Owensboro City Commission agenda, May 20, 2025
At its meeting 4 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall, the Owensboro City Commission will consider the following:
• Recognize retiring Bus Driver Shellene Davie.
• Proclaim Older Americans Month.
• Proclaim Emergency Medical Services Week
• Receive an Occupational Tax overview from Dana Coomes, Occupational Tax Administrator.
• Receive a presentation on fire department water rescue response and capabilities and training from Battalion Chief Jason Pickrell and and Lt. Johnston, Owensboro Fire Department.
• Review city projects list.
• Consider board appointments.
• Consider approving an ordinance changing Taylor Avenue to Kamuf Way.
• Consider approving an ordinance repealing Ordinance 2-2019 and adopting the Daviess Fiscal Court countywide animal control ordinance.
• Hold first reading of an ordinance for the fiscal year 2025-26 city budget.
• Hold first reading of an ordinance establishing the compensation for city employees and non-elected city officers.
• Hold first reading of an ordinance amending the 2024-25 city budget to include $600,000 to purchase property (Colonel House Motel); to appropriate $400,000 for cold food storage; for construction of bus shelters; to provide a $375,00 incentive payment to TS Enterprises; and to transfer $462,000 to the Debt Service Fund.
• Consider approving a municipal order adopting the 2025-29 city consolidated plan and the 2025-26 action plan for Community Development Block Grant, and Home Investment Partnership Funds.
• Consider new hires and promotions.
• Go into closed session to discuss future property acquisition or sale of property under KRS 61.810(1)(b).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
St. Paul weighs consolidating some downtown offices at Osborn 370 building
The city of St. Paul plans to lease more than 10,000 square feet within the Osborn 370 building on Wabasha Street, covering the building's entire ninth floor, for eight years. What will that square footage be used for? Therein lies the question. The lease at 9 Fifth St. E., approved Wednesday by the St. Paul City Council, allows for flexible move-in dates and below-market rates, with the first 12 months rent-free. That gives the city some time to complete a 'space use' study with the help of real estate consultants, who will attempt to determine which city offices will make best use of the new floor and in what manner. It might become collaborative work space for the city to engage with private sector partners, or it may support departments with space shortages, such as the city attorney's office. It also may be used as upgraded space for staff committed to working downtown more than three days per week, said Bruce Engelbrekt, the city's real estate manager, addressing the city council on Wednesday. With many office staff on a hybrid work schedule, St. Paul Mayor Melvin Carter floated the idea last year of clearing out the downtown City Hall Annex building on Fourth Street and converting the property into residences, which remains a possibility. 'We're trying to think strategically about how to use our purchasing power and people power to help be part of the solution,' said Council President Rebecca Noecker. City offices are largely but not exclusively spread throughout the City Hall/Ramsey County Courthouse building at 15 West Kellogg Blvd. and the annex building directly across the street. The city's Department of Safety and Inspections works out of a building on Jackson Street, which is owned by Madison Equities, an embattled downtown property owner that has recently lost control of some of its buildings to foreclosure and receivership. The study likely will at least touch on library staff based at the downtown George Latimer Central Library. 'We have a question into (the consultants) whether the mayor's office and the city council offices should be part of the study, because of your need to be located in this building,' Engelbrekt said. 'We need to specifically look at those (offices) that have some space needs.' Council Member Cheniqua Johnson noted Osborn 370 has developed a positive reputation downtown, drawing notable tenants such as the St. Paul and Minnesota Foundation. The Osborn 370 floor is partially furnished, allowing 'minimal up-front investment to move and establish operations,' according to the council resolution approved Wednesday. St. Paul's Maxfield Elementary breaks ground on 'community schoolyard' Ex-teacher of Hmong College Prep Academy in St. Paul sentenced for criminal sexual conduct with student Four candidates file for Ward 4 seat on the St. Paul City Council Canadian wildfire smoke causes 'very unhealthy' conditions in American Midwest and reaches Europe 40 St. Paul street lights stripped of copper wiring, though reports are down overall
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: Brandon Johnson turns to taxing groceries
Mayor Brandon Johnson has positioned himself as a champion of working families and the poor. But his messaging is getting complicated as it collides with the city's difficult fiscal reality. 'You all know my position. The ultra-rich continue to get away with not having to put more skin in the game,' he said at a Tuesday news conference. But at the same time, Johnson is pushing for a grocery tax that will disproportionately hurt families at the checkout line as they try to put food on the table. His administration is taking an obfuscational messaging approach to explain its position. Johnson insists this isn't a new tax — it's merely a local continuation of a state tax being phased out. But for struggling families, the semantics won't matter. Higher grocery prices are higher grocery prices. '(The grocery tax) was a function that the state of Illinois decided to relinquish, and leave it to the cities to collect the tax,' Johnson said earlier this week. 'So we're not creating a grocery tax, we're just creating a process by which we can collect it.' That's some twisty logic, to say the least. A tax is a tax even when a mayor calls it a 'function.' It's true that when Gov. JB Pritzker ended the state's 1% grocery tax, he left the door open for cities to collect their own — being as state grocery tax revenues flow to municipalities, not state coffers. Chicago stands to lose $80 million in revenue from the change — at a time when it's already facing a $1 billion budget shortfall. But the budget problem is not just Springfield's doing. It's a reflection of City Hall's unwillingness to rein in spending and make hard choices. And now, instead of leading with reforms, the mayor is reaching for the easiest — and most regressive — option on the shelf. The mayor has put himself in a corner on this one. If his goal is tax fairness, it's hard to see how making food more expensive for struggling Chicagoans fits the bill. In a better world, Chicagoans would be getting a small break at the grocery store. Pritzker has acknowledged the regressive nature of the grocery tax and its impact on families. 'Even with inflation cooling off every dollar counts, so I'm proud we're doing what we can to make trips to the grocery store a little easier,' he said in 2024 after eliminating the statewide grocery tax. We have said much the same, noting that the grocery tax does not need to be there, especially since its absence might contribute in some small way to motivating people to cook healthy meals at home rather than stopping at the local fast-food outlet. In a few months, the working group Johnson convened to explore budget cuts and revenue options for addressing the city's structural budget challenges is expected to share its preliminary recommendations, ahead of the mayor's budget proposal later this year. We're interested to see what the group comes back with — hopefully sooner rather than later. We're aware that the city's finances are so grim there may be no choice but to add back the grocery 'function,' or tax. We'll leave our final view on that until we see a fuller picture of ideas. Until now, the mayor's efforts to introduce widespread new revenue sources have been met with stiff opposition and a lack of public support. First, his flagship fiscal proposal, a real estate transfer tax hike dubbed 'Bring Chicago Home,' failed, a rude awakening that Johnson's election was not a mandate for sweeping new tax hikes. Next, an attempt to build support for a $300 million property tax hike fizzled out amid understandable public resistance and pushback from aldermen. We opposed both ideas. We say these outcomes are a reflection of the general sentiment among Chicagoans, most of whom are sick to death of being asked for more as the city gives them more of the same, often worse, public services. The mayor's grocery tax push will certainly be met with resentment. If he wants to make it happen, the grocery tax will need to be adopted as an ordinance by City Council and submitted to the state by Oct. 1 in order for the tax to be imposed beginning Jan. 1, according to the Illinois Municipal League. Even Johnson's supporters may struggle to square this proposal with his progressive ideals. It's hard to claim you're standing with working families while taxing their daily bread. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@
Chicago Tribune
9 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Editorial: Brandon Johnson turns to taxing groceries
Mayor Brandon Johnson has positioned himself as a champion of working families and the poor. But his messaging is getting complicated as it collides with the city's difficult fiscal reality. 'You all know my position. The ultra-rich continue to get away with not having to put more skin in the game,' he said at a Tuesday news conference. But at the same time, Johnson is pushing for a grocery tax that will disproportionately hurt families at the checkout line as they try to put food on the table. His administration is taking an obfuscational messaging approach to explain its position. Johnson insists this isn't a new tax — it's merely a local of a state tax being phased out. But for struggling families, the semantics won't matter. Higher grocery prices are higher grocery prices. '(The grocery tax) was a function that the state of Illinois decided to relinquish, and leave it to the cities to collect the tax,' Johnson said earlier this week. 'So we're not creating a grocery tax, we're just creating a process by which we can collect it.' That's some twisty logic, to say the least. A tax is a tax even when a mayor calls it a 'function.' It's true that when Gov. JB Pritzker ended the state's 1% grocery tax, he left the door open for cities to collect their own — being as state grocery tax revenues flow to municipalities, not state coffers. Chicago stands to lose $80 million in revenue from the change — at a time when it's already facing a $1 billion budget shortfall. But the budget problem is not just Springfield's doing. It's a reflection of City Hall's unwillingness to rein in spending and make hard choices. And now, instead of leading with reforms, the mayor is reaching for the easiest — and most regressive — option on the shelf. The mayor has put himself in a corner on this one. If his goal is tax fairness, it's hard to see how making food more expensive for struggling Chicagoans fits the bill. In a better world, Chicagoans would be getting a small break at the grocery store. Pritzker has acknowledged the regressive nature of the grocery tax and its impact on families. 'Even with inflation cooling off every dollar counts, so I'm proud we're doing what we can to make trips to the grocery store a little easier,' he said in 2024 after eliminating the statewide grocery tax. We have said much the same, noting that the grocery tax does not need to be there, especially since its absence might contribute in some small way to motivating people to cook healthy meals at home rather than stopping at the local fast-food outlet. In a few months, the working group Johnson convened to explore budget cuts and revenue options for addressing the city's structural budget challenges is expected to share its preliminary recommendations, ahead of the mayor's budget proposal later this year. We're interested to see what the group comes back with — hopefully sooner rather than later. We're aware that the city's finances are so grim there may be no choice but to add back the grocery 'function,' or tax. We'll leave our final view on that until we see a fuller picture of ideas. Until now, the mayor's efforts to introduce widespread new revenue sources have been met with stiff opposition and a lack of public support. First, his flagship fiscal proposal, a real estate transfer tax hike dubbed 'Bring Chicago Home,' failed, a rude awakening that Johnson's election was not a mandate for sweeping new tax hikes. Next, an attempt to build support for a $300 million property tax hike fizzled out amid understandable public resistance and pushback from aldermen. We opposed both ideas. We say these outcomes are a reflection of the general sentiment among Chicagoans, most of whom are sick to death of being asked for more as the city gives them more of the same, often worse, public services. The mayor's grocery tax push will certainly be met with resentment. If he wants to make it happen, the grocery tax will need to be adopted as an ordinance by City Council and submitted to the state by Oct. 1 in order for the tax to be imposed beginning Jan. 1, according to the Illinois Municipal League. Even Johnson's supporters may struggle to square this proposal with his progressive ideals. It's hard to claim you're standing with working families while taxing their daily bread.
