logo
Why is the Indian far-right attacking New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani?

Why is the Indian far-right attacking New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani?

Middle East Eye21-07-2025
Zohran Mamdani's historic win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor shook up the political establishment.
A Democratic Socialist assembly member from Queens, Mamdani ran on a campaign pushing progressive policies such as a citywide rent freeze, taxpayer-funded childcare and "fast and free" public buses.
New Yorkers of all faiths rallied around the 33-year-old, and on 25 June he secured a stunning political upset, defeating his main rival, the political heavyweight Andrew Cuomo.
Despite being a relative unknown before the primary election, and polling as low as one percent in February, Mamdani's campaign mobilised a coalition of voters, including many from New York's 600,000 strong South Asian community.
But since his shock win, some within the Indian-American community have put a target on his back, making it abundantly clear they don't want, and will never vote for, a Muslim candidate.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Last week, at a packed event in Queens, New York, a far-right Hindu activist pulled out the knives for the progressive candidate.
Kajal Shingala, also known as Kajal Hindusthani, a keynote speaker at the event, called Mamdani a "jihadi zombie" and said New York would become another Pakistan if he was elected mayor in November.
Listed as one the top 10 purveyors of hate speech in India, Shingala's social media accounts are rife with Islamophobic content, where she labels Muslim men as terrorists, rapists and "love jihadists" - a conspiracy theory that Muslim men are trapping Hindu women into marriage in order to convert them to Islam.
Her comments at the event, which were met by a round of applause from the hundreds of attendees - organised by the Gujarati Samaj and supported by a coalition of different Hindu groups such as the Vaishnav Temple of New York and the Brahman Samaj of New York - were a prelude for her to bring up the 2002 Gujarat riots which Mamdani described as a "mass slaughter" of Muslims at a mayoral forum.
India's current Prime Minister Narendra Modi was chief of minister of Gujarat at the time, leading to Mamdani calling him a "war criminal".
Modi was banned from entering the US for nearly a decade for failing "to control the persistent violation of rights of life, liberty, equality, and dignity of the people of the state".
Despite this, the Gujarati Samaj sought to cultivate strong ties with Modi, with its vice-president, Manikant Patel, saying back in 2012, while the ban was still in place, that he was in "constant contact" with Modi before he became Indian prime minister.
Lies and conspiracy theories
Shingala later said that electing Mamdani would mean that New York - supposedly like London under Mayor Sadiq Khan - would become another Pakistan and Hindu businesses would be under threat.
Since becoming mayor of London, Khan has faced a deluge of criticism from right-wing commentators, including Islamophobic abuse, despite the murder rate going down, an increase in public transport infrastructure and free meals for public primary school children.
Shingala spent most of her speech warning about the threat Muslims pose to the community and encouraged the attendees to learn self-defence to protect themselves from marauding Muslims, to boycott Muslim products, to protect their daughters from Muslim men who sought to lure and oppress them, and to produce more Hindu leaders to protect Indian and Hindu interests.
Sunita Viswanath, executive director of Hindus for Human Rights, told Middle East Eye that Shingala was using the event to extend her hateful rhetoric "from India to the US".
"It pains me that such extreme messages find platforms with mainstream cultural organisations like Gujarat Samaj," she said.
'The Hindu nationalist attacks on Mamdani are a predictable display of depraved bigotry'
- Audrey Truschke, Rutgers University-Newark
She added that recent Carnegie Institute data revealed that "the majority of Indian Americans - even Hindu Americans - do not support such hate. This is why opportunistic hate mongers like Kajal Hindustani have to huddle in closed door private events. We in Savera and Hindus for Human Rights will continue our work to unite across all our differences to fight hate together."
New York City Mayor Eric Adams, who will run as an independent against Mamdani, was originally billed to be the guest of honour according to flyers advertising the event.
Without explanation, however, he pulled out of the event.
According to reports, he received a letter last Thursday signed by more than two dozen interfaith organisations asking him to withdraw and assert that such bigotry has no place in New York.
New York Focus reported that the president of the Gujarati Samaj, Harshad Patel, organised a fundraiser for Adams' re-election campaign at his home last week, which the mayor was supposed to attend.
Mamdani's deputy press secretary, Zachary Nosanchuk, told MEE that the "event is not on the mayor's public schedule, and he is not set to attend."
Neither the mayor's office nor the Gujarati Samaj would answer MEE's questions as to whether Adams attended the fundraiser at Patel's house.
String of attacks
Shingala's attacks were the latest in a string by Hindu nationalists who have weaponised his ethnic and religious identities to smear him.
The Ugandan-born state assemblyman and his family identify as Muslim, which has led to many accusing him of being a jihadi.
But it is his criticisms of Modi that seem to have incensed politicians on both sides of the political divide in India, who have derided him as anti-Indian.
Former actress and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) parliamentarian Kangana Ranaut - who has almost 3 million followers on X - shared a post on 25 June that falsely accused Mamdani of once leading "a mob of protestors in Times Squre calling Hindus as bastards and heaping abuses upon Lord Rama, who is worshipped by Hindus. A true scumbag."
Mamdani, in actual fact, was speaking out about the construction of the Ram temple on the site of the former 16th century Babri mosque in Uttar Pradesh, which was destroyed by far-right Hindu mobs in 1992, triggering Hindu-Muslim riots which led to the death of 2,000 people, mainly Muslim.
Ranaut's comment above the post she shared said: "He [Mamdani] sounds more Pakistani than Indian… whatever happened to his Hindu identity and now he is ready to wipe out Hinduism, wow!! It's the same story everywhere."
Across the political aisle, Indian parliamentarian Abhishek Singhvi, of the Indian National Congress party, also attacked Mamdani.
"When Zohran Mamdani opens his mouth, Pakistan's PR team takes the day off. India doesn't need enemies with 'allies' like him shouting fiction from New York," he wrote on X on 26 June to his 305,000 followers.
Although most of the vitriol against Mamdani originates from India, MEE has found that there are also a growing number of Indian-Americans - influenced by right-wing politics in India - who have sought to smear him.
During Mamdani's primary election campaign, a group called Indian Americans for Cuomo - who are based in New Jersey rather than New York - spent thousands on Cuomo's campaign.
They paid for a radio slot on an Indian radio station rubbishing Mamdani, as well as for a banner to fly over New York with the line: "Save NYC from Global Intifada. Reject Mamdani."
The group's authorised representative is Satyanarayana Dosapati, who has also organised a pro-Trump rally in Pennsylvania as well as being involved in pro-BJP politics in India.
New Yorkers won't be duped by the far right
Amid the attacks, scholars and analysts have differed over the impact the Hindu right wing poses to Mamdani's election ambitions.
Audrey Truschke, a history professor of modern India at Rutgers University-Newark, told MEE she doesn't think New Yorkers will be influenced by the "depraved bigotry" of right-wing Hindu forces.
"The Hindu nationalist attacks on Mamdani are a predictable display of depraved bigotry, especially anti-Muslim hate," she told MEE. "I doubt New Yorkers will be fooled by such execrable, anti-pluralistic sentiments."
She said: "I do hope the attacks [on Mamdani] serve as a wake-up call to the harms of far-right Hindutva ideology and groups who promote such intolerance in American society."
'If you are on the left of progressive politics, you get targeted'
- Manan Ahmed, Columbia University
David Ludden, emeritus professor of history at New York University, said the attacks on Mamdani by right-wing Hindus and pro-Israel factions were rooted in ethnonationalism.
"Claiming Mr Mamdani is anti-Hindu or anti-Indian has the same Islamophobia logic as claiming he is antisemitic or anti-Israel, and is equally far-fetched and baseless," he said.
"Ideologically, Hindutva and Zionism are both based on the populist claim that one ethno-religious group owns national territory, where it has exclusive rights to livelihood, wealth, and resources,' he added. 'Politically, Modi and Netanyahu regimes are allied against enemies they identify with Islam, whom they claim threaten national survival, to justify violence, expulsion, even genocide, in defence of the nation."
Ludden explained that both ideologies derive from early 20th century British imperial policies that carved the empire into national territories and made them fertile ground for "racist imperial ideologues, and for global Islamophobia today".
Trump backlash
Just like in India, support among Hindu nationalists for US President Donald Trump is strong.
The US president's right-wing politics, his stance on immigration and his denigration of Muslims have appealed to India's far-right, whose rhetoric is predicated on ethnonationalism.
During his first term, Trump ran on an anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim platform. He controversely implemented a "Muslim ban" and in 2019 appeared at a mass rally in support of Modi in Houston where he told the 50,000 strong crowd that the Indian leader was "one of America's greatest, most devoted and most loyal friends".
Since Mamdani's primary win, Trump has repeatedly accused the Democratic Socialist of being a communist, with little to no push-back from the Democratic Party.
"The Democrats have crossed the line," Trump wrote on Truth Social after his primary win. "Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Leftists before, but this is getting a little ridiculous."
Later, during a dinner at the White House for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump reiterated to a reporter that Mamdani was a communist.
"I think he's going through a little bit of a honeymoon right now, but he might make it. But, you know, it all comes through the White House. He needs the money through the White House. He needs a lot. He's going to behave... He better behave. Otherwise, he's going to have big problems," Trump said.
"It's a philosophy [communism] this country is not ready for, and never will be," he added.
Why is The New York Times so afraid of Zohran Mamdani? Read More »
Manan Ahmed, a professor of history at Columbia University said that amid the alliance between pro-Trump and Hindutva forces the attacks served what he called a global fascist movement.
"The Hindutva support for Trump, and Trump's focus on Zohran as a communist or as a socialist or as anti-Israel means that the Hindutva interest in Zoran goes up," he said.
As well as anti-leftist sentiment, he said there was a constellation of interests in which Mamdani's candidacy had became fertile ground for right-wing figures and groups - including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Hindu America Foundation (HAF), Trump and Modi - to advance their agenda such as anti-immigrant and anti-Muslim sentiment.
He said that BJP or Hindutva groups had a history of attacking prominent figures from the diaspora whose politics contrast with the divisive type of politics they are invested in, as a means to "shape the cultural conversation on both ends". He cited figures like the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, who faced attacks by UK-based versions of BJP and Hindutva groups.
He pointed to similiar dynamics in the US where both former US vice-president Kamala Harris (who is half-Indian) and Seattle Assembly councilwoman Kshama Sawant, who spearheaded a resolution to ban caste discrimination in the city, have been subject to attacks. Sawant was also denied a visa to India earlier this year.
Ahmed added that the reason that support against Mamdani could be "operationalised so quickly" is because the Hindutva infrastructure in the US has been established for a while. "That's the reason someone in New Jersey can hire a plane to fly a banner," he added.
According to Ahmed, far-right ethnonationalists don't want a candidate who may challenge them
"If you are on the left of progressive politics, you get targeted," he said. "Obviously, if it is a Muslim subject, they have added language, but that language can be just as easily tailored if the person is not Muslim.
"That's why it's important to understand the relationship between the ADL and the Hindutva ecosystem. The ADL can target a Jewish person who takes an anti-zionist stance just as easily as the ADL can target a Palestinian or someone who's taking a stance for Gaza, even if they're not Jewish."
Punjabi and Sikh support
Fahd Ahmed, the executive director of community social justice organisation Desis Rising Up and Moving (Drum), told MEE that he didn't believe that Hindutva supporters will have much influence on electoral politics in New York due to the demographic make-up of the city.
He said the number of Indian Hindus who formed the working-class South Asian communities in New York City was "limited" and those who did exist were in neighbourhoods that are further out such as Flushing and Fresh Meadows.
Ahmed added it was important to distinguish between Indian Hindus - who were influenced by right-wing politics - and Hindus from other cultures who were not.
"We have lots of Hindu members who are from Guyana, Nepal, and even from Bangladesh," Ahmed said. "All of those people have been very deeply involved in supporting Zohran, doing work on the ground, knocking doors, making calls, talking to their neighbours, talking to their co-workers, and things like that."
'They have their own hesitations around Hindutva forces'
- Fahd Ahmed, Desis Rising Up and Moving (DRUM)
He said that Indian New Yorkers, who were largely Punjabi and Sikh, were also supportive of Mamdani.
"They have their own hesitations around Hindutva forces, coupled with Zohran himself being partially of Punjabi origin. He was involved in the taxi workers' strike, so the enthusiasm for him in that community where people know him is pretty high."
Ahmed added that young professional Indian Hindus who had moved to New York and were living in hip parts of Brooklyn or Manhattan were also supportive of Mamdani and had volunteered with Drum.
"They're not a very large number, but they turned out for the election at pretty high rates. I think it's fair to say that they turned out in support of Zohran."
Overall, he said Hindutva forces were largely present outside of New York City in New Jersey, Long Island and Westchester, which is why he hadn't seen much right-wing mobilisation for the primary election.
As we edge close to the November election, Ahmed said Mamdani's Muslim and Indian heritage, along with his strong pro‑Palestine positions and criticism of Hindu nationalism, rendered him an outlier in the race and a major target.
"Whether it's Zionist or Hindutva forces, they want to make sure that they're never critiqued," he said.
"Having somebody in office that is doing that is a threat to them."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US senator asks tax authority to strip Muslim civil rights organisation of nonprofit status
US senator asks tax authority to strip Muslim civil rights organisation of nonprofit status

Middle East Eye

time7 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US senator asks tax authority to strip Muslim civil rights organisation of nonprofit status

Republican Senator Tom Cotton called on the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on Monday to revoke the nonprofit status of the largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organisation in the US, accusing it of providing material support to terrorists. In his letter, Cotton accused the Council on American-Islamic Relations (Cair) of purporting to be 'a civil rights organization protecting the rights of American Muslims' while having 'deep ties to terrorist organisations'. He alleged the organisation was listed as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood's Palestine Committee and that Cair participated in a meeting of Hamas supporters in Philadelphia. 'Tax-exempt status is a privilege, not a right, and it should not subsidize organisations with links to terrorism,' the letter said. Cair denounced the accusations as 'debunked conspiracy theories' in a statement sent to Middle East Eye. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Tom Cotton's baseless demand that the IRS target a nonprofit organization based on debunked conspiracy theories is an un-American political stunt straight from the McCarthy era and it's motivated by the senator's desire to protect the genocidal Israeli government from criticism," the statement said. Cair said it is an independent organisation that has spent over thirty years defending the US constitution, anti-Muslim bigotry and has "opposed injustice both here and abroad". Former Israeli prime minister urges Jewish Americans to bypass Aipac in Washington Read More » 'This is called moral consistency and Senator Cotton should try it, but he better check with his handlers at AIPAC first," Cair said, referring to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a pro-Israel lobbying group that has contributed over $230,000 to the senator. This is not the first time Cair has been subject to attacks for its pro-Palestinian advocacy; the organisation is just the latest in a list of pro-Israel campaigns that Cotton has run. In December, the senator introduced a bill in the Senate that sought to eliminate the federal use of the term 'West Bank' and instead implement the use of 'Judea and Samaria', the biblical name for what is now the occupied West Bank, claiming the terminology aligns with Israel's historical and biblical claims to the territory. In November 2024, after the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant on charges of using starvation as a method of warfare, as well as crimes against humanity, plus other charges, Cotton lashed out at the ICC. At the time, Cotton cited a US law that permits the president to use "all means necessary and appropriate" to free Americans or allies detained by the court. Passed in 2002, the American Service-Members' Protection Act, often referred to as the "Hague Invasion Act," was designed to shield US personnel from ICC jurisdiction. Rights groups argue the law aims to intimidate nations that support the ICC treaty. It authorises military action to rescue any American or allied citizen held by the court in The Hague, the Netherlands. 'The ICC is a kangaroo court and Karim Khan is a deranged fanatic,' Cotton wrote in a social media post on X. Khan is the chief prosecutor at the ICC.

Photo of Saudi Arabia's crown prince inside Jeffrey Epstein's mansion fuels criticism online
Photo of Saudi Arabia's crown prince inside Jeffrey Epstein's mansion fuels criticism online

Middle East Eye

time8 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Photo of Saudi Arabia's crown prince inside Jeffrey Epstein's mansion fuels criticism online

The New York Times on Tuesday ignited a wave of backlash after revealing a framed photograph of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman displayed inside the New York City mansion of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The article, which takes readers inside the late convicted paedophile's seven-storey Manhattan home, features surveillance cameras positioned above his bed and in adjoining rooms, taxidermied animals, and provocative artwork, including a sculpture of a bride clutching a rope suspended from the ceiling in the atrium. Images from the home of Jeffrey Epstein show cameras in bedrooms and photos of him with: Donald Trump Steve Bannon Bill Clinton Elon Musk Larry Summers Mohammed bin Salman and more As well as memorabilia from Ehud Barak, Woody Allen, Bill Gates, and many others. Gift link 👇🏼 — Leah McElrath (@leahmcelrath) August 5, 2025 The revelation of the crown prince's photograph inside Epstein's mansion has sparked a storm of criticism on social media. Many social media users expressed their lack of surprise, with one remarking on another photograph of Mohammed bin Salman with George Nader, another convicted criminal and serial paedophile. 'Whenever Mohammed Bonesaw isn't orchestrating the murder of journalists (a reference to the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi) and dissolving their remains in acid, he seems to enjoy posing for photos with pedophiles.' Another person commented, 'Personally, I think this is the least surprising one out of all of them.' New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Some questioned the public's reaction altogether. 'Is MBS considered a moral leader in any way?' one person asked, while others connected the scandal to Saudi Arabia's silence towards the ongoing war in Gaza, which several states, human rights scholars and institutions now qualify as a genocide. One Reddit user wrote, 'If this is true, it would explain a lot for why there's no coordinated military response to the genocide [in Gaza].' Another post on X added: 'This is why he supports 'Israel'.' Wonder why they're all working for Israel and against their people ? Saudi Arabia's King MBS, Pope, Emirati high level figure, Trump ... with their common pedophile friend Jeffrey Epstein. — MenchOsint (@MenchOsint) August 5, 2025 The criticism escalated as people connected the image to long-standing allegations of Gulf-Israeli collaboration. Sam Youssef, author and editor of American and International Affairs, asked: 'Do you now understand why Arab rulers kneel to Netanyahu and the Mossad?' Others saw the photograph as symbolic of regional betrayal. 'Basically, the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques was being managed by an Israeli agent. That's why Palestinians are helpless today. But not for long,' one person posted. Many expressed disbelief and concern over the Saudi crown prince's apparent proximity to Epstein. But the relationship between Epstein and Mohammed bin Salman isn't new. A year before his death, which was ruled a suicide in 2019, Epstein boasted of his ties to the crown prince during an interview with The New York Times. A 2019 report by The New York Times—Jeffrey Epstein claimed to have known Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia. During a 2018 interview with journalist James B. Stewart, Epstein gestured to a framed photograph of MBS displayed prominently in his… — Levantine Logic (@SyriaRetold) August 6, 2025 The crown prince was not the only high-profile figure whose image was exposed from inside Epstein's mansion. Framed photos of US President Donald Trump; former President Bill Clinton; Pope John Paul II; Mick Jagger; Elon Musk; Fidel Castro; CEO of DP World, Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem from the United Arab Emirates; and former prime minister of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr al-Thani were also in his home. Framed photograph in Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home shows him with the UAE's Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, the current group chairman & CEO of DP World (X) In 2008, Epstein was convicted in Florida for soliciting prostitution from a minor, serving just 13 months in jail under a controversial plea deal. A decade later, he was arrested again on federal charges of sex trafficking of minors, accused of abusing dozens of underage girls between 2002 and 2005 in his homes in New York and Palm Beach. On 6 July 2019, Epstein was arrested and held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He died in his cell on 10 August 2019. Epstein's death has done little to quell public scrutiny. His connections to influential individuals, including former US presidents, royals, and billionaires, continue to fuel speculation about the extent of his network and whether justice was truly served.

Most Israelis not bothered by reports of suffering and famine in Gaza, new poll shows
Most Israelis not bothered by reports of suffering and famine in Gaza, new poll shows

Middle East Eye

time9 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Most Israelis not bothered by reports of suffering and famine in Gaza, new poll shows

The vast majority of Israelis say they are not troubled by reports of famine and suffering in Gaza, a new poll released by the Israel Democracy Institute shows. The survey shows that 79 percent of Jews in Israel were not troubled, or troubled at all, whereas 86 percent of 'Arab' respondents were somewhat or very troubled by the reports about the war on Gaza. 'Arab' respondents in the survey refer to Palestinian citizens of Israel. When the question was broken down by political affiliation, it shows that there is far greater concern among the left for the suffering and hunger, with 70 percent showing concern, whereas only 32 percent and six percent among the centre and right, respectively, are personally troubled by the reports. The survey was conducted between 27-31 July. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The world's leading hunger monitoring system last week issued a warning that the 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza due to the Israeli-imposed starvation and siege. 'Latest data indicates that famine thresholds have been reached for food consumption in most of the Gaza Strip and for acute malnutrition in Gaza City,' the United Nations-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification said in its report. The warning comes as at least 150 Palestinian children and adults in Gaza have succumbed to death from starvation since Israel's onslaught on Gaza began in October 2023. The low number of Israelis concerned about famine and suffering in Gaza may be correlated with the number of people who believe the Israeli army's reporting on the extent of the civilian casualties in Gaza. A clear majority of Israeli Jews, 70 percent, believe the Israeli army's reporting on the number of civilian casualties in Gaza, whereas the vast majority of Palestinian citizens of Israel, 63 percent, do not believe those numbers. The Palestinian health ministry in Gaza counts over 60,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza, with the vast majority of those civilians, women and children. Ministry numbers have been broken down by name, age and gender. 'You can see his bones': In Gaza, parents struggle against child starvation and Israeli war crimes denial Read More » The Israeli army, as of May of this year, puts the count at 30,000, with 14,000 of those labelled 'combatants'. Israel has yet to provide any methodology or verification of those numbers. The health ministry's numbers are widely accepted globally, with the British medical journal, The Lancet, having estimated that the 60,000 number is a vast undercount. When asked about the claim that 'Israel's actions are restricted by the fighting, but it is making substantial efforts to avoid causing unnecessary suffering to Palestinians in Gaza' was correct, the vast majority of Israeli Jews, 78 percent, believed it to be accurate. The Israeli public, however, does not align with the state on the issue of settler violence and accountability against them. Nearly half of the Israeli public, 44 percent, believe security forces are too lenient towards Israeli settler violence, whereas 23 percent think the response is appropriate, and 22 percent think they deal with them too harshly. The majority of Palestinian citizens of Israel, 61 percent, think security forces are too lenient on the issue. Bleak outlook Israel's war on Gaza has carried on for just under two years now, with lower-level armed conflict with other countries in the region, including Lebanon, Iran, Syria and Yemen. The seemingly intractable conflict could be taking a toll on the public's general outlook, as the survey shows that compared to findings in June, there has been a general decline in optimism across all four indicators of national mood. Those four indicators are the future of national security, democratic rule, the economy, and national cohesion. Only a minority of Israelis are optimistic, the survey found. The steepest declines came in security and democracy, which the authors of the survey said are two indicators that Israelis are historically most optimistic about. Just 40 percent of Israelis are optimistic about national security, with that number even lower at 38 percent for the outlook on democratic rule. The lowest level of optimism was reserved for national cohesion, with just 23 percent optimistic about its future and 28 percent optimistic about the country's economic future. According to the authors, the share of optimists among Palestinian citizens of Israel is far lower than that among Israeli Jews. The report's authors caveat this section, saying, "However, as the figure below shows, this does not constitute a new crisis, as these declines have essentially restored the situation that existed two and three months ago; thus, it is possible that the previous month's finding was anomalous." Israel's standing globally has also taken a hit, with the public in the US finding itself increasingly opposed to Israel's war on Gaza and a steady rise in sympathy for Palestinians. Middle East Eye reported on Tuesday that former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said that Israel's reputation in the US was 'in collapse'. Gaza: Family of frail boy killed at GHF site months ago still haven't received his body Read More » Bennett, who served as prime minister from 2021 to 2022 for the New Right Party, accused Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of turning Israel into 'a leper state'. Bennet cited members of the Make America Great Again movement distancing themselves from Israel, with the country's friends having 'a hard time defending' it in the face of the ongoing starvation of Palestinians in Gaza. Recent data shows that Bennet's assessment of Israel's reputation in the US is correct. In a dramatic 10 percentage point drop since a poll from September 2024, only 32 percent of Americans said they support Israel's war on Gaza, new Gallup polling results released recently showed. As of July 2025, 60 percent of Americans said they disapprove of Israel's military action, and 52 percent said they see Netanyahu in a negative light - a significant shift from a year and a half ago. Netanyahu has also never been viewed this unfavourably in any of its previous polling stretching back to the 1990s, Gallup said, citing a 'continued deterioration in his image'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store