Pregnant Woman Forced Into Heartbreaking Decision—Her Life or Five Babies
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
After finding out she was pregnant with five babies, one woman had to make a heartbreaking decision to save her own life and the lives of two of her unborn children.
Chelsae Michelle Jenner and her husband already had three sons, but they wanted to try for one more as they could finally have a girl. They went through intrauterine insemination (IUI), and, just nine days later, she got the exciting news that she was pregnant.
But, by the time her pregnancy reached five weeks and four days, the joy faded, only to be replaced with heartbreak. Jenner, who resides in Austin, Texas, discovered that there were five sacs and potentially a sixth. She told Newsweek that it was "a very dangerous situation."
"My doctor immediately told me this wasn't good news," Jenner said. "Based on my weight and only being 5 feet tall, the risk of severe consequences carrying all five was very high."
From left: Chelsae Jenner poses during her pregnancy; and with the twins.
From left: Chelsae Jenner poses during her pregnancy; and with the twins.
@chelsaejenner / TikTok
Jenner said she and her husband were told they had a difficult decision to make.
Their options were to either continue carrying all five babies and hope they survived, or to undergo a fetal reduction. The latter would hopefully save the lives of two babies and save Jenner's life, too.
The gravity of this lifechanging decision left Jenner utterly broken, she said.
Jenner continued: "From six weeks, we had to watch the babies weekly. We didn't know what we wanted to do, but we were encouraged to wait and see if nature would take its course and they passed naturally.
"The pregnancy also caused me to have heart issues. I needed a heart monitor to watch my heart, because, at rest, it was 120 to 130 bpm. My heart was already working way too hard, pumping so much blood for five babies. I also had kidney issues and liver issues at just six weeks."
By eight weeks, Jenner learned that the fifth baby no longer had a heartbeat, and one of the babies may have Turner Syndrome, a rare genetic condition that affects only females.
All Jenner ever wanted was a baby girl.
From left: The dad holds the surviving twins; and Chelsea cradles them.
From left: The dad holds the surviving twins; and Chelsea cradles them.
@chelsaejenner / TikTok
The grief started to set in, but she was still mentally prepared to carry the remaining four babies. Her body was physically struggling, but she was willing to do whatever it took.
During a 10-week consultation, the couple were given a sheet with statistics about what their life could be like if Jenner carried the four babies to term.
"The consultant took into account my BMI and my health issues, and it put me at 60 percent mortality rate due to complications or hemorrhage," Jenner said. "She showed us the disabilities the babies were at risk of, with a 90 percent chance of one or more having them.
"She asked about our financial situation and if we could afford children with disabilities. She asked about our other children; how would they do with their parents giving all their attention to four babies who may have special needs," she continued.
Jenner had spent so long believing that it was selfish to let them go, but after realizing what the family's reality could look like, she came to see that sparing their lives was a selfless act.
"No one understands until they read that paper, and their life changes in an instant. After we read that paper, my decision was clear," Jenner said.
The decision to undergo fetal reduction was made at 10 weeks. This requires inserting a needle into the sac of the chosen baby and stopping their heart.
Jenner had to wait until 12 weeks to ensure Baby A and Baby B were big enough, but she was assured that they wouldn't feel pain. She couldn't choose herself, so the doctor took that burden and showed them moving around on the ultrasound before stopping their hearts.
Jenner was then monitored weekly to ensure the remaining twins were growing, and that her body was coping. The twins were born at 33 weeks and six days, but to Jenner, they will always be her quintuplets.
From left: Chelsae Jenner poses with her twins in hospital, who are pictured together in 2025.
From left: Chelsae Jenner poses with her twins in hospital, who are pictured together in 2025.
@chelsaejenner / TikTok
Jenner's grief is palpable, but she shared her journey on social media (@chelsaejenner on TikTok) to connect with others. Back then, she felt like no one understood what she was going through, so she hopes to provide support for any other women facing this.
Many of her TikTok posts have gone viral, with one clip documenting her devastating pregnancy generating over 1.5 million views and more than 66,000 likes.
Jenner said: "I felt tired of hiding my pain. They are a massive reason I'm still here and why the twins are thriving. The more I silenced their journey, the more I silenced them, and it made them not feel real. By sharing this, I hope our story can reach someone walking this same journey and to know they are not alone.
"Every time I think of them, the exact moment we chose to save our babies will haunt me forever. But I have learned to accept those feelings and know that the decision was the best-possible outcome," Jenner added.
Is there a health issue that's worrying you? Let us know via health@newsweek.com. We can ask experts for advice, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Democratic Senator Admitted to Hospital: What We Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Democratic U.S. Senator Tina Smith of Minnesota was admitted to George Washington University Hospital in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday after feeling unwell and being evaluated by a Capitol physician. Smith's staff posted on X around 5:30 p.m. ET, "A Note from Senator Smith's Staff: While at work at the Capitol today, Sen. Smith started to not feel well. She went to the Capitol physician who recommended she undergo more thorough examination at GW hospital. Out of an abundance of caution, they are keeping her overnight for observation. She expects to be back at work very soon." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I tried this power walking method to boost my heart rate and reduce my stress levels — and I'm hooked
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Power walking has been around long before TikTok made it cool. It's been found to be good for your bones, reduce your risk of high blood pressure, burn calories, and improve your mental health. Unlike running or jogging, walking has a low impact on your joints, so it is suitable for most people, plus you don't need any fancy equipment to get a good workout — just a comfortable pair of sneakers will do. How to power walk Power walking, also known as brisk walking, is exactly what it sounds like — you're walking at a faster pace, probably an effort of six or seven out of ten. An easy way to tell if you're walking quickly enough is the talk test — imagine you're walking with a friend, at the right pace you'd be able to hold a conversation, but you'd probably be a little breathless. If you couldn't speak without gasping for breath, you're walking too fast. If you could easily talk like you would standing still, you're not walking quickly enough. If you couldn't speak without gasping for breath, you're walking too fast. If you could easily talk like you would standing still, you're not walking quickly enough. Alternatively, if you have one of the best fitness trackers strapped to your wrist, another way to check your pace is by looking at your heart rate. When power walking, your heart rate should be 50 to 85 per cent of your maximum heart rate. Your maximum heart rate is 220 beats per minute (bpm) minus your age in years. Therefore, for a 30-year-old, the calculation would be 220 - 30 = 190 bpm. To determine the range you should be walking in, multiply this number by 0.5 to find 50 percent of your maximum heart rate (so 95 bpm for a 30-year-old), and by 0.85 to see 85 percent (162 bpm). Keep an eye on your heart rate as you walk and try and keep it in this zone. What are the benefits of power walking? We've explored the effects of 30 minutes of power walking on the body in more detail here, but in simple terms, power walking is an excellent form of cardio. You're working your entire body as you walk — just make sure you think bout engaging your core to stabilize your torso, and swinging your arms as you walk. Not only does power walking raise your heart rate and burn calories, but studies have found this form of walking can reduce your blood pressure and your risk of high cholesterol and diabetes. I tried this power walking method to boost my heart rate and reduce my stress levels — and I'm hooked As Tom's Guide's fitness editor, I'm no stranger to a walking challenge — you can read what happened when I tried the Japanese walking method for a week here, as well as when I took on the 12-3-30 walking workout for a month. Yet next on my list was a 20-minute power walking workout, with a five-minute warm-up and cool down. As always, I set up the workout on my Apple Watch 10 beforehand — here's how to build a workout on your Apple Watch. During the power walking workout itself, I used the 1-2 step method — this refers to a technique where you swing your arms in a 1-2 rhythm to match your steps. I found myself counting 'one, two' throughout the workout, focusing on swinging my arms, with a 90-degree bend in my elbow, as I took a big step forward each time, striking the floor with my heel and rolling to the ball of my foot. I found the counting and the arm swing helped me take longer strides, working my lower body harder as I pushed myself forward. Unlike going for a run, I wasn't immediately out of breath, but I found myself working hard as my heart rate increased. I focused on my form, keeping my core engaged and my torso upright. I tend to tense through my head and neck as I push myself, so I thought about keeping my neck, shoulders, and back relaxed. My heart rate remained elevated throughout the 20-minute workout, but stayed at 50-60% of my maximum heart rate. More importantly, I really enjoyed the power walking session. While it won't be for everyone, the 1-2 rhythm was somewhat meditative, and I found myself tuning into my body and focusing on my walk. I use exercise as a way to reduce stress and improve my mental health, and this workout did just that. If 20 minutes of brisk walking is too ambitious, why not mix intervals of brisk walking with intervals of slower walking to recover? The Japanese walking method involves three minutes of a brisk walk, followed by three minutes of a slower-paced walk to recover. Remember, your brisk walking pace will be different from mine, and that the best workout for you is the one you enjoy the most. As always, if you're new to exercise or you're returning to workouts following an injury or pregnancy, it's always a good idea to check in with a doctor before taking on a new workout routine. More from Tom's Guide Forget running — 3 walking workouts that build lower body strength and burn calories I tried this 3-2-1 walking workout — and it boosted my energy level and my mood Walking for weight loss: what you need to know
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Ozempic Is Costing Grocery Stores Billions
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. GLP-1 medications, including Ozempic and Mounjaro, are already costing grocery stores billions. According to a new report from Big Chalk Analytics, GLP-1 users have cut $6.5 billion from U.S. grocery spending, and the popularity of the weight loss and diabetes medications appears to only be growing. Why It Matters The use of weight-loss medications called glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists has skyrocketed in recent years. Popular products include Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy and Zepound and have been key treatments for many Americans who are obese or have type 2 diabetes. While the full health effects of these drugs in the long term has not been studied, their prevalence has shown the potential to disrupt industries by lowering grocery and even restaurant profits in the long term. People shop at a grocery store in Brooklyn on May 13, 2025 in New York City. People shop at a grocery store in Brooklyn on May 13, 2025 in New York To Know While GLP-1 medications are already reportedly costing grocers $6.5 billion, the impact could be even costlier in the years to come as 8.3 percent of Americans are planning to start the medications, according to the new Big Chalk survey of more than 4,500 consumers. If this happens, the survey projects losses as much as an additional $4.4 to $10.8 billion. "The changes being seen in grocery stores are the result of people making better choices about food –less ultra-processed food and possibly less food overall," David Navazio, CEO of health care product company Gentell, told Newsweek. Several types of products have seen their purchase rates go down, from cereal and soft drinks to lunch meats. Currently, an estimated 11.2 percent of U.S. adults are on GLP-1 medications, but roughly 20 percent could soon be on the medication in just 12 months. "It's one of the fascinating business 'side effects' of medications like Ozempic that grocery stores are seeing a dip in business," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek. "The idea is these medications suppress hunger, which is causing consumers to purchase food less. And while there is certainly some truth to this, it's too soon to call it a long-term trend. Financially, it can be seen as a good thing for money-strapped customers who can reduce their grocery bills along with their waistlines. Whether or not this economic impact is a lasting one remains to be seen." So far, the medications have triggered grocery volume losses of 1.2 to 2.9 percent, with dollar sales dropping between 0.9 and 2.3 percent, depending on the category, according to the report. GLP-1 users were 65 percent more likely to buy smaller packs of cereal and 48 percent more likely to purchase smaller packs of lunch meats. This extended to soft drinks as well, with those on the medication 36 percent more likely to opt for the smaller sizes. "The opportunity for grocery brands is twofold: A continued migration toward better-for-you products—plus an emphasis on smaller pack sizes—are ways CPG brands can adapt to these changing consumer demands for volume," Rick Miller, partner and marketing effectiveness practice lead at Big Chalk, told Newsweek. What People Are Saying Rick Miller, partner and marketing effectiveness practice lead at Big Chalk, said in a statement: "GLP-1s have crossed the household-penetration threshold where their impact on grocery volumes and dollar sales can no longer be ignored. We're past anecdotes. This is measurable, structural change. Brands and retailers must rethink assortment, pricing, and promotion for a shopper who is literally consuming less." David Navazio, CEO of health care product company Gentell, told Newsweek: "We will see changes in product selection as a result of the changes in people's buying habits, with an emphasis on whole foods, produce, lean meats." For grocery stores, it may take time to adapt. But the change is undoubtedly good for the country as a whole that our population is becoming healthier." Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Like anything else, this comes down to supply and demand. If grocery stores are seeing a drop in volume, the next step would usually be lower prices. That's not what we're seeing. Grocery prices were up another 0.3 percent in June, according to the latest CPI data. So if grocers are losing, I'm not quite sure who's winning yet." Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "At any given point in time, there is one part of the economy that is booming at the expense of another. This is just the normal oscillation around economic equilibrium. In very general terms, being less obese is healthier, and I think it is a good thing overall to having a healthier population. Grocery stores will slowly adapt to new eating and shopping habits, which will have knockoff effects in other sectors, while some parts of the economy will see increased spending that can be attributed to GLP-1 use." What Happens Next Beyond the economic impacts, the long-term implications of GLP-1 medications on health are still being studied. A recent study discovered a new link between taking GLP-1 drugs and elevated risk of pancreatitis and kidney conditions, including kidney stones. GLP-1 medications are also tied to a higher risk of digestive problems, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and even stomach paralysis in rare cases. For the business economics of grocers reacting to the uptick in GLP-1 usage, prices have not adequately shifted yet, Thompson said. "America has an obesity problem. If these drugs are helping people eat less and live healthier lives, that's a net positive," Thompson said. "But in a capitalist economy—if Adam Smith's invisible hand is really at work—we should be seeing food prices and health care costs fall also. That's not happening. Health care continues to rise at an alarming rate, and food prices are still climbing. Long term, we might expect some price relief, but we're not there yet."
