
Indiana-Illinois border bill — criticized as ‘waste of time' — passes Indiana Senate
The Indiana-Illinois border bill was passed out of the Senate Tuesday with Democratic senators calling the bill a 'political stunt' and 'a waste of time.'
House Bill 1008, authored by Speaker Todd Huston, would establish an Indiana-Illinois boundary adjustment commission to research the possibility of adjusting the boundaries between the two states. If the bill becomes law, Gov. Mike Braun would have to set the commission's first meeting no later than Sept. 1.
The bill was amended in the Senate Public Policy Committee earlier this month to allow one more Indiana representative to the commission and, with that, give the commission a quorum to meet.
Under the amended bill, Indiana would have six commissioners and Illinois would have five. The amended bill also states that a quorum of the commission consists of at least six members.
The bill passed the Senate 36-13, with three Republicans joining all 10 Democrats to vote against the bill. In a statement Wednesday, Huston said House Bill 1008 starts the conversation of shifting the border between Indiana and Illinois.
'Indiana is a great place to live, work, raise your kids and enjoy a high quality of life. We welcome our neighbors in Illinois seeking lower taxes and more opportunity to join us in the Hoosier state,' Huston, R-Fishers, said.
Sen. Scott Baldwin, who sponsored the bill in the Senate, said the bill was amended in committee 'in the highly unlikely event that Illinois doesn't participate in this measure' the commission can meet and discuss the border shift.
'We would have six members who would then be able to meet and report back to our governor as to the status, but they would also be able to function as it relates to communicating with the members of those 33 counties,' Baldwin said.
Baldwin, R-Noblesville, said nearly three dozen Illinois counties have voted in recent years to leave the state.
In November, seven Illinois counties — Iroquois, Calhoun, Clinton, Greene, Jersey, Madison and Perry counties — voted to secede from the state. Iroquois County is along the Indiana border, the remaining six counties are closer to Missouri.
'I've heard people say, 'this will never happen,' and maybe so,' Baldwin said. 'This is a matter of readiness not reciprocity. It's a political signal that we're willing to take on those 33 counties if they choose to do so.'
To change a state line, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the Indiana legislature, the Illinois legislature and then Congress would have to approve the measure, said professor Paul Helmke ot the Indiana University Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
The Illinois counties voted to 'succeed from the state of Illinois and join the state of Indiana,' Baldwin said, but Illinoisans who are leading the effort testified in a House committee that the breakaway Illinois counties would like to form their own state.
G.H. Merritt, chairwoman of New Illinois, clarified in a House committee hearing in February that her organization is one of two in Illinois are working toward seceding from Illinois and creating a new state.
'Our goal is the constitutional formation of a new state separate from Illinois,' Merritt said.
Baldwin outlined Indiana's benefits compared to Illinois including better fiscal management, lower taxes and business-free policies and better infrastructure services. Indiana has lower income tax, corporate tax, sales tax, cigarette tax and fuel tax, Baldwin said, as well as lower property taxes.
'Many residents in Illinois feel like they are donor communities for Chicago,' Baldwin said. 'They feel like our Hoosier values are more aligned with their values.'
Indiana's unemployment rate is 1% lower compared to Illinois, Baldwin said. Further, Baldwin said Indiana has 'a strong sports legacy,' with NCAA basketball, Big Ten football and the Indy 500.
'It wouldn't happen overnight. We're just signaling to those Illinois counties that Indiana's open for business, and we'd be happy to accept them,' Baldwin said.
Sen. Greg Taylor, D-Indianapolis, asked Baldwin if he contacted Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker if he would support the commission. Baldwin said he read in media reports that Pritzker is 'less than pleased with the measure,' so he doubted Pritzker would take his call.
Pritzker brushed off the proposal — and fired back at the neighboring state — when he was asked about it at an unrelated news conference in January.
'It's a stunt. It's not going to happen,' Pritzker said. 'But I'll just say that Indiana is a low-wage state that doesn't protect workers, a state that does not provide health care for people in need, and so I don't think it's very attractive for anybody in Illinois.'
A spokesman for Pritzker said Tuesday the governor's position on House Bill 1008 hasn't changed.
Even if Pritzker agreed, Taylor said with the research and discussions about shifting the border, as well as the required congressional approval, means the border wouldn't shift within his lifetime.
'This is a waste of time,' Taylor said. 'This is political. Stop playing games. Stop beating around the bushes.'
Illinois state Rep. Brad Halbrook, R-Shelbyville, filed Illinois House Bill 1500 and it 'does similar things and is comparable to the Indiana bill,' he previously said.
Illinois House Bill 1500 states that if Indiana House Bill 1008 becomes law then, within 60 days after receiving notice from the governor of Indiana, the Illinois governor should appoint five members to the Illinois-Indiana boundary adjustment commission.
Indiana 'just made history,' Halbrook said in a statement Tuesday, while Illinois House Bill 1500 still hasn't been given a hearing.
'But the tide is turning. Indiana's actions have energized this movement and validated what so many of us already know: our voices matter, and we have a right to be heard,' Halbrook said.
Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, said many Indiana residents 'think this is a joke,' and that the Indiana legislature should be focused on other issues.
'We have so many major policies to address rather than sending political signals that we want to absorb other counties and study whether or not they want to join us,' Qaddoura said.
Sen. Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington, said House Bill 1008 is 'a political stunt.' Indiana's wages remain stagnant, health care remains 'among the most dire in the country,' and affordable housing 'is increasingly out of reach for working Hoosiers,' Yoder said.
'These are the challenges that should be front and center for our state legislature. Instead, Indiana statehouse Republicans have spent the better part of this legislative session, and even started our session, naming House Bill 1008 as a priority focused on the people of Illinois,' Yoder said.
Yoder pointed to a Ball State University study, which found that if the 33 counties were their own state it would be the second poorest state in the U.S.
The counties pay less than $3,000 in taxes annually, but they require more than $5,000 in government services per year, Yoder said. Hoosiers would have to pay an additional $2 billion in taxes to subsidize the cost, she said.
Baldwin said he 'skimmed' at the Ball State study and that he did not agree 'with the assumptions that were made to generate the financial review.'
'If you're going to use Illinois finances and then compare them to Indiana finances you're pretty much off base already,' Baldwin said. 'The grass is always greener where you water it. We water it here in Indiana, that's why 33 counties want to come here. Indiana is open for business.'
The bill will be sent back to the House for final approval because it was amended in the Senate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
32 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Buildup to a meltdown: How the Trump-Musk alliance collapsed
Papers in that file showed that Trump's nominee to run NASA — a close associate of Musk's — had donated to prominent Democrats in recent years, including some who Trump was learning about for the first time. The president set his outrage aside and mustered through the public farewell, with both men praising each other and saying their relationship would continue. But as soon as the cameras left the Oval Office, the president confronted Musk. Trump started to read some of the donations out loud, shaking his head and pointing out several of the most recent ones in the file. This was not good, the president said — an early signal of the simmering tensions between the two men that would explode into the open less than a week later. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Musk, who was sporting a black eye, which he blamed on a tussle with his young son, tried to explain. He said his friend Jared Isaacman, a billionaire entrepreneur who was set to become the next NASA administrator, cared about getting things done. Yes, he had donated to Democrats, but so had a lot of people. Advertisement Maybe it's a good thing, Musk told the president — it shows that you're willing to hire people of all stripes. But Trump was unmoved. He said that people don't change. These are the types of people who will turn, he said, and it won't end up being good for us. Advertisement Musk was anxious about mounting a vigorous defense of Isaacman with other people around, including Sergio Gor, director of the presidential personnel office who has clashed with Musk over nominees. Musk believed that he would be able to talk to the president after the gathering, privately. But later that day, Trump decided he would withdraw Isaacman from consideration to run NASA, dealing a blow to Musk, who had worked to place a top associate in charge of the agency most important to SpaceX, his rocket business. Musk spent the next day trying to salvage Isaacman's nomination, to no avail. Musk was stunned by the timing. This account of the crumbling relationship between the president and Trump is based on interviews with 13 people with direct knowledge of the events, all of whom asked for anonymity to describe private discussions. On Thursday, less than a week after the confrontation in the Oval Office, an extraordinary political alliance exploded, with Trump and Musk hurling insults at one another on social media. The feud culminated in threats from the president to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts with Musk's companies, and Musk claiming there were references to the president in government documents about Jeffrey Epstein, the sex offender. Musk indicated his support for the president's impeachment. By Thursday evening, Musk signaled he would be open to de-escalating the fight, while the president seemed to have little interest in an immediate reconciliation. Late Thursday, Musk backed off a threat to 'immediately' decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which transports NASA astronauts and supplies to and from the International Space Station. A short time later, when Bill Ackman, the hedge-fund billionaire, posted on social media that the two men 'should make peace for the benefit of our great country,' Musk responded, 'You're not wrong.' Advertisement Over the past several months, Musk saw his standing in the administration diminish. He angered the president by planning to attend a sensitive briefing about China at the Pentagon, one the president learned about from a New York Times report. He also sparred with Cabinet officials and top Trump aides, and criticized the president's tariffs. The president had grown more distant from a man with whom he had once seemed inseparable. One point of contention between the men was the president's signature domestic policy bill. Musk spent several days assailing the bill on X, his social media platform, furious because he said it would undo his work to cut government spending. He also suggested that he would support efforts ahead of next year's midterm elections to unseat Republicans who backed the bill. But it was the decision to pull Isaacman's nomination that people close to both men said had accelerated the end of the relationship. For Musk, there were few positions across the thousands in the federal government that mattered more than the head of NASA, because of its crucial importance to SpaceX. So it was of great personal benefit to Musk when Trump chose Isaacman, who has flown to space twice with SpaceX, to oversee the agency. For weeks, Senate Republican leadership had been under pressure from the White House to expedite his nomination, despite concerns from some Republican lawmakers about his past donations. The president, a White House aide told leaders, was fine with those donations, and the leadership should be as well. Advertisement After Trump withdrew Isaacman's nomination, Musk, his allies, and even some White House officials pinned the blame on Gor, believing he intentionally sabotaged Isaacman as Musk was on his way out. Gor and Musk had clashed several times early in Trump's second term, including at two Cabinet meetings, where Musk questioned how swiftly Gor was moving to fill the top ranks of agencies. By Friday morning, White House officials said Trump was planning to sell the red Tesla he said he had purchased in March in a show of support for Musk.

Epoch Times
42 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Senate GOP Seeks Consumer Financial Protection Funding Cuts, Federal Reserve Pay Caps
The Senate Banking Committee is proposing to cut all mandatory funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and cap pay for many Federal Reserve employees in its section of the One Big Beautiful Bill—the Republicans' sweeping tax relief and spending measure that is to serve as a springboard for President Donald Trump's second-term agenda. The proposed changes, released on June 5 and tucked into
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kentucky leaders see change in voter registration trends: ‘Candidates should take note'
FRANKFORT, Ky. (FOX 56) — State leaders are seeing a spike in voter affiliation shifting away from Republicans or Democrats. Secretary of State Michael Adams announced on Friday in a news release that Kentuckians registered under 'other' political affiliations have outpaced Republican and Democratic registrations combined for three straight months. 'As the Democrats move further left and the Republicans move further right, more voters are registering as Independent,' said Adams. 'Kentucky has a large and growing political center; candidates should take note and court this growing bloc of voters.' Owensboro's blue bridge to close for up to 3 months Kentucky gas tax to see reduction next month Kentucky health officials urge vaccines after infant deaths State officials said in a news release that Republican voter registration made up 47% of the electorate in Kentucky, with 1,582,699 voters, gaining an increase of 1,026 voters for an increase of 0.07%. Democratic registration makes up 42%, with 1,391,172 voters, seeing a decrease of 838 registrations. Adams wrote that by comparison, voters registered under other political parties saw an increase of 0.38%, or 1,352 voters. Secretary Adams' office wrote in a news release that 4,157 voters were removed in May, including 3,173 who died, 440 who moved out of state, 402 convicted felons, 65 who voluntarily de-registered, 49 voters adjudged mentally incompetent, and 28 duplicate registrations. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.