UnitedHealth shares slide as criminal probe report adds to investor fears
UnitedHealth Group shares fell nearly 7% in premarket trading on Thursday, after the Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Department of Justice was investigating the company for potential Medicare fraud.
The latest news adds to the health insurer's litany of woes, including multiple government inquiries, a sudden change in top leadership and a pulled outlook in the face of soaring medical costs.
Investors and analysts noted that while details on the investigation were limited, they did heighten investor concerns.
"The stock is already in the doghouse with investors, and additional uncertainty will only pile on," said James Harlow, senior vice president at Novare Capital Management, which owns shares in UnitedHealth.
The company, however, said that it had not been notified by the DOJ regarding this criminal investigation.
The news of the probe follows CEO Andrew Witty's abrupt departure and the withdrawal of its 2025 forecast, which triggered an 18% drop in shares to a four-year low on Tuesday.
"UnitedHealth Group is mired in a crisis seemingly without end. Investors are bracing for another big bout of turbulence given reports of the DOJ investigation," said Susannah Streeter, head of money and markets at Hargreaves Lansdown.
If premarket losses hold, UnitedHealth's market capitalization will touch $280 billion, or almost half of the $530 billion recorded on April 16, a day before a surprise earnings miss sparked a selloff in its shares.
The health insurance industry has come under government scrutiny after a lawsuit this month accused three major U.S. insurers of paying kickbacks to brokers to steer patients into their plans.
In February, the WSJ revealed a civil fraud investigation into UnitedHealth's Medicare practices, while U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley launched an inquiry into the company's billing methods, demanding detailed compliance records.
For decades, the company has flourished by leveraging its dominance in insurance and growth in the Medicare market, the U.S. government program that covers medical costs for the elderly.
This streak of strong performance came under pressure just months after a senior executive was tragically killed, allegedly by a man enraged over insurer practices.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH) Reaches US$69 Million Record ERISA Settlement
UnitedHealth Group recently reached a $69 million settlement in a fiduciary duty lawsuit, underscoring its legal challenges. This development, coupled with UnitedHealth's exploration of selling its Latin American operations amid financial difficulties, significantly impacts the company's reputation and strategy. Last week, UnitedHealth's stock price increased by 3%, reflecting these events. The overall market remained flat during the same period, suggesting these specific developments may have contributed positively against broader market trends. As UnitedHealth addresses these hurdles, the share price movement reflects ongoing adjustments and investor reactions to these significant corporate actions. UnitedHealth Group has 1 warning sign we think you should know about. The end of cancer? These 23 emerging AI stocks are developing tech that will allow early identification of life changing diseases like cancer and Alzheimer's. The recent settlement and exploration of selling UnitedHealth Group's Latin American operations highlight the company's focus on streamlining its structure and addressing legal challenges. These actions may influence investor sentiment and potentially drive strategic realignments as UnitedHealth navigates these operational hurdles. Despite these short-term developments, UnitedHealth's long-term performance shows a total return including share price and dividends of 15.36% over the past five years, reflecting steady growth. In comparison, the company underperformed the US Healthcare industry and overall US Market, both of which experienced different returns over the past year, as indicated by the industry's 17.9% decline and the market's 10.6% gain, respectively. The implications of current news events on revenue and earnings forecasts are notable. The adjustments in the Medicare business and the adoption of digital tools may stabilize and expand future revenue streams, while also enhancing operational efficiency. Analysts forecast an annual revenue growth rate of 9.4% over the next three years, with earnings expected to rise to US$30.5 billion by 2028. As of today, with UnitedHealth Group's stock priced at $394.51, it trades below the analysts' consensus price target of US$547.65, creating a room for potential growth in line with market expectations, driven by anticipated improvements in profit margins and strategic executions. Click here to discover the nuances of UnitedHealth Group with our detailed analytical financial health report. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Companies discussed in this article include NYSE:UNH. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Los Angeles Times
5 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Simplify your finances with fewer credit cards
Dear Liz: I have too many credit cards that I opened to get frequent flier points. I understand that closing a credit card lowers your credit scores. How long does the ding last? How long should I wait before closing another card? Do you have any other advice on this subject? You probably have discussed this in previous columns but might be worth repeating. Answer: If you have a lot of cards, closing a few is unlikely to significantly hurt your credit scores as long as you do so strategically. A big chunk of your credit scores is determined by how much of your available credit you're using. You want a large gap between the amounts you charge and your credit limits. Try to keep open the cards with the highest credit limits. If you have multiple cards with the same issuer, ask if the credit limit from a card you're closing can be transferred to one you're keeping. Even if your scores do dip because of a closure, the impact is likely to be short-lived if you continue using credit responsibly. Ideally, you would review your portfolio of credit cards every year or so to determine which cards to keep and which to close. Travel rewards cards typically have annual fees, sometimes significant ones, so you'll want to make sure every card you have is at least paying for itself in annual rewards and benefits. Also consider the mental load involved. As you age, you may find it more difficult to monitor multiple accounts and keep track of all the details. You may want to simplify your finances by winnowing your cards down to just one or two. At that point, keeping your finances manageable will be more important than maintaining the highest possible credit scores. Dear Liz: If someone inherits my retirement account, is there any way they can avoid having their Medicare premiums increased for 1 year? Answer: A large-enough retirement account could affect their Medicare premiums for up to 10 years, not just one. Normally inheritances aren't taxable, but retirement accounts are the exception. Withdrawals from inherited retirement accounts are usually taxable as income, and most non-spouse inheritors must drain a retirement account within 10 years. Withdrawals from inherited Roth accounts aren't taxable, but the accounts still must be drained by the inheritor within a decade. If the inheritor is on Medicare, taxable withdrawals could boost income enough to increase their Medicare premiums, thanks to the income-related monthly adjustment amounts (IRMAA). This surcharge starts once modified adjusted gross income exceeds certain amounts, which in 2025 is $106,000 for single filers and $212,000 for married couples filing jointly. Anyone who inherits a retirement plan should get advice from a tax pro, but that's particularly important when withdrawals might affect tax brackets and Medicare premiums. The pro can help determine how quickly or slowly the money should be withdrawn to maximize how much the inheritor gets to keep. Dear Liz: I waited until age 70 to start collecting Social Security. My wife turns 65 this year so her full retirement age is 67. Can she start collecting Social Security benefits now based on my benefit or should we wait until her full retirement age? Answer: If she applies for Social Security now, she would be 'deemed' to be applying for both her own benefit and her spousal benefit and given the larger of the two. She would not be allowed to switch to the other benefit later. Most people are better off waiting at least until their full retirement age to apply, and many will maximize their lifetime benefits by delaying until age 70. Her mileage may vary, of course, so it's worth using a Social Security claiming calculator and consider getting advice from an objective source, such as a fee-only financial advisor. Liz Weston, Certified Financial Planner®, is a personal finance columnist. Questions may be sent to her at 3940 Laurel Canyon, No. 238, Studio City, CA 91604, or by using the 'Contact' form at
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
An Open Letter to the President: Addressing our Debt
Donald J. TrumpThe Mar-a-Lago Club1100 South Ocean BoulevardPalm Beach, Florida Dear President Trump: I voted for you in all three of your presidential campaigns. The first time, I cast my vote with cautious optimism. The third time, with enthusiasm. And I contributed financially to your campaign. You have achieved what few thought possible - a triumphant return, driven by a deep-seated belief among millions of Americans that only you can effectively challenge the entrenched political establishment. Your first 100 days were extraordinary, but if your presidency is to be remembered not just as bold but also historic, one challenge must rise above all others: - the national debt. The national debt, currently $37 trillion, is the result of pervasive fiscal irresponsibility, accumulated over many decades. Our annual interest payments now exceed $1trillion - more than we spend on our national defense. This is not just a financial burden. It is a threat to the survival of our country as a democratic republic. Without immediate, decisive action, the consequences are predictable: more credit downgrades, more increases in interest rates, and crippling obligations to service the debt. What would happen to our great country if annual interest payments exceeded not just our defense budget but also Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare? Mr. President, if we are to remain a vibrant nation, this exploding national debt has to be attacked immediately and significantly. That will not happen without your leadership. Sadly, the Republican Party has shown that it is not a reliable ally. Even before Republicans regained control of the House, they held a secret vote. By a margin of 158 to 2 they brought back earmarks - the very same pork barrel spending practices that Speaker John Boehner put to bed. Since then, the Democratic Congress never dared to bring back earmarks. House Republicans did. The results were predictable, and immediate: $16 billion in earmarks. More than 7,500 pet projects. In the Senate, eight of the 12 largest earmarkers are Republicans. In the House, 48 of the top earmarkers are Republicans. Here are the largest earmarkers: Sen. Susan Collins of Maine (population 1.4 million) secured $870 million in earmarks. Sen. Lisa Murkowski grabbed $851.1 million in earmarks. Sen. Mitch McConnell took nearly $500 million in earmarks. My own congressman, Brian Mast, walked away with $437 million in earmarks. Obviously, eliminating pork barrel spending wont, by itself, address the structural problems in Washingtons budget process - or make the "big, beautiful bill" currently being debated in Congress deficit-neutral. But if members of Congress cant even control themselves, what kind of example do they set for the American people? How can politicians ask their fellow Americans to sacrifice when they wont do it themselves? Actions speak louder than words. Fiscal irresponsibility dominates the culture within Congress, within our government. That culture, obviously, will not change on its own. It can be changed. But only with your leadership. Mr. President, fortunately, today you have a tool to attack waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence. Because of the cloud, Big Data, and the Freedom of Information Act, you can deliver every government expenditure to every citizens cell phone, iPad, and computer. You can bring a new era to government, i.e., transparency. Mr. President, you can be the launch pad for transparency. Imagine a government where every single taxpayer dollar that government spends is tracked and reported to the public. Imagine the cultural shift from secret votes, from wasteful spending to one where every government official knows their budgets will be scrutinized in detail. Mr. President, here are several all-encompassing, culture-changing, deficit-attacking actions you can announce tomorrow: Lead by example: Cut White House expenses by a defined percentage. Report the savings to the public every quarter. Challenge Congress: Ask every member to cut their office and committee budgets. Suggest at least 10%. Publish a quarterly report on every senator and representative. Eliminate pork-barrel projects: Call on Congress to abolish earmarks. Shine a light on every remaining earmarker until they fall in line. Mobilize the bureaucracy: Instruct all agencies to focus on rooting out waste, fraud, duplication, and incompetence, and report the progress quarterly. Say explicitly that you will monitor progress and report the bold and expose the complacent. Bringing transparency to government can do more than clean up wasted taxpayer dollars. It can rebuild trust. It can remind the American people that the government can still work for them. It will solidify your legacy as the chief executive who did not just talk about draining the swamp, you did it. Imagine our country if we did not have to spend $1 trillion each year on interest payments. That is the future Americans deserve. Mr. President, you have been given a historic mandate. You can leave office with a legacy as the president who did not just promise to "Make America Great Again," but who actually did it. America cannot be made great again without addressing the greatest threat to our countrys survival as a democratic republic - the exploding national debt. Respectfully, Thomas W. Smith Thomas W. Smith is the founder of Prescott Investors, Inc.
