Dad of tragic teen says major change 'should be biggest moment in online safety'
The dad of a teen who took her own life after accessing horrendous material online says new laws are "promising" - but vowed to make sure they were being enforced.
From July 25 new rules will require platforms to stop children from accessing content such as pornography, violent extremism, and promotion of self-harm and eating disorders. Ian Russell, whose 14-year-old daughter Molly tragically died in 2017, told the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: "This should be the biggest moment in online safety since social media was invented."
Today the head of regulator Ofcom - which will enforce the laws - said it will be down to tech chiefs to decide how to check ages. But Dame Melanie Dawes said: "There's no question of companies deciding not to put in age checks."
And Labour cabinet member Heidi Alexander hinted further legislation is likely to follow the Online Safety Act, which includes measures to keep kids safe online. Mr Russell, who has campaigned for laws to be strenghtened since Molly's death, said the charity set up in her memory - The Molly Rose Foundation - will be carrying out its own research to test the measures are stuck to.
He said: "The Ofcom PR is often spun such that it sounds like everything will change for the better in a matter of weeks. But I think it's quite clear that Ofcom as a regulator need to do more than just spinning their PR, they need to act within the bounds of the act to the strongest possible way.
"And they're not doing that, they're sitting in the middle." Referring to the new checks he said: "It sounds promising, but in all these cases the proof is in what happens. Sadly the sort of content that Molly was looking at that led to her death is still available online and barely able to find. It's very easy to find out how easy it is to find."
Dame Melanie said: "What we're expecting to see is that any company that shows material that shouldn't be available to under-18s - pornography, suicide and self harm material, that should either be removed from their service or they're going to need highly effective age checks to screen under-18s."
She added: "We're under no illusions at Ofcom about the really quite challenging path ahead." She said: "What we've said to the industry is you decide what works for your platform, but we will be checking whether it's effective and those that don't put in those checks will hear from us with enforcement action."
She said: "What we've said to the industry is you decide what works for your platform but we'll be checking what is effective."
Cabinet member Heidi Alexander yesterday said the Government will be looking at further ways to strengthen the law. She said: "It is not the end of the coversation... We will keep under review what is required."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
33 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Ofcom boss: Tech firms not given much power over how to protect children online
The regulator announced last month that sites containing potentially harmful content, like porn sites, will have to perform age checks on users as part of reforms which apply to both dedicated adult sites and social media, search or gaming services as part of the Online Safety Act. Ian Russell, who has been campaigning for improved online safety since his 14-year-old daughter Molly took her own life after viewing harmful content on social media, said Ofcom needs to 'act within the bounds of the Act in the strongest possible way' and communicate weaknesses in the legislation to the Government. Ofcom's chief executive Dame Melanie Dawes told BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: 'We've set out about five or six things that we think can work, like facial checks and using things where you've already been checked for your age, like credit cards or open banking. 'We said (to tech companies) you decide what works for your platform but we will be checking whether it's effective and those that don't put in those checks will hear from us with enforcement action.' Responding to the suggestion that Ofcom is giving companies a lot of power over how they implement measures, Dame Melanie said: 'No, we're not giving them that much power actually. What I'm saying is that when they're putting in age checks they need to work out what's going to work on their service. 'But, let me be really clear, what we are demanding to protect children and what does come in force at the end of this month they're going to need to tame those algorithms so that not just porn and suicide and self-harm material must not be shown but also violent content, dangerous challenges, misogyny, all of that must not be fed actively to kids on their feeds.' Pressed on why those types of content are not being blocked altogether, the chief executive said: 'What Parliament decided was that there should be an absolute block on suicide and self-harm material and pornography for under-18s and, then, what we've done is also add to that other types of content that we think is really harmful for children.' She added: 'I'm not a politician and I think it's incredibly important that Ofcom respects the role that we have which is to implement the laws that we've been given. 'If Parliament decides to widen those towards mis- and disinformation, or wider issues around addiction for the kids, for example, then of course, Ofcom stands ready to implement that.' Mr Russell said on the programme that it 'sounds promising' but the proof will be in what happens in practice. He said: '(Ofcom) need to act within the bounds of the Act in the strongest possible way. 'They're sitting in the middle pushed on one side by families who've lost people like me and pushed on the other side by the power of the big tech platforms. 'I also think it's really important that Melanie starts to talk back to Government because Ofcom is clear about where the act is weak and she needs to push back and communicate those weaknesses to the Government so that we can make change where necessary.' He said the charity he set up in his daughter's name, the Molly Rose Foundation, will be monitoring how harmful content online is reduced. Any company that fails to comply with the checks by July 25 could be fined or could be made unavailable in the UK through a court order. Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said those changes in the law are 'really important', adding it was now up to technology companies to put in 'robust safeguards' for children using their platforms. But she suggested it was not the end of ministers' plans, telling the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg: 'We are very clear as a Government that this is the foundation for a safer online experience for children, but it is not the end of the conversation. 'Peter Kyle, the Technology Secretary, has been clear that he wants to look at things such as addictive habits and how we create healthier habits for children online in the same way as we talk about healthier physical habits for children.' Ministers 'will keep under review what is required', Ms Alexander added. Ofcom research found that 8% of eight to 14-year-olds in the UK had visited an online porn site or app on smartphones, tablets or computers in a month. Last month, the regulator said it had launched a string of investigations into 4chan, a porn site operator and several file-sharing platforms over suspected failures to protect children, after it received complaints about illegal activity and potential sharing of child abuse images. A report looking into the use and effectiveness of age assurance methods will be published by Ofcom next year.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Mayors to be given powers to fast track planning permission
Mayors will get sweeping powers to grant upfront planning permission in Labour's drive to speed up development. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, has promised more 'large-scale projects' as she grants mayors greater control over what is built locally. An English devolution bill published last week set out Rayner's plan for all areas of the country to have a mayor with greater powers over areas such as transport, skills and housing. The bill will give mayors far wider power over local planning applications as Rayner and Sir Keir Starmer aim to kickstart homebuilding and other development that will spur the economy. Labour is promising to build 1.5 million homes over the parliament, but numbers have slumped to record lows under rules introduced by the previous government.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
The 1970s are back, but we're still waiting for our Thatcher moment
The 1970s, it seems, are back. A scorching summer and a teetering economy evoke memories of 50 years ago. A Labour Chancellor mulls how best to soak the rich; beyond Westminster, state authority crumbles. Rachel Reeves has not yet gone to the IMF like Denis Healey did. But there is a sense on the British Right that the UK is facing a fresh '1976 moment' as the old unsustainable order gives way to something new. Both the Tories and Reform are keen to embrace that narrative. Jim Callaghan's remark that 'If I were a young man, I would emigrate' is reflective of the mood of many voters today. 'Broken' is the most commonly used word to describe the country in focus groups. Yet while Kemi Badenoch and Nigel Farage agree that Britain in 2025 faces real national decline, they differ on who will be its saviour come 2029. In the fight for the future, a proxy war is being fought over the past. A century after Margaret Thatcher's birth, both Badenoch and Farage claim her legacy for their respective parties. The Tory leader points to Thatcher's seriousness and sense of purpose; the upcoming party conference will stress her Conservative core. Farage meanwhile is urging think tanks to work with him, publicly praising 'the great revolution that took place from 1979' as a lodestar for a Reform-led government. It is not yet clear who will win out in the battle of the Right. But there are encouraging signs that members of both parties appreciate the scale of the problems facing Britain. Some within Reform are keen to look Stateside; one senior figure dined with a member of the Trump transition team last week. Among Conservatives, there is a keen sense of 'getting things right next time.' One Tory MP likens the experience of the last parliament to that of Ted Heath's government. Past failure will, hopefully, inform future success. Both are correct to recognise that preparation and a sense of purpose will be key to the success of the next government of the Right. If national decline is to be reversed, then a clear plan is essential to succeed. An example of this is offered by the Coalition's school reforms. Consultation had been done in opposition; relevant bills drafted before entering office, ensuring last reform. A similar body of work will be necessary if issues such as Britain's creaking asylum system are to be overhauled in the next parliament. Badenoch has handed policy review to Alex Burghart, who is regularly spotted around parliament clutching a copy of Keith Joseph's The Right Approach. Zia Yusuf will perform a similar role for Reform, working with Simon Marcus, the party's head of research. Yet planning alone will not be sufficient. As the unhappy experience of this current government shows, ministers are always susceptible to being blown off course by events. Having an intellectual core will be necessary for continued renewal in office. Charles Moore's magisterial biography of Thatcher notes how her policy-making was an iterative process. Constant memos were circulated in written form. This ensured the detail of any policy, not merely the theory, was subject to scrutiny prior to implementation. A similar robustness could help the Right avoid many of the stupid fights that have plagued more recent leaders. Thatcher's success was built on a shrewd sense of her electoral coalition. In the 1980s, this was achieved by peeling off a sufficient chunk of the old working class vote with houses, shares and economic prosperity. In the 2020s, new loyalties must be affirmed. For the Right, this will likely include marrying 'Thatcher's children' – economic winners of her era – with those who lost out in her era. Strikingly, Reform is now targeting ex-coal mining areas like South Wales and the East Midlands. To bind this coalition together, a new economic model will likely have to be forged. 'Culture wars are not enough' admits one Tory frontbencher. Farage has shown a willingness to nationalise British Steel and Thames Water; members of Badenoch's team are critical of Beijing deliberately crippling Western industries. Both leaders appreciate that the sickness benefits bill – set to rise to £100bn by 2030 – is completely unsustainable. Both will have to find a way to sell welfare reform and palatable spending cuts to an electorate that is wary of both. 'We all know the state needs to do less,' says one former Tory minister. 'But where does the axe fall? Thatcher barely touched the welfare state.' She chose to privatise state liabilities; liberalising state commitments on areas like Net Zero could offer the equivalent answer in 2029. Opinions differ on the Right as to whether the challenges facing Britain now are greater than those 50 years ago. Back then, there was union militancy, the Soviet threat and IRA terror; now there is a demographic time bomb, a febrile electorate and two decades of stagnant growth. In looking to the future, the spirit, if not the means, of Thatcher will animate those wrestling to resolve the nation's problems – regardless of which party they are in.
