
Indiana-Illinois border bill — criticized as ‘waste of time' — passes Indiana Senate
House Bill 1008, authored by Speaker Todd Huston, would establish an Indiana-Illinois boundary adjustment commission to research the possibility of adjusting the boundaries between the two states. If the bill becomes law, Gov. Mike Braun would have to set the commission's first meeting no later than Sept. 1.
The bill was amended in the Senate Public Policy Committee earlier this month to allow one more Indiana representative to the commission and, with that, give the commission a quorum to meet.
Under the amended bill, Indiana would have six commissioners and Illinois would have five. The amended bill also states that a quorum of the commission consists of at least six members.
The bill passed the Senate 36-13, with three Republicans joining all 10 Democrats to vote against the bill. In a statement Wednesday, Huston said House Bill 1008 starts the conversation of shifting the border between Indiana and Illinois.
'Indiana is a great place to live, work, raise your kids and enjoy a high quality of life. We welcome our neighbors in Illinois seeking lower taxes and more opportunity to join us in the Hoosier state,' Huston, R-Fishers, said.
Sen. Scott Baldwin, who sponsored the bill in the Senate, said the bill was amended in committee 'in the highly unlikely event that Illinois doesn't participate in this measure' the commission can meet and discuss the border shift.
'We would have six members who would then be able to meet and report back to our governor as to the status, but they would also be able to function as it relates to communicating with the members of those 33 counties,' Baldwin said.
Baldwin, R-Noblesville, said nearly three dozen Illinois counties have voted in recent years to leave the state.
In November, seven Illinois counties — Iroquois, Calhoun, Clinton, Greene, Jersey, Madison and Perry counties — voted to secede from the state. Iroquois County is along the Indiana border, the remaining six counties are closer to Missouri.
'I've heard people say, 'this will never happen,' and maybe so,' Baldwin said. 'This is a matter of readiness not reciprocity. It's a political signal that we're willing to take on those 33 counties if they choose to do so.'
To change a state line, the U.S. Constitution dictates that the Indiana legislature, the Illinois legislature and then Congress would have to approve the measure, said professor Paul Helmke ot the Indiana University Paul H. O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs.
The Illinois counties voted to 'succeed from the state of Illinois and join the state of Indiana,' Baldwin said, but Illinoisans who are leading the effort testified in a House committee that the breakaway Illinois counties would like to form their own state.
G.H. Merritt, chairwoman of New Illinois, clarified in a House committee hearing in February that her organization is one of two in Illinois are working toward seceding from Illinois and creating a new state.
'Our goal is the constitutional formation of a new state separate from Illinois,' Merritt said.
Baldwin outlined Indiana's benefits compared to Illinois including better fiscal management, lower taxes and business-free policies and better infrastructure services. Indiana has lower income tax, corporate tax, sales tax, cigarette tax and fuel tax, Baldwin said, as well as lower property taxes.
'Many residents in Illinois feel like they are donor communities for Chicago,' Baldwin said. 'They feel like our Hoosier values are more aligned with their values.'
Indiana's unemployment rate is 1% lower compared to Illinois, Baldwin said. Further, Baldwin said Indiana has 'a strong sports legacy,' with NCAA basketball, Big Ten football and the Indy 500.
'It wouldn't happen overnight. We're just signaling to those Illinois counties that Indiana's open for business, and we'd be happy to accept them,' Baldwin said.
Sen. Greg Taylor, D-Indianapolis, asked Baldwin if he contacted Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker if he would support the commission. Baldwin said he read in media reports that Pritzker is 'less than pleased with the measure,' so he doubted Pritzker would take his call.
Pritzker brushed off the proposal — and fired back at the neighboring state — when he was asked about it at an unrelated news conference in January.
'It's a stunt. It's not going to happen,' Pritzker said. 'But I'll just say that Indiana is a low-wage state that doesn't protect workers, a state that does not provide health care for people in need, and so I don't think it's very attractive for anybody in Illinois.'
A spokesman for Pritzker said Tuesday the governor's position on House Bill 1008 hasn't changed.
Even if Pritzker agreed, Taylor said with the research and discussions about shifting the border, as well as the required congressional approval, means the border wouldn't shift within his lifetime.
'This is a waste of time,' Taylor said. 'This is political. Stop playing games. Stop beating around the bushes.'
Illinois state Rep. Brad Halbrook, R-Shelbyville, filed Illinois House Bill 1500 and it 'does similar things and is comparable to the Indiana bill,' he previously said.
Illinois House Bill 1500 states that if Indiana House Bill 1008 becomes law then, within 60 days after receiving notice from the governor of Indiana, the Illinois governor should appoint five members to the Illinois-Indiana boundary adjustment commission.
Indiana 'just made history,' Halbrook said in a statement Tuesday, while Illinois House Bill 1500 still hasn't been given a hearing.
'But the tide is turning. Indiana's actions have energized this movement and validated what so many of us already know: our voices matter, and we have a right to be heard,' Halbrook said.
Sen. Fady Qaddoura, D-Indianapolis, said many Indiana residents 'think this is a joke,' and that the Indiana legislature should be focused on other issues.
'We have so many major policies to address rather than sending political signals that we want to absorb other counties and study whether or not they want to join us,' Qaddoura said.
Sen. Shelli Yoder, D-Bloomington, said House Bill 1008 is 'a political stunt.' Indiana's wages remain stagnant, health care remains 'among the most dire in the country,' and affordable housing 'is increasingly out of reach for working Hoosiers,' Yoder said.
'These are the challenges that should be front and center for our state legislature. Instead, Indiana statehouse Republicans have spent the better part of this legislative session, and even started our session, naming House Bill 1008 as a priority focused on the people of Illinois,' Yoder said.
Yoder pointed to a Ball State University study, which found that if the 33 counties were their own state it would be the second poorest state in the U.S.
The counties pay less than $3,000 in taxes annually, but they require more than $5,000 in government services per year, Yoder said. Hoosiers would have to pay an additional $2 billion in taxes to subsidize the cost, she said.
Baldwin said he 'skimmed' at the Ball State study and that he did not agree 'with the assumptions that were made to generate the financial review.'
'If you're going to use Illinois finances and then compare them to Indiana finances you're pretty much off base already,' Baldwin said. 'The grass is always greener where you water it. We water it here in Indiana, that's why 33 counties want to come here. Indiana is open for business.'
The bill will be sent back to the House for final approval because it was amended in the Senate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Perino hits back at Newsom social media criticism: ‘We get the joke'
Fox News host Dana Perino hit back at California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Tuesday after the Democrat attacked her for criticizing his social media and messaging strategy, which in recent days has seemingly mocked the posting style of President Trump. 'And that was my point,' Perino said during an episode of 'The Five,' responding to the criticism. 'If you're doing this and it's not authentic and you're trying to do somebody else who you say is Hitler and you think that we don't get the joke, oh no, we get the joke, it's just not funny,' she added in a clip first highlighted by Mediaite. The host was responding to a slew of remarks made by the governor's office on social platform X, pushing back on her and Fox after she said Monday that he was 'making a fool' of himself with posts in all-caps that attack Trump and his allies. Much of the 'FOX HATES THAT I AM AMERICA'S MOST FAVORITE GOVERNOR ('RATINGS KING') SAVING AMERICA,' Newsom's office posted earlier this week. The Democratic governor has increased his criticism of the president in recent months and rolled out a revamped media strategy, sparking speculation he could launch a White House bid for 2028. A new poll, published Wednesday, shows Newsom leading former Vice President Harris in a hypothetical presidential primary matchup in the Golden State. Perino is a leading host and political analyst at Fox and served as White House press secretary under former President George W. Bush.


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Unredacted texts show Jeanine Pirro praising Trump, blasting Hannity while at Fox
Text messages sent in 2020 by Jeanine Pirro, the former Fox News host and new top prosecutor in Washington, D.C., show her bragging about helping President Trump ahead of the election and blasting Fox colleague Sean Hannity. 'I work so hard for the party across the country… I'm the # 1 watched show on all news cable all weekend. I work so hard for the President and party,' Pirro texted the then-head of the RNC, Ronna McDaniel, in September 2020. The text messages, which were first reported by the Washington Post, were unredacted and submitted in court by voting systems company Smartmatic as part of its ongoing litigation against the network over its coverage of the 2020 election. In another text message, sent in October of that year, Pirro wrote about an Oval Office meeting with Trump and complained about Hannity. 'Sean [Hannity] is an egomaniac. I was in the Oval with Hariri talking to POTUS,' she wrote. 'He storms in like he owns the place, throws his papers on the Pres desk and says, you don't mind if I use your private bathroom, and walks into bathroom within Oval and uses it. Looks at me and says, I got to talk to him. Ie, you go. It's all abt him, period. No one else matters.' Pirro, a firebrand political commentator and close ally of the president, left Fox earlier this year when Trump tapped her to serve as U.S. attorney in Washington, D.C. She has vowed to help the president crack down on crime in the district and blasted community activists and Democrats who have pushed back on the president's anti-crime efforts. Pirro is among the Fox hosts whom Smartmatic has alleged in court documents knowingly promoted Trump's false claims about voter fraud and defamed the company with criticism of its software, which the president and his allies were pushing. Fox has countered in legal filings and public statements that it was merely covering newsworthy allegations of an improper election being pushed by the president and his allies, and has argued Smartmatic is inflating its valuation. The network has also highlighted allegations of bribery and money laundering that executives at Smartmatic has faced in recent months. 'The evidence shows that Smartmatic's business and reputation were badly suffering long before any claims by President Trump's lawyers on Fox News and that Smartmatic grossly inflated its damage claims to generate headlines and chill free speech,' the network said in a statement to The Hill. 'Now, in the aftermath of Smartmatic's executives getting indicted for bribery charges, we are eager and ready to continue defending our press freedoms.' A trial in the Fox-Smartmatic case is not expected for months.


The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas Democrat seeks to force Epstein vote ahead of expected passage of new map
Texas Democrats are looking to put Republicans on defense ahead of the expected passage of a GOP-friendly map by putting an amendment to a vote concerning the Jeffrey Epstein files. Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu (D) is introducing an amendment that would allow a new House map to take effect only after Attorney General Pam Bondi publicly releases files related to the disgraced financier. Wu's amendment says the maps won't be adopted until Bondi 'makes publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in the possession of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Attorneys' Offices, that relate to Jeffrey Epstein.' The Texas House is convening at 11 am E.T., where the lower chamber is expected to pass a new House map that would allow Republicans to net five seats ahead of 2026. The Epstein files have been a thorn in President Trump's side, with both Republicans and Democrats calling for the release of more documents around Epstein, who pled guilty to several state charges in Florida pertaining to solicitation of prostitution. He also faced sex trafficking and conspiracy charges before he died in jail in 2019. Officials have determined Epstein died by suicide though there's been skepticism among the public regarding the actual cause of his death. Trump said on the campaign trail he would declassify documents around Epstein — a figure who the president has sought to distance himself from — though some, including among Trump's most loyal supporters have been upset over the administration's handling of the Epstein case. The Wall Street Journal reported that Bondi told Trump his name appeared in the Epstein documents, among other notable names, though that does not mean the president is guilty of any wrongdoing. But that hasn't stopped Democrats from putting pressure on Republicans over the issue. 'Trump is in those files, and that's why he's fighting to keep them hidden,' Wu alleged in a statement. 'At the same time he's demanding Abbott ram through racist maps, he's making sure Congressional Republicans block the release of files that could expose his decades-long relationship with a child sex trafficker,' he added. 'This amendment forces Republicans to choose between their loyalty to Trump and their obligation to expose sexual predators.'