XRPL EVM Sidechain Goes Live, Unlocking Ethereum Dapps in XRP Ecosystem
The development adds EVM-compatible smart contracts while maintaining a connection to the XRPL, giving developers access to the ecosystem at a low cost, Ripple said in a blog post. It is designed to eliminate the trade-off between EVM compatibility and XRPL's own advantages, opening the door for dapps to lean into XRP's payments infrastructure.
'The XRPL EVM Sidechain introduces a flexible environment for developers to deploy EVM-based applications, while maintaining a connection to the XRPL's efficiency,' David Schwartz, Ripple's chief technology officer and a co-creater of XRPL, said in the post. 'It extends the capabilities of the ecosystem without changing the fundamentals that make the XRPL reliable.'
The sidechain operates as a separate blockchain that is parallel and connected to the XRP Ledger over the Axelar bridge, an interoperability protocol. XRPL's native token, XRP (XRP), will serve as the native gas token for the sidechain.
The chain is designed specifically for developers, as they can now build and deploy their EVM-based applications, while accessing XRPL's network of over 6 million wallet holders, Ripple said. The sidechain is planned to eventually also integrate with Wormhole, another interoperability protocol, allowing even more developers to access the XRP ecosystem.
Read more:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
Codie Sanchez says this is the 'sword' you need to fight for your freedom
Codie Sanchez told Fox News Digital she's helping Americans reclaim their freedom — one small business at a time.
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
StableCoins - Will They Last And Can They Reduce The Debt?
There should be a rule in financial markets that, at some stage, a financial product or strategy will do the opposite of what its name suggests – we might call it the 'inverse Ronseal hypothesis' (Ronseal paint is famous for promising that 'it does what it says on the tin'). In this sense, think of how the 'risk free' assets of the textbooks perform under inflation, how 'low volatility' structured products blew up spectacularly and how in the 1980's America's Savings and Loan banks went bust, because they failed to save and lend properly. Into this realm steps the 'stablecoin', an asset that is growing speedily and that is forecast to become the solution to many problems – the US national debt, a sluggish and conservative banking system and the impoverishment of emerging economies. A neat way to think of stablecoins is to first consider the gold standard – money backed by physical holdings of gold – and then conceive of them as a digital coin (token or 'betting chip') that is backed by a well-established, reputable asset (increasingly, US Treasuries). The idea is that because they are backed by a stable financial asset, the value of the stablecoin should not fluctuate and should therefore form the basis for transfers of money and value. Yet, some stablecoins are not fully backed by Treasuries and others are backed by crypto 'money', which quite obviously renders them less than stable. Bear in mind that a crypto coin called 'FartCoin' is inexplicably worth USD 1.4 bn, which is a lot of comedy value compared to zero intrinsic value. In the past year, the use of stablecoins has surged, notably so in the case of those backed by Treasuries. Stablecoins are now the 18th largest holder of Treasuries (with USD 150bn) just after Norway, India and Brazil. The vast majority of stablecoins are used in crypto trading, but the potential they hold to revolutionise the payments industry is startling. Payments by stablecoin are nearly instantaneous (as opposed to having to wait 1-5 days with banking systems), carry a very low transaction charge and should make payments across borders easier. Indeed, the volume of stablecoin transactions is creeping close to the activity that the major credit card firms – Visa and MasterCard generate (Visa has its own crypto/stablecoin division). Consistent with the instinct that is prevalent in markets and politics to see all new things as solutions to old problems, stablecoins are being promoted as a new source of demand for Treasuries, and therefore a new channel through which the US national debt can be nourished. This is a dangerous idea, because whilst stablecoins are a digital join between the old financial world (Treasuries) and the new ('defi' or decentralised finance), their growth may set in train a situation where the tail starts to wag the dog. What I mean by this is that even though an individual stable coin, backed 100% by Treasuries is stable, the infrastructure and the people behind the stablecoin network, and the crypto world, may not themselves be are several relates to Gresham's Law, which stated that 'bad money, will drive out the good'. In the same way that 16th century bankers and traders had an incentive to use coins (which all had the same face value) with some lower quality metal. Equally, certain stablecoin providers will have an incentive to only partially back coins with reliable assets or to misreport the extent to which coins are backed by 'good assets', and in the event – a recession or financial crisis – that these assets are 'called', there could very easily be a bank run style collapse in a few stablecoins, with contagion across the field. As such, the large stablecoin providers may submit themselves to central bank regulation, to ensure that there is hard evidence that coins are backed by stable assets – but the quid pro quo of this (that they surrender details of the people using stablecoins) may be unpalatable. It is also worth recalling that over the past five years, there have been a range of scandals in the crypto world, and many crypto exchanges have collapsed or been shut down by regulators. To that end there is a counterparty risk inherent in the stablecoin system. Also, the loss or theft of wallets and keys to crypto assets makes the stablecoin system highly vulnerable, at a time when financial institutions are investing even more in security. From a macro pint of view, it is more likely that stablecoins effectively digitise the grey and black economies (so that there is no net financial or economic effect) or that they have very strong appeal in emerging economies with poor financial infrastructure. If that is the case, the economic effect will be to draw capital out of emerging market economies, enfeebling them (and their currencies and bond markets). Tether is very popular in Turkey, whose financial system has been significantly weakened by the current government, whose autocratic style incentivises business to transact 'outside' the existing economic system. The other major risk is that the obvious attractions of stablecoins as cheap and speedy means of switching money, implies an undercutting of the profitability of banks and payment companies, especially if savers can start to earn yield (technically called a 'reward') on stablecoins. The incumbent financial system will not like this, and whilst the larger financial institutions will likely adapt to them, many smaller ones will suffer. From a regulatory point of view, a weaker banking system is unwelcome, and the very fact that fewer dollars are taken 'out of sight' of regulators is not good either. There are already a number of regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, 'MICA' in Europe and the Genius Act in the US for instance. In these ways, stablecoins can make financial systems more volatile, and of diminished quality, and higher volatility, unless they are brought under the wing of regulators (which is anathema to most in the crypto world) or adopted by the large, incumbent financial institutions. Reflecting this, researchers at the ECB[1] found that in periods where crypto assets (i.e. Bitcoin) were volatile, stablecoins exhibited volatility that was not evident in the assets used to back them (Treasuries). From a geopolitical, or geo-economic point of view, the spread of stablecoins that are backed by safe dollar based assets (Treasuries) is at least a means of spreading dollarization to grey and emerging economies. The question for central banks like the ECB is how best to approach stablecoins. My sense is that there are two avenues to follow. The first is to encourage financial institutions, corporates and banks to develop stablecoins, in a way that permits later adoption of a digital euro. The other is to push a euro-stablecoin into Russia, Belarus, the 'Stans' and generally the former USSR countries not in or wanting to get into the EU to deprive the 'rouble' zone if we can put it that way, of money that flows through its large grey economy. Have a great week ahead Mike
Washington Post
a minute ago
- Washington Post
Target and Ulta mutually agree not to renew partnership launched in 2021
NEW YORK — Target and Ulta Beauty are parting ways, ending a partnership launched in 2021 that created in-store shops filled with beauty products at hundreds of the discounter's stores. According to a joint release issued Thursday, the companies said they have 'mutually agreed' not to renew their pact, which concludes in August 2026. Until then, the Ulta Beauty experience at Target will continue in Target stores and on the release said.
