
Trump's Brazil Blow-Up Raises Stakes for Leftist Summit in Chile
Chilean President Gabriel Boric on Monday will receive Brazil's Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, along with Colombia's Gustavo Petro, Spain's Pedro Sánchez and Uruguay's Yamandú Orsi for the one-day conference in Santiago. The meeting's goals of fomenting multilateralism and combating disinformation risk provoking a backlash from Trump, who floated tariffs against the BRICS bloc of emerging-market countries when they criticized his levies at a separate gathering earlier this month. Then he trained his rage on host-nation Brazil.
This summit now puts a bullseye on leaders like Boric, who has so far evaded Trump's threats, as well as others like Petro, who is navigating souring relations with the US. On July 16, Trump said he will send letters to over 150 countries notifying them of tariffs in the latest sign of his strategy for weaponizing trade. As many nations strive to work together to blunt the effects of protectionism, Trump is showing he won't hesitate to lash out against critics.
What Bloomberg Economics Says
'We had a very recent precedent that could repeat itself. We're seeing objectives that are at odds with Trump and also progressive leaders that are teaming up, potentially with a statement that he can feel is also criticism of himself and his policies.'
— Jimena Zúñiga, Latin America Geoeconomics Analyst
Monday's meeting mirrors growing cooperation in other regions of the world such as the European Union, which is preparing to step up engagement with countries like Canada that have been hit by Trump's tariffs and ultimatums.
The gathering in Chile marks the first formal, face-to-face encounter of the group following an online conference in February this year. Participants will advance in their 'shared position in favor of multilateralism, democracy and global cooperation based on social justice,' according to a Chilean government statement. The group's proposals will be presented and developed further at its next meeting on the sidelines of September's United Nations General Assembly.
'These are countries that are not inclined to just bow down and make concessions to Washington, given the very coercive and punitive approach that Washington is taking,' said Kenneth Roberts, a Cornell University professor of government who focuses on Latin American politics.
In that context, the summit is a particularly big gamble for Boric as host, given that his government is weak and counts the US as its biggest trading partner after China.
'There are scenarios where the United States could take economic actions, at least in the short term, which would be detrimental to Chile,' Roberts said.
Lula presided over July's BRICS conference in Rio de Janeiro which released a declaration criticizing trade protectionism and airstrikes on Iran, both clear swipes at Trump even if it didn't mention him or the US by name. Days later, the US president threatened aggressive tariffs on goods from Latin America's largest economy, heavily citing political reasons.
Monday's event in Santiago will end up being quite different from the broader BRICS gathering, which included China, Iran and Saudi Arabia and addressed sensitive issues like dollarization, said Brian Winter, executive vice president of Americas Society and Council of the Americas. As a result, the odds of a response from Trump are lower, he said.
The event also gives Boric's team an opportunity to learn from Lula's recent experiences.
'I suspect that the Chilean foreign ministry, which is the host government, will be cautious and try to ensure that whatever collective statements are made are free of inflammatory language,' Winter said.
There's scant room for error. In Brazil, polls show more voters rallying around Lula as he stands up against Trump's coercion. In contrast, Boric's and Petro's high disapproval rates mean there's little they can do to reverse public sentiment, said Zúñiga, from Bloomberg Economics.
Boric's outgoing administration is already on alert as it awaits details on Trump's plan to impose a 50% tariff on copper. The red metal is Chile's top export product.
Any backlash from Trump stands to 'elicit some criticism because some Chileans may say, 'hey Boric, this just happened to Brazil, you should have been more careful,'' Zúñiga said.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Columbia University reaches $220 million settlement with Trump over antisemitism concerns
Columbia University has agreed to pay $220 million to the federal government to settle investigations tied to antisemitism concerns and suspended research funding. The settlement follows months of scrutiny from the Trump administration over the university's handling of campus protests during the Israel-Hamas war. read more Columbia University has reached a $220 million settlement with the Trump administration to resolve federal investigations linked to antisemitism concerns and the suspension of research funding, the Ivy League institution announced on Wednesday. Under the agreement, Columbia will pay $200 million over three years to the federal government and an additional $21 million to settle separate investigations by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The deal follows months of federal scrutiny after allegations that the university failed to effectively address antisemitism on campus during the Israel-Hamas conflict that erupted in October 2023. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In response to pressure from the Trump administration, Columbia agreed earlier this year to a set of reforms, including adopting a new definition of antisemitism and revising its student disciplinary procedures. Acting University President Claire Shipman called the settlement 'an important step forward,' saying it codifies the agreed changes while preserving the university's academic independence. The agreement does not include an admission of wrongdoing. At one point, Columbia faced the potential loss of billions in federal funding, including more than $400 million in research grants that had already been canceled. Shipman said the settlement restores the university's critical research partnership with the federal government while protecting its institutional values. As part of the deal, Columbia will also review its Middle East studies curriculum to ensure it is 'comprehensive and balanced,' hire new faculty at the Institute for Israel and Jewish Studies, and dismantle programs deemed to promote unlawful race-based outcomes, quotas, or diversity targets.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Supreme Court green lights Trump's removal of 3 Democrats from consumer safety panel
The US Supreme Court has allowed the removal of 3 Democratic members from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, siding with the Trump administration in a dispute over presidential authority. The decision overturns a lower court ruling that had reinstated the Biden-appointed officials. read more Ties between the US and Pakistan have improved under Donald Trump. File Photo/Reuters The US Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the removal of three Democratic members of the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), siding with the Trump administration in a dispute over presidential authority. The three officials, appointed by President Biden to serve seven-year terms, were fired by Donald Trump in May. A federal judge had reinstated them, calling the firings unlawful, but the Supreme Court overturned that decision in response to an emergency appeal from the Justice Department. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The administration argued that the CPSC, like other federal agencies, falls under presidential control—giving the president the power to remove commissioners without cause. The court's three liberal justices dissented. The CPSC, created in 1972, is tasked with protecting consumers by issuing recalls and enforcing product safety rules. By law, the five-member panel must be bipartisan, with no more than three commissioners from the president's party. The ruling reflects broader legal tensions over the extent of presidential power. In June, a Biden-appointed judge, Matthew Maddox, had ruled that the CPSC's structure offered some independence from the executive branch, unlike agencies where firings had been upheld. The case could eventually lead to a challenge of the 1935 Humphrey's Executor ruling, which held that presidents cannot fire members of independent agencies without cause. That decision has long frustrated conservatives, who argue federal agencies should answer directly to the president. Attorneys for the ousted commissioners warned that allowing such removals could undermine the agency's independence and its ability to function free from political pressure.


India Today
43 minutes ago
- India Today
Trump AI policy: Build supercomputers, fight ‘woke' bias, slash red tape
President Donald Trump on Wednesday unveiled a sweeping new plan for America's 'global dominance' in artificial intelligence, proposing to cut back environmental regulations to speed up the construction of AI supercomputers while promoting the sale of US-made AI technologies at home and 'AI Action Plan' embraces many of the ideas voiced by tech industry lobbyists and the Silicon Valley investors who backed Trump's election campaign last must once again be a country where innovators are rewarded with a green light, not strangled with red tape,' Trump said at an unveiling event that was co-hosted by the bipartisan Hill and Valley Forum and the 'All-In' podcast, a business and technology show hosted by four tech investors and entrepreneurs, which includes Trump's AI czar, David Sacks. The plan includes some familiar tech lobby pitches. That includes accelerating the sale of AI technology abroad and making it easier to construct the energy-hungry data centre buildings that are needed to form and run AI products. It also includes some AI culture war preoccupations of the circle of venture capitalists who endorsed Trump last signed three executive orders on Wednesday to deliver on the plan. They seek to fast-track permitting of AI construction projects, expand US tech exports and get rid of 'woke' in had given his tech advisers six months to come up with new AI policies after revoking President Joe Biden's signature AI guardrails on his first day in PLAN: GLOBAL DOMINANCE, CUTTING REGULATIONSThe plan prioritises AI innovation and adoption, urging the removal of any barriers that could slow down adoption across industries and government. The nation's policy, Trump said, will be to do 'whatever it takes to lead the world in artificial intelligence.'Yet it also seeks to guide the industry's growth to address a longtime rallying point for the tech industry's loudest Trump backers: countering the liberal bias they see in AI chatbots such as ChatGPT or Google's plan aims to block the government from contracting with tech companies unless they 'ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias.' The plan says the nation's leading AI models should protect free speech and be 'founded on American values,' though it doesn't define which values those should a former PayPal executive and now Trump's top AI adviser, has been criticizing 'woke AI' for more than a year, fueled by Google's February 2024 rollout of an AI image generator. When asked to show an American Founding Father, it created pictures of Black, Asian, and Native American quickly fixed its tool, but the 'Black George Washington' moment remained a parable for the problem of AI's perceived political bias, taken up by X owner Elon Musk, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen, Vice President JD Vance and Republican among the plan's goals is to speed up permitting and loosen environmental regulation to accelerate construction on new data centers and factories. It condemns 'radical climate dogma' and recommends lifting environmental restrictions, including clean air and water has previously paired AI's need for huge amounts of electricity with his own push to tap into U.S. energy sources, including gas, coal and nuclear.'We will be adding at least as much electric capacity as China,' Trump said at the Wednesday event. 'Every company will be given the right to build their own power plant.'Many tech giants are already well on their way toward building new data centers in the U.S. and around the world. OpenAI announced this week that it has switched on the first phase of a massive data center complex in Abilene, Texas, part of an Oracle-backed project known as Stargate that Trump promoted earlier this year. Amazon, Microsoft, Meta and xAI also have major projects tech industry has pushed for easier permitting rules to get its computing facilities connected to power, but the AI building boom has also contributed to spiking demand for fossil fuel production, which contributes to global Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres on Tuesday called on the world's major tech firms to power data centers completely with renewables by plan includes a strategy to disincentivize states from aggressively regulating AI technology, calling on federal agencies not to provide funding to states with burdensome regulations.'We need one common sense federal standard that supersedes all states, supersedes everybody,' Trump said, 'so you don't end up in litigation with 43 states at one time.'WHO BENEFITS FROM TRUMP 'S AI ACTION PLAN?There are sharp debates on how to regulate AI, even among the influential venture capitalists who have been debating it on their favorite medium: the some Trump backers, particularly Andreessen, have advocated an 'accelerationist' approach that aims to speed up AI advancement with minimal regulation, Sacks has described himself as taking a middle road of techno-realism.'Technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop. If we don't do it, somebody else will,' Sacks said on the 'All-In' Tuesday, more than 100 groups, including labor unions, parent groups, environmental justice organizations and privacy advocates, signed a resolution opposing Trump's embrace of industry-driven AI policy and calling for a 'People's AI Action Plan' that would 'deliver first and foremost for the American people.'J.B. Branch, Big Tech accountability advocate at the watchdog group Public Citizen, which signed the resolution, called the plan a 'sellout.''Under this plan, tech giants get sweetheart deals while everyday Americans will see their electricity bills rise to subsidize discounted power for massive AI data centers,' Branch said in a statement Wednesday. 'Americans deserve an AI future rooted in safety, fairness, and accountability — not a handout to billionaires.'- EndsTune InMust Watch