logo
White smoke at Sistine Chapel signals new pope elected

White smoke at Sistine Chapel signals new pope elected

The National08-05-2025
White smoke has been seen billowing from the chimney of the Sistine Chapel, signalling a successor to Pope Francis has been elected. The conclave of cardinals has been gathered since Wednesday to choose the new leader of the world's 1.4 billion Catholics in a centuries-old ritual. The identity of the next pontiff, and his papal name, is due to be announced shortly. Following tradition, the cardinals burnt their ballot papers to ensure the secrecy of their votes. Chemicals – potassium chlorate, lactose and chloroform resin – were added to provide the white smoke which acts as a signal to the crowds gathered outside in St Peter's Square that they have agreed who among them will be the 267th pontiff. The 133 cardinals entered the Sistine Chapel on Wednesday afternoon, sealing themselves away from the outside world until they came to a two-thirds majority decision. Bright red cassocks, Swiss Guards standing at attention, ancient Latin chants and oaths preceding the slamming shut of the doors were part of he heavily ritualised procedure to the conclave, a word which comes from the Latin term meaning a room that can be locked with a key. At a mass shortly before being sequestered, the dean of the College of Cardinals, Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, prayed that the cardinals making up the most geographically diverse conclave in the faith's 2,000-year history could agree 'on the pope that our time needs', saying it requires a 'leader who can awaken consciences'. Pope Francis, who died last month aged 88, named 108 of the 133 'princes of the church' including younger ones from the 'global south', which injected an unusual degree of uncertainty in the process. This conclave was the largest – and the most international – in history, with representatives from 70 countries across five continents. For much of the past century, it has taken between three and 14 ballots to find a pope. John Paul I – the pope who reigned for 33 days in 1978 – was elected on the fourth ballot. His successor, John Paul II, needed eight. Pope Francis was elected on the fifth in 2013. Voting for a new pope follows a strict choreography that is dictated by church law. Each cardinal writes his choice on a piece of paper inscribed with the words 'Eligo in summen pontificem' – 'I elect as Supreme Pontiff.' They approach the altar one by one and say: 'I call as my witness, Christ the Lord who will be my judge, that my vote is given to the one who, before God, I think should be elected.' The folded ballot is placed on a round plate and tipped into a silver and gold urn. Once cast, the ballots are opened one by one by three different 'scrutineers', cardinals selected at random who write down the names and read them aloud. The scrutineers, whose work is checked by other cardinals called revisors, then add up the results of each round of balloting and write it down on a separate sheet of paper, which is preserved in the papal archives. As the scrutineer reads out each name, he pierces each ballot with a needle through the word 'Eligo." All the ballots are then bound together with thread, and the bundle is put aside and burnt in the chapel stove along with a chemical to produce the smoke.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'You look fabulous': Zelensky's formal attire draws praise from Trump, reporter
'You look fabulous': Zelensky's formal attire draws praise from Trump, reporter

Khaleej Times

timean hour ago

  • Khaleej Times

'You look fabulous': Zelensky's formal attire draws praise from Trump, reporter

The last time Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky visited the White House, his dark military-style outfit drew scorn from US President Donald Trump, who wears suits every day. Zelensky's garb at that February meeting featured in a disastrous session with Trump in which the two leaders bickered and the Ukrainian president was escorted out of the White House early, without lunch. On Monday, with his country facing pressure to accept a peace deal to end Europe's deadliest war in 80 years, Zelensky showed up for his talks with Trump wearing more formal attire. The black-on-black ensemble, sans tie, wasn't exactly a suit, but it seemed to please Trump all the same. Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels. A reporter who had asked Zelensky in February why he was not wearing a suit complimented the Ukraine leader on the attire he chose for his latest Oval Office session with Trump. "You look fabulous in that suit," the reporter said. Trump chimed in: "I said the same thing." This time, Zelensky got in a good-natured dig. "You're wearing the same suit," he told the reporter, drawing laughter. "I changed." The media-savvy Ukrainian leader had worn military-type outfits to show solidarity with the troops fighting Russian invaders since Moscow's 2022 full-scale invasion. But after the February meeting with Trump, Zelensky switched to a more formal wardrobe. When the two leaders met at Pope Francis's funeral in Rome in April, the Ukrainian president wore a heavy black field jacket and black shirt buttoned to the collar, with no tie. The negative focus on Zelensky's attire at the White House was widely criticized at the time by Ukrainians, who have largely rallied around their leader since Moscow's invasion.

Trump arranging peace talks between Putin, Zelensky; location to be determined
Trump arranging peace talks between Putin, Zelensky; location to be determined

Khaleej Times

time2 hours ago

  • Khaleej Times

Trump arranging peace talks between Putin, Zelensky; location to be determined

Russian and Ukrainian presidents Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky looked set for a peace summit after fast-moving talks Monday between Donald Trump and European leaders that focused on the key issue of long-term security guarantees for Kyiv. Hopes of a breakthrough rose after Trump said he had spoken by phone with Russian counterpart Putin, whom he met in Alaska last week following a "very good" meeting with the Europeans and the Ukrainian president at the White House. It would be the first meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders since Moscow's brutal invasion nearly three and a half years ago, and comes as Trump tries to live up to his promise to quickly end the war. Trump, 79, wrote on his Truth Social network that "everyone is very happy about the possibility of PEACE for Russia/Ukraine." "At the conclusion of the meetings, I called President Putin, and began the arrangements for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between President Putin and President Zelensky," Trump said. Trump said he would then hold a three-way summit with the Ukrainian and Russian leaders. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said Putin had agreed to the bilateral meeting within the next two weeks, but there was no confirmation of a date or location. Zelensky 'ready' to meet Putin Zelensky confirmed to reporters outside the White House he was "ready" for a bilateral with bitter foe Putin, whose invasion of Ukraine has led to tens of thousands of deaths. In Moscow, a Kremlin aide said that Putin was open to the "idea" of direct talks with Ukraine. The Ukraine war has ground to a virtual stalemate despite a few recent Russian advances, but Trump's summit with Putin last Friday failed to produce any ceasefire. Zelensky then rushed to the White House to meet with Trump after the US president increasingly pushed the Ukrainian leader to make concessions to Russia. The leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland, the European Commission and NATO then announced that they would be coming too, in a pointed show of support. Zelensky also met one-on-one in the Oval Office with Trump in their first encounter in the heart of the US presidency since their acrimonious blow-up there in February. The Ukrainian president said the meeting was their "best" yet, with little of the tensions that erupted when Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated him in front of TV cameras for not being "grateful" for US support. Trump even complimented Zelensky on his black jacket, after the Ukrainian was criticized by right-wing media because he failed to change his trademark war-leader's outfit for a suit during the February visit. 'Security guarantees' The US president meanwhile said he had discussed security guarantees for Ukraine, adding that Putin had agreed to them despite ruling out Kyiv's long-held dream of joining the NATO alliance. Trump said the guarantees "would be provided by the various European Countries, with a coordination with the United States of America." NATO chief Mark Rutte told reporters at the White House it was a "very successful meeting" with "the president really breaking the deadlock." "Today was really about security guarantees, the US getting more involved there, and all the details to be hammered out over the coming days," he said. The Financial Times, citing a document seen by the newspaper, said Ukraine had undertaken to buy $100 billion of US weapons financed by Europe in return for US guarantees for its security. Zelensky later spoke to reporters about a $90 billion package, and said Ukraine and its allies would formalize the terms of the security guarantees within 10 days. The presence of the European leaders however also underscored continuing nervousness about whether Trump will pivot towards Putin as he has on a number of occasions. Trump had pushed Ukraine ahead of the meeting to give up Crimea and abandon its goal of joining NATO -- both key demands made by Putin. French President Emmanuel Macron called Monday for stepping up sanctions against Russia if Putin does not move forward on peace with Ukraine. Finnish President Alex Stubb said Putin was not "to be trusted." Germany's Merz meanwhile said Ukraine should not be forced to surrender its Donbas region to Russia in talks. "The Russian demand that Kyiv give up the free parts of Donbas corresponds, to put it bluntly, to a proposal for the United States to have to give up Florida," Merz told reporters.

UK warns author Sally Rooney after pledge to fund banned Palestine Action
UK warns author Sally Rooney after pledge to fund banned Palestine Action

The National

time14 hours ago

  • The National

UK warns author Sally Rooney after pledge to fund banned Palestine Action

The UK government has warned the award-winning Irish author Sally Rooney that she would be committing a terrorist offence if she funds Palestine Action. Ms Rooney, who has twice had novels adapted into BBC dramas, said she would use the earnings of her work and her platform to 'go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide'. 'If this makes me a supporter of terror under UK law, so be it,' she wrote in The Irish Times, deliberately avoiding any legal risk if she published her support in a UK publication. Responding to Ms Rooney on Monday, No 10 Downing Street said 'support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act' and no one should be backing the group. Palestine Action was designated a terrorist organisation in July for a string of direct action protests against weapons manufacturers, an RAF airbase and universities, which caused millions of pounds worth of damage. But the move has caused outcry from campaigners who fear it ignores a long-standing tradition of direct action in the UK dating back to the Suffragettes and that it risks undermining terrorism laws. More than 700 people who came out in support of the group have since have been arrested, with dozens charged. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper defended her decision to proscribe the group on Sunday, accusing them of conducting 'an escalating campaign involving … criminal damage, intimidation, violence, weapons and serious injuries to individuals". Ms Rooney said she would have liked to publish her statement in a UK newspaper but that this would now be illegal under the law. Regarding her intention to use the royalties earned from UK publishers and the BBC to fund the group, she said: 'If the British state considers this 'terrorism', then perhaps it should investigate the shady organisations that continue to promote my work and fund my activities, such as [retailer] WH Smith and the BBC." The BBC has already faced backlash this year after it emerged that the child narrator of one of its Gaza documentaries was the son of a minister in Gaza's Hamas-led administration. Questions were raised at the time as to whether payments made to the son's family for his participation could have been used to fund Hamas. A BBC representative said of Ms Rooney's remarks: "Matters relating to proscribed organisations are for the relevant authorities." 'Selective enforcement' Palestine Action – whose co-founder Richard Barnard was a member of Extinction Rebellion – once represented a small minority of people campaigning for the Palestinian cause in the UK. But support for the group has grown exponentially since its proscription – with civil rights campaigners also joining the cause. More than 500 people were arrested for supporting the group in one day this month. Labour peer, Shami Chakrabarti, warned the government ban is at risk of becoming an 'I am Spartacus' moment, which could lead to more people taking to the streets to support the group. Ms Rooney claimed the recent arrests – which include Irish citizens in the UK – were a "selective enforcement of anti-terror law". She highlighted the activities of supporters of another proscribed organisation, the Ulster Volunteer Force, who had repainted a loyalist mural in north Belfast after it was damaged by a storm last year. 'No arrests were made on that basis, nor has the mural been taken down, though the UVF is a proscribed terrorist organisation responsible for the murders of hundreds of civilians," she said. 'Palestine Action, proscribed under the same law, is responsible for zero deaths and has never advocated the use of violence against any human being. Why then are its supporters arrested for wearing T-shirts, while murals celebrating loyalist death squads are left untouched?' Celebrity donations Ms Rooney is not the first high-profile donor to Palestine Action. James 'Fergie' Chambers, an American communist and heir to a multibillion-pound conglomerate, said in a 2023 interview that he was paying Palestine Action's legal fees. Ms Cooper has previously spoken of her suspicions that Palestine Action was receiving funding from Iran, a claim the group dismissed as a ' sham '. Palestine Action previously told The National its donations came from 'ordinary people' who support the movement. It does not publish the names of its major donors and still takes them in the form of cryptocurrency on its website. Mick Napier, the founder of Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaign (which is not linked to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign), said he had seen a 'groundswell' of public support for the group since the proscription came into effect. He said his group was currently raising the funds to cover legal fees for people arrested for attending demonstrations in support of Palestine Action in recent weeks, and that donations ranged from £5 to £1,000 ($6.80 to ($1,355).

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store