Treasuries End Turbulent Week Lower as Traders Eye Jackson Hole
The selloff lifted 10-year yields to 4.32% on Friday, slightly above last week's levels. The dollar slipped and traders held to bets on a September rate cut while shifting focus to the Fed symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, where Powell is set to deliver an address.
A week that included conflicting reports on retail sales, consumer sentiment, and inflation — as well as White House calls for lower interest rates — ended with a pivotal meeting between presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. It added up to a choppy run for Treasuries.
'The market took a sharp turn on Thursday after the producer price index surprised dramatically to the upside,' Nancy Vanden Houten, lead US economist at Oxford Economics, wrote. 'Treasuries added to those losses on Friday, on stronger than expected data on import prices and a consumer sentiment survey showing rising inflation expectations among households.'
Futures imply a roughly 80% chance of a quarter-point rate cut at the Fed's September meeting. If Powell offers no clear signal, investors will look to upcoming economic data for confirmation, said Gregory Faranello, head of US rates trading and strategy at AmeriVet Securities.
A weak jobs report, set to be released in early September, would solidify bets on a 25-basis-point reduction, he said.
The moves on Friday pushed the gap between five- and 30-year Treasury yields to its widest level since 2021.
It tracked a similar selloff in European government bonds, with the rate on 30-year German note rising to a 14-year high. The yield is up 14 basis points this week, the largest jump since the nation's historic investment plan in March sent rates higher across the region.
The selloff in Europe may have been exacerbated by public holidays in many countries worsening already thin August liquidity. There's also continued focus on increased fiscal spending across the region and reduced demand for long-dated assets due to Dutch pension reforms.
Earlier this week, a benign reading on consumer prices and White House pressure for Fed rate cuts spurred a rally, only for a bigger-than-expected jump in producer prices on Thursday to prompt a reassessment.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that the central bank should cut rates by 50 basis points next month.
Traders are still fully pricing in at least two, quarter-point reductions by the end of the year.
'A move of 25 basis points in September followed by similarly sized cuts in the following couple of quarters appears like a reasonable baseline assessment of the likely path for US rates,' Mark Dowding, chief investment officer of the BlueBay Fixed Income unit at RBC Global Asset Management, wrote in a note.
What Bloomberg Strategists say...
'Benchmark yields have been trading in a zone from 4.18% to 4.32% since the July nonfarm payrolls led to a lower rate regime. The range trade can persist, with Friday's swath of economic data confirming Federal Reserve officials will likely need to gather more data before solidifying a view for the September FOMC meeting.'
—Alyce Andres, US FX/Rates Strategist, Markets Live
For the full analysis, click here.
While some traders have piled into bets that would benefit from an outsize, 50-basis-point move, Myles Bradshaw, head of global aggregate strategies at JPMorgan Asset Management, said that such a move would hinge on the next monthly jobs report.
'There is a chance we get 50 and it's going to be that roulette wheel of the next payrolls report,' Bradshaw said on Bloomberg TV. 'If that is showing zero payrolls growth, then 50 basis points is on the table.'
--With assistance from Alice Atkins.
(Recasts with updated prices and context.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe
The London Stock Exchange overhauled the ceremony for welcoming new companies to its ranks last year, adding confetti cannons, slick videos and cinematic music. It has mostly been used for such events as product launches and anniversaries. So far this year, according to Dealogic, six companies have gone public in the U.K., raising $208 million, the lowest level in three decades of data. It isn't much better across the English Channel, despite surging stock markets. Initial public offerings in continental Europe have nearly halved in value compared with last year. Fundraising in the U.S., meanwhile, has jumped 38% to around $40 billion, while IPOs more than doubled in value in Hong Kong after a fallow patch. Tech stars such as the Swedish 'buy now, pay later' company Klarna and the British chip designer Arm are eschewing local markets to list in New York. And stock-market heavyweights are disappearing, either bought out by American companies or moving their listings stateside, where business is growing faster. Examples are Wise, the British payments company, and the sports-betting company Flutter Entertainment. 'For the Europeans who are responsible for the future, this is a material wake-up call,' said Stéphane Boujnah, chief executive officer of Euronext, which owns seven stock exchanges in the region. Europe doesn't want to 'be just a zone between America and Asia,' he added. Amsterdam and London pioneered the creation of public stock trading centuries ago, raising money for ship voyages to Asia, Africa and the Caribbean that forged Europe's colonial empires. Now, Europe's stock markets face a crisis of inactivity. Not only are listing volumes moribund—exchanges are shrinking too. Hastened by a global shift toward greater private ownership of businesses, the number of listings in London has fallen by a fifth in five years, to about 1,600. London's total market value stands at about $5 trillion, while Nvidia alone is worth $4.4 trillion. The exodus looks likely to continue. Next year Wise and the machinery specialist Ashtead are set to move their main listings to the U.S. from the LSE, which is part of the broader London Stock Exchange Group. Speculation has swirled that AstraZeneca—the largest company in the FTSE 100—could do the same. In a recent interview in New York, CEO Pascal Soriot declined to comment on whether he is considering moving the listing. 'We are very committed to the U.K.,' he said. 'But the reality is, over time, the investments are moving to the U.S.' AstraZeneca recently pledged to invest $50 billion in the U.S. by 2030. European leaders see the withering of these historic exchanges as an emergency—and one of the culprits behind Europe's economic stagnation, low productivity, and the widening wealth gap between its citizens and Americans. 'The wealth creation will happen to Texas teachers and California public-sector employees, not to European pensioners,' said Stephan Leithner, CEO of Deutsche Börse, operator of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. Politicians fear the continent's inability to finance and keep exciting companies entrenches American domination over financial markets and reduces Europe's strategic autonomy. President Trump's 'America First' stance has added to the sense of urgency. A lack of investment hurts European businesses, and starts long before they go public. Startups struggle to get access to venture-capital funding, and many leave for Silicon Valley or New York. Those who stay in Europe often get investment from American firms, which then want them to go public in the U.S. or shift operations there. Some companies that make the leap have become more American over time simply because their U.S. businesses grew so fast. New listings are in the doldrums as other corners of European finance, such as the debt markets, shine. Trans-Atlantic dealmaking—one reason for Europe's shrinking stock market—is generating big paydays for selling shareholders and advisers, as U.S. acquirers hunt for bargains. Europe's problem isn't a shortage of money, but an underdeveloped and risk-averse system for investing it. European Union households save more than Americans, but their wealth has grown by a third as much since 2009, according to a 2024 paper by former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi on Europe's lack of competitiveness. Europeans hold $12 trillion of their savings, or about 70%, in bank accounts that typically have low yields, according to the European Commission. Unlike in the U.S., which cultivated widespread stock ownership through 401(k)s, they often rely on state pensions, paid out through government budgets, in retirement. Private pension systems—in places such as the U.K., the Netherlands and Denmark—invest mostly in supersafe assets including government bonds, or U.S.-focused global stock funds. Defense-spending pledges and aging populations are straining government budgets. Channeling more savings into high-returning investments would alleviate the pressure. Executives complain that tepid domestic investment results in lower stock valuations. The French oil producer TotalEnergies, its U.K. rival Shell and the mining company Glencore have in recent years raised the possibility of moving their listings, citing valuation gaps with U.S. peers, though none have made the jump. S&P 500 constituents have a forward price/earnings ratio of 22, compared with 13 for the FTSE 100 and 15 for Germany's DAX. Some Europeans argue that the premium on U.S. stocks is illusory, noting that groups such as the plumbing-supplies company Ferguson Enterprises failed to close the discount to American rivals after moving their primary listings to New York. Only three of the 20 U.K. companies that opted for a New York debut in the past decade have seen market value increase, while half have delisted, according to the LSE. Higher pay for U.S. executives is another draw. Peter Jackson, the chief executive of Flutter, which owns the betting platform FanDuel, nearly tripled his compensation after the gambling company moved its main stock listing to New York last year from London. European leaders have tried to reverse the tide, but with little to show so far. The U.K. has moved to deregulate, including by loosening restrictions on supervoting shares favored by tech founders. The government is launching a 'concierge service' to court businesses and backed an advertising campaign to encourage more retail investing. Speaking at a recent investment conference in London, Julia Hoggett, the CEO of the London Stock Exchange, urged attendees to be more confident. 'If we keep talking ourselves down…then we shouldn't be surprised of the consequences,' Hoggett said. The EU, meanwhile, has revived the painstaking work of knitting together its 27 members' capital markets. The project is already a decade and more than 55 regulatory proposals old. Deutsche Börse's Leithner was part of a working group that ended in a list of technical problems, such as tackling differences in national bankruptcy approaches. 'We need to make the leap from talking about technicalities to fundamental change,' said Leithner. 'If this doesn't happen, it will be a major shame. It would be almost a crime on the younger generation.' Write to Chelsey Dulaney at and Joe Wallace at America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe America's Stock-Market Dominance Is an Emergency for Europe
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
No Ukraine Cease-Fire From Putin
President Trump tried to put the best spin he could Friday on his summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and the mutual pleasantries were effusive. But the substantive news from the meeting seems to be that Mr. Putin refuses to end his war in Ukraine, and he won't even agree to a temporary cease-fire. The killing that Mr. Trump rightly abhors will apparently continue. Mr. Trump was full of praise for Mr. Putin and said the two 'made some great progress today,' though 'we didn't get there' to an agreement. He offered no details about the 'progress' and announced no end to hostilities. He said they agreed on many things but not on the biggest areas, which presumably means a cease-fire and any compromises on Mr. Putin's war aims. There will be some cautionary relief in Europe that Mr. Trump didn't announce a deal with Mr. Putin that he would present to them as a fait accompli. Instead Mr. Trump said he would call European allies and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky to brief them on what happened in Alaska. There's no deal, he said, until there's a final deal, which suggests he is at least listening to what Ukraine needs to feel secure if an armistice is reached. Mr. Putin for his part gave nothing away on Ukraine. He offered his familiar line that the 'root causes' of the war must be addressed before it can end. By this he means blaming Ukraine for wanting to determine its own future as part of the European Union with security help from NATO countries. It was notable that Mr. Putin spent most of his soliloquy in front of the press flattering Mr. Trump, endorsing the U.S. President's view that the war would never have happened if Mr. Trump had been in office in 2022, and extolling the possibilities for U.S.-Russia business ties. With his economy struggling, Mr. Putin wants financial relief. In that sense the Russian achieved one of his major goals from the summit, which is the start of his rehabilitation as a world leader. The summit ended his isolation from the West, and he gave up nothing for it. He also appears to have gained more time to continue bombing Ukrainian cities and slowly taking more territory. It isn't clear what Mr. Trump gained. He had told the press that he would be angry if no cease-fire emerged from the parley, but Mr. Trump showed no pique afterward. Perhaps there was some quiet concession Mr. Trump will take back to Ukraine, and if so we will know that soon enough. If there was nothing but niceties and a Putin stonewall, then Mr. Trump will have to decide if he will follow through on the red lines he has drawn. On Wednesday he had promised 'very severe consequences' if Mr. Putin didn't agree to end the war. Will he now move to impose sanctions on such buyers of Russian oil as China and Turkey as he has India? Or will he agree to a second summit, as Mr. Putin seems to want, in hope that next time will be different? Mr. Trump's desire to be a peacemaker is laudable, but in Vladimir Putin he is dealing with a hard man who has his eyes fixed on conquering Ukraine sooner or later. Mr. Putin will only bend from that goal if he sees a unified West determined to deny him that victory and willing to impose severe costs if he continues his march of death in Ukraine.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Karnataka Kolhapuri Chappal makers seek PRADA's support
Kolhapuri chappal makers in Athani have appealed to PRADA, a Italian fashion house that is facing allegations of 'stealing' design ideas from India, to set up a training centre for artisans in Athani in Belagavi district. This follows a visit of PRADA designers to Kolhapur last week. The European company had faced criticism after one of its footwear had striking resemblance to Kolhapuri chappals. The Italian team interacted with artisans and traders in Kolhapur, but they are yet to visit Athani and surrounding villages where the footwear is traditionally made. 'Most of the production of Kolhapuri chappals happens in Karnataka, while most of the sale happens in Maharashtra. They are named after the city they are sold in, not made in. Maharashtra artisans, some of who are our relatives, have told us that PRADA designers promised them training, scholarships and commissioned production. We are seeking similar benefits too,' said Shivaraj Soudagar, who runs a Kolhapuri chappal making cluster in Athani. Manmanth Kumar, an artisan from Madabhavi near Athani said that remunerative prices for Kolhapuri chappals would sustain the craft. 'Children of most artisans are out of the craft now. They are taking up menial jobs like security guards and sweepers in big cities. If our chappals get better prices, there is a likelihood of at least young men and women coming back to take it up,' he said. Babu Jagjivanram Karnataka leather industries development corporation (LIDKAR) is coordinating with the Italian fashion house, Rakesh Kumar, commissioner, social welfare, said. 'Welfare of artisans will form the basis of all our negotiations with PRADA,' he said. Mundaragi Nagaraju, chairman, LIDKAR, said Karnataka would not fall behind in demanding its rights to the craft. 'The GI tag belongs to both Karnataka and Maharashtra. Karnataka has 30 times more chappal artisans compared to Maharashtra. While Maharashtra has only around 80 registered artisans, Karnataka has around 1,860. I have instructed officials to meet the Italian company officers in Bengaluru soon to demand that PRADA set-up a training centre to train artisans in new age designs and help their ware get better prices,' he said. K.M. Vasundhara, managing director, LIDKAR, said Karnataka was the first to send a legal notice to PRADA following the controversy. 'PRADA would not take up developmental or corporate social responsibility initiatives without involving Karnataka. They are willing to train our artisans and help them sell their produce for better prices, by commissioning craft works or branding local production. They have offered to take artisans to Italy or send their resource persons here,' she said. She further said that officials from Karnataka and Maharashtra had held a first round of meeting with PRADA officials. 'They asked for some details from us like the infrastructure being provided to artisans, compliance of child labour norms, etc. We told them our cluster facilities are of global standards. We are providing all details. A second meeting is scheduled for September,' she said.
