
Washington State Lawmakers Vote to Limit Rent Increases
After a protracted battle, Washington State lawmakers voted Sunday to limit annual residential rent increases to no more than 10 percent, positioning the state to become the third in the country to adopt statewide rent regulations.
Among the key provisions of House Bill 1217:
Between 2001 and 2023, median residential rents in Washington State rose by 43 percent, adjusted for inflation, outpacing the 26 percent rise in renters' incomes over the same period, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a national research group.
And while there is broad consensus that more housing needs to be built, supporters of the caps say they can offer short-term predictability and protections for tenants who have been forced to move because of steep price increases.
The issue has long been a priority for Democrats, and the Legislature nearly passed a similar bill in 2024. But this year, with a more turbulent economy, supporters say the problem has never been more urgent.
'At a time when people worry whether they'll lose their federal benefits, we can help assure them that here in Washington you won't face an excessive rent hike,' said Emily Alvarado, a Democratic state senator and one of the bill's sponsors, during a floor debate Friday night.
Most economists have historically been skeptical of rent control, saying it does more harm than good. But that has started to change somewhat in recent years.
In Washington, opponents say rent regulations would discourage new development and reduce the availability of rental homes. And for years, Republicans, joined by moderate Democrats, have scuttled various proposals.
But progressives gained more clout after last year's elections and have pushed an agenda that also includes tax increases and spending cuts.
Andrew Barkis, a Republican state representative, said in an interview that the new bill was 'driven by ideology.' He said that an earlier version, which called for a 10 percent cap, plus inflation, and exempted most single-family home rentals that were not owned by a corporation, was better. That version had cleared the Senate.
'You put an artificial cap on this, I can guarantee you that every single rent is going to go up,' Mr. Barkis said
Rent regulations have typically been embraced by municipalities, not states. More than 300 local governments regulate rents, including New York City, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
When states get involved, it has often been to prevent local jurisdictions from enacting rent regulations. More than 30 states have done that — including Washington, which blocked local rent regulations in 1981, when Republicans last controlled the governor's office and Legislature.
The new bill — which survived some last-minute procedural drama and was passed on Sunday, the last day of the legislative calendar — would not lift that ban. Instead, it is aimed at protecting tenants throughout the state, including those in towns that may be unable or unwilling to take their own action.
Until now, California and Oregon had been the only states to adopt statewide rent regulations, both passed in 2019. The cap is 7 percent plus the inflation rate in Oregon, and 5 percent plus inflation in California; both states set a maximum of 10 percent. But there are efforts in both states to lower those caps.
The bill heads to Gov. Bob Ferguson, a Democrat who took office this year. While Mr. Ferguson has not stated his intentions, many legislators and lobbyists anticipate he will sign the legislation. It would take effect immediately.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
31 minutes ago
- CNBC
Elon Musk's favorability among Republicans dropped 16 points since March, Quinnipiac says
Elon Musk's official role in the Trump administration recently came to an end. Many Republicans won't be sad to see less of him, according to the results of Quinnipiac University's latest public opinion survey. While a majority of Republicans still hold a favorable view of Musk, the number fell to 62% in the poll out Wednesday, down from 78% in March, Quinnipiac said. Overall, the Quinnipiac poll found that 30% of self-identified voters surveyed in the U.S. hold a favorable opinion of Musk, according to polling from June 5 to June 9. Republican and Democratic voters remain deeply divided in their views of the world's richest man, who contributed nearly $300 million to propel President Donald Trump back to the White House. Only 3% of Democrats surveyed said they held a favorable of view of the Tesla CEO, who was once seen as an environmental leader appealing to liberal values. Musk didn't respond to a request for comment. Musk and Trump had a very public falling out last week that started with Musk's disapproval of the president's spending bill and escalated into an all-out war of words that played out on social media. Musk said on Wednesday that he regretted some of the posts he made about Trump last week, adding that "they went too far." Even with a slide in his favorability, Musk is still popular among Republicans after his time running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an effort to dramatically slash the size of the federal government. Among the Republican respondents to the early June poll, 80% rated Musk and DOGE's work as either excellent or good, while 13% said it was either not so good or poor. In the March poll, 82% of Republicans surveyed said they thought Musk and DOGE were helping the country. Read the full survey results here.

Washington Post
35 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Rand Paul says White House excluded his family from picnic as punishment
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) said the Trump administration has excluded him and his family from a picnic at the White House in what he believes to be an act of retribution, politicizing an annual celebration of bipartisanship over Paul's refusal to support the president's signature legislation. 'We just tried to get our tickets today, and they said, 'You were not invited,' ' Paul told reporters outside the Capitol on Wednesday. While he said he did now know exactly who left him out, he added, 'I think that it's somebody acting in a very petty way.'


Boston Globe
39 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
David Hogg won't try to keep his DNC role amid dispute over Democratic primaries
Related : Advertisement He says the party Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Hogg on Wednesday decried 'a serious lack of vision from Democratic leaders, too many of them asleep at the wheel,' noting three Democratic House members have died this year after being reelected in November, leaving the party shorthanded in Washington. The culture on Capitol Hill rewards seniority and protects complacency, he said in a statement announcing his decision to walk away from his DNC role. 'If there is anything activism or history teaches us it's that comfortable people, especially comfortable people with power, do not change,' Hogg said. 'In this moment of crisis, comfort is not an option.' Related : Advertisement In April, DNC Chair Ken Martin proposed bylaw changes to require party officers to remain neutral in all Democratic primaries. Party neutrality is crucial to maintaining the confidence of voters, he argued, pointing to the bitter feud that emerged after supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders' 2016 campaign believed he was stymied by party insiders putting their thumb on the scale in favor of Hillary Rodham Clinton, who won the nomination but went on to lose the general election to Donald Trump. Hogg rose to prominence as a gun-control advocate after surviving the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida.