Republicans move to eliminate payment pauses for struggling student loan borrowers
One provision in Republicans' "big beautiful" bill would narrow the relief options for struggling student loan borrowers. House and Senate Republicans both call for the elimination of both the economic hardship and unemployment deferment.
Those deferments allow federal student loan borrowers to pause their monthly bills during periods of joblessness or other financial setbacks, often without interest accruing on their debt.
Less attention has been paid to the GOP plan to do away with the deferments than its proposals to eliminate several student loan repayment plans and to establish a minimum monthly payment for borrowers.
The House advanced its version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act in May. The Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions released its budget bill recommendations related to student loans on June 10. Senate lawmakers are preparing to debate the massive tax and spending package.
More from Personal Finance:Here's the inflation breakdown for May 2025What's happening with unemployed Americans — in five chartsThe economic cost of Trump, Harvard battle over student visas
Nixing the deferments could have major consequences, said Abby Shafroth, director of the National Consumer Law Center's Student Loan Borrower Assistance Project.
"I'm concerned this is going to lead more people to default on their student loans when they encounter a job loss, surprise medical expense or other economic hardship," Shafroth said.
The Trump administration said this spring that the number of student loan borrowers in default could soon rise from more than 5 million to roughly 10 million in the coming months.
Under the Senate Republicans' proposal, student loans received on or after July 1, 2026 would no longer qualify for the unemployment deferment or economic hardship deferment. The House plan does away with both deferments a year earlier, on July 1, 2025.
The unemployment deferment is typically available to student loan borrowers who are seeking but unable to find full-time employment or are eligible for jobless benefits, among other requirements, according to the National Consumer Law Center. Under the deferment, borrowers can pause their payments for up to six months at a time, and for a total of three years over the life of the loan.
The absence of the relief "means that for someone who lost their job and is struggling to keep their head above water, the government will demand monthly payments on student loans," Shafroth said.
The bill comes as the share of entry-level employees who report feeling positive about their employers' business prospects dropped to around 43% in May, a record low, according to a recent report by Glassdoor.
The economic hardship deferment, meanwhile, is generally available to student loan borrowers who receive public assistance, earn below a certain income threshold or work in the Peace Corps. The total time a borrower can spend in an economic hardship deferment is also three years.
The end of the deferments "eliminates one of the key benefits on subsidized loans," said higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz.
Persis Yu, deputy executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center, agreed.
"The ability of borrowers to pause payments and interest on subsidized loans during financial shocks and hardship is a critical benefit of the federal loan program," Yu said.
Around 150,000 federal student loan holders were enrolled in the unemployment deferment in the second quarter of 2025, while around 70,000 borrowers had qualified for an economic hardship deferment, according to data by the U.S. Department of Education.
The absence of the deferments will push more federal student loan borrowers into a forbearance, experts say, during which interest continues to climb on their debt and borrowers often resume repayment with a larger bill.
Republicans say doing away with the payment pauses will encourage borrowers to enroll in repayment plan they can afford.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee, said in a statement on June 10, that his party's proposals would stop requiring that taxpayers who didn't go to college foot the loan payments for those with degrees.
"Biden and Democrats unfairly attempted to shift student debt onto taxpayers that chose not to go to college," Cassidy said.
Cassidy said the higher education legislation, which also stretches out student loan repayment timelines, would save taxpayers at least $300 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
16 minutes ago
- New York Times
The Senate Wants Billions More in Medicaid Cuts, Pinching States and Infuriating Hospitals
The Senate policy bill released Monday would cut billions of dollars more from Medicaid than the earlier, House-passed legislation — in large part by cracking down on a budgeting maneuver used by 49 states that congressional Republicans have called a scam or gimmick. It does this by limiting Medicaid provider taxes, a loophole that states use to collect more federal matching funds for Medicaid, an insurance program for the poor that covers roughly 70 million Americans. For decades, taxing providers like hospitals has been a major part of how states pay Medicaid bills, but this tactic has come under scrutiny in Congress this year as Republicans look for ways to help pay for President Trump's tax cuts. Cutting provider taxes would probably mean funding shortfalls of hundreds of billions of dollars for states over the next decade, leaving them with budget holes to fill. To offset the losses, states would most likely need to explore cutting other services or raising other taxes. In scaling back Medicaid provider taxes, Senate Republicans are pursuing cuts that their House colleagues were hesitant to propose. House members had landed on freezing provider tax rates at current levels instead of reducing them. If the Senate passes its plan for provider taxes, the House and the Senate will have to reconcile their differences. The basic way Medicaid payments work A state pays a hospital $1,000 for a patient's medical expenses. The federal government reimburses the state a share of the amount, in this case 60 percent. $1,000 payment $600 reimbursement State government $400 paid on net Federal government Local hospital How states use provider taxes A state pays a hospital a higher amount, but charges some of it back in taxes, in this case $30. The federal government calculates its share based on the original payment. The state can keep the extra money. $1,030 payment $618 reimbursement $30 tax State government $382 paid on net The tax generates an additional $18 for the state. Federal government Local hospital The basic way Medicaid payments work How states use provider taxes A state pays a hospital $1,000 for a patient's medical expenses. The federal government reimburses the state a share of the amount, in this case 60 percent. A state pays a hospital a higher amount, but charges some of it back in taxes, in this case $30. The federal government calculates its share based on the original payment. The state can keep the extra money. $1,030 payment $1,000 payment $600 reimbursement $618 reimbursement $30 tax State government State government $400 paid on net $382 paid on net The tax generates an additional $18 for the state. Federal government Local hospital Federal government Local hospital The basic way Medicaid payments work A state pays a hospital $1,000 for a patient's medical expenses. The federal government reimburses the state a share of the amount, in this case 60 percent. $1,000 payment $600 reimbursement State government $400 paid on net Federal government Local hospital How states use provider taxes A state pays a hospital a higher amount, but charges some of it back in taxes, in this case $30. The federal government calculates its share based on the original payment. The state can keep the extra money. $1,030 payment $618 reimbursement $30 tax State government $382 paid on net The tax generates an additional $18 for the state. Federal government Local hospital Note: States pay different shares of Medicaid costs. This example illustrates when a state pays 40 percent, a common scenario. The New York Times Estimated share of federal Medicaid funding from hospital and nursing home taxes 0% 10% 20% 30% Wash. Maine Mont. N.D. Minn. Vt. Ore. N.H. Idaho Wis. N.Y. S.D. Mich. Wyo. Conn. Pa. Iowa N.J. Neb. Nev. Ohio Md. Ill. Ind. Utah Colo. Calif. Va. Kan. Mo. Ky. N.C. Tenn. Okla. Ariz. Ark. S.C. N.M. Ala. Ga. Miss. La. Texas Alaska Fla. Hawaii Estimated share of federal Medicaid funding from hospital and nursing home taxes 0% 10% 20% 30% Wash. Maine Mont. N.D. Minn. Vt. Ore. N.H. Idaho Wis. S.D. N.Y. Mass. R.I. Conn. Mich. Wyo. Pa. N.J. Iowa Neb. Nev. Ohio Del. Md. Ill. Ind. Utah Colo. Va. Calif. Mo. Kan. Ky. N.C. Tenn. Okla. Ariz. Ark. N.M. S.C. Ga. Ala. Miss. La. Texas Alaska Fla. Hawaii Source: The Hilltop Institute This map underestimates the effect of provider taxes in the Dakotas, which tax other health care providers, and North Carolina, which recently made major policy changes. The New York Times Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Unhinged': Democrats are furious Sen. Alex Padilla was hauled out of Noem briefing
WASHINGTON – The fury radiating off of Congressional Democrats is palpable. Hours after Alex Padilla, the senior U.S. senator in California, was forcibly removed from a press briefing with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, House Democrats roamed the Capitol seeking an audience with GOP leadership. Meanwhile, their Senate counterparts gave floor speech after floor speech, condemning the action as an "abuse of power" and "assault." House Speaker Mike Johnson called Padilla's actions "wildly inappropriate" and alleged he rushed at the secretary. House Democrats shouted over him, saying "that's a lie!" Padilla interrupted a press briefing Noem held in Los Angeles on June 12, amid days of protests against President Donald Trump's immigration raids in the city. Some of those protests have turned violent, with demonstrators burning cars and hurling objects at law enforcement. Trump sent in National Guard troops without Gov. Gavin Newsom's consent, spurring additional outrage from Democrats. 'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and mayor have placed on this country,' Noem said as Padilla started asking: 'Madam Secretary I want to know why you insist on –' before he was grabbed and hauled out of the room by security guards. Padilla was pushed to the ground and handcuffed outside the room. "Anybody that looks at that video will understand that this amounts to an assault, a felony," said Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-New York, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. "The White House is unhinged and out of control." Espaillat and more than a dozen other Democratic lawmakers attempted to enter Thune's office, who was meeting with the White House, and were turned away from Johnson's office. "They said he was busy, that he couldn't come out to meet with dozens of members of the U.S. House of Representatives, hiding behind the doors there," said Rep. Nanette Barragán, D-California. "It's a disgrace." On the other side of the Capitol, a string of Democratic senators delivered floor speeches hammering the indignity of the episode. 'I saw this happen to my colleague, and I am shocked by how far we have descended in the first 140 days of this administration . . . What is the becoming of our democracy? Are there no limits to what this administration will do?' said New Jersey Democrat Sen. Andy Kim on the Senate floor. Washington Sen. Patty Murray said on the Senate floor she 'cannot believe' lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are not calling the situation 'outrageous.' Republicans largely defended the actions taken by federal law enforcement agents. 'What were they supposed to do? They have to restrain someone who is engaged in that kind of behavior . . . A sitting member of Congress should not act like that,' House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters at the Capitol. 'It is beneath a member of Congress. It is beneath a senator. They're supposed to lead by example, and that is not a good example." White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said Padilla 'embarrassed himself and his constituents with this immature, theater-kid stunt.' 'It's telling that Democrats are more riled up about Padilla than they are about the violent riots and assaults on law enforcement in LA,' she added. Trump dispatched 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to quell the protests. Padilla said in a press conference after the incident that he wanted more information from Noem on the Trump administration's "increasingly extreme immigration enforcement actions." Noem met with Padilla for 15 minutes afterward, according to the Department of Homeland Security. He added he was not arrested or detained. But, he said, "if this is how the Department of Homeland Security responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they're doing to farm workers, to cooks, to day laborers out in the Los Angeles community and throughout California and throughout the country. We will hold this administration accountable.' Tricia McLaughlin, spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, wrote on X that Padilla was 'told repeatedly to back away and did not comply with officers' repeated commands.' Contributing: Joey Garrison and Deborah Berry, USA TODAY This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: 'Unhinged': Democrats furious Padilla hauled out of Noem briefing
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Choking back tears, Sen. Alex Padilla details his LA handcuffing
WASHINGTON – Sen. Alex Padilla delivered an emotional floor speech June 17, his first remarks on the Senate floor since the California Democrat was dragged out of a press conference in Los Angeles held by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, pushed to the floor, and handcuffed. "You've seen the video. I was pushed and pulled. Struggled to maintain my balance. I was forced to the ground, first on my knees and then flat on my chest," Padilla said as he choked back tears. "If that is what the administration is willing to do to a United States senator for having the authority to simply ask a question, imagine what they'll do to any American who dares to speak up." Federal law enforcement agents forcibly removed Padilla from Noem's June 12 press conference after he interrupted the event amid mass protests over the administration's immigration crackdown. More: 'Unhinged': Democrats are furious Sen. Alex Padilla was hauled out of Noem briefing Noem's agency oversees Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, which had been carrying out raids in Los Angeles. Protesters flooded the nation's second most populous city's downtown for days, some of which devolved into violence as protesters burned cars and looted buildings. Padilla said that he had gone to the federal building in Los Angeles where Noem was holding the press conference that day because he had a briefing with a four-star general about the military deployment in the city. His briefing was delayed by Noem's press conference, he said, so he asked an FBI agent and a national guardsman whether he could attend. They escorted him to the press conference, where he listened until Noem began speaking about plans to "liberate" Los Angeles. 'We are not going away. We are staying here to liberate this city from the socialist and the burdensome leadership that this governor and mayor have placed on this country,' Noem said. Padilla started asking: 'Madam Secretary I want to know why you insist on –' before he was grabbed by security guards. During his floor speech, Padilla said the administration planned "to somehow liberate us from the very people we democratically elected to lead our city and our state. Let that fundamentally un-American mission statement sink in." "Are we truly prepared to live in a country where the president can deploy the armed forces to decide which duly elected governors and mayors can lead our constituents?" he continued. Noem said during the press conference that she didn't recognize the two-term Padilla and that he hadn't requested a meeting with her. They met for for 15 minutes afterward, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Tricia McLaughlin, a Trump DHS official, wrote on X that Padilla's actions were "disrespectful political theatre" and claimed that the Secret Service believed he was an attacker. Republicans in Congress similarly put the blame on Padilla. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, told reporters shortly after the event that Padilla's actions were "wildly inappropriate" and said he should be censured. Democrats were furious upon viewing the viral video of Padilla being forced to the ground. "Anybody that looks at that video will understand that this amounts to an assault, a felony," said Rep. Adriano Espaillat, D-New York, chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus. "The White House is unhinged and out of control." This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Sen. Padilla chokes back tears in floor speech on handcuffing
