Athletics make unfortunate franchise history in blowout loss to Cubs
The Athletics' 18-3 home-opener loss to the Chicago Cubs was a historic MLB event — in more ways than one.
Advertisement
Playing at Sutter Health Park for the first time, the Athletics suffered a blowout loss the likes of which MLB hasn't seen in nearly a century.
The Athletics allowed 18 runs to the visiting Chicago Cubs, the most surrendered in a home opener since the St. Louis Browns surrendered 21 to the then-Cleveland Indians on April 14, 1925, per the Associated Press' Josh Dubow via Sportradar.
It also is the most allowed in a home opener in franchise history, per Sportradar, with the Athletics' previous high being 15 runs allowed, which happened in 2006 against the New York Yankees and in 1922 against the Boston Red Sox.
Advertisement
The Cubs wasted no time jumping on Athletics starter Joey Estes, who allowed four runs in the top of the first inning and finished his first outing of the 2025 MLB season with a loss after surrendering six runs in four innings of work.
There was one positive on the evening, as Athletics shortstop Jacob Wilson, the No. 6 overall pick in the 2023 MLB Draft, launched his first MLB home run over the left field wall in the bottom of the third inning.
Wilson's trip around the bases was one of the few highlights in an otherwise forgettable night for the Athletics.
The good thing about baseball is tomorrow often offers a chance at redemption, something the Athletics will seek as they square off with the Cubs for the second game of their three-game series.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
18 minutes ago
- New York Post
How proposed MLB realignment would work against Yankees, Mets
Call it the Ea$t division. Following Rob Manfred's recent comments about MLB expansion that would lean into Eastern and Western conferences, one often-circulated proposed four-team division would be a heavyweight quartet featuring the Yankees, Mets, Phillies and Red Sox. Such a division would feature the second-, third- and fourth-highest payrolls in MLB this season in the Mets, Yankees and Phillies, respectively, per Spotrac, with Boston ranking 12th. Advertisement 4 The proposed MLB realignment graphic. New York Post Even if one swapped in teams like the Blue Jays and their fifth-highest payroll or the Orioles, who have a new billionaire owner and a strong core of young position players, the division still remains loaded. The proposed four-team collection is based on the idea that if MLB expands it will add two teams — possibly Charlotte, Nashville or Portland — putting the league at 32. Advertisement MLB would then create an NFL-like setup of eight divisions featuring four teams. 'I think if we expand, it provides us with an opportunity to geographically realign,' Manfred said Sunday night on ESPN during the Mets' win over the Mariners. 'I think we could save a lot of wear and tear on our players in terms of travel. And I think our postseason format would be even more appealing for entities like ESPN because you'd be playing up out of the East and out of the West.' 4 Mets owner Steve Cohen spends with the best of them. Corey Sipkin for the NY POST A division with the Mets, Yankees, Red Sox and Phillies would easily project as the hardest in the sport. Advertisement Emerging from such a division would be a ruthless battle each year and one of those teams would have to finish in last each year. 4 Hal Steinbrenner's Yankees have been passed in yearly spending. Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post The East divisions already are strong, with the AL East having three playoff teams as of Tuesday and the NL East featuring three last year, but this would be a whole other level. Advertisement Gone would be the easier games against perennially bad teams like the Marlins, past Orioles teams and recent renditions of the Nationals. The Red Sox have had some lean years in recent memory, but they have a good core of players and seem destined to contend for the next few years and still spend in the top half of the sports. The Yankees, Mets and Phillies could always bottom out, but history shows that teams that spend at top levels in MLB tend to be in the hunt each year. And while, yes, that's always going to be the case that some divisions are stronger than others, the four-team template eliminates the chance for opportunities to beef up on a weaker foe. The owners of said team surely would have problems with the alignment since it could affect their ability to earn via postseason revenue. 4 Red Sox owner John Henry. Getty Images Playing the majority of one's schedule against those teams would be vicious, compared to say the Braves proposed alignment featuring the Marlins, Rays and an expansion Nashville team. A fourth-place team in that division — which could possibly mean missing the playoffs — may be better than division winners in other leagues, yet win fewer games than others. Advertisement These are all topics that MLB and the owners are surely to consider but, like most things in the world, cash rules everything around us and the money is going to do the talking. And, in that case, there would be a lot of money talking among those four teams.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why is Rob Manfred trying so hard to ruin MLB?
It's been close to 48 hours since MLB Commissioner Rob Manfred's announcement about the inevitable expansion to 32 teams. The shockwaves are still reverberating. A revolution is coming, he said. Love it or leave it. I'll gladly take Door No. 2. Before you ask why I'm opposed to a bigger sport, I'd like to hit Manfred with my own point-blank question: Who at MLB convinced you that baseball's evolution has to come at the expense of the traditional fan base? I'm talking about the 55-64 male demographic, aka Boomerville. They're the saps who've had a lifetime bond with baseball but are now being thrown overboard in favor of younger fans who don't watch games. Many folks I've spoken to already hate the idea of adding two franchises, creating eight four-team divisions (which I bet will be called conferences). It will turn MLB into a sprawling, faceless corporate mess. I figured my friends would push back on Manfred's idea. They already think the commissioner is a gimmick-happy lightweight. But one MLB person I talked to recently believes otherwise. 'Trust me, Rob knows what he's doing,' is what the higher-up said. Sure. I'm going to put my faith in the man who's brought us the third wild card, an extra round of playoffs, the pitch clock and, the ultimate insult, the 10th-inning ghost runner. And let's not forget those Friday night Apple broadcasts, or Sunday morning games on Roku. Manfred's term doesn't expire until 2029, so there's plenty of time to complete his mission – making baseball as unrecognizable as possible to those who grew up in the 1960s and 70s. Expansion – and with it, realignment - will be the greatest disruption of all. Manfred said the geographically-based divisions will reduce air travel. Ball players will be less fatigued. Better baseball, right? Funny how the commissioner has forgotten who forced teams to crisscross the country at 30,000 feet in the first place – him! The balanced schedule that requires everyone to play everyone not only erased the lines between the American and National Leagues, but it's made for shorter homestands and longer flights. If Manfred really cared about the quality of play, he'd reduce the schedule from 162 games to 154. And if the goal is to 'grow the game' – the unbearable cliché that floats through the hallways of MLB headquarters – local market blackouts would be eliminated. Doesn't Manfred realize baseball is currently the hardest sport to follow? In many areas of the country, it's impossible to watch a team that's hundreds of miles away. One example: MLB TV subscribers in parts of North Carolina can't watch the Orioles or Nationals playing the Yankees in the Bronx. That's because the O's and Nats are considered 'home teams' in select parts of the Tar Heel state. That's absurd. It's also an outdated business plan. Blackouts were originally intended to boost attendance. Those fans would theoretically buy tickets in person. But TV has become an integral part of how the sport is consumed now. We are, after all, in the age of marketing. Games are no longer games. They are now an experience. Many teams blast their fans with music and between-pitch sound effects that are so loud, they can cause hearing damage. The noise level at Yankee Stadium, for instance, often exceeds 90 decibels, which is like sitting next to a roaring motorcycle. Ticket buyers complain they have a hard time holding conversations with each other. MLB believes marketing is necessary to juice the public's interest. But the gap between the haves and have-nots remains as wide as ever. Last year, MLB saw the White Sox lose 121 games, an all-time record. The Rockies are on pace to lose 115 this year. There's barely enough talent to fill the current rosters. Two more clubs, almost certain to be bottom-feeders, would only further erode the quality of play. The Twins, one of at least 11 teams with no chance at the playoffs, traded away 10 players at the July 31 deadline. The Athletics have no home, the Marlins are going nowhere as usual and the Pirates are broke. But sure, let's continue to feed the beast. Although it's too soon to know how the four-team conferences will stack up, it's likely the Yankees, Mets, Red Sox and Phillies will be grouped together. It'd be a summer-long steel cage match, at least on paper. But ask yourself if it's necessary for the Yankees and Mets to play each other 19 times a season. It doesn't seem right to break up the iconic AL East or NL Central divisions. I suggest Manfred rethink the obsession with turning MLB into the NFL or the NBA. He should remember baseball was built on a slower, more predictable pace that stretches over six months. Old-time rivalries matter. So does tradition. Manfred is instead hunting for one new trick after another, ignoring the coming storm in his path. Baseball is likely to undergo a monster labor dispute in 2027. The owners and players are already hunkering down for a long war over a salary cap. It could jeopardize the entire season. Now isn't the time to think about expansion. Baseball has more important problems than deciding which city gets the next non-competitive team. If Manfred wants to do something about his legacy, he can start by making the sport better, not bigger. Thank you for relying on us to provide the journalism you can trust. Please consider supporting us with a subscription. Bob Klapisch may be reached at bklapisch@
42 minutes ago
Second game of scheduled doubleheader between Brewers and Cubs postponed by inclement weather
CHICAGO -- The second game of a scheduled doubleheader between the Milwaukee Brewers and Chicago Cubs was postponed Monday night due to thunderstorms in the area. It will be made up Tuesday afternoon as part of a day-night twinbill at Wrigley Field. Milwaukee opened the five-game series with a 7-0 victory Monday afternoon, thanks to six innings of one-hit ball from All-Star pitcher Freddy Peralta. Brice Turang and Caleb Durbin each hit a solo home run to lead the Brewers to their 23rd victory in 28 games. At 79-45, the Brewers have the best record in the majors. Milwaukee leads the second-place Cubs, who have lost six of 10, by nine games in the NL Central. Matthew Boyd (11-6, 2.46 ERA) is set to pitch the first game Tuesday for the Cubs, and Jameson Taillon (7-6, 4.44) is probable to start the nightcap after returning from the 15-day injured list Monday. Milwaukee right-hander Chad Patrick (3-7, 3.52 ERA) is scheduled to start the opener, with Brandon Woodruff (4-0, 2.06) slated to go in Game 2.
