logo
22 Best And Worst Movie Musical Adaptations

22 Best And Worst Movie Musical Adaptations

Buzz Feed27-06-2025
As a movie musical lover (and a once theatre kid), I love seeing how passionate people get when debating movie adaptations of beloved stage shows.
Over on Reddit, theatre fans are sharing the absolute BEST of the best stage-to-movie-musicals, to the ones that massively flopped and ultimately embarrassed themselves. Here's what they had to say — and fair warning, theatre folks don't hold back (it's the trauma from getting brutal post-show notes from drama teachers.)
"Chicago works because it's one of the only ones that didn't think of a movie as an improvement on the limitations of the stage, but rather imported the idiosyncrasies of theatre into the movie. Other movie musicals are often ashamed of their origin, but Chicago embraced it."
"The fact that they pulled off Wicked after all these years, all the production delays, and so many stage play iterations to compare it to if it went wrong...it blows my mind how good it was! I know we still have Part 2 but considering it was all filmed as one movie, I think we're gonna be just fine!"
"I saw the Wicked stage production for the first time a few weeks after seeing the movie, and I actually prefer the movie. When watching the stage, I got whiplash from the pacing on the first act, and the writing of the second act felt messy. I understand why the stage production is the way it is, but the movie had the chance to correct one of my biggest gripes. That being said — "Defying Gravity" is the only thing I enjoyed more on stage. Seeing someone lifted into the air in person hits harder than on screen."
"I know how some people feel about jukebox musicals on here, but the movie version of Mamma Mia is legitimately so much better than the stage version imo."
"The Fiddler on the Roof is not only one of the best movie versions of a musical I've seen, but might be one of the best movies I've ever seen in general. (Granted, the list of movies I would consider "one of the best I've seen" is pretty extensive!)
"Can't believe how little The Sound of Music is being mentioned in this thread. Kind of THE definitive Broadway-to-movie adaptation, both in terms of cultural impact and in terms of how it improved on the stage version. Julie Andrews gives an all-time iconic performance as Maria, and the filming location in Austria with all the helicopter shots of the Alps is just magic."
"I'm always in awe of how amazing Matilda is throughout all mediums. The book, the movie, the musical, and the musical movie are all incredible and I think there's something really special about that."
"Probably The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Capturing the spirit and vibe of such a musical is amazing, and they did it."
"I haven't seen every single movie adaptation of the musical, but of the ones I have seen, I usually refer to 1962's The Music Man as a perfect way to transfer a Broadway show to a film..."
"I will also say that Oliver! is the rare example of a film version of a musical that is actually better than the stage version."
"Best: Hairspray. I honestly think that the few changes that were made improved the story/flow."
"Please do yourself a favour and watch The Producers with Matthew Broderick and Nathan Lane. It is an almost 1-to-1 adaptation of the stage show, minus a song or two. It is a clever and hilarious thrill ride, with loveably unloveable characters."
And now, the worst:
"As someone who treasures and adores Rent (it meant SO much to me at a certain time), the movie was horrid and made me angry!"
"In terms of worst, there's a lot of options, but 13's movie adaptation will never fail to bewilder me. It's like they went out of their way to make every wrong choice they could..."
"I've got a bone to pick with the In the Heights movie. Lots of good, fun choreo, but John Chu cut it from a love story between a neighbourhood and its people into one between Usnavi and Vanessa. Lots of very weird changes, including the "X days until the blackout timer," which ruins the surprise of the act I finale. I could go on and on...I lived near the set, though, so that was a really fun summer."
"Honestly, if The Phantom of the Opera had better male leads, it would've been perfect. But putting 17 year-old Emmy Rossum with two 30+ year-old men, and having her kiss them gives me the heebie jeebies. (On top of the male actors' terrible singing)."
"A Chorus Line takes the cake as the worst. Some great performances (Terry Mann can do no wrong) but the transfer to film doesn't work."
"They didn't use Michael Bennett's original choreography, they completely sidelined certain characters, and they CUT 'THE MUSIC AND THE MIRROR'."
"Rock of Ages. Why Tom Cruise? Why Alec Baldwin? Why goddamn Russell Brand? Terrible casting...The show gives you a lot to work with and that adaptation just turned it to crap. I was so excited, ROA is genuinely a good show. It's campy as fu**, but it's SUPPOSED TO BE! The '80s were cheesy and campy and ridiculous. The stage show was great. The movie sucked balls."
"Dear Evan Hansen was pretty high up there with not good adaptations. As much as I love the score and the show, I know it's problematic — but that show and its music got me through one of the harder times in my life. I love my Benny boy fiercely but he definitely looked extremely out of place and it felt like the whole thing was trying too hard. I loved the addition of 'The Anonymous Ones' — that is a beautiful song. But cutting out 'Good For You' was not a great call.
"Meh: They faceplanted on The Last 5 Years by having them both in every scene together, imo. Completely effs up the emotional impact."
"Sweeney Todd (unpopular opinion). It's hard to capture Sondheim properly, and they failed at almost every stop. This story needs to be Shakespearean, incredibly complex, and highly absurd in order for it to work. They reached for it all, but landed at none. Also, they started the dreadful trend of having tenors singing Sweeney's part, and I can't forgive that."
"The Into The Woods movie SUCKS ASS I hate it so much. They cut out 'No More' (literally a pivotal moment in the baker's character development) and cut the narrator and the mysterious old man entirely?? And kept Rapunzel alive?????? Not to mention JAMES CORDEN. UGHHHH I hate this movie."
And because these two were such popular answers, we had to give a special shoutout (or side-eye?) to what might just be the most universally hated movie musical adaptations...
"Cats is genuinely one of the worst films I've ever seen. I thought it would be funny as a hate-watch, but it wasn't even 'so bad it's good.' It was just awful and made me sick to my stomach at several different moments lol."
"I mean Cats is so obviously the worst so it shouldn't count to say Cats hahaha."
"Cats was horrific and I wonder how anybody got roped into it. The cast was stacked."
"The Mean Girls musical movie adaptation was awful. It felt like they were embarrassed they were making a musical."
"The Mean Girls musical movie was one of the worst things i've ever seen."
Let us know your all-time favourite and most hated movie musicals in the comments — I'll go first: I LOVE Mamma Mia (yes, even with Pierce Brosnan's...unique singing, it's campy!), and I HATED the Mean Girls movie musical. Not super original answers, I know...sue me.😅😅
If you like what you see, be sure to follow BuzzFeed Canada on TikTok and Instagram for even more hot takes and theatre kid energy.🎭✨
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out
Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out

This "Jeopardy!" champion is speaking out about the shocking end of his 16-game winning streak. Who is … Scott Riccardi? On July 25, the engineer from New Jersey lost on the game show after 16 consecutive wins due to a surprising miss on Final Jeopardy! Riccardi subsequently took to Reddit to explain what happened, after some on social media who'd claimed he lost on purpose. The clue that Riccardi answered wrong was in the category of 20th Century Names. "According to one obituary, in 1935 he owned 13 magazines, 8 radio stations, 2 movie companies & $56 million in real estate," it read. The correct response was William Randolph Hearst, but Riccardi incorrectly guessed "Who is Howard Hughes?" Riccardi was in the lead going into Final Jeopardy!, but his opponents both gave the correct response, including Jonathan Hugendubler, who came from behind with the win after wagering $9,601. Some "Jeopardy!" fans expressed surprise that Riccardi didn't respond correctly. As is often the case when a winning streak ends, there were even claims that he threw the game because he was tired of being on the show. "Does anyone think he lost on purpose because he didn't want to come back next season?" one commenter on Instagram read. Did Scott Riccardi's 'Jeopardy' winning streak continue? But on the "Jeopardy!" Reddit, Riccardi chimed in to explain the thought process behind his answer. "My mind unfortunately went straight to Howard Hughes, mostly due to overestimating the importance of the movie companies part of the clue; any previous FJs that had come to mind immediately had worked out, so I trusted my initial response on this," he wrote. Ken Jennings on 'Jeopardy!' Tournament of Champions, 'misogynistic' Mayim Bialik critics Riccardi continued that Hearst "wasn't on my mind at all," adding that "several information near-misses and a poor understanding of the timeline in the clue really piled up to prevent me from getting what I now understand to be a very gettable clue." Some defended Riccardi by arguing the clue was worded in a confusing way and could have been read to mean that the obituary was written in 1935, which would rule out Hearst. Hugendubler appeared as surprised as anyone by his win, with host Ken Jennings remarking, "He can't believe it!" A visibly stunned Hugendubler immediately walked over and shared a hug with Riccardi, who finished his run on the show with a hefty $455,000 in winnings. Riccardi, who will return in the "Jeopardy!" Tournament of Champions now ranks number eight on the game show's all-time leaderboard in terms of highest winnings in regular-season play. With $2,520,700, Jennings, who competed on "Jeopardy!" in 2004 before becoming the show's host, remains number one.

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out.
Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out.

USA Today

time6 hours ago

  • USA Today

Did 'Jeopardy!' champion lose on purpose? Scott Riccardi speaks out.

This "Jeopardy!" champion is speaking out about the shocking end of his 16-game winning streak. Who is … Scott Riccardi? On July 25, the engineer from New Jersey lost on the game show after 16 consecutive wins due to a surprising miss on Final Jeopardy! Riccardi subsequently took to Reddit to explain what happened, after some on social media who'd claimed he lost on purpose. The clue that Riccardi answered wrong was in the category of 20th Century Names. "According to one obituary, in 1935 he owned 13 magazines, 8 radio stations, 2 movie companies & $56 million in real estate," it read. The correct response was William Randolph Hearst, but Riccardi incorrectly guessed "Who is Howard Hughes?" Riccardi was in the lead going into Final Jeopardy!, but his opponents both gave the correct response, including Jonathan Hugendubler, who came from behind with the win after wagering $9,601. Some "Jeopardy!" fans expressed surprise that Riccardi didn't respond correctly. As is often the case when a winning streak ends, there were even claims that he threw the game because he was tired of being on the show. "Does anyone think he lost on purpose because he didn't want to come back next season?" one commenter on Instagram read. Did Scott Riccardi's 'Jeopardy' winning streak continue? But on the "Jeopardy!" Reddit, Riccardi chimed in to explain the thought process behind his answer. "My mind unfortunately went straight to Howard Hughes, mostly due to overestimating the importance of the movie companies part of the clue; any previous FJs that had come to mind immediately had worked out, so I trusted my initial response on this," he wrote. Ken Jennings on 'Jeopardy!' Tournament of Champions, 'misogynistic' Mayim Bialik critics Riccardi continued that Hearst "wasn't on my mind at all," adding that "several information near-misses and a poor understanding of the timeline in the clue really piled up to prevent me from getting what I now understand to be a very gettable clue." Some defended Riccardi by arguing the clue was worded in a confusing way and could have been read to mean that the obituary was written in 1935, which would rule out Hearst. Hugendubler appeared as surprised as anyone by his win, with host Ken Jennings remarking, "He can't believe it!" A visibly stunned Hugendubler immediately walked over and shared a hug with Riccardi, who finished his run on the show with a hefty $455,000 in winnings. Riccardi, who will return in the "Jeopardy!" Tournament of Champions now ranks number eight on the game show's all-time leaderboard in terms of highest winnings in regular-season play. With $2,520,700, Jennings, who competed on "Jeopardy!" in 2004 before becoming the show's host, remains number one.

Owner Rescues 'Pit Bull' From Shelter—DNA Result Stuns Internet
Owner Rescues 'Pit Bull' From Shelter—DNA Result Stuns Internet

Newsweek

time8 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Owner Rescues 'Pit Bull' From Shelter—DNA Result Stuns Internet

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. When a family welcomed their new puppy, Lieutenant Ripley, into their home, they believed they were adopting an American Pit Bull Terrier. She was rescued from a shelter specializing in pit bulls, but as the weeks passed and Ripley began to grow at an astonishing rate, her features sparked curiosity and a DNA test—which ultimately revealed an unexpected genetic makeup, shocking viewers in a post to Reddit. In the post, the owner shared their story along with a plethora of photos of the pup. A woman holds her Pitbull close to her. A woman holds her Pitbull close to her."Adopted Lt. Ripley at 15 weeks old from a dedicated Pitbull rescue," they wrote. "They listed her as American Pit Bull Terrier. With her long snout and body type and coloration, we figured she was more hound than anything. I was thinking Plott Hound. Some people were saying Greyhound or Whippet." Their initial guesses proved far from the mark when the DNA results came back: Ripley is a striking 50.8 percent Great Dane and 49.2 percent German Shepherd. The revelation immediately captivated Redditors, who found the mix surprising and fascinating. "Okay that is hilarious. I love her," one user commented. Another added, "That is such a neat mix! I'd guessed Sighthound/[German Shepherd] but I guess the lanky-ness I was seeing was the Dane!" The dog's distinctive ears also provided a clue to some. "It's those ears, OP!" one person wrote, adding, "The 'weird/goofball floppy triangle' on top of the head—like they want to stick up, but have a mind of their own, and may just decide to walk off entirely one day' thing is 100 percent a [German Shepherd] thing!" The owners, who were fully intending to adopt a Pitbull, embraced the surprise with open arms. The decision to adopt a new puppy came at a significant time for the family, as their beloved pit bull/Staffordshire Bull Terrier mix had recently passed away from cancer, and they were expecting their first child. "We were hoping [our dog] be here to help raise our son," the owner shared in a comment. "It was a difficult decision to get a new puppy and try to train it in the short amount of time we have, but growing up with a dog is such a beautiful thing." Ripley has already shown incredible progress in her new home. "She has taken to our own training pretty seamlessly and is very intelligent," the owner wrote. Ripley is actively socialized, joining her owner for skateboarding sessions and runs at the local park where she interacts with other dogs. Despite being initially "highly skeptical of other humans," regular park visits have significantly helped her social skills. But ultimately, Ripley's size has become the constant discussion point. She gained "40 pounds in two months and is around 60 pounds now," the owner wrote, leaving them to wonder "how much larger she'll get now that we know her actual breed mix." Despite the initial breed assumption, the family is thrilled with their intelligent and rapidly growing gentle giant. Newsweek reached out to u/pleasedtomichu for comment via Reddit.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store