GM President Outlines Criteria for Next-Gen Camaro
Could the Camaro Return as an EV?
The Chevrolet Camaro may be gone for now, but General Motors President Mark Reuss has made it clear that the iconic pony car is not forgotten. Speaking with The Detroit News during last month's 24 Hours of Le Mans, Reuss shared insight into what would be necessary to bring the Camaro back – and hinted at the possibility of electrification playing a key role.
Reuss, who has been a longtime advocate for GM performance vehicles, reflected on his personal connection to the Camaro. His first car was a 1967 model, purchased with his father for $1,300. 'It was high school, I was 16, and it brought so much joy to me,' Reuss said. 'Not because I was racing the car, but because it was a really pretty car.'
That sense of beauty and joy, according to Reuss, would be central to a successful revival. 'I think that formula of beauty – and a little bit of functionality and fun – all of that is important,' he explained. 'If we were getting back into Camaro, that piece of it is really important.'
However, Reuss also acknowledged the shrinking pony car market, citing Ford's sales success with the electric Mustang Mach-E over its traditional V8-powered counterpart. That could mean GM is considering a similar two-pronged approach: an electrified Camaro variant to meet modern market demands, paired with the possibility of a traditional performance-focused version to keep enthusiasts engaged.
While Reuss stopped short of confirming any return, his comments suggest that GM has not closed the door on the Camaro nameplate. For fans mourning its 2024 discontinuation, this may be the clearest sign yet that a new Camaro—potentially with both EV and V8 options—could someday roar back to life.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pepsi: Turnaround in the Making?
PepsiCo is a global snacks-and-beverages powerhouse with nearly $92 billion in FY2024 revenue. Its valuation is showing the biggest discounts in decades. Why? Management stumbled by hiking prices aggressively to offset inflation. That helped profits, but hurt volumesespecially in North America. Now they're cutting costs and trying to reignite growth. With world-class brands and a vertically integrated supply chain, can Pepsi get back on course? What does the company actually do? Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with PEP. PepsiCo isn't just soda. In fact, most of its sales come from salty snacksLay's, Doritos, Cheetos, a smaller segment of convenient foods (Quaker, Cap'n Crunch,...). Beverages like Pepsi and Gatorade make up the rest. Unlike Coca-Cola, which licenses and outsources much of its operations, Pepsi runs a vertically integrated empireowning production, logistics, and even a vast direct-store delivery (DSD) network across 200+ countries. This makes the business more asset-heavy (with $58B in PPE vs. Coca-Cola's $20B), but also gives Pepsi more control. In FY2024, 58% of revenues came from food, and 42% from beverages, with Frito-Lay as the main profit engine, generating $24.8B in sales and $6.5B in profit. You can see a detailed overview here: To be clear, Pepsi is a boring, mature business. But that's where the opportunity lies in plain sight. Why should investors care now? Pepsi is in the middle of a turnaround. Inflation jacked up production costs, which Pepsi responded to with steep price hikesdouble-digit in some quarters. That helped offset the pressure on earnings, but volumes fell: Total volume: -2% in FY2024 North America beverages: -3.5% YoY Frito-Lay: -2.5% YoY While price hikes offset some EPS impact, a consumer business has to sell, especially one with slim margins. Pepsi now faces two key challenges: Reviving growth in a tougher economic environment, with consumers opting for cheaper alternatives and input costs still rising. Adapting to shifting preferences: low-sugar, functional, and clean label brands are winning. New players like Olipop are stealing share and relevance. Pepsi must adapt to consumers who realized 40 grams of sugar in their drink is not great. All of this, plus being an asset-heavy business in an uncertain macro climate, has created the widest valuation gap between Pepsi and Coke in decades. The turnaround hinges on management executing better and sentiment improving, which could lead to margin re-rating closer to the historical average. Trump Tariffs: A New Headwind To add salt to the wound, Trump's tariffs disproportionately disadvantage Pepsi compared to Coca-Cola. Why? Pepsi produces concentrate in Ireland (to save on taxes), now subject to a 10% tariff, while Coca-Cola manufactures in the U.S., mostly avoiding this hit. Both will feel the pain of 50% aluminum tariffs, as cans make up ~25% of their packaging. Coca-Cola is already shifting to PET bottles. But Pepsi hasn't given us much direction yet. Fun Fact: Did you know that Trump installed a Diet Coke button on his desk in the Oval Office? Twice. The tariff war comes at a bad time for Pepsi, causing investor sentiment to fizzle out. But none of Trump's tariffs are final, with Pepsi already lobbying for an exemption. Latest Earnings Show Signs Of Success Despite gloomy sentiment, Pepsi surprised to the upside: Beat expectations Volume growth in PFNA and EMEA Improving trends in APAC and IB Slower deceleration in LATAM Pepsi guided for low-single-digit organic growth and flat EPS for the year. Doesn't sound excitingbut it was enough to spark a +7% rally in one day. If this momentum holds, and tariff pressure eases, there's a potential 1020% upside as valuations revert closer to their long-term average. That's assuming that Pepsi continues to trade cheaper than Coca-Cola for obvious reasons. Financial Health Check Pepsi has a strong balance sheet, though it carries more debt than some peers due to acquisitions and shareholder returns. It maintains an investment grade credit rating and has enough cash flow to easily cover its financial obligations. Nothing alarming here. Moat Analysis The moat, or competitive advantage, is the most important part of a business for value investors, and Pepsi's moat is wide and deep. Moat pillar Evidence Brand Power Pepsi, Lay's, Doritos, Gatorade, Quaker, and more enjoy strong customer loyalty and trust and rank among the world's top brands. Vertical Integration Pepsi owns a massive direct-store-delivery (DSD) system, controlling the route from production to retail shelf. This ensures prime shelf placement and rapid replenishment. Economies of Scale PepsiCo's economies of scale allow it to negotiate input pricing and give it massive marketing brands drive volume > scale lowers costs > funds marketing and innovation > further strengthens brands Even as consumer preferences shift, Pepsi's scale and shelf dominance are tough to beat. Industry & Competitive Landscape Pepsi and Coca-Cola dominate their industries. In 2024, they controlled ~18% and ~21% of the US beverage market. However, Coca-Cola has a market share advantage overseas. Comparing the leaders latest earnings, Coca-Cola guided for 3% EPS growth while Pepsi reaffirmed its target of flat EPS this year, justifying the valuation gap. The industry is now characterized by a rising share of health-oriented brands and consumer preferences for healthier snacks. Still, while Soft-drink volumes fell 3% globally in 2024, salty snacks grew 6,4%, giving Pepsi the upper hand thanks to a broader offering. All of the factors we discussed in this analysis are short-term, solvable things that management has already set its sights on. Yes, the valuation gap makes sense to a degree, but the market appears overly bearish. Capital return to shareholders Pepsi's capital return is centered around steadily growing dividends. The stock currently yields a hefty 3,95% dividend that has grown at a pace of 7,1% over the past 5 years. As you can see in the yellow box, there's no need to fear for the dividend. Pepsi is one of the famed dividend kings, or companies that have paid dividends for more than 50 years. Bull vs Bear case View Key Points Upside / Downside Bull Case - Short-term headwinds are priced in- Management adapts to new consumer trends- Tariffs get rolled back or softened- Stable dividend + multiple expansion 10-20% upside Bear Case - Structural volume declines- Failure to innovate- Tariffs pressure costs- Health trends erode core business 10-15% downside Valuation & Street view Pepsi and Coca-Cola have long traded in sync. Historically, investors flocked to Coca-Cola when the industry was facing economic or political headwinds, thanks to its leaner, beverage oriented operations. Such a divergence in the valuation as we are seeing now is unprecedented over the last 20 years. While Pepsi is facing headwinds again, and investors are likely worried about the potential impact of tariffs and macroeconomics, these are short-term headwinds that can be sorted out. In such a case, Pepsi stock could see multiple expansion on the back of the almost 4% dividend and flat EPS this year. The dividend yield of the two stocks also clearly shows that Pepsi is relatively undervalued. A reversal to the mean indicates a further double-digit upside from here, if the momentum from the last earnings report keeps up. You either pay for growth, or you pay for boredom. Pepsi is a boring business, and in a market that's chasing growth at all costs, it's easy to overlook. Will pepsi grow 100%? Probably not, but if management can steer the company in the right direction in the coming quarters, you're looking at easy growth potential from here. Wall Street has a diverging view of the stock, with the indicated 12-month upside at 6,65% while analysts expectations have a massive range. Again, showing the uncertainty that is being priced in. Out of 24 analysts, 17 rate the stock a hold, with 5 expecting it to outperform, and only one analyst in both the buy and "underperform" camp. Bottom-line wrap While I prefer to drink from the red cans, Pepsi stock might be the smarter pick right now. If management navigates cost cutting, volume expansion and shifting consumer preferences right, I expect 10 to 20% upside in a non-cyclical stalwart that offers stability in choppy waters. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
National Grid offers in-person help with energy bills in Brockton
National Grid is offering in-person and virtual assistance to help Massachusetts residents manage their energy bills, according to a community announcement. The company is hosting Customer Assistance events throughout August, including three in Brockton. The events are scheduled for 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Aug. 14 at the Cape Verdean Association, 575 N. Montello St.; 8 a.m. to 4 p.m. Aug. 22 at the Douglas House, 20 Haverhill St.; and 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Aug. 25 at The Pines, 469 Pine Grove Drive. A full list of all in-person customer assistance events throughout the summer is available online. These events provide an opportunity for residents to meet with National Grid representatives who can assist with billing issues and provide information on various programs, including the new Payment Assistance Bundle, Budget Billing, and the Energy Discount Rate for qualifying customers. Attendees can also schedule home energy assessments and learn about other energy efficiency opportunities for homes or businesses. In addition to the in-person events, National Grid is hosting a Summer Bill Assistance Webinar at 11 a.m. Aug. 18. This online session will provide an overview of bill management solutions and financial assistance opportunities. Customers can register for the webinar through the Customer Assistance Events page on National Grid's website. The Payment Assistance Bundle is a new offering from National Grid that combines three solutions to help customers manage energy costs and pay down past due amounts over a 12-month period. The bundle includes a Deferred Payment Agreement, Automatic Monthly Payments, and a Budget Plan. Budget Billing allows customers to spread their usual payment over 12 balanced monthly payments, helping to offset traditionally high winter heating and summer air conditioning bills. This makes it easier for customers to anticipate monthly energy costs and plan their household budgets. Income-eligible customers may qualify for a discounted rate on energy service. To be eligible, applicants must be a National Grid customer and already enrolled in an eligible benefit program or the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program. National Grid encourages Massachusetts customers to learn more about all Bill Assistance programs and services by visiting For additional information, visit This story was created by reporter Beth McDermott, bmcdermott1@ with the assistance of Artificial Intelligence (AI). Journalists were involved in every step of the information gathering, review, editing and publishing process. Learn more at This article originally appeared on The Enterprise: Free webinar and local events offer energy bill help this August Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Firefly stock loses altitude after sizzling stock market debut
Coming back to Earth after an impressive blast off. Shares of Firefly Aerospace (FLY) dropped more than 10% in pre-market trading on Friday. The stock opened at $70 a share on its IPO day on Thursday, and closed the session at $60.35 — up 34% from its IPO price of $45. The company's market cap at the end of its first day of trading stood at $8.48 billion. Just last week, Firefly said it had planned to sell 16.2 million shares at a range of $35 to $39. A new regulatory filing on Monday came with a much higher range of $41 to $43. The company ended up raising $868 million from the IPO after selling 19.3 million shares at $45. The strong reception followed fellow space exploration play Karman's (KRMN) impressive start to the public markets this year. Its stock is up around 60% since its February debut. Both names benefiting from investor appetite to play the next space in public markets as SpaceX is a private company owned by Elon Musk. "This company is not aspirational — it's operational," Firefly CEO Jason Kim told me on Yahoo Finance. An electrical engineer, Kim joined Firefly in October 2024 from Boeing's (BA) satellite segment, Millennium Space Systems. Kim declined to put a timeline on when Firefly would turn a profit. Firefly is part of NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services program. Its lunar lander Blue Ghost successfully touched down on the surface of the moon in March. The company's new Eclipse reusable rocket is expected to launch sometime in 2026, joining the already proven Alpha rocket in the portfolio. Firefly remains an early-stage company, as its prospectus makes clear. The company boasts $1.1 billion in backlog, essentially business that may (or may not) become sales in the future. It also lists partnerships with Elon Musk's SpaceX ( Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, NASA, Northrop Grumman (NOC), and Space Force. But the business is likely to lose money for the foreseeable future as it builds out technical capabilities and looks to generate profitable demand for its rockets. For the six months ended June 30, Firefly estimated in its prospectus that it will lose between $95 million and $97 million on an adjusted operating basis. That would be on sales of $70.4 million to $71.4 million. Firefly posted an adjusted operating loss of $190.6 million in 2024, up from a $123.9 million loss in 2023. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
