
What MEPs and Parliament's parties' want from the EU budget
Since the 2009 Treaty of Lisbon the Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) has required the regulatory consent of the European Parliament in addition to the unanimous consent of the EU member states.
This means that a majority of Members of Parliament must approve the final text, giving the largest political groups some leverage to push for their demands to be included.
The European Social Fund: a red line for Socialists
The Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group were the first to enter the fray last week. Socialists claimed they had received reassurances from Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that the European Social Fund (ESF) would remain a cornerstone of the next EU budget.
This promise led them to vote against a no-confidence motion promoted in the European Parliament, which was eventually defeated by a large majority.
The ESF is a fund designed to support employment, social inclusion, education and skills across the EU's member states, accounting for almost €100 billion in the current financial framework.
It is indeed the top priority for Socialists, which deems its inclusion in the EU budget fundamental. 'We cannot accept an MFF without the European Social Fund. It's very important to support health, education, employment, [workers'] skills,' MEP Carla Tavares, the S&D's budget negotiator, told Euronews.
Beyond this, the group is pushing for a larger percentage of member states' gross national income to be devoted to the EU budget, with the current figure at approximately 1.2%.
An EU levy on digital companies and another on small parcels sent to the EU are also among the Socialists' demands, several MEPs told Euronews.
EPP to defend agricultural and cohesion funding
The European People's Party (EPP), the largest group in the Parliament, also wants the ESF to be included, according to its lead MEP for budget talks, Siegfried Mureșan.
'The Parliament as a whole will defend the European social fund,' he told Euronews.
'Security and competitiveness need to be the new priorities of the budget, with special attention given to research and innovation,' the Romanian MEP argued.
But the EPP does not want these aspects to be financed at the expense of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and cohesion funds—two budget lines that could be significantly reduced.
A separate budget for farmers is needed, according to Mureșan, as well as direct allocations for regions under cohesion policy. The EPP opposes the idea of merging agriculture and/or cohesion policy into a broader fund—a concept pivotal to the Commission's proposal, as reported by Euronews.
The European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR) are also championing the CAP and cohesion funds as stand-alone instruments. They support investments in critical defence infrastructure such as transport connections, power grids, and communication networks that also improve military mobility, as stated in the group's position paper on the MFF.
Liberals oppose the idea of 'national cash pots'
The liberal Renew Europe group strongly opposes the idea of dividing the EU budget by merging different programs into a single national cash pot. This idea, which has also been circulating ahead of the proposal's unveiling, could sideline EU regions by granting power over expenditure to national governments alone.
'This is wrong. It threatens the very fabric of the union and risks severing the link our regions have with the EU institutions,' Renew's lead negotiator for the MFF, French MEP Fabienne Keller, wrote in a position paper.
Liberals also want more and stable 'own resources'— revenues that the EU collects directly from citizens, complementing national contributions — and oppose any funding for 'autocrats', as the party labels leaders including Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán.
The proceeds of the EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, the benefits of an OECD agreement on tax evasion, and a tax on small parcels delivered from outside the EU could be good candidates for revenues at EU level, the group believes.
'If we do not find new own resources for our budget then we will only be left with cuts', said Keller in a statement to Euronews.
Far right against funding defence and Ukraine
The far-right Patriots for Europe (PfE) group claims that the European Commission wants to set up a 'wartime budget' by cutting funding for European farmers.
PfE doesn't support EU financial aid to Ukraine and rejects any EU-level taxation. Cracking down on irregular migration and scrapping climate policies are the key goals for the group.
'EU funds must support [...] the strongest possible external border protection. The Green Deal must be scrapped: its agenda is destroying farmers, crippling industries, and burdening families,' the head of PfE's Hungarian delegation, Tamás Deutsch, wrote in an internal booklet for his fellow MEPs.
Protecting external EU borders is also the top priority of the Europe of Sovereign Nations (ESN) group, followed by tax relief, funding innovative research initiatives, safeguarding farmers' incomes and what they call 'a consistent, results-oriented use of funds".
'Every euro of the MFF has to deliver a clear benefit for citizens; costly prestige projects are out of place,' ESN German MEP Alexander Jungbluth told Euronews.
Greens and The Left for climate and social justice
The Greens/EFA group advocates that at least half of the next EU budget be spent on green objectives, co-president Terry Reintke said during the plenary debate on the topic last week in Parliament - 30% of the current MFF is earmarked for climate-related projects.
This group also wants the Commission to introduce a tax on digital services to finance new budget needs.
The Left's Portuguese MEP João Oliveira outlined his group's priorities in a statement to Euronews: the housing crisis, social and economic cohesion, full employment across member states, improved living conditions for workers and the fight against poverty.
'The Commission must resist its worst instincts of ramping up defence spending at the expense of policies with a direct impact on livelihoods and public services,' he said.
The Left opposes any cuts to cohesion, agriculture and fisheries policies and calls instead for a €20bn European Child Guarantee, to fight against child poverty and social exclusion.
If Parliament's demands are ignored, MEPs have the right to return the proposal to the Commission and reject it as a basis for negotiation.
When negotiations start, political groups' priorities will be closely intertwined with the tug-of-war between the Parliament and the member states, which often have different priorities for funding. One thing has already been made clear in a resolution adopted in May: the current level of contributions granted to the EU by member states is not enough.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euronews
11 minutes ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen and Trump strike EU-US trade deal to avert tariff war
The European Union and the United States have struck a tentative trade deal to avert a potentially devastating tariff war between two of the world's largest economies, capping a race against time before a self-imposed deadline of 1 August. Under the agreed terms, finalised on Sunday by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump during a meeting in Scotland, the majority of EU exports bound for the American market will be slapped with a 15% tariff. "I think it's great we made a deal today instead of playing games," Trump said at the end of the meeting. "I think it's the biggest deal ever made." "We have a trade deal between the two largest economies in the world. And it's a big deal. It's a huge deal," von der Leyen said. "It will bring stability, it will bring predictability. That's very important for businesses on both sides of the Atlantic." This is a developing story.

LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU chief to Zelensky: Keep anti-graft bodies independent
The president of the European Commission urged Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky on Sunday, July 27, to preserve the independence of anti-corruption organizations, after a row last week over Kyiv's move to curb their powers. Ursula von der Leyen said she had held good talks with the leader of Ukraine, a country she said had "already achieved a lot on its European path." "It must build on these solid foundations and preserve independent anti-corruption bodies, which are cornerstones of Ukraine's rule of law," she added in a post on X. Ukraine sparked a firestorm of criticism on Tuesday after its parliament voted to revoke the autonomy of two anti-corruption agencies. The EU at the time described the move as a "serious step back," with critics saying it would enable the government to meddle in high-profile graft cases. Von der Leyen herself demanded "explanations" from Zelensky, a rare rebuke from Brussels that came as Kyiv is pushing to join the 27-nation EU. The move sparked unprecedented protests in Kyiv, and Zelensky backtracked two days later, announcing new laws to guarantee the independence of the anti-graft bodies. The EU was quick to welcome that action, saying the fight against corruption was "an extremely important priority for us and for Ukraine as well." "Ukraine can count on our support to deliver progress on its European path," said von der Leyen on Sunday in her post on X.


Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
How does unemployment vary among university graduates across Europe?
Does a university degree lower your chances of being unemployed in Europe? Yes. Across all EU countries, the unemployment rate is lower for university graduates than for the general population. However, it is still not possible to say 'yes' for all countries because there is one exception among 33 European countries as of 2024: Turkey. University graduates face a higher unemployment rate than the overall population in Turkey, according to Eurostat. Both the unemployment gap and the unemployment ratio between graduates and the total population vary widely across Europe. So, in which countries does higher education make the biggest difference? In 2024, among 33 countries, including EU member states, EU candidates, and EFTA countries, the unemployment rate for people aged 15–74 ranged from 2.6% in Czechia to 11.4% in Spain. These figures reflect the overall population, without considering education levels. The EU average was 5.9%. At the top, Greece (10.1%), Turkey (8.8%), Serbia (8.6%), and both Finland and Sweden (8.4%) followed Spain, reporting unemployment rates above 8%. At the bottom of the list, together with Czechia, Poland (2.9%), Malta (3.1%), Germany (3.4%), Iceland (3.6%), as well as the Netherlands and Slovenia (both 3.7%), recorded unemployment rates below 4%. University graduates and unemployment: The countries with the highest rates Among university graduates, defined as those with tertiary education, according to the ISCED classification, unemployment rates in 2024 ranged from 1.4% in Czechia and Poland to 9.2% in Turkey. The EU average stood at 3.8%. After Turkey, the highest unemployment rates among university graduates were recorded in Greece (7.3%), Spain (6.9%), Serbia (6.5%), and France (5%). Unemployment gap: Overall population vs university graduates When comparing unemployment rates between the general population and university graduates, Turkey was the only country in 2024 where the rate was higher for university graduates than for the overall population. The difference was –0.4 percentage points (pp). 'It is indeed unusual for the unemployment rate among tertiary education graduates to be greater than others in the workforce,' OECD's Turkey desk told Euronews. The largest gap was recorded in Spain by 4.5 pp. The unemployment rate was 11.4% for the overall population compared to 6.9% for university graduates in Spain. The EU average was 2.1 pp (5.9% vs 3.8%). Since unemployment rates vary significantly across countries, absolute differences may not fully reflect the extent of the gap. To better compare countries, the ratio between the unemployment rate of the general population and that of university graduates can be useful. A ratio below 1 indicates that the unemployment rate is higher among the tertiary-educated than the general population. A ratio of 1 means there is no difference between the two groups. The higher the ratio goes above 1, the more significantly unemployment is higher among the general population than among university graduates. EU: General unemployment 55% higher than among graduates Turkey is the only country with a ratio below 1, at 0.96, while the EU average stands at 1.55. This means that, in the EU, the unemployment rate among the general population is, on average, 1.55 times that of university graduates—or 55% higher. The ratio is also 1.23 in Cyprus, 1.26 in Switzerland, and 1.31 in Germany, and 1.32 in Denmark, the Netherlands, and Serbia. This suggests that unemployment rates among the general population and university graduates are relatively close in these countries. Romania (2.84), Slovakia (2.65), Bulgaria (2.63) and Hungary (2.50) have the highest ratios, meaning university graduates have significantly lower unemployment rates than the overall population. No other country has ever shared Turkey's case Is 2024 an exception? What about other years? Euronews Business also looked at the period from 2004 to 2024. Over these 21 years, Turkey was the only country where university graduates faced a higher unemployment rate than the general population. This fact occurred in 12 different years, starting in 2011. No other country recorded this even once during the entire period according to the data available from Eurostat. The line chart also shows a downward trend in the EU, indicating that the unemployment gap between the tertiary-educated and the overall population is narrowing. In 2022, Turkey had the third-lowest share of tertiary graduates in Europe, following Romania (17.4%) and Italy (18.5%). In Turkey, 20.6% of the population aged 25–74 held a university degree according to Eurostat. University boom in Turkey However, this picture may change for Turkey. In 2019, Turkey had the highest rate of university students relative to its population, with 95 students per 1,000 people—more than double the EU average of 38, according to Eurostat. According to Turkey's Higher Education Board, there were 53 public universities in 2003. This number rose dramatically to 129 by 2018. As of 2024, Turkey has 129 public universities and 75 private, foundation-based universities, bringing the total to 204. 'This rapid expansion was, in part, due to a government policy to establish a university in every province,' OECD told Euronews. According to OECD's Turkey desk, as in many countries, the quantity of tertiary-level graduates has grown faster than the number of jobs that require a degree. As a result this has eroded the previous benefits of having a university degree — ease of getting a job and higher wages. 'In Türkiye's case the erosion has been extreme, notably as regards rates of unemployment,' OECD officials told. OECD: Time to prioritise the quality of tertiary education OECD explained that 'rapid expansion of the university sector has made it difficult to uphold the quality of tertiary courses, aggravating the decline in labour-market returns to students'. 'As our surveys point out, the government's tertiary education policy needs to now prioritise the quality of tertiary education and the relevance of courses for the labour market." OECD also noted that there seems to be a large gap between the skills demanded by the labour market and the skills acquired by students in universities in Turkey. Their survey points to Turkey's relative low share of graduates in STEM (science, technology, engineering and maths) subjects.