Canada election 2025: Burlington North—Milton West
Send this page to someone via email
Share this item on Twitter
Share this item via WhatsApp
Share this item on Facebook
Burlington North—Milton West is a federal riding located in Ontario.
This new federal riding includes parts of the riding previously known as Milton.
Voters will decide who will represent Burlington North—Milton West in Ontario during the upcoming Canadian election on April 28, 2025.
Visit this page on election night for a complete breakdown of up to the minute results.
Candidates
Liberal: Adam van Koeverden (Incumbent)
Conservative: Nadeem Akbar
NDP: Naveed Ahmed
People's Party: Charles Zach
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
15 minutes ago
Donations to Sean Feucht groups via B.C.-based charity add to financial transparency concerns raised in Canada
A non-profit watchdog says Canadians have no way of knowing how much money is being donated to an evangelical group founded by an American who is making headlines across the country for event cancellations and questions about his views. Permits for Sean Feucht's summertime worship concert events organized by his Burn 24/7 group in major cities across Canada — including Winnipeg, Halifax, Charlottetown and Abbotsford, B.C. — were cancelled recently amid public backlash. The Canadian arm of Feucht's Burn 24/7 organization accepts some donations via the Great Commission Foundation, a B.C.-based registered charity that provides tax receipts on behalf of hundreds of unregistered Christian organizations. Charity Intelligence says the foundation's finances are opaque, and the only way to get audited statements is through access-to-information requests. This charity is not financially transparent, said Kate Bahen, Charity Intelligence's managing director. When charities are not transparent and are not accountable and they're not open and disclosing where the money goes, that opens them up to these questions. Enlarge image (new window) The project page for Burn 24/7 Canada on the Great Commission Foundation's website welcomes donations. The B.C.-based registered charity takes donations on behalf of hundreds of unregistered Christian organizations. Photo: CBC / Arturo Chang MAGA-affiliated musician and preacher Feucht has drawn condemnation over comments he's made online and in past interviews about abortion, 2SLGBTQ+ rights, critical race theory and gender diversity (new window) . Charity Intelligence's criticism of the foundation comes as others note that news articles about Feucht's cancelled worship concerts have likely raised his profile among potential donors. Kate Bahen of Charity Intelligence says the foundation's finances are opaque. Photo: Submitted by Charity Intelligence The attempt to censor has backfired in a way that's … brought him attention that $1 million in advertising would have never brought him, said James Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University. Burn Canada Ministries previously held registered charitable status in Canada, but it was revoked in 2021 over a failure to file required documents. Then in 2024, the Great Commission Foundation announced Burn Canada was one of its projects (new window) . Canadians can also donate directly to Burn Canada without receiving any tax receipts. In a 2024 annual report (new window) , the organization says broadly how it's spending funds on such things as recruitment, worship events and Feucht's Let Us Worship tour, but there is no detailed breakdown of its spending. CBC reached out to the Great Commission Foundation and Burn Canada for comment, asking them how much money the foundation processes on behalf of Burn Canada. They did not respond. Miles Howe, a Brock University sociology and criminology professor who studies charities, said oversight in the Canadian charity sector is too lenient, and the Great Commission Foundation should be scrutinized. Any time that you have a Canadian charity operating in this fashion of … an amped-up GoFundMe campaign for dozens of other intermediaries, be they qualified or non-qualified donees, it's certainly cause for further investigation, he said about the foundation. Audited Great Commission Foundation financial statements from 2022 obtained by Charity Intelligence through an access to information request show only consolidated results. There was $31.1 million in total agency program costs, but no disclosure of which organizations got the money. The foundation does break down how much it spends on individual international programs in publicly available filings. CRA not doing enough audits: Lawyer Toronto-based charity lawyer Mark Blumberg wouldn't speak about specific charities, but he said public filings usually have more information on foreign activity than on what charities manage inside the country. Guidance from the Canada Revenue Agency says while registered charities can use intermediaries or make grants, they cannot act as a conduit that merely funnels resources to an organization that is not a qualified donee. The CRA says charities must keep adequate records showing that's not the case. But Blumberg said most of the time, charities don't make it clear enough to the public that they're following the rules. A charity may be publicly talking about doing certain work, he said, but is there all the backup for it? Did they do the due diligence? Blumberg says transparency is an issue because Canadians may question why some charities get special tax privileges. He believes the CRA does not do enough audits, saying the agency only performs about 200 a year, even though there are about 86,000 registered charities. The CRA said in an email that its enforcement is based on the risk of non-compliance, and a charity may be chosen for an audit based on things like public complaints and media coverage. The CRA claims to have checks in place, Howe said, but to me … there's a lack of even baseline reporting there that the CRA appears comfortable with. Ex-Feucht volunteers urge caution Questions are also being raised in the United States about some of Feucht's charities. Burn 24/7 is only one of several charities led by Feucht, whose main organization — Sean Feucht Ministries — was given a withhold giving rating by U.S.-based Christian charity watchdog MinistryWatch (new window) , which gave it an "F" grade for transparency. Sean Feucht Ministries changed its Internal Revenue Service tax-exempt status to church in 2022, exempting it from filing some documents that provide financial information to the public. Another Feucht charity, Let Us Worship, is also exempt from disclosing that information because it has church status. Two other organizations, Burn 24/7 and Light a Candle, do file the U.S.-based tax Form 990, which can increase financial transparency. But for Burn 24/7, the most recent annual filing available is from 2021. In 2020, the last year in which Sean Feucht Ministries, Burn 24/7 and Light a Candle all reported publicly available financial details, the disclosed compensation for Feucht himself is listed as $167,000 US, $17,500 US and $37,467 US respectively. That equals over $221,000 US a year. Earlier this year, a group of former employees and volunteers who worked for Feucht called on the U.S. government to formally investigate Feucht's financial practices. 'Sean was like a hero,' says Richie Booth, who worked as an administrative staff member for Burn 24/7. Booth is part of a group of former volunteers and staffers calling for an investigation into Feucht's finances. Photo: Submitted by Richie Booth I was someone that believed in his cause, said Richie Booth, who worked as an administrative staff member for Burn 24/7. Sean was like a hero in the worship and prayer movement. He cautioned people who may agree with some of Feucht's views about donating to his ministries. The group of former supporters raises concerns about real estate owned by Feucht and his ministry, asking why a charity needs such expensive real estate. Public records say Sean Feucht Ministries is owner of a residential property in Washington, D.C., that was purchased for $967,000 US in 2022; a mansion in Orange County, Calif., that, according to real estate site RedFin, was bought for $3.5 million US in 2024; and a cabin and 40 acres of land in Montana with a market value of over $1 million US purchased in 2023. The Washington property is home to Camp Elah, which Feucht has described as his ministry headquarters in D.C. Enlarge image (new window) This mansion in Orange County belongs to Sean Feucht Ministries. Photo: Public disclosures from the D.C. licensing department show the non-profit status for Sean Feucht Ministries — which would allow it to operate in the U.S. capital — was revoked in 2023. A department spokesperson said in an email Tuesday the organization failed to submit a required filing. CBC News could not reach Feucht for comment. Feucht unsuccessfully ran for Congress as a Republican in California in 2020. Documents say the singer's campaign made two contributions (new window) to Burn 24/7 despite U.S. regulations barring electoral committees from making donations to charities that have previously compensated candidates. The contributions to Burn 24/7 totalled $22,844 US in 2020 and 2021 — both years when Feucht received compensation as president of Burn 24/7, tax filings say. More than half of the donated money ended up being returned to the campaign after regulators told the campaign committee that a number of prohibited contributions had to be refunded to donors, U.S. Federal Election Commission documents say. Christy Gafford appears at a Burn 24/7 'furnace' in Corsicana, Texas, in 2021. Gafford served as national director for the U.S. non-profit. Photo: Submitted by Christy Gafford Christy Gafford, who served as a national director for Burn 24/7 at the time, said she did not have any information on the campaign, but that she has serious concerns regarding how Feucht operates through his organizations. He's very charismatic. He is very influential. But I also believe that he utilizes his platform to dictate a narrative that is going to be beneficial to him, she said. I believe that he uses that platform to increase the controversy, instead of actually using the platform to properly tell the gospel. Gafford said that the controversy in Canada has played into Feucht's hands. He creates a narrative that is going to, in the long run, make him look as though he is persecuted and utilize that to increase his own enrichment, she said. Arturo Chang (new window) · CBC News · Reporter Arturo Chang is a reporter with CBC Manitoba. Before that, he worked for CBC P.E.I. and BNN Bloomberg. You can reach him at
Toronto Sun
15 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
Poilievre win affirms leader's political relevance, say pundits
"Carney started with his elbows up, but now he's tucked tail," says pundit Stephen Taylor on the PM's inability to secure a trade deal Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks in front of workers at EnQuest Energy Solutions in Calgary on Aug. 7, 2025. (Brent Calver, Postmedia) OTTAWA — This week's byelection win for Canada's Conservative leader puts to rest any doubts about his political relevance, pundits say. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Alex Brown, a director with the National Citizens Coalition, told the Toronto Sun that Tory Leader Pierre Poilievre's win in Battle River-Crowfoot on Monday — a victory that returns him to the House of Commons — proves he's still got something to add to Canada's political discourse. 'The thing that comes to my mind is to remind people that Stephen Harper, Jean Chretien, Diefenbaker, Churchill, Thatcher, Reagan, Lincoln — I'm not saying he's as lofty as some of these characters — but they all lost multiple elections before winning the big one,' he said. 'What they're putting together there, particularly with support from young voters and a more working class Canadian worker approach. I believe it has the chance to be a sustainable force.' Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Stephen Taylor, a partner at Shift Media, said the Conservatives need somebody like Poilievre at the helm right now. 'He's a dynamic leader for the Conservatives,' he said. 'He energizes the base, he energizes the party — people in the party are actually excited by his leadership, his tone and his tactics in the House.' Poilievre was ousted from his suburban Ottawa seat of Carleton in the April 28 federal election, forcing him to run his party from outside of the House of Commons. Monday night saw Poilievre win the riding by winning 80% of the vote, topping the second-place finisher — independent Bonnie Critchley — by over 35,500 votes. Recommended video Brown said with Poilievre back in the House of Commons, the Conservatives are better able to take on the Mark Carney Liberals and their conspicuous stutter-start on rolling out his lofty list of commitments made during the spring election. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'We're seeing little material progress on some major core campaign promises, whether it's fleeing capital, rising unemployment, unaffordable homes, endless and higher tariffs, the growing gap in GDP-per-capita between the U.S and Canada, slow starts on immigration, these anxieties aren't going anywhere. ' Brown said. Taylor said Canada's failing relationship with the United States — coupled with Carney's inability to negotiate a trade deal with the White House — needs to be front-and-centre when the fall session begins Sept. 15. 'Mark Carney was elected on a promise to deal with Donald Trump and get concessions from Donald Trump, and we've seen no such thing,' he said. 'Carney's record on trade and the bilateral relationship has been quite underwhelming — Mark Carney started with his elbows up, but now he's tucked tail.' bpassifiume@ X: @bryanpassifiume Read More Toronto Blue Jays NHL Canada Sunshine Girls World
Winnipeg Free Press
15 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Poilievre happy to keep old beater running, even if it's stuck in reverse
Opinion The federal Conservatives want to kill Ottawa's electric vehicle mandate. That's their solution to the many challenges Canada faces in transitioning to a low-emissions transportation sector. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has made no secret of his disdain for the policy, which requires that all new light-duty vehicles sold in Canada by 2035 be either fully electric or plug-in hybrid. A phase-in period is scheduled to begin next year. ADRIAN WYLD / THE CANADIAN PRESS FILES It's Poilievre's latest wedge issue — one he hopes will be as successful politically as the 'axe the tax' campaign he waged against the Liberal government's consumer carbon tax (which Prime Minister Mark Carney scrapped earlier this year). Granted, there are legitimate concerns with Ottawa's EV target, especially in a country with long winters, sprawling geography and a patchwork of inadequate charging infrastructure. But cancelling the mandate outright would be reckless, given what's at stake with climate change. Canada has already been experiencing the costly effects of global warming — out-of-control wildfires that are devastating communities coast-to-coast, extreme heat and more intense storms. Transportation is the second-largest source of greenhouse-gas emissions in Canada, accounting for almost a quarter of the total. About half of those emissions came from cars and light passenger trucks in 2023. If we're serious about curbing those emissions, we can't simply throw up our hands and stick with the status quo. Expecting Canadians to embrace electric vehicles, including hybrid plug-ins, en masse without ensuring affordability, reliable performance in cold weather and easy access to charging stations is putting the cart before the horse. That doesn't mean the Liberal plan is flawless. Far from it. Ottawa has set an ambitious deadline but hasn't fully equipped Canadians to meet it. Expecting Canadians to embrace electric vehicles, including hybrid plug-ins, en masse without ensuring affordability, reliable performance in cold weather and easy access to charging stations is putting the cart before the horse. For most Canadians, the biggest barrier to buying an EV today is price. While costs have come down in recent years, electric vehicles remain considerably more expensive than their gas-powered counterparts. Ottawa had an EV rebate program, but the program ran out of money. There's talk of bringing in a new one. The second challenge is performance in Canada's climate. Anyone who has driven or tested an EV in -30°C knows battery range drops significantly in the cold, sometimes by as much as 30 to 40 per cent. That's not a minor inconvenience for Canadians who live in rural or northern regions, where driving distances are longer and charging stations are few and far between. People need to know that their vehicle will get them from A to B reliably, even in the dead of winter. Manufacturers are making progress, but cold-weather performance is still a major hurdle that has to be overcome before Canadians can have full confidence in electric vehicles. MIKAELA MACKENZIE / FREE PRESS FILES That leads directly to the third problem: infrastructure. Canada's charging network is woefully inadequate. According to Natural Resources Canada, there are just under 30,000 public charging ports nationwide. That might sound like a lot, but the federal government estimates that Canada would need well over 600,000 charging ports by 2040 to meet the new mandate. It's not enough to have a token charging station in a small town off the highway. Drivers need the same kind of convenience they have today with gas stations — knowing they can charge quickly and get back on the road without planning their trip around charging stops. Ottawa has committed to funding more charging stations, but the pace of expansion is nowhere near what's required to meet the 2035 mandate. None of these shortcomings should surprise anyone. Transforming an entire transportation sector in a country as large and diverse as Canada is not a simple task. What's disappointing is the lack of urgency in addressing them. Rather than tackling these challenges head-on — through stronger subsidies, cold-weather technology incentives and aggressive investment in charging infrastructure — the Liberals have spent more time trumpeting the target itself. Targets don't reduce emissions. Real action does. This is where the Conservatives could play a constructive role. But instead, they've chosen the easy political path of tearing down the mandate altogether. That might be an effective vote-getter in some quarters, but it's dangerously short-sighted. It does nothing to address the broader climate crisis. We can debate the feasibility of a 2035 deadline and the phase-in period leading up to it. Maybe it needs to be pushed back to 2040 to give technology and infrastructure time to catch up. But eliminating the policy altogether would leave Canada further behind in a global transition that is already well underway. The climate crisis doesn't care about political lines or partisan preferences. It's already costing Canadians billions in disaster recovery and insurance payouts. The climate crisis doesn't care about political lines or partisan preferences. It's already costing Canadians billions in disaster recovery and insurance payouts, not to mention lives lost and communities destroyed. Canadians deserve a serious conversation about how to make this mandate workable, not a political stunt that promises a return to business as usual. That means acknowledging the obstacles and crafting solutions that ordinary people can afford and trust. Bring back meaningful subsidies. Accelerate investment in infrastructure. Incentivize research and development into cold-weather battery performance. And if the 2035 timeline proves unrealistic, adjust it. What Canada can't afford to do is simply give up. Tom BrodbeckColumnist Tom Brodbeck is a columnist with the Free Press and has over 30 years experience in print media. He joined the Free Press in 2019. Born and raised in Montreal, Tom graduated from the University of Manitoba in 1993 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics and commerce. Read more about Tom. Tom provides commentary and analysis on political and related issues at the municipal, provincial and federal level. His columns are built on research and coverage of local events. The Free Press's editing team reviews Tom's columns before they are posted online or published in print – part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
