State Department cutting 1,353 jobs amid downsizing
July 12 (UPI) -- The State Department on Friday began notifying 1,353 affected workers of their pending job losses as the department reduces its workforce by 15%.
The people losing their jobs amid the downsizing work in positions that are being eliminated or consolidated, a State Department official told media on Thursday, NBC News reported.
"This is the most complicated personnel reorganization that the federal government has ever undertaken," the official told reporters during a briefing. "It was done so in order to be very focused on looking at the functions that we want to eliminate or consolidate, rather than looking at individuals."
The State Department notified 1,107 civil service and 246 foreign service workers of their pending job losses, CBS News reported.
The department plans to eliminate nearly 3,400 positions, including many who have already accepted voluntary departure offers this year.
The State Department also will close or consolidate many U.S.-based offices as part of the reduction in force that is being done in accordance with a reorganization plan, which members of Congress received in March.
The Trump administration says the downsizing is needed to eliminate redundancy and better enable the State Department to focus on its primary responsibilities.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio created the downsizing plan, which he said is needed due to the department being too costly, ideologically driven and cumbersome, The New York Times reported.
The downsizing isn't going unchallenged on Capitol Hill.
All Democratic members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Friday opposed the downsizing in a letter sent to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
"During a time of increasingly complex and widespread challenges to U.S. national security, this administration should be strengthening our diplomatic corps -- an irreplaceable instrument of U.S. power and leadership -- not weakening it," the Democratic Party senators said.
"However, [downsizing] would severely undermine the department's ability to achieve U.S. foreign policy interests, putting our nation's security, strength and prosperity at risk."
The Senate Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee include Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Chris Coons of Delaware, Chris Murphy of Connecticut, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland and Tim Kaine of Virginia.
The Senate committee's other Democratic Party members are Jeff Merkley of Oregon, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Brian Schatz of Hawaii, Tammy Duckworth of Illinois and Jacky Rosen of Nevada.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is there a future for Kamala Harris in 2028?
Several Democratic governors like Andy Beshear of Kentucky and Gavin Newsom of California are traveling to South Carolina sparking speculations of a 2028 presidential run. But is there still a future for former Vice President Kamala Harris in 2028? The New York Times' Tyler Pager and The Washington Post's Isaac Arnsdorf breakdown Democrats' future in their new book, "2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America."
Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Musk can spend a fortune on the 'America Party,' but it likely won't succeed
Set aside for a moment the raging egos and MAGA personalities at the heart of the renewed argument about whether America needs a new political party to compete with the Republican and Democratic parties. One thing we can say for sure: There's an appetite for just that among Americans. A Gallup poll released Oct. 1, just 35 days before the 2024 presidential election, in a time of extremely heightened political tension and public awareness, found that 58% of American adults said a third party was needed. Americans had Donald Trump or Kamala Harris to choose from at that moment, and a majority wanted more options. That polling number has fluctuated over the years, but Gallup has found majority support for the issue in polls going back two decades. But that's theory. What about practice? What if the third-party movement at the center of attention now was being spearheaded by one of the most politically toxic people in America? Is Elon Musk, currently viewed unfavorably by 55% of Americans, the best face for the "America Party" he announced on July 5? Musk, the world's wealthiest person, spent about $290 million to help Trump win a second term as president. Now they're spitting social media venom at each other after Musk was ousted from Trump's administration and then became infuriated by the deficit-busting spending in the president's new budget bill. Musk casts his new political party as an attack on the "uniparty," a common shorthand to suggest that the Republican and Democratic parties are more alike than different, especially when it comes to spending our taxes. Opinion: Trump's tax bill will crush the rural voters who chose him There's a glaring flaw in that claim ‒ Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act was crafted exclusively by his administration and Republican leaders in Congress. Democrats were locked out of the process and did not vote for the bill, which passed with thin Republican majorities. But Musk, like Trump, is not the kind of politician who will let reality govern his rhetoric. So, in his framing, they're all bad guys in Washington, DC, and he's going to be the new sheriff who cleans up the town. That's one way this might go. Another could be that political consultants squeeze Musk's fortune for as much juice as the America Party can produce, while not having much of an impact. Or, with Musk's businesses taking serious economic hits from his political combat, he might just talk a big game and then walk away. Trump, in a long social media post on Sunday, July 6, said Musk was "off the rails" while noting that third parties "have never succeeded in the United States." Then why did Trump need a 336-word post at all? He showed us his fear by adding that third parties are effective at causing "Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS" in American politics. Here's what disruption and chaos probably looks like to Trump ‒ Musk's America Party impacts the thin congressional margins, tipping the House and Senate to Democrats, giving them the power of oversight or even impeachment (for a third time) to hold Trump to account. Ryan Clancy, chief strategist for No Labels, told me that the "initial reaction from the Republicans suggests that they think (Musk) is more of a threat to them." And he would know. No Labels, you might remember, was a significant concern for the Democratic Party and its allies in 2024 as the group tried, and eventually failed, to put on the presidential ballot a bipartisan centrist ticket. Will Musk's America Party be the threat to Republicans that No Labels was to Democrats? Clancy said it's too early to say, and that will depend on what kind of candidates Musk recruits. Musk has suggested that he might "laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts" in the 2026 midterm elections because the House and Senate have "razor-thin legislative margins," and that it might "be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws." Opinion: Data centers are inevitable, but why should Indiana pay for their energy demand? Clancy told me No Labels has not spoken to Musk or anyone close to him about the America Party. But the strategist hopes the new political party would inject a little competition into elections, which could pull some Republicans and Democrats back to the center of the political spectrum. "I would encourage people to give it a chance, give it some runway, let it breathe a little," Clancy said. "Let's see what kind of candidates come around it." Rahna Epting, executive director of MoveOn, a progressive policy group, spent part of 2024 criticizing No Labels as a potential "spoiler" that could have helped Trump win a second term. She told me that "another party, paid for by billionaires like Elon Musk, is not the answer for this country's challenges." Where Clancy sees potential, Epting sees only vanity and self-interest as motivation for Musk. She noted that Republicans, from Trump on down the ballot, ran last year on making life more affordable for Americans. And she thinks Americans are still looking for solutions like that in the midterms. The MoveOn leader is just as opposed to the Big Beautiful Bill as Musk is. And she's just as opposed to his America Party as she was with No Labels. "No Labels was a tactic without a plausible strategy to win, and I think Elon Musk's effort is a tactic without a plausible way to win," Epting said. "And both were in it for themselves and not for the people of this country." Clancy estimates that a competitive Senate campaign next will cost "easily nine figures," while a House seat "can easily be low eight figures." And then there is the complicated and costly infrastructure of getting on ballots, state by state. Put another way: Musk might be about to spend some serious money again. But I'm not sure if he can repeat his 2024 success. And it's worth pointing out that Musk himself no longer sees 2024 as a success.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Ex-AOC aide: Mamdani must run primaries against Dems resisting agenda
A former top aide to far-left 'Squad' member Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said socialist Big Apple mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani — who has already sent Democrats into 'absolute panic' — should support primary challengers against lefty lawmakers who refuse to support his proposed $9 billion in tax hikes on millionaires and corporations. 'I think Mamdani has to support primary challengers. The big stick he has is the primary,' Corbin Trent told The Post. 'He's already facing resistance. The resistance is out there.' 3 A former aide to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is calling on Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani to push for primaries against lawmakers who won't support his proposed tax hikes. Matthew McDermott Trent said no one should be immune from challenges in next year's state legislative and House races — including top House Dem Rep. Hakeem Jeffries and Bronx Congressman Ritchie Torres. 'Politics runs on fear. You don't have to take out that many,' he said. Trent was part of Ocasio-Cortez's brain trust when the Democratic Socialist shocked the political world by ousting longtime lawmaker and then-head of the Queens Democratic machine, Joe Crowley, in the 2018 Democratic primary, becoming the youngest woman elected to Congress. Trent is a co-founder of Justice Democrats, the progressive political action that backed Ocasio-Cortez's successful insurgency and boosts other lefty primary challengers against incumbents deemed too tied to the status quo and monied interests. He said Democratic incumbents beholden to the donor class and who cling to the status quo 'are like sitting ducks.' 3 Corbin Trent was part of Ocasio-Cortez' team during her campaign to oust former Queens Rep. Joe Crowley. William Miller President Trump and his MAGA movement have backed primary challenges when fellow Republicans stand in the way of their agenda, he noted. Tensions have erupted between Mamdani's far-left network of supporters — including the Democratic Socialists of America and Working Families Party — because prominent Democratic Party leaders, such as Senate Democratic Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Rep. Jeffries have shied away from endorsing the millennial in the mayoral race. Reps with DSA and the WFP have also suggested that some establishment Democrats and longtime incumbents could be vulnerable to primary challengers. 3 House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is one of the Democrats Trent suggested could be targeted with primaries. AP A top aide to Jeffries, who is black, said the congressman's campaign would be ready for what he mockingly dubbed 'Team Gentrification.' Jeffries, however, will personally meet with Mamdani later this week, a source said. The House Minority Leader declined to comment on Trent's call for the socialist upstart to get behind primary challengers. Torres, meanwhile, said he was unfazed. 'House Democrats are strategizing about how to defeat Donald Trump and make Hakeem Jeffries the next Speaker. Donald Trump and DSA are strategizing about how to tear down Hakeem Jeffries. Strange bedfellows,' Torres told The Post. Unlike other parts of the city, ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo carried Torres' South Bronx congressional district over Mamdani in the primary by 20 percentage points. In an exasperated column on Substack, Trent lambasted Dems for paving the way to another Trump administration. 'Democrats keep pretending Trump voters are moving right when the truth is much simpler: people are voting for whoever promises to blow up a rigged system. Same reason they voted Obama in '08, Bernie in '16, and Trump — twice now,' the political strategist wrote. 'It's not about specific policies. It's about wanting someone, anyone, to break through and deliver transformation,' he continued. 'Democrats either can't see this or won't admit it because their entire mission is maintaining the status quo for the donors and consultants who run the party. They'd rather manage decline than acknowledge that voters want revolutionary change — because admitting that would mean admitting they're not the leaders for the job.' Trent said Mamdani won the Democratic primary election for mayor because he offered sweeping change to help address the affordability crisis for many New Yorkers. Critics, however, question whether the socialist's lofty proposals — that he said he could pay for with sweeping tax hikes — are achievable. The proposals would require legislative approval.
