
Is Australia's worst-case housing scenario about to hit? Grim warning issued - despite Albanese's optimism
On Tuesday, the Reserve Bank of Australia decided to cut the cash rate for the third time this year, bringing it down 25 basis points to 3.60 per cent.
Within an hour, Mr Albanese praised the decision as the result of his government's efforts to tackle the cost-of-living crisis.
'Interest rates have just been cut again. It will mean Australians paying less on their mortgages,' he said.
'We're working hard to help families with the cost of living. There's more to do and that's what we're focused on every day.'
The announcement fell on deaf ears, with a number of Australians pointing out the decision will drive up demand for housing, ultimately pushing up prices.
'Historically, every time interest rates have been cut, home prices tend to increase,' Mr van Onselen told the Daily Mail.
'Cutting interest rates is a band-aid. It can increase your borrowing capacity and it can reduce your monthly mortgage payments - so if you already have a mortgage, it's great if you're looking to buy again.
'It can lower your payments on a new home loan because you've got to pay less monthly.
'But as that lower interest rate gets capitalised into higher prices, it then reduces affordability going ahead. So, it makes affordability structurally worse down the road.'
Mr Van Onselen says the root cause of the housing crisis was rising immigration.
'We've grown by 8.7million people in less than 25 years - 46 per cent population growth - and you wonder why we don't have enough housing, we don't have enough infrastructure.
'We've run one of the biggest immigration programs in the world, and we haven't built enough houses, enough infrastructure, enough anything, to cope with it.'
According to his analysis, if Australia's population growth slowed by 15 per cent over the next five years, the country would end up with a surplus of 40,000 homes.
'That was buried at the back of the NHSAC's report and what that tells you is that the solution to this mess is to cut immigration,' Mr van Onselen said.
The Albanese government has committed to shoring up Australia's housing supply, with a target of 1.2 million new homes in the next five years.
Meanwhile, the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council predicted in May the government will fall short of its goal by at least 250,000.
Even if it were to reach its goal, Mr van Onselen said rising demand fuelled by government policy would keep accessibility out of reach.
'It's a government policy failure - we've got the supply issues but it won't get better until the government stops pumping demand with things like its five per cent deposit scheme and mass immigration,' he said.
Despite the government's efforts to address the supply issue, NSHAC predicted Australia's housing shortage will worsen over the next five years.
According to Loan Market, home loan pre-approvals spiked across the country last month as homebuyers scrambled to secure financing ahead of an expected rate cut.
Loan pre-approvals were 53 per cent higher in July compared to the same time last year, with an 80 per cent spike in the Northern Territory and South Australia.
Pre-approvals were up 79 per cent in Western Australia while the eastern states all recorded upticks of nearly 50 per cent.
Loan Market chief executive David McQueen said a tight housing stock was forcing homebuyers to test their borrowing capacity ahead of the Spring rush.
'Market listings are sitting at a three-year low, which is making it tough for buyers,' Mr McQueen said.
'They're looking for every edge and that starts with knowing exactly what they can borrow and afford to repay.
'Buyers want to walk into an auction with confidence or put forward strong private treaty terms that help them stand out.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
28 minutes ago
- The Guardian
News live: Australians warned not to reuse passwords as almost half the nation experienced cybercrime last year
Update: Date: 2025-08-13T20:30:13.000Z Title: Welcome Content: Good morning and welcome to our live news blog. I'm Martin Farrer with the top overnight stories and then my colleague Nick Visser will be in the hot seat. Almost half of Australians experienced some form of cybercrime last year, according to a study by the Australian Institute of Criminology, with close to 22% of people experiencing some sort of identity crime. In response, the federal government is urging people not to reuse online passwords and make sure they have multi-factor authentication on devices. More details in a minute. The number of battery electric vehicles sold in Australia hit a record high in the three months to 30 June, with sales increasing by 63% when compared with the first quarter of 2025. Figures from the AAA shows 29,244 battery electric vehicles were sold in the latest three-month period, up from 17,901 registered sales. It comes as we report this morning that the government is ready to introduce road charging for EV drivers to make up for the decline in revenue from petrol sales. More coming up.


Press and Journal
32 minutes ago
- Press and Journal
Nicola Sturgeon admits in new book she got it wrong on oil and gas - as Aberdeen paid the price
Nicola Sturgeon has admitted the SNP over-inflated promises about oil and gas in the independence campaign, just before a collapse hit Aberdeen and the north-east hard. The former first minister looks back at policies and pledges central to the regional economy in an extract from her new memoirs, called Frankly. The much anticipated book relives the events running up to the crucial vote on Scotland's future in September 2014. In it, she reflects: The publication of the book comes just as government figures were forced again to respond to falling North Sea revenue and a widening financial deficit. In her book, Ms Sturgeon looks back more than 10 years when prices were riding high. 'The numbers we had used in the referendum White Paper to illustrate an independent Scotland's fiscal position had been heavily dependent on oil revenues,' she writes. 'And, of course, we had based these on the optimistic estimates that Alex had insisted on. 'I didn't know then that a total collapse in the oil price was just around the corner. 'In early 2015, this caused significant political and practical problems. The practical came from the impact on the economy of Aberdeen and the north-east, which is heavily reliant on the oil and gas supply chain. 'As the major companies started to shed jobs and curtail activity, the effects were quickly felt across the region.' As first minister, Ms Sturgeon set up a taskforce but powers were limited and political opponents sensed opportunity. 'To have the price of a barrel of crude fall to around 40 US dollars when we had relied on a figure of well over 100 US dollars in the referendum blew a massive hole in the credibility of our argument,' she added. 'I resolved then that in any future referendum, we must not allow the strength of the independence prospectus to stand or fall on the volatile value of oil, especially as it is a finite commodity. 'We needed to show how Scotland's economy would be sustainable in the long term without it.' On Wednesday morning, the volatility of North Sea revenue and government policies were again under scrutiny with the publication of annual revenue and spending. It coincides with another push for independence under First Minister John Swinney. The difference between revenue and public sector spending, including capital investment, was a deficit of 11.7% of gross domestic product in Scotland. When excluding the North Sea, there was a deficit of 14.4% of GDP – equal to £30.6 billion. The Scottish Government has faced criticism for delays to an energy strategy and lack of vocal support for oil and gas. Much of the crucial policy power rests at Westminster where the Labour government is under pressure to address a windfall tax on profits. Russell Borthwick, chief executive at Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said: 'If the UK Government continues to tax the industry at 78%, then we face an accelerated industrial decline, we will lose our world class supply chain to other parts of the word, and our oil and gas imports will continue to soar, syphoning tens of billions of pounds out of the UK economy. 'However, there is another future, one where we commit to sourcing the oil and gas we require as a nation from the North Sea, supporting jobs, public services and – crucially – creating the bridge required to a just transition while we build out renewable energy projects.' Responding to the new figures, Scottish Government Finance Secretary Shona Robison said: 'Falling oil prices and a decrease in extraction present challenges going forward, but we are clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with our climate change commitments and energy security.'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Labour's inheritance tax must be scrapped
How have we managed to create a world where a dwindling band of taxpayers is funding a growing number of able-bodied people to live relatively comfortably on benefits without even being required to look for work? As the welfare bill balloons, the Government has to find more money because its own MPs will not let it cut payments or tighten the rules. Since the Chancellor Rachel Reeves has promised not to increase borrowing or add to the taxes of so-called 'working people' she is forced to look elsewhere, notably at pensions and savings. Now she is targeting inheritance tax (IHT) to plug holes in the finances ahead of an autumn Budget. Treasury officials have been told to examine greater restrictions on gifting money and assets. The tax burden is at its highest for nearly 80 years. Taxpayers who are by no means rich are dragged into paying higher rates by the pernicious freezing of allowances. The minority of earners who contribute the most in taxes have gone along with this in the expectation of being able to help their children with any accumulated wealth left to them by a rapacious state. If the morality of this tax is questionable, tougher rules are not even politically advantageous. Polling shows it is probably the most unpopular tax of all, even among people who are unlikely to have to pay it. It would be a desperate act to tighten the rules further, but Ms Reeves is cornered. IHT is a tax on the prudent and family-minded. It involves being taxed when you die on wealth that was taxed while being accumulated in life, and therefore discourages wealth creation and retention. In drawing up their new policies, the Tories should commit to its abolition.