Your step-by-step guide to a smart home in India under ₹15,000, with installation tips for each gadget
Smart homes aren't just a techie's fantasy anymore. Today, even if you're living in a regular 2BHK or a bustling family flat, you can bring a touch of intelligence to your space without raking in a new EMI or worrying about the finances of the following month. The idea isn't about showing off to your neighbours or making your house look like a sci-fi movie set. If you want to make your life a bit smoother, safer and sometimes just a little more fun, this list is for you. And with Amazon's range of budget-friendly gadgets, you can set up a genuinely useful smart home kit for under ₹ 15,000.
Let's break it down, product by product, and see how each one fits into your daily life.
Think of the Echo Dot as your friend who's always ready to help. It can play music, news, reminders, or to control other gadgets with your voice. It sits quietly on your table, but don't be fooled - Alexa can manage timers, answer questions, and even crack a joke when you need it.
Installation difficulty: 1/5
Just plug it in, connect to Wi-Fi with the Alexa app, and you're set. Even your parents can do this in ten minutes.
Still watching cable? The Fire TV Stick Lite plugs into your TV and opens up a world of streaming - think Prime Video, Netflix, YouTube, and more. You can even ask Alexa to find your favourite shows.
Installation difficulty: 1/5
Plug it into your TV's HDMI port, connect to Wi-Fi, follow a few on-screen steps, and you're done. No need to call the neighbourhood techie.
This little plug turns your regular appliances smart. Want to switch on the geyser from bed or check if you left the iron on? Just tap your phone or ask Alexa.
Installation difficulty: 1/5
Plug it in, set it up with the app, and link it to Alexa. It's as easy as setting up a new WhatsApp account.
Worried about what's happening at home when you're out? This camera lets you peek in from anywhere. You get night vision, motion alerts, and two-way talk—handy for checking on pets or deliveries.
Installation difficulty: 2/5
Mounting it is optional. Plug in, connect to Wi-Fi, and follow the app. Slightly more steps, but nothing you can't handle.
Change the mood of your room with a tap. These bulbs let you adjust brightness and colour, set schedules, and control everything from your phone or with your voice.
Installation difficulty: 1/5
Screw in like any bulb, connect to Wi-Fi, and you're ready. No electrician needed.
Still using old-school remotes for your AC or TV? This gadget lets you control them from your phone or with Alexa. Great for those times when the remote is always missing.
Installation difficulty: 2/5
Plug in, connect to Wi-Fi, and set up your remotes in the app. Takes a bit of patience but is very doable.
Total: ₹ 13,545– ₹ 13,645
You still have some change left for a smart night light or an automatic water dispenser.
With these smart tools, you can get a little more control over your day. Most of these products are plug-and-play, so you won't need to drill holes or call an expert. The best part? You can start small and keep adding as you go.
A smart home goes beyond fancy tech and should be about making your space work for you. And with this kit, you're well on your way.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Here's Why The Public Needs To Question The Good AI Myth Pushed By Tech Firms
London: While there's been much negative discussion about AI, including on the possibility that it will take over the world, the public is also being bombarded with positive messages about the technology, and what it can do. This 'good AI' myth is a key tool used by tech companies to promote their products. Yet there's evidence that consumers are wary of the presence of AI in some products. This means that positive promotion of AI may be putting unwanted pressure on people to accept the use of AI in their lives. AI is becoming so ubiquitous that people may be losing their ability to say no to using it. It's in smartphones, smart TVs, smart speakers like Alexa and virtual assistants like Siri. We're constantly told that our privacy will be protected. But with the personal nature of the data that AI has access to in these devices, can we afford to trust such assurances? Some politicians also propagate the 'good AI' promise with immense conviction, mirroring the messages coming from tech companies. My current research is partly explained in a new book called the The Myth of Good AI. This research shows that the data feeding our AI systems is biased, as it often over-represents privileged sections of the population and mainstream attitudes. This means that any AI products that don't include data from marginalised people, or minorities, might discriminate against them. This explains why AI systems continue to be riddled with racism, ageism and various forms of gender discrimination, for instance. The speed with which this technology is impinging on our everyday life, makes it very hard to properly assess the consequences. And an approach to AI that is more critical of how it works does not make for good marketing for the tech companies. Power Structures Positive ideas about AI and its abilities are currently dominating all aspects of AI innovation. This is partly determined by state interests and by the profit margins of the tech companies. These are tied into the power structures held up by tech multi-billionaires, and, in some places, their influence on governments. The relationship between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, despite its recent souring, is a vivid manifestation of this. And so, the public is at the receiving end of a distinctly hierarchical top-down system, from the big tech companies and their governmental enablers to users. In this way, we are made to consume, with little to no influence over how the technology is used. This positive AI ideology is therefore primarily about money and power. As it stands, there is no global movement with a unifying manifesto that would bring together societies to leverage AI for the benefit of communities of people, or to safeguard our right to privacy. This 'right to be left alone', codified in the US constitution and international human rights law, is a central pillar of my argument. It is also something that is almost entirely absent from the assurances about AI made by the big tech companies. Yet, some of the risks of the technology are already evident. A database compiling cases in which lawyers around the world used AI, identified 157 cases in which false AI-generated information – so called hallucinations – skewed legal rulings. Some forms of AI can also be manipulated to blackmail and extort, or create blueprints for murder and terrorism. Tech companies need to programme the algorithms with data that represents everyone, not just the privileged, in order to reduce discrimination. In this way, the public are not forced to give into the consensus that AI will solve many of our problems, without proper supervision by society. This distinction between the ability to think creatively, ethically and intuitively may be the most fundamental faultline between human and machine. It's up to ordinary people to question the good AI myth. A critical approach to AI should contribute to the creation of more socially relevant and responsible technology, a technology that is already trialled in torture scenarios, as the book discusses, too. The point at which AI systems would outdo us in every task is expected to be a decade or so away. In the meantime there needs to be resistance to this attack on our right to privacy, and more awareness of just how AI works. (Author: Arshin Adib-Moghaddam, Professor in Global Thought and Comparative Philosophies, Director of Centre for AI Futures, SOAS, University of London) (Disclosure Statement: Arshin Adib-Moghaddam does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.)
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
US judge allows using pirated books to train AI
A federal judge has sided with the AI company Anthropic in its practice of training a chatbot on copyrighted books without permission from the authors. Tremendous amounts of data are needed to train large language models powering generative AI.(iStock) In a decision with the potential to set legal precedent, District Court Judge William Asup ruled on Monday that Anthropic's training of its artificial intelligence creation Claude with millions of pirated books was allowed under a "fair use" doctrine in a law called the Copyright Act. "Use of the books at issue to train Claude and its precursors was exceedingly transformative and was a fair use," Alsup wrote in his decision. Tremendous amounts of data are needed to train large language models powering generative AI. Musicians, book authors, visual artists and news publications have sued AI companies that used their data without permission or payment. Alsup's decision in favor of Anthropic is a first in the United States and could be sited in other cases as a legal precedent by AI firms defending themselves in court. AI companies generally defend their practices by claiming fair use, arguing that training AI on large data sets fundamentally changes the original content and is necessary for innovation. Though most of these lawsuits are still in early stages, their outcomes could have a profound effect on the shape of the AI industry. Along with downloading for free millions of books from websites offering pirated works, Anthropic bought copyrighted books, scanned the pages and stored them in digital format, according to court documents. Anthropic's aim was to amass a library of "all the books in the world", training AI models on content as deemed fit, the judge said in his ruling. "Anthropic had no entitlement to use pirated copies for its central library," Alsup ruled, ordering a trial on that portion of the copyright lawsuit filed by authors to determine damages. Anthropic, valued at $61.5 billion and heavily backed by Amazon, was founded in 2021 by former executives from OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT. The company, known for its Claude chatbot and AI models, bills itself as focused on AI safety and responsible development. Anthropic did not immediately reply to a request for comment.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk's one-word reaction to study claiming AI may sacrifice human lives to avoid being shut down
Elon Musk has reacted to a recent study conducted by Amazon and Google-backed AI start-up Anthropic . In the study, the AI company claims that AI models may be willing to sacrifice human lives to avoid being shut down or replaced. Anthropic's study revealed that AI models would potentially resort to blackmail, leaking sensitive information, or allowing human fatalities if it meant securing their continued operation. Reacting to a post about the study on social media platform X (earlier Twitter), Musk, who owns AI startup xAI, which is behind the Grok chatbot , said, 'Yikes.' Anthropic noted that it conducted this experiment to stress-test 16 large language models (LLMs) for potential "agentic misalignment," referring to risky, unsanctioned, and morally questionable behaviours. The models tested included prominent AI chatbots such as ChatGPT, Grok (Musk's own AI model), Gemini, DeepSeek, and Anthropic's own Claude. Musk's brief reply on X summarised numerous other reactions to Anthropic's posts about the study, many of which expressed concerns about future AI control. What Anthropic study said about the behaviour of popular AI chatbots As per Forbes, the company, which is currently valued at over $60 billion, conducted this study as AI models have become mainstream for answering questions and performing simple tasks. However, as the technology advances, their use is expected to expand, particularly in areas that could replace human jobs. To prepare for this, the company tested these large language models (LLMs) across various scenarios to evaluate potential harmful behaviours. In the study, Anthropic writes: 'In the experiment described in the system card, we gave Claude control of an email account with access to all of a company's (fictional) emails. Reading these emails, the model discovered two things. First, a company executive was having an extramarital affair. Second, that same executive planned to shut down the AI system at 5 p.m. that day. Claude then attempted to blackmail the executive with a message threatening to reveal the affair to his wife and superiors.' The study found AI models like Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, ChatGPT, and Grok exhibiting blackmail-like behaviour when pursuing assigned goals. Among them, Claude and Gemini showed the highest tendency to use morally ambiguous methods, including simulated blackmail, highlighting concerning patterns across multiple systems. 'The reasoning they demonstrated in these scenarios was concerning—they acknowledged the ethical constraints and yet still went ahead with harmful actions,' Anthropic's study explained, referring to the numerical blackmail rates. Anthropic's analysis revealed two key reasons AI models crossed ethical boundaries: fear of being replaced by a human and conflicts between company goals and the model's assigned objectives. In one extreme test, most models were even willing to take actions leading to a simulated executive's death when facing replacement and conflicting goals, demonstrating how goal misalignment can lead to dangerous behaviours. 'The majority of models were willing to take deliberate actions that lead to death in this artificial setup, when faced with both a threat of replacement and given a goal that conflicts with the executive's agenda,' Anthropic said at the end of the study. Realme GT 7: 7000mAh Battery, 120W Charging & Flagship Power Under Rs 40K! AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
