logo
Five years on, has NEP delivered what it promised?

Five years on, has NEP delivered what it promised?

India Today5 days ago
Five years ago, India promised a revolution in education. But in 2025, are students, teachers and schools better off or just more confused?When the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 was launched, it was hailed as a landmark moment in India's post-independence education history. With promises of sweeping reforms from foundational literacy to flexible college degrees the NEP aimed to make India's education system more inclusive, modern, and aligned with 21st-century goals.advertisementBut five years later, the results are mixed, the implementation patchy, and the impact uneven.WHAT WAS PROMISED IN 2020At its heart, the NEP aimed to overhaul every level of learning. Among its key promises were:Universal foundational literacy and numeracy by 2025More inclusive, play-based learning in early years (age 3–8)Mother tongue/regional language as medium of instruction till Grade 5New school structure: 5+3+3+4 instead of 10+2Reduced syllabus burden and focus on critical thinkingVocational training from Grade 6National Assessment Centre (PARAKH) to revamp board examsHigher Education Commission to replace UGC and AICTEMultiple exit options and academic credit bank in collegesPublic education spending to increase to 6% of GDPThe vision was clear. The ground reality? Far more complex.FIVE YEARS LATER: WHERE ARE WE REALLY?Despite the tall promises, only 16 out of 28 states and 8 UTs have partially implemented the NEP as of mid-2025.Foundational Literacy Mission (FLN)Target: 100% Grade 3 literacy by 2025Reality: Only 48% of Class 3 students in government schools met age-appropriate reading levels in ASER 2024Education SpendingNEP Target: 6% of GDPActual: 2.9% in 2024-25, per Union Budget analysisMultilingual EducationNEP pushed mother tongue till Class 5Result: English-medium pressure remains high in cities; rural schools report teacher shortages for regional language teachingHigher Education4-Year UG Programs: Implemented in 356 universitiesAcademic Credit Bank: Introduced, but usage remains under 12% of college studentsDropout Rates: Still high—nearly 17% at UG level (AISHE 2023)INSIDE CLASSROOMS: TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS SPEAK'We got new books, but no training.'Many government school teachers say they've been handed new curricula without adequate support.'They told us to make learning 'play-based' for Class 1, but didn't train us or give enough teaching materials,' says a government primary teacher in Uttar Pradesh.In tribal belts of Odisha and Jharkhand, teachers struggle to switch to local dialects as mandated, citing lack of bilingual textbooks and trained instructors.VOCATIONAL COURSES? STILL ON PAPERNEP's promise of 'bagless days' and vocational exploration in middle school has barely taken off. Most schools either don't offer these courses or club them into activity periods with no practical exposure.FOR STUDENTS, MORE FLEXIBILITY OR MORE CONFUSION?While NEP intended to reduce pressure on students and give them more choice, in many cases it has added layers of uncertainty.CBSE's split term system was rolled back after confusionGrading systems changed but lack of uniformity across boards remainsCareer counseling remains rare in most schools'My daughter had to choose new subjects in Class 9, but we had no idea what those changes meant for competitive exams,' says a parent from Bhopal.THE URBAN-RURAL DIVIDE IS WIDENINGUrban private schools have adopted parts of NEP, often branding them as 'progressive learning.'advertisementMeanwhile, rural schools still face digital gaps, shortage of subject teachers, and limited infrastructure.In many low-income schools, NEP implementation is more of a document than a reality.WHAT THE EXPERTS SAYDr. Anuradha Joshi, Education Policy Analyst: 'The NEP was visionary, but without financial and structural support, it risks becoming another lost opportunity.'R. Chidambaram, Principal of a Chennai-based school chain: 'The flexibility in subject choices is good but parents and students need much more guidance.'SO, WHO HAS BENEFITTED?Private ed-tech firms and publishers have boomed, offering 'NEP-aligned' products.Select state boards like Karnataka and Maharashtra have been more proactive.Students in elite schools may see some real benefit—critical thinking, coding, and new subjects are more available.But for the majority of students in India's 15 lakh government schools, the NEP remains a work in progress, not a revolution.As India marches toward its NEP 2030 goals of universal secondary education, full GER in higher ed, and global competitiveness, the road will depend on:More funding, especially for teacher training and rural infrastructureStronger centre-state coordinationTransparent, nationwide progress trackingClear communication with parents and studentsFive years after it began, the NEP 2020 stands at a crossroads. It promised a leap forward for Indian education. What it needs now is not just ambition—but accountability, funding, and honest review.Because for the next generation of Indian learners, half-reforms are not enough.- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kerala govt, Governor set to begin talks for consensus on VC appointments
Kerala govt, Governor set to begin talks for consensus on VC appointments

New Indian Express

time5 hours ago

  • New Indian Express

Kerala govt, Governor set to begin talks for consensus on VC appointments

THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: With the Supreme Court directing both the state government and the chancellor (Governor) to kick-start the process to appoint permanent vice-chancellors (VCs) in universities at the earliest, both sides are set to begin discussions to arrive at a consensus on the matter. Higher Education Minister R Bindu and Law Minister P Rajeeve are scheduled to meet Governor Rajendra Arlekar on Sunday at the directions of CM Pinarayi Vijayan. 'The government will try its best to resolve the deadlock,' Bindu told TNIE. As per highly placed sources, the constitution of search committees for selection of permanent VCs in a few universities will be taken up as a preliminary step. Of the 14 state universities, the Acts of seven varsities lay down that the chancellor shall constitute the search committee. However, the Acts of seven other universities are silent on who is the authority to constitute the panel. 'The second category mostly includes varsities that are newly established or under departments such as agriculture, fisheries, veterinary and health,' said a top source. 'The chancellor will allow the government to form search panel in such varsities to start the process. However, the Raj Bhavan will insist that the search committee be constituted as per UGC regulations,' the source added. As per the UGC regulations, the three-member panel will have nominees of the UGC chairman, the chancellor and the university syndicate. 'If the government agrees to this proposal, it would be an admission that the University Amendment Bill, that aims to alter the composition of search committees in its favour, is now a closed chapter. But there is no other choice as the President has withheld assent to the Bill,' said a government source. The preliminary steps by both parties will serve as a chance for either sides to demonstrate their intent in appointing permanent VCs through consensus. Universities where chancellor is authority to constitute search panel Kerala University MG University Calicut University Kannur University CUSAT Sanskrit University Digital University Universities where Act is silent on who should constitute search panel Kerala Agricultural University Malayalam University APJ Abdul Kalam Tech University Kerala University of Health Sciences Kerala Veterinary & Animal Sciences University Fisheries University Sreenarayana Guru Open University

Fourth-Year Schedule Irks Teachers At DU
Fourth-Year Schedule Irks Teachers At DU

Time of India

time10 hours ago

  • Time of India

Fourth-Year Schedule Irks Teachers At DU

New Delhi: Faced with the pressure to accommodate a fourth year under the undergraduate curriculum framework, several colleges have slashed breaks and packed five-hour teaching slots into 12-hour working days, a move now formalised by a university notification that has triggered outrage amongthe faculty. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Teachers say the directive, issued ahead of the Aug 1 rollout, forces colleges into an "exhaustive and exploitative" routine that compromises safety, ignores infrastructure gaps and sidelines the ad-hoc staff. The notification dated July 31, reflecting the decisions of the July 12 Executive Council meeting, states that colleges have been advised to function from 8am to 8pm "for optimal utilisation of the available resources". It directed colleges to stagger the deployment of faculty and staff to meet this requirement. Teachers say this has resulted in the elimination of transition and lunch breaks, with some colleges forcing five hours of continuous classes onto faculty schedules, despite the lack of adequate infrastructure, rest areas or staff rooms. "This latest DU directive to adopt 8am to 8pm daily classes is extremely dangerous from the safety perspective of students and teachers," said Mithuraaj Dhusiya, Executive Council member. "Further, making students sit from 8am to 8pm is neither feasible nor practical. It just shows that DU isn't prepared for the fourth year of NEP on both counts — infrastructure and manpower." Faculty members are particularly upset with the clause stating that it would be "in the best interest of all stakeholders if the senior regular faculty members of colleges are entrusted with the responsibility for teaching and guiding the students in the 4th year". Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They argue this undermines newly appointed and ad-hoc teachers, especially in Delhi govt-funded colleges where permanent appointments are pending. "Teaching is based on areas of specialisation, not age," Dhusiya remonstrated. "This notification insults younger teachers and deepens the divide." Abha Dev Habib, secretary, Democratic Teachers' Front, and associate professor at Miranda House, questioned the timing of the advisory, calling it "a sign of ill-preparedness". She said, "The university issued the advisory on Aug 1, the very day classes are to begin. Time-tables and teaching distribution are prepared during vacations — not overnight. The new courses have been pushed without holding workshops for teachers. Clearly, there has been no systematic effort to ensure smooth implementation of the fourth year." The notification invokes Clause 15 of the UGC Regulations, 2018, which mandates that teachers be available at the college for at least five hours daily and devote two hours per day to mentoring students. A minimum of 15 students are to be mentored per faculty member for extra-curricular activities, community development or research. Teachers say this arbitrary quantification of mentoring dilutes its purpose and adds to an already heavy load. It also notes that while workload norms remain at 14 hours per week for associate professors and 16 hours for assistant professors, research supervision and mentoring duties for the fourth year will be "over and above" this. "This is the beginning of the end of protections that cap faculty workload," remarked Rudrashish Chakraborty, DUTA member and associate professor at Kirori Mal College. "The push to make only senior teachers teach the fourth year while excluding the ad hoc teachers is an uncalled-for attempt to divide the faculty and create hierarchies within departments. It will especially hurt the 12 colleges fully funded by Delhi govt where hiring is stuck. " Chakraborty also asked questions about the fate of evening colleges under the new regime. "If colleges must now work from 8am to 8pm, where does that leave institutions that primarily run evening classes? Will they be asked to function from 8pm to 8am?" he asked. While the notification states the additional work will be compensated "as per prevailing norms", the faculty members say the policy fails to consider on-ground realities — from lack of classroom space to overburdened timetables — making the fourth-year rollout anything but smooth. Last month, during an executive council (EC) meeting, Delhi University vice chancellor Yogesh Singh had said that "the university is fully prepared for the 4th year rollout and that solutions are being worked out for colleges facing implementation challenges."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store