean-Noel Barrot, who visited China in March. The war in Ukraine will likely be high on the agenda, with European leaders having been forthright in condemning what they say is Beijing's backing for Moscow. China has portrayed itself as a neutral party in Russia's more than three-year war with Ukraine. But Western governments say Beijing's close ties have given Moscow crucial economic and diplomatic support, and they have urged China to do more to press Russia to end the war. Trade tensions Ties between Europe and China have also strained in recent years as the EU seeks to get tougher on what it says are unfair economic practices by Beijing. After the European bloc placed tariffs on Chinese electric vehicle imports, China retaliated with its own duties, including on French cognac. An agreement on cognac has been reached with Beijing but not formally approved by the Chinese commerce ministry, a source in the French economy ministry told AFP. The source said finalization was partially linked with the EU's ongoing negotiations over EVs. Tensions flared this month after the EU banned Chinese firms from government medical device purchases worth more than five million euros ($5.8 million), in retaliation for limits Beijing places on access to its own market. The latest salvo in trade tensions between the 27-nation bloc and China covered a wide range of healthcare supplies, from surgical masks to X-ray machines, that represent a market worth 150 billion euros in the EU. In response, China accused the European Union of "double standards". Another sticking point has been rare earths. Beijing has since April required licences to export these strategic materials from China, which accounts for almost two-thirds of rare earth mining production and 92 percent of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency. The metals are used in a wide variety of products, including electric car batteries, and there has been criticism from industries about the way China's licences have been issued.

UN conference seeks boost for aid as US cuts bite
UN conference seeks boost for aid as US cuts bite

France 24

time6 hours ago

  • France 24

UN conference seeks boost for aid as US cuts bite

At least 50 world leaders including French President Emmanuel Macron, Kenya's William Ruto, EU chief Ursula von der Leyen and UN head Antonio Guterres will gather in the city of Seville from June 30 to July 3. But key player the United States is snubbing the biggest such talks in a decade, underlining the erosion of international cooperation on combating hunger, disease and climate change. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, whose country has tried to promote Global South priorities such as debt during its presidency of the G20 club of wealthy nations, cancelled his visit for domestic political reasons. More than 4,000 representatives from businesses, civil society and financial institutions will also attend the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development. UN sustainable development goals set for 2030 are slipping from reach just as the world's wealthiest countries are withdrawing funding for development programmes. President Donald Trump's gutting of the US development agency USAID is the standout example, with Germany, Britain and France among other rich economies making cuts when faced with competing priorities such as defence. International charity Oxfam says the cuts to development aid are the largest since 1960 and the United Nations puts the growing gap in annual development finance at $4 trillion. More than 800 million people live on less than $3 per day, according to the World Bank, with rising extreme poverty affecting sub-Saharan Africa in particular. Disruption to global trade from Trump's tariffs and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine have dealt further blows to the diplomatic cohesion necessary for concentrating efforts on helping countries escape poverty. 'Global development failing' Among the key topics up for discussion is reforming international finance to help poorer countries shrug off a growing debt burden that inhibits their capacity to achieve progress in health and education. The total external debt of the group of least developed countries has more than tripled in 15 years, according to UN data. A recent report commissioned by the late Pope Francis and coordinated by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz says 3.3 billion people live in countries that fork out more on interest payments than on health. Critics have singled out US-based bulwarks of the post-World War II international financial system, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, for reform to improve their representation of the Global South. Painstaking talks in New York in June produced a common declaration to be adopted in Seville that only went ahead after the United States walked out. The document reaffirms commitment to the UN development goals such as eliminating poverty and hunger, promoting gender equality, reforming tax systems and international financial institutions. The text also calls on development banks to triple their lending capacity, urges lenders to ensure predictable finance for essential social spending and for more cooperation against tax evasion. Coalitions of countries will seek to spearhead initiatives in addition to the so-called "Seville Commitment", which is not legally binding. The document shows the world can tackle the financial challenges standing in the way of achieving the development goals "and that multilateralism can still work", said Chola Milambo, Zambia's permanent representative to the United Nations. But campaigners have criticised the text for lacking ambition and have rung alarm bells about rising global inequality. "Global development is desperately failing because... the interests of a very wealthy few are put over those of everyone else," said Amitabh Behar, executive director of Oxfam International.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store