Haryana amends Sikh Gurdwaras (Management) Act, 2014
One of the key changes is the omission of Section 17(2)(c) of the Act, which previously empowered the Gurdwara Committee to remove its own members and this authority will now vest with the Judicial Commission under Section 46.
'The aim of these amendments is to increase transparency, ensure judicial oversight, and provide a clear structure to the administration of gurdwara properties,' an official spokesperson said.
The Sections 44 and 45 have been substituted to grant exclusive jurisdiction to a newly constituted Judicial Commission to resolve disputes related to voter eligibility, disqualifications, service matters of gurdwara employees and the selection or appointment issues concerning the gurdwara committees.
The appeals against the orders of the commission can be filed before the Punjab and Haryana high court within 90 days.
The Section 46 has been revised to empower the commission to adjudicate disputes concerning gurdwara property, funds, and internal conflicts. The commission will have the authority to remove or suspend committee members on grounds of misconduct, and take suo moto cognizance in cases involving misuse or potential damage to gurdwara property or funds. It will also be able to issue temporary injunctions to safeguard such assets.
The spokesperson said that new sections from 46-A to 46-N have been added. 'These provide the Judicial Commission powers equivalent to a civil court...and extend protection to commission members for acts performed in good faith under Section 46D,' the spokesperson said.
The orders passed by the commission will be enforceable as civil court decrees and its members will be treated as public servants. The amendment introduces a comprehensive legal process for the declaration and management of gurdwaras.
The gurdwaras will be classified into three types —Historical (Schedule I), Notified (Schedule II), with annual income of ₹20 lakh or more and Local (Schedule III). A petition to declare a gurdwara as a Sikh gurdwara has to be filed by at least 100 adult Sikh worshippers.
'Through these amendments, the state government seeks to establish a transparent, efficient, and legally robust framework for the administration of Sikh gurdwaras in Haryana,' the spokesperson said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
HC sets aside RDO's order restoring tribal land to non-tribal parties
Kochi: The high court has set aside the orders issued by the Ottappalam RDO and Palakkad district collector in 2010, which had wrongfully restored possession of around 12 acres of tribal land at Kottathara village in Agali, Palakkad, to non-tribal parties. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Justice Harisankar V Menon delivered the judgment on Wednesday in a petition filed by Rangan of Kottathara and his three brothers, challenging the RDO's orders and the collector restoring possession of the tribal land to non-tribal parties. The petitioners contended that their father, Chathamooppan, had made an application under the Kerala Scheduled Tribes (Restriction on Transfer of Lands and Restoration of Alienated Lands) Act, 1975, stating that he had originally possessed around 12 acres in Kottathara, which had been transferred to certain non-tribal parties between 1964 and 1990 under the guise of various sale deeds. In 1995, the Ottappalam RDO, acting on the application, issued an order directing the non-tribal parties to deliver possession of the land to Chathamooppan and his brother within 30 days and further directed the applicants to pay compensation under the Act. However, in Dec 2010, the Ottappalam RDO, acting suo motu and without notice to the petitioners, sons of the deceased Chathamooppan, reviewed the 1995 order and restored possession of the land to the non-tribal parties under Section 5(1) of the Kerala Restriction on Transfer by and Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1999, which permits the transfer of up to 2 acres of tribal land to non-tribal parties. The district collector upheld the RDO's order, prompting the petitioners to move HC. Upon perusal of the records, the bench held that the proceedings regarding the land in question under the 1975 Act had attained finality with the 1995 order of the RDO, as no one had challenged the same later. Further, the 1999 Act does not contain any provision authorising the RDO to review an order passed under the 1975 Act. Accordingly, the bench set aside the 2010 orders of the RDO and the collector. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Similarly, T V Krishnan of Agali, who is also a party respondent in Rangan's petition, filed a separate petition alleging that he had been interdicted by the police from cutting and removing timber from his property, based on a complaint filed by one Murugan of Agali. However, the court noted that Krishnan had failed to disclose that he was a party respondent in Rangan's petition. The court further directed the revenue authorities to verify whether the property referred to in Krishnan's petition is the same as that involved in Rangan's petition and to take appropriate action accordingly.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
'EPIC' trouble for Tejashwi: RJD leader's 'name missing' from Bihar poll roll claim prompts EC to look into 'forgery'; what poll panel said
Tejashwi Yadav (ANI photo) NEW DELHI: Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader Tejashwi Yadav 's name is in the Bihar draft electoral rolls with the EPIC number used in the last poll. Meanwhile, a probe in on to ascertain if his second EPIC numbers is forged, Election Commission of India (ECI) sources told news agency ANI. The poll body reportedly noted that it is "quite likely that the second EPIC (Election Photo Identity Card) was never made through official channel". EPIC is issued by the ECI to eligible voters. It serves as both proof of identity and eligibility to vote in elections. The poll body sources also rejected Tejaswi Yadav's allegation that his EPIC number was changed, saying that the RJD leader used the Electoral Roll with EPIC No. RAB0456228 for filling his nomination papers on affidavit in 2020. The sources told ANI that the former Bihar chief minister was having this EPIC number even in the electoral roll in 2015 and his name with this EPIC number exists in the draft Electoral Rolls. They said the other EPIC number - RAB2916120 has been found to be non-existent, and more than 10 years of records have been checked, and further inquiries are being made to understand 'whether that is a forged document'. 'The other EPIC number - RAB2916120 has been found to be non-existing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Featuring Brigade Ebony™ at Brigade Showcase 2025 | Aug 8–10, Sheraton Grand, Brigade Gateway Brigade Group Learn More Undo More than ten years old records have been checked. No records have been found for the second EPIC number yet. It is highly likely that the second EPIC was never made through the official channel. Further inquiries are on to understand that reality of the second EPIC number, whether that is a forged document,' a source told the agency. Tejashwi Yadav, who is Lalu Yadav's son, kicked off a political storm on Saturday after publicly claiming that his name had vanished from Bihar's voter list, despite holding a valid EPIC number. Displaying the "no records found" message on a large screen during a press conference, the former Deputy CM alleged a larger conspiracy by the Election Commission to erase voters ahead of the assembly polls. However, responding to the allegations, the Election Commission of India said Tejashwi Yadav's name is present in the draft voter list. The Commission also released a copy of the list with his name to counter his claim.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Forest Dept. grants permission to capture one more elephant in Karnataka's Chikkamagaluru dist.
The Forest Department has granted permission to capture one more elephant roaming in the villages of N.R. Pura taluk of Karnataka's Chikkamagaluru district. The department staff captured an elephant on July 29, following the incidents of human-elephant conflicts in the region. Prabhash Chandra Ray, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife), issued an order on Saturday granting permission to capture a tusker, aged around 25 to 30, as per the Wildlife (Conservation) Act, 1972. MLA for Sringeri T.D. Raje Gowda had met Forest Minister Eshwar Khandre and appealed to him to grant permission to capture the trouble-causing elephant. Conservator of Forests of Chikkamagaluru, Yashpal Kshirasagar, had submitted a proposal seeking permission to capture the elephant that caused damage to crops and left the local people worried. The Forest Department captured a tusker on July 29, following protests by local people in N.R. Pura condemning the repeated incidents of human-elephant conflict in the region. The local people hit the streets of Balehonnur in N.R. Pura taluk on July 28, as two people had died in elephant attacks within a gap of four days. The department had given permission for the capture and relocation of one elephant. A team of officials succeeded in capturing a 15-year-old elephant near Elekallu in N.R. Pura taluk. The local people were anticipating that one more trouble-causing elephant would be captured. However, the PCCF had not granted permission to capture one more elephant.
