Samsung's Galaxy S25 FE is coming into focus, and here's what to expect
The phone is expected to feature a 6.7-inch AMOLED display, Exynos 2400 chip, and 45W charging.
It looks like the selfie camera will be bumped to 12MP, and the device will weigh around 190g.
We've already got a pretty solid idea of what to expect from the Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, but the same leaker behind last week's RAM and storage leak is back with a more substantial spec dump. Let's look at what you'll be getting for your money.
In a new post on X, leaker Arsène Lupin shared a comprehensive hardware rundown for Samsung's next Fan Edition phone. A few of the details had already been rumored, such as the 6.7-inch AMOLED display at 120Hz and the Exynos 2400 chip. Still, we've now got reliable indications of things like 45W wired charging, 15W wireless charging, and a 4,500mAh battery.
The camera hardware looks largely unchanged, though the selfie cam has been bumped to 12MP. We'll have to wait and see if any actual photo quality improvements are in store. The same goes for the design — no sign yet of any big shake-up.
Other newly mentioned details include IP68 water resistance, Gorilla Glass Victus, and a 190g weight, which seems reasonable given the screen size. None of this is mind-blowing, but it does help paint a more complete picture of the phone, which is also expected to ship with One UI 8 out of the box.
The Galaxy S25 FE is expected to land sometime between late Q3 and early Q4, likely around early October if past launches are anything to go by. Unless Samsung has a few surprises left, this might be more of a refinement than a full refresh.
Follow
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Unable To Plan In 2025? Use AI To ‘Leave No Scenario Behind'
During in-person discussions with boards and senior leaders in Asia, the Americas and Europe this summer, the directors and executives cited the inability to plan as their single greatest business challenge in 2025. Consequently, effective leaders are conducting robust scenario planning to avoid stagnation or delayed decision making as recent advances in generative AI change how they approach scenario development. Why are businesses unable to plan? The global leaders provided several concurrent challenges that make planning difficult: Said one senior executive recently, 'We used to have a core scenario in place with a handful of back-ups, but now we need to have literally hundreds of options on the table and know which one to follow at any given time. And the answer can change daily or weekly and vary by product line or country.' The role of scenario analysis: Rehearsing the future Peter Schwartz, a pioneer of scenario planning and author of The Art of the Long View, likened the use of scenarios to 'rehearsing the future.' Similar to rehearsing a theater production, the process of scenario development historically required a collaborative effort of numerous individuals and several days, weeks, or months of refinement before the scenarios were ready for their intended audience. This traditional approach to scenario development generally was time-consuming and resource intensive. The role of AI in scenario planning: 'No Scenario Left Behind' Recently in Silicon Valley, PruVen Capital Managing Partner Ramneek Gupta shared the concept of 'no scenario left behind.' He and his colleagues have been studying advances in scenario planning and funding solutions that could enable business leaders to leverage advanced AI such as large language models (LLMs) and large geotemporal models (LGMs). LGMs use frameworks that analyze and reason across both time and space to exhaustively simulate virtually any and every event and scenario. These AI models provide dynamic risk modeling and real-time simulations for a vast array of business scenarios, allowing business leaders to address the inability to plan. WTW's Jessica Boyd and Cameron Rye explain in a recent article that advances in generative AI tools have enabled the rapid generation of numerous scenario narratives across a wide range of disciplines. These models accelerate the traditional, resource-heavy process of scenario development, streamlining the steps while introducing novel perspectives that might be missed by human analysts. They help overcome the limitations of human imagination that occur when people overlook or underestimate potential risks that have not yet happened in historical data. This can reduce potential blind spots that otherwise leave organizations vulnerable to highly disruptive events. Already, AI breakthroughs have enabled the next stage of scenario planning using advanced language models in areas such as weather forecasting, including hurricane landfall predictions, as well as political and economic modeling. These models provide the opportunity to expand beyond the traditional exploratory scenarios that most businesses currently use. For example, normative scenarios (similar to a reverse stress test) can add significant value when they are built around specific business objectives. Further, within the UK and Europe, new regulations focused on financial institutions have sparked considerable attention on scenario testing (in the U.K.: Operational Resilience 2025 and in the EU: Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)). These rules have further increased the importance of well-developed and defined scenarios, including scenario testing with third parties. How to start scenario planning and conducting an impact analysis Recently, WTW's Laura Kelly explained how scenario building and impact analysis have become a crucial part of business planning and risk management. She suggests three key steps in scenario planning and impact analysis: Effective leaders are not halted by uncertainty but rather mobilize around it. They identify the broad range of scenarios that might occur in a given set of circumstances, prioritize the greatest risks as well as the solutions that can mitigate these risks, and enable the company to thrive.
CNET
35 minutes ago
- CNET
I Tested the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Had Mixed Feelings (Until I Saw the Sale Price)
CNET's expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise. 7.5 / 10 SCORE Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE $700 at Amazon $700 at Walmart Pros The same software experience as the Z Flip 7 Smaller cover screen is still functional Cameras the same as the Flip 6 and Flip 7 Cons Fingerprint and dust magnet May run warm Battery life gets through a day, but not much more Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE 7.5/10 CNET Score $700 at Amazon I've spent a few weeks testing Samsung's $900 Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, and while I'd love to say it's just a slightly less powerful version of last year's Z Flip 6 and a less-expensive alternative to the $1,100 Galaxy Z Flip 7, there are moments when the phone feels a little too cheap for its price. That's not to say the Flip 7 FE is bad, because the phone does use the same body as last year's Flip 6. This means it has the same 3.4-inch cover screen that is easy for me to tap out quick texts or glance at map directions, along with the same cameras that are powerful enough to use in dark and bright settings. Its ability to fold in half makes it easy to use the phone as a tripod for my photos, or to prop up on my desk to play YouTube videos. It's even able to use the same phone cases as the Galaxy Z Flip 6. But you'll likely find that a case is necessary in order to truly enjoy using the Z Flip 7 FE. That's partly because of the phone's oleophobic coating is a fingerprint magnet -- at least on the black review sample I tested. Its hinge easily accumulates skin oil and pocket lint on the outside which is something I find to be more common on phones that cost $300, not $900. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE in its flex position. Joe Maldonado/CNET I also found the phone to run a little warm. My initial review unit ran warm enough during a 40-minute video call with light web browsing that the phone displayed a message that I could no longer do both at the same time, as the phone was now too hot. Samsung provided me a second review unit which did not get as warm under similar use. But if you're someone who gets particularly sensitive to noticing when your phone gets warm, having a case should help. But putting those design-related issues aside, the Flip 7 FE makes a lot of smart choices to be Samsung's first flip phone priced under $1,000. The FE uses Samsung's Exynos 2400 processor, which is capable of handling apps and Galaxy AI features, but is slower than the Qualcomm chip in the Flip 6. Even though the $700 Motorola Razr is cheaper and has several fun design choices, I can see how Samsung might justify its $900 price, thanks to the Flip 7 FE's superior software experience and photography. And recent sales are closing that price gap: at the time of this writing, the Flip 7 FE costs $700 for its 128GB model and $760 for 256GB. Both models are normally $200 more, and the Flip 7 FE offered for $700 then becomes a much easier recommendation over the Razr when you consider all of the software support Samsung offers. The Flip 7 FE also get's Samsung's Now Brief for highlighting your schedule and other essential information like the weather all in one place. Joe Maldonado/CNET My experience with the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE While I'm not crazy about the Z Flip 7 FE's need to be in a case to guard against fingerprints, I have to admit that the phone remains quite fun to use. The Flip 7 FE's cameras (a 50-megapixel wide, 12-megapixel ultrawide and 10-megapixel selfie camera) and the ability to use the phone as its own tripod are certainly the main reasons to consider this phone. I brought the Flip 7 FE to Utopia Bagels, and despite not having a telephoto lens, my 1x and 2x shots taken on the wide-angle camera of a sausage, egg and cheese bagel with red onion and tomatoes are filled with detail. A sausage, egg and cheese bagel taken at 1x zoom on the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE. Mike Sorrentino/CNET On the 2x shot in particular, you get the cheese drip, the dimples of the bread inside the bagel and noticeable color separation between the sausage patty and the red onion slices. Taken on the Z Flip 7 FE's wide angle lens at 2x zoom. Mike Sorrentino/CNET And like with other flip-style Android phones, it's easy to make use of the main camera for selfies by having the phone prop itself up like a stand, and then making a hand gesture that activates a camera timer. This works with both the rear camera and the front-facing camera inside the screen. In both of my photos, the focus is on my face, and, as expected, there are slightly fewer details available in the food for the photo taken with the interior screen's 10-megapixel camera. Enlarge Image Self-taken photo with the 50-megapixel wide angle camera on the Z Flip 7 FE. Mike Sorrentino/CNET Enlarge Image Self-taken photo with the 10-megapixel front-facing camera that's positioned on the interior display. Mike Sorrentino/CNET The Flip 7 FE can also capture video at 4K resolution and 60 frames per second, matching the Flip 7. Oddly, you're limited to shooting at 1,080p from the main camera when the phone is folded into a stand. Similar to the Motorola Razr, you can also fold the phone into a "camcorder" mode to use the top half of the internal screen like a viewfinder. Recycling the Flip 6's design means that apps that were optimized for that device readily work here. I use the Transit app for subway directions, and it's easy for me to navigate the 3.4-inch display and type in my destination, as well as scroll through those directions. A smaller edition of Samsung's Now Bar -- a shortcut of active apps that's similar to the iPhone's Dynamic Island -- gives me fast access to my music and podcasts while I look at those directions, and I especially enjoy treating the cover screen like a mini-music player a la the MP3 players of the 2000s. But if you do use cameras extensively, be prepared to recharge the phone more often than you'd expect. The 4,000-mAh battery is the same as what's on the Flip 6, and in my use, it just barely got through a day of use (albeit the weekend when I use my phone the most). My battery life fared better on office days, where heavier use was limited to morning and evening, but I typically ended with 10% to 30%, making an overnight charge necessary. This was also noticed in CNET's battery tests, where the Z Flip 7 FE drained faster than the Z Flip 7 and Motorola's Razr (2025) and Razr Ultra in our 45-minute endurance test and the 3-hour YouTube streaming test. In the 45-minute test, the Flip 7 FE performs equal to the Flip 6. In our 30-minute wired charging test, the phone's 25-watt charging speed brought the battery up from 0% to 45% in 30 minutes. The Flip 7 FE also supports 15-watt Qi wireless charging. Samsung's flip is more powerful, but Motorola's has personality The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and Motorola Razr (2025). Joe Maldonado/CNET/PCMag Because Samsung's Flip 7 FE costs $200 more than the $700 Motorola Razr when the former isn't discounted, it's important for Samsung's phone to earn that premium. And on a software level, it unequivocally does. The Flip 7 FE's operating system -- running the brand new Android 16 and debuting Samsung's One UI 8 overlay -- looks great, and Samsung plans to update the phone with software and security updates for seven years. This is a far cry from the three-year update cycle (and four-year security upgrades) of the Razr. The Razr doesn't yet have Android 16, but will eventually get the update. In benchmark testing for the CPU (Geekbench 6), the Flip 7 FE performed better than the Razr (2025) but worse than the Flip 6 and Flip 7. And in a benchmark test for graphics (3DMark), it did better than the Razr (2025), and almost identical to the Flip 7. Geekbench v.6.0 Motorola Razr (2025) 1,069 2,995 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE 1,575 5,408 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 2,237 6,777 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 2,216 7,338 Single-core Multicore Note: Longer bars indicate better performance 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Motorola Razr (2025) 1,023 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE 3,979 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 4,290 Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 3,945 Note: Longer bars indicate better performance The Flip 7 FE's ability to tackle low-light photography is also easily better than what Motorola provides with the Razr. I took both phones to CNET's TV lab -- which is a very dark space -- and the Samsung phone was able to light it up despite there being very little available light. Meanwhile, the Razr photo looks borderline unusable. Taken on the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE. Mike Sorrentino/CNET Taken on the Motorola Razr (2025). Mike Sorrentino/CNET The Razr has a slightly larger 3.6-inch cover screen, but I found both phones to be equally functional. In some cases, despite having a smaller screen, the Z Flip 7 FE would show more information. For instance, with Mozilla Firefox loaded on each, the Z Flip 7 FE chooses to zoom out a little bit on this comparison of CNET's homepage. The CNET homepage loaded on both the Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (left) and the Motorola Razr, both running in the Mozilla Firefox browser. Mike Sorrentino/CNET The Motorola Razr lets you run any Android app on the cover screen by default, but doing so on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 FE requires downloading Samsung's Good Lock app. To use apps on the cover screen, you need to first install Samsung's Good Lock. Joe Maldonado/CNET/PCMag Both phones have access to their respective Galaxy AI and Moto AI feature suites for generative AI and adopt different tactics. Galaxy AI mostly focuses on translation, transcription and photo editing features like Generative Edit for removing objects. Moto AI blends multiple services together, including using Perplexity for contextual service, Meta's Llama AI for summarizing notifications and Motorola's own features that are focused on photo processing. But it's still early days for most AI features like these, and I wouldn't say one is necessarily better than the other as of yet. But whereas the Galaxy provides better photography and software support, the Razr just looks aesthetically better. The Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE comes only in a black-and-white finish that easily picks up fingerprints, dirt and lint. The Razr ships in four colors with varying materials. My Motorola Razr (2025) review unit came in Pantone Spring Bud green and has a leather-like back that doesn't pick up fingerprints. Apps like YouTube are optimized to put the video on the top half of the display when folded. Joe Maldonado/CNET/PCMag Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE: Bottom line Samsung's Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a good phone that's worth the premium over the $700 Motorola Razr, but its $900 price feels awkward. By being so similar to the Flip 6 in design but having a slightly slower processor, it's quite possible that a better overall value could be a discounted Flip 6 in the event you find last year's model for a similar $900 price. If the Flip 7 FE itself is discounted into the $700 range, like we are currently seeing at Amazon, then choosing Samsung over Motorola is absolutely the move. But without the sales, the Flip 7 FE could be a good upgrade for someone who prefers Samsung phones, is curious about getting a flip-style phone and wants a more compact handset with decent cameras. Most people looking for an affordable flip phone, however, should either consider saving more money by going with Motorola's $700 Razr (2025), or spring upward for the $1,000 Razr Plus or $1,100 Flip 7. All of these alternatives start with double the storage of the Flip 7 FE with 256GB of space, and have larger cover displays. You could also consider buying a Galaxy Z Flip 6 with 256GB of storage, which can be found (at time of publishing) for $899 on Amazon. That gets you a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor and more RAM. In his review for the Flip 6, CNET's Patrick Holland noted that the phone got warm occasionally but didn't have any overheating issues. It's likely because it had a vapor chamber cooling system. It's unclear if the Flip 7 FE has the same cooling system. Now Playing: Ultra Thin: First Look at the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 02:45 How we test phones Every phone tested by CNET's reviews team was actually used in the real world. We test a phone's features, play games and take photos. We examine the display to see if it's bright, sharp and vibrant. We analyze the design and build to see how it is to hold and whether it has an IP-rating for water resistance. We push the processor's performance to the extremes using standardized benchmark tools like GeekBench and 3DMark, along with our own anecdotal observations navigating the interface, recording high-resolution videos and playing graphically intense games at high refresh rates. All the cameras are tested in a variety of conditions, from bright sunlight to dark indoor scenes. We try out special features like night mode and portrait mode and compare our findings against similarly priced competing phones. We also check out the battery life by using it daily as well as running a series of battery drain tests. We consider additional useful features like support for 5G, satellite connectivity, fingerprint and face sensors, stylus support, fast charging speeds and foldable displays, among others, that can be useful. We balance all of this against the price to give you the verdict on whether that phone, whatever its price, actually represents good value. While these tests may not always be reflected in CNET's initial review, we conduct follow-up and long-term testing in most circumstances.
Digital Trends
35 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
The Switch 2's power and popularity are a double-edged sword for the industry
If I were a betting man, I would've put down everything I had on the Nintendo Switch 2 being a smash hit. It doesn't take an industry analyst to make that call so I don't give myself too much credit, but seeing it break all these early sales numbers has still been a bit of a shock. While I personally wish that Nintendo had done a bit more to make this console launch feel more special, it was clearly the safe move to make as direct an upgrade as possible over the wildly popular Switch to ride that wave. Last generation, third parties were far more hesitant to support the Switch right out of the gate. Nintendo was at its lowest point in history, coming off the debacle that was the Wii U, so it made sense to take a more wait-and-see approach to Nintendo's next console. Once it became clear that this little hybrid system had struck gold, we started seeing all these 'impossible' ports hitting the console to capitalize. We're already seeing that the industry at large — with the notable exceptions of Xbox and PlayStation — doesn't intend to make the same mistake twice. But that may have rippling consequences for everyone, not just Switch 2 players. Adjusting the bar Game development is complicated. If there's one thing that must be stressed upfront, it's that. I don't pretend to know the intricacies and discussions that happen behind the scenes, and fully recognize that development and porting processes are different from studio to studio and game to game. This article is mainly me ruminating on different ways I predict the Switch 2's success could impact games moving forward. Recommended Videos What set off this entire thought process for me was wondering how different the rest of this generation will look compared to the last when more studios will opt to develop their games with the Switch 2 hardware in mind. There were plenty of games that came out cross-platform right away on Switch and PS5, but a wide swath either started on Switch and later came to other platforms or vice versa. From what I understand, and how it appears from the outside, porting a game is a very different process than developing it from the ground up with that platform in mind. If more teams are looking to get in on the runaway success that is the Switch 2, then it would make sense to launch on that platform simultaneously with the others if possible. It might seem like a purely negative situation for devs to build games with weaker hardware in mind, but I disagree. In fact, I think we saw just the opposite for the majority of the PS5 generation thus far. Much to the chagrin of a certain segment of the fanbase, most of PlayStation's first party games have been available on PS4 and PS5, including God of War: Ragnarok and Horizon: Forbidden West. I have no proof to back this up, but I think that it is because these games were developed with the PS4 in mind that they played so smoothly on PS5. The latter had the option to run at 4K 30 or a dynamic 1800p at 60, while the former had similar settings plus a 120Hz mode. I'm clearly cherry-picking here since Sony's first party teams clearly have a deeper knowledge of the hardware, plus don't have to worry about porting to completely different systems. Add in other variables like game engines, budgets, and time, and this is by no means a sure thing. All I mean to show is that there is evidence to suggest that a lower-powered SKU can have a positive impact on games also available on stronger systems. There's also the dream of the Switch 2 being the universal console handheld. We've seen plenty of other handhelds enter the space since the first Switch, with Xbox partnering with ROG to release one later this year and rumors of a PlayStation handheld coinciding with the PS6 also on the table, but the market is still niche for everyone but Nintendo. If everyone jumps aboard the Switch 2 train, it could become the default portable system for everything but exclusives, which are already on their way to going extinct. I promised that there was a negative to all this by calling it a double-edged sword, so it's time to take off my optimistic goggles for a minute. The easiest stone to throw at my prior argument is that teams could treat the Switch 2 similarly to the Switch 1 and worry about crunching down their game after the fact to fit on the hardware. As impressive as some ports like Doom, The Witcher 3, and Kingdom Come: Deliverance are to even exist on the Switch, they came at the cost of some massive concessions. There are even worse examples like Mortal Kombat 1 that really drive this point home. Besides just looking and playing worse than its console counterparts, we've also seen Switch games lack features compared to the other versions. In Civilization VII, for example, the Switch version could only play with four players in the Antiquity & Exploration Ages, or six in the Modern Age, as opposed to other platforms supporting five and eight players respectively. Scope and mechanical concessions are much harder pills to swallow compared to graphics of frame rates because the game is, objectively, lesser than the other versions. That is another possibility we could see taken with the Switch 2. So, which way will the dominoes end up falling? I think the only safe assumption I can make here is that we will see plenty of examples of both scenarios. It all comes down to the individual teams and dozens of factors we players may never be privy to on how development shakes out. I only hope that we see more end up on the positive side of things than the negative.
