Millions of Americans could pay up to $1,247 more for Affordable Care Act health insurance next year
A Biden-era policy expanding eligibility for Affordable Care Act subsidies is set to expire at the end of this year, and there doesn't seem to be much legislative appetite to extend it.
Without those subsidies, out-of-pocket premium costs are set to go up by an average of 75% — imposing another financial burden on Americans and potentially leading to some opting out of coverage altogether.
For some Americans, that could mean a $1,000 or more a year increase in health insurance.
An analysis from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities found that the enhanced ACA subsidies reduced net premium costs by 44% in 2024, with 93% of those enrolled in the marketplace receiving some form of premium tax credits. In 2024, around 19.3 million Americans enrolled in the marketplace received premium tax credits — the subsidy beefed up by both the American Rescue Plan and the Inflation Reduction Act. How much enrollees received depended on their income and the initial costs of their local plans.
Miranda Yaver, an assistant professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh and a healthcare fellow at the left-leaning Roosevelt Institute, said that the enhanced subsidies were a "game changer" for Americans who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid, but still may struggle to make ends meet. Business Insider has reported on these workers, known as ALICE or asset-limited, income-constrained, employed. They make too much to qualify for robust assistance, but still struggle to pay their bills.
"If you're piecing together some better-than-minimum-wage jobs, but still hourly jobs, this means that health insurance becomes much more accessible, and that means that you can get the care you need and not have to fear as much about getting sick," Yaver said.
Subsidies expanded who was eligible for ACA health insurance
Some GOP legislators have argued that the policy expanded ACA eligibility too much and offered relief to higher earners while remaining costly to the country. A CBO projection found that making the policy permanent would increase the deficit by $335 billion over the next decade and reduce revenues by $60 billion.
"It is particularly concerning that, by removing the income eligibility limit, some of our nation's highest earners are now eligible for government assistance," Reps. Jason Smith and Jodey Arrington, who respectively chair the House Ways and Means Committee and House Budget Committee, wrote in a 2024 letter. "In certain areas of the country, a family making as much as $599,000 in 2023 could qualify for taxpayer-funded subsidies."
Before the subsidies, only Americans earning between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty line qualified, or between $15,650 and $62,600 based on the current cutoff for a single American.
That 400% limit was expanded under the new structure, meaning that some Americans with ACA coverage were newly eligible to have some premium relief, especially older beneficiaries. Those who made above the 400% line, but were spending over 8.5% of their household income on premiums, became eligible for subsidies.
Christen Young, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution's Center on Health Policy, said that those newly eligible Americans saw savings of around $10,000 to $15,000 a year on their premiums.
"Those are the people who are facing particularly large increases in premiums when these enhancements expire," Young said.
A 2024 KFF analysis found, for instance, that Americans making $40,000, or 266% of the federal poverty line, could see their annual premiums increase by $1,247 annually.
"If you take a single parent of one child earning $50,000 a year, that family is saving about $1,700 because of the enhanced premiums. They're going to see their premium increase by about 80% next year when the subsidy enhancements go away," Young said. "A family of four with a household income of $130,000, they're saving $8,000 a year with these enhancements, and they'll see their yearly premium increase by about 60 to 70% next year."
When health insurance costs go up, healthy young people tend to drop coverage
With the expiration looming at the end of the year and premiums expected to rise, many younger and healthier Americans may decide to opt out of coverage. This could, in turn, raise costs even more for those who remain on ACA plans.
Without that younger and healthier group, it becomes more expensive to insure the remaining Americans, and costs go up across the board.
"It's insurance companies correcting for the fact that the people who are going to be enrolled in their plans will probably not be as healthy," Yaver said.
A projection from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that should the measures lapse, 4.2 million more Americans would be uninsured by 2034.
"One of the things that is really critical to health insurance is being able to essentially spread the risk of insuring people so that we can essentially bring younger and healthier people into the insured population," Yaver said.
There is a possibility that Congress could step in and extend the subsidies, although that looks unlikely, as it would have to have bipartisan approval. The potential end of the subsidies also comes as Americans face a mixed economy: The labor market is seeing shifts, but still chugging along. Inflation is creeping higher, and consumer sentiment is looking dreary — albeit not as low as it has been.
"The average American would have a very difficult time accommodating an unexpected $1,000 expense. That could be a medical, dental expense, home repair, car repair, you name it," Yaver said. "It's very easy to end up spending a thousand dollars in the American healthcare system."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
15 minutes ago
- The Hill
Buttigieg: Approach to transgender rights ‘starts with compassion'
Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Democrats should approach transgender rights, including eligibility requirements for trans athletes, 'with compassion' during an interview aired early Monday with NPR's 'Morning Edition.' Buttigieg, who confirmed in May that he is weighing a bid for the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination after passing on a Senate run in Michigan, was asked about his messaging on transgender rights in response to remarks from former Obama White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel that diminished trans identities. Emanuel, a Democrat and former Chicago mayor, has also said he is considering a 2028 presidential bid. 'Your approach starts with compassion — compassion for transgender people, compassion for families, especially young people who are going through this, and also empathy for people who are not sure what all of this means for them,' Buttigieg, who ran unsuccessfully for the 2020 Democratic nomination, told host Steve Inskeep on Monday. 'And I think when you do that, that does call into question some of the past orthodoxies in my party, for example, around sports, where I think most reasonable people would recognize that there are serious fairness issues if you just treat this as not mattering when a trans athlete wants to compete in women's sports,' Buttigieg said. 'Meaning the parent who has complained about this has a case,' Inskeep interjected. 'Sure,' Buttigieg said. 'And that's why I think these decisions should be in the hands of sports leagues and school boards and not politicians. Least of all, politicians in Washington trying to use this as a political pawn.' Buttigieg's stance on transgender athletes echoes that of other potential Democratic candidates for the 2028 presidential election. In May, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said the party should be more open to hearing legitimate concerns about trans students participating in girls' and women's sports, similarly advocating for compassion and a hands-off approach from Washington. California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D), seen as a top contender for the 2028 nomination, said in March that he found transgender girls and women competing on female sports teams 'deeply unfair.' He later said he would be open to a conversation about limiting their participation in California if such a discussion were conducted 'in a way that's respectful and responsible and could find a kind of balance.' Newsom applauded a pilot program announced last month by the California Interscholastic Federation, which governs high school sports in the state, allowing more girls to qualify for California's track-and-field championship in events where a transgender student-athlete also qualified. The issue is likely to play out on the campaign trail. Roughly two-thirds of Americans said in a recent Gallup poll that they support policies preventing transgender people from participating on sports teams that match their gender identity. On Monday, Buttigieg said he disagrees with the Trump administration's approach to transgender athletes, which includes a sweeping executive order stating that the U.S. opposes 'male competitive participation in women's sports' and more than two dozen federal investigations into states, universities, school districts and athletic associations that continue to allow trans women and girls to compete on teams that match their gender identity. The U.S. Olympic & Paralympic Committee updated its eligibility rules last week to exclude transgender female athletes, citing Trump's order. The NCAA barred trans women from competition in February, shortly after Trump issued the order on trans athletes. President Trump and administration officials have refused to use the word 'transgender' in orders and policies related to transgender Americans, routinely referring to trans women as 'biological males' and 'men.' An executive order Trump signed on his first day back in office proclaims the federal government recognizes only two unchangeable sexes, male and female. 'I think that chess is different from weightlifting, and weightlifting is different from volleyball, and, you know, middle school is different from the Olympics,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'So, that's exactly why I think that we shouldn't be grandstanding on this as politicians. We should be empowering communities and organizations and schools to make the right decisions.' Buttigieg, who is gay, has criticized other recent moves by the Trump administration that target transgender Americans, including a Department of Defense policy that took effect last month barring trans people from serving openly in the military. 'Deep down, I have to believe that most Americans get that whatever group happens to be disfavored at the moment, and it's always somebody, that the kinds of politicians — left, right or center — that get ahead by stepping on their faces, nothing good comes of that,' Buttigieg said at a VoteVets Action Fund town hall in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, in May, responding to a question about Democratic messaging on transgender rights. In February, Iowa became the first state to remove anti-discrimination protections for a previously protected class when it struck safeguards for transgender people from its civil rights code. 'There's a perception that Democrats became so focused on identity that we no longer had a message that could actually speak to people across the board, or that we were only for you if you fit into a certain identity bucket,' Buttigieg said on Monday. 'And the tragedy of that is that I believe the right kind of Democratic vision is one that lifts everybody up — it pays specific attention to discrimination or mistreatment of people because they're Black or because they're women or LGBTQ or whatever reason that might be. But you don't have to be in this particular combination of categories to benefit from what we have to offer.'

Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Welltower raises annual FFO forecast on strong demand for senior housing
(Reuters) -Real estate investment trust Welltower raised its forecast for annual funds from operations on Monday, banking on steady demand for its assisted living and senior housing properties. The company expects 2025 normalized FFO, a key performance measure for REITs, to be in the range of $5.06 to $5.14 per share, compared to a previous projection of $4.90 to $5.04 per share. Analysts, on average, expect $4.97 apiece, according to data compiled by LSEG. The REIT owns housing, outpatient medical centers and healthcare properties with a focus on older adults and assisted living. It operates in the United States, Canada and the UK. It reported quarterly normalized FFO of $1.28 per share for the quarter, up 21.9% from last year. The growing number of elderly Americans and their rising healthcare expenditures have fueled increased demand for senior living facilities. Welltower's same-store net operating income from its senior housing properties rose 23.4% in the quarter. The Ohio-based company posted a net profit of 45 cents per share for the quarter, compared with a net profit of 42 cents per share reported a year earlier. Sign in to access your portfolio

Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Are You an 'Above‑Average' Couple? Here's The Net Worth You Need to Be Richer Than 90% of Households
Think you and your spouse are crushing it financially? You might be doing better than you think — or not even close — depending on how you measure. According to personal finance site Financial Samurai, there's a big difference between being typical and being intentional. The site's benchmark for the "above-average person" doesn't come from ambition or vibes — it's built on clear expectations. To be considered above average, you're expected to graduate from college, which only about 36% of Americans do. You're expected to work diligently, save consistently, take full advantage of retirement accounts like 401(k)s or IRAs, track your finances, invest regularly, live within your means, and expect nothing from your parents, spouse, or the government. Don't Miss: Be part of the breakthrough that could replace plastic as we know it— $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. In short, if you're living like a C-student but expecting an A-lifestyle, Financial Samurai would not put you in the above-average category. Based on this profile, an above-average individual is projected to reach a net worth of around $660,250 by age 45. But what if there are two of you? Defining the Above-Average Couple Some might assume that two financially savvy individuals should simply double their solo benchmarks and call it a day. But Financial Samurai recommends a more conservative approach by using a 1.7x multiplier instead of 2. This accounts for the financial efficiencies that couples often enjoy when it comes to housing, utilities, food, insurance, and transportation. By applying this method, an above-average couple in their mid-40s should aim for a combined net worth of roughly $1.12 million. That target represents a couple who's aligned on money, disciplined with spending, and working toward common long-term goals. This isn't a figure reserved for doctors and tech executives — it's within reach for many dual-income households that save and invest consistently over time. Trending: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— Where Does That Put You Nationally? The Federal Reserve's most recent Survey of Consumer Finances reports that the median net worth for U.S. households is around $192,900. That means half of American households are below that figure. The average net worth, skewed by ultra-high earners, is higher — roughly $1.06 million. If you're aiming for the top 10% of households, the bar is significantly higher. To join the top decile in America, you need a household net worth of at least $1.92 million. To break into the top 5%, you'll need around $3.78 million. The top 1% of households starts at approximately $13.7 million. By comparison, a Financial Samurai–style above-average couple may not be in the top 10% just yet — but they're still well ahead of most American households. Why Couples Have the Advantage Financially aligned couples often benefit from the natural efficiencies of sharing a household. Two people working together toward shared savings and investing goals can make faster progress than individuals operating separately. When couples reduce overlapping costs and increase financial communication, they compound their efforts — both literally and figuratively. Income alone isn't what separates average from above-average. Behavior, consistency, and clarity do. Financial Samurai emphasizes the importance of tracking net worth regularly, resisting lifestyle creep, and prioritizing long-term goals over short-term your household net worth is between $500,000 and $1 million, you're likely ahead of the national average but not yet in the top 10%. If you've crossed the $1.9 million threshold in your 40s or 50s, you're solidly within the wealthiest tier of U.S. households. Graded on a Curve? Not Quite "Above average" sounds like something you'd see on a report card — but real-life finances aren't graded on a curve. One couple's $1.2 million might mean financial freedom. For another, it barely covers the mortgage and daycare. Some want to upgrade their home. Others want to backpack through Europe. The point is: there's no universal benchmark. If you're living below your means, investing in a way that fits your risk level, and consistently working toward goals that matter to you, you're probably doing just fine. There's no gold star for hitting a number. The only standard that counts is the one you set together. Read Next: The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement —? Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data