&w=3840&q=100)
Trump vs Powell: Can the US president really fire a Fed chief?
US President Donald Trump announces Jerome Powell as his nominee to become chairman of the US Federal Reserve in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, US, November 2, 2017. File Image/Reuters
One of US President Donald Trump's most contentious relationships remains with the head of the US central banking system — Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
Over the past weeks, Trump has revived his long-standing frustration with Powell.
On Wednesday, Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that it was "highly unlikely" he would remove Powell from his post.
He added, however, that 'unless he has to leave for fraud,' he would prefer not to act.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The previous day, in a closed-door meeting with Republican lawmakers, Trump took a far more confrontational stance.
According to sources familiar with the meeting, he asked the lawmakers whether he should go ahead and dismiss Powell, even going so far as to point toward a letter he claimed was a draft of Powell's termination, reported numerous US media outlets.
Those in attendance reportedly reacted favourably to the idea, which appeared to embolden the president.
Though he later insisted to the media that reports of an imminent dismissal were 'not true,' Trump confirmed he had discussed the concept of firing Powell with lawmakers and claimed that most of them supported it.
The catalyst for this renewed pressure appears to be a $2.5 billion renovation plan for the Fed's historic headquarters in Washington, DC.
Trump has seized on the cost overruns and design changes in the project as justification for escalating criticism. 'I think he's terrible… But the one thing, I didn't see him as a guy that needed a palace to live in,' Trump remarked.
He mocked Powell by saying conversations with him were like 'talking to a chair.' When asked directly whether the renovation alone constituted grounds for removal, the president responded, 'I think it sort of is.'
Can a president remove the Fed chair?
The Federal Reserve Act permits the president to remove a member of the Fed's Board of Governors 'for cause,' a phrase interpreted by courts to mean instances of inefficiency, misconduct or dereliction of duty.
However, the legal standing around the removal of the chair specifically remains less clear. Jerome Powell, while serving as chair, is also a member of the Board of Governors and of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Fed's principal policy-making body.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
US Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference following a Federal Open Market Committee meeting at the Federal Reserve in Washington, DC. File Image/AFP
The US Supreme Court recently signalled in a May decision that the Federal Reserve's unique quasi-private structure might shield it from presidential interference.
The court's ruling indicated that while the president may have broader authority to remove heads of other independent federal agencies, the Fed's structure offers it distinct legal protection, especially when no explicit misconduct or legal violation has been proven.
How has Trump been pressuring Powell?
In recent weeks, administration officials have mounted a campaign against Powell, focusing sharply on the escalating cost of the Fed's headquarters renovation project.
The plan, originally estimated at $1.9 billion in 2023, has ballooned to $2.5 billion.
The Fed attributes the increase to updated design requirements, consultations with oversight bodies, and the discovery of unforeseen conditions such as higher-than-expected levels of asbestos.
Powell, appearing before Congress on June 25, defended the renovations and disputed suggestions that the project included extravagant features.
However, some of Trump's allies saw an opening.
Bill Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, labeled Powell's testimony 'deceptive,' though he provided no substantiated evidence. A Fed spokesperson said Powell's congressional statements were accurate and consistent with internal assessments.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Russell Vought, the director of the Office of Management and Budget, took the criticism further. In a public letter shared on social media, Vought accused Powell of mismanagement and described the renovation as an 'ostentatious overhaul.'
He also pointed to the Fed's recent operating losses to support his criticism. Former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, who has been floated as a possible replacement for Powell, told Fox News that a 'regime change at the Fed' was necessary.
Soon after these developments, Trump replaced three members of the National Capital Planning Commission, which has oversight authority over federal projects in Washington, reported CNN.
The new appointees — White House staff secretary Will Scharf, deputy chief of staff James Blair, and OMB analyst Stuart Levenbach — are seen as loyalists, raising concerns about politicisation of oversight mechanisms related to the Fed's operations.
How will Powell's potential removal impact the market?
Even the suggestion that Powell could be dismissed has reverberated through financial markets. On the morning of July 16, the US Dollar Index fell by as much as 0.8 per cent, reflecting investor anxiety.
Although the losses narrowed later in the day following Trump's clarification, the potential for market instability remains significant.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Republican lawmakers have not remained silent. Louisiana Senator John Kennedy issued a stark warning: 'If you fire the chairman of the Federal Reserve, you will see the stock market crash, and you will see the bond market crash.'
He added that unilateral interest rate cuts could trigger panic in the bond market and sharply increase the cost of government borrowing.
US Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina voiced similar concerns, stating that dismissing Powell would be a 'colossal mistake' and would undermine global confidence in the Fed's independence.
'So anybody out there in voter land who thinks that firing Jay Powell will change the policy outcomes for [the Fed's] dual mandate — I don't think it will,' he said.
Tillis stated that such a move would likely produce 'second and third order effects that none of us who track markets want to see.'
What does historic precedent tell us?
This is not the first time Trump has clashed with Powell. Throughout his presidency, both during his first and current terms, Trump has sharply criticised the Fed for not aligning its interest rate policy with his economic agenda.
In 2018, when Powell approved a series of rate hikes, Trump openly floated the idea of firing him. Though he ultimately refrained, the incident marked the beginning of a tumultuous relationship.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Trump has previously said he would not reappoint Powell when his current term ends in May 2026, but until recently, he indicated he would let him serve it out. Powell, for his part, has made it clear that he would not resign if asked to.
Historically, US presidents have often tried to exert influence over the Fed, albeit through informal channels. In 1965, Lyndon Johnson summoned then-Fed Chair William McChesney Martin Jr to his Texas ranch to express displeasure over monetary tightening.
In the early 1970s, Richard Nixon pressured Fed Chair Arthur Burns to avoid raising interest rates, a move that some economists later blamed for fuelling inflation.
By contrast, President Joe Biden largely avoided public commentary on Fed decisions during his term. However, some Democratic lawmakers, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, did call for lower interest rates before the Fed shifted policy in September 2024.
So what power does Trump actually have?
Trump's power over the Fed lies primarily in nominating individuals to serve on the Board of Governors and choosing leadership positions when terms expire. Powell's term as chair runs through 2026, while his term as a governor extends to 2028.
As past precedent shows, most Fed chairs have left the board after stepping down from the chairmanship, but it is not legally required.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Another opportunity for Trump to influence the Fed's composition will arise in January 2026, when Governor Adriana Kugler's term ends. These appointments, however, affect only a portion of the 19-member Federal Open Market Committee.
The remaining seats are filled by presidents of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks, chosen not by the White House but by their respective boards and subject to approval from the Board of Governors.
Trump has already had an opportunity to appoint a new vice chair for supervision, a key regulatory role.
Also Watch:
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang reveals America's ‘unique advantage' — Donald Trump seems to love it
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently heaped praise on US President Donald Trump, saying that America has a 'unique advantage' by having him as its leader. Speaking on Wednesday at an AI summit in Washington, Huang said that no other country has that advantage — a compliment that Donald Trump seemed to like as he shared a video of the Nvidia CEO's talk on his Truth Social platform. 'America's unique advantage that no other country can possibly have is President Trump,' Huang said. In a chat at the AI Summit that was also attended by Trump, Huang said that the President realised the importance of AI and energy as soon as he took over his role at the White House. 'On the first day of his administration, he realised the importance of AI, and he realised the importance of energy. For the last I don't know how many years, energy production was vilified, if you guys remember,' he said. Donald Trump, since returning as President for the second time, has rallied for various energy projects, signing executive orders one of which requires 'the automatic rescission of outdated regulations to unleash American innovation and energy production'. 'We can't create new industries without energy. You can't reshore manufacturing without energy. You can't sustain a brand new industry like artificial intelligence without energy. If we decide, as a country, the only thing we want is IP—to be an IP-only, a services-only country—then we don't need much energy. But if we want to produce things, something as vital as artificial intelligence, then we need energy.' The AI summit at Washington also saw Donald Trump heaping praise on Huang. America's unique advantage that no other country can possibly have is President Trump. 'What a job you've done,' Trump said. Throughout his address, the president name-checked and complimented Huang for his investments in tech in the US. Huang met earlier this month with the president at the White House, and last week the company announced it would be allowed to resume selling its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China as part of a recent trade truce with Beijing. The Trump administration had previously frozen the sale of those chips to China.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump's immigration overhaul: What it means for H-1B and citizenship tests
The Trump administration is planning sweeping changes to the United States immigration system, including an overhaul of the H-1B visa programme for skilled foreign workers and a tougher citizenship test. The proposed reforms signal a renewed push to align immigration policy with the administration's economic and ideological goals. Joseph Edlow, newly confirmed director of US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), revealed the administration's plans in an interview with T he New York Times on Friday (local time). Edlow, who previously served in an acting capacity in 2020, now leads the agency overseeing work visas, citizenship certification, and asylum programmes. What is the H-1B visa? The H-1B visa is a non-immigrant visa that allows US companies to employ foreign workers in speciality occupations requiring theoretical or technical expertise. These roles typically span fields such as technology, engineering and medicine. Each year, the government issues 85,000 new H-1B visas through a lottery system, including 20,000 reserved for individuals with advanced degrees from US institutions. The visa is widely used by the tech industry, which argues it is critical to filling talent gaps in a competitive global labour market. H-1B visa reform: High wages over lottery At the centre of the administration's plans is a revamp of the H-1B scheme. Edlow said the current randomised lottery process should be replaced with a system that prioritises employers offering higher wages. 'The way H-1B needs to be used… is to supplement, not supplant, the US economy and US workers,' Edlow said. He argued that prioritising higher-paid positions would help the programme better serve the national interest and reduce criticism from Republican hardliners who claim it suppresses American wages. Vice-President JD Vance added to that criticism this week, accusing firms of laying off domestic employees while hiring foreign workers. The proposed changes have drawn criticism from immigration policy experts, who argue that the H-1B programme is key to ensuring US companies can hire the best and brightest international graduates of US universities. Citizenship test: Return to tougher standards The administration is also preparing changes to the naturalisation test required of immigrants seeking US citizenship. Edlow said the current version is too easy and undermines the law's intent. 'It's very easy to kind of memorise the answers,' he said. 'I don't think we're really comporting with the spirit of the law.' Currently, applicants study 100 civics questions and must correctly answer six out of 10 during the test. Under Trump's first term, the test was toughened to include more questions and a higher passing threshold. Edlow said the administration plans to reinstate that version soon. US tightens asylum procedures USCIS under Edlow has already begun tightening asylum procedures, echoing policies from Trump's first term that had been partially blocked in court. While Edlow has ruled out reviving the controversial 'public charge' rule — which denied green cards to immigrants using public benefits — his approach has been consistent, with efforts to restrict access to permanent residency and citizenship unless it can be clearly linked to economic or national interest benefits. Edlow has also signalled that future policy decisions will focus on 'net positive' immigration. 'If we're looking at the people that are coming over… to advance certain economic agendas that we have and otherwise benefit the national interest — that's absolutely what we need to be taking care of,' he said. Donald Trump's US immigration agenda Since returning to office in January 2025, the Trump administration has moved swiftly to reshape the H-1B visa landscape. The Department of Homeland Security has proposed replacing the current lottery-based selection system with a wage-weighted model that would prioritise higher-paying job offers—a move aimed at aligning the visa programme more closely with the national economic interest. The proposal is currently under review by the Office of Management and Budget. Separately, Republican lawmakers have introduced legislation, the Colleges for the American People Act of 2025, that would eliminate long-standing exemptions allowing universities and non-profit research institutions to bypass the H-1B visa cap, meaning foreign academic staff could soon face the same restrictions as those in the private sector.


New Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump's trip to Scotland as his new golf course opens blurs politics and family's business
Trump family's new golf course has tee times for sale Trump went to Scotland to play his Turnberry course during his first term in 2018 while en route to a meeting in Finland with Russian President Vladimir Putin. But this trip comes as the new golf course is already actively selling tee times. 'We're at a point where the Trump administration is so intertwined with the Trump business that he doesn't seem to see much of a difference,' said Jordan Libowitz, vice president for the ethics watchdog organization Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. 'It's as if the White House were almost an arm of the Trump Organization.' During his first term, the Trump Organization signed an ethics pact barring deals with foreign companies. An ethics frameworks for Trump's second term allows them. Trump's assets are in a trust run by his children, who are also handling day-to-day operations of the Trump Organization while he's in the White House. The company has inked many recent, lucrative foreign agreements involving golf courses, including plans to build luxury developments in Qatar and Vietnam, even as the administration negotiates tariff rates for those countries and around the globe. Trump's first Aberdeen course sparked legal battles Trump's existing Aberdeenshire course, meanwhile, has a history nearly as rocky as the area's cliffs. It has struggled to turn a profit and was found by Scottish conservation authorities to have partially destroyed nearby sand dunes. Trump's company also was ordered to cover the Scottish government's legal costs after the course unsuccessfully sued over the construction of a nearby wind farm, arguing in part that it hurt golfers' views. And the development was part of the massive civil case, which accused Trump of inflating his wealth to secure loans and make business deals. Trump's company's initial plans for his first Aberdeen-area course called for a luxury hotel and nearby housing. His company received permission to build 500 houses, but Trump suggested he'd be allowed to build five times as many and borrowed against their values without actually building any homes, the lawsuit alleged. Judge Arthur Engoron found Trump liable last year and ordered his company to pay $355 million in fines — a judgment that has grown with interest to more than $510 million as Trump appeals. Golfers-in-chief Family financial interests aside, Trump isn't the first sitting US president to golf in Scotland. That was Dwight D. Eisenhower, who played in Turnberry in 1959. George W. Bush visited the famed course at Gleneagles in 2005 but didn't play. Many historians trace golf back to Scotland in the Middle Ages. Among the earliest known references to game was a Scottish Parliament resolution in 1457 that tried to ban it, along with soccer, because of fears both were distracting men from practicing archery — then considered vital to national defense. The first US president to golf regularly was William Howard Taft, who served from 1909 to 1913 and ignored warnings from his predecessor, Teddy Roosevelt, that playing too much would make it seem like he wasn't working hard enough. Woodrow Wilson played nearly every day but Sundays, and even had the Secret Service paint his golf balls red so he could practice in the snow, said Mike Trostel, director of the World Golf Hall of Fame. Warren G. Harding trained his dog Laddie Boy to fetch golf balls while he practiced. Lyndon B. Johnson's swing was sometimes described as looking like a man trying to kill a rattlesnake. Bill Clinton, who liked to joke that he was the only president whose game improved while in office, restored a putting green on the White House's South Lawn. It was originally installed by Eisenhower, who was such an avid user that he left cleat marks in the wooden floors of the Oval Office by the door leading out to it. Bush stopped golfing after the start of the Iraq war in 2003 because of the optics. Barack Obama had a golf simulator installed in the White House that Trump upgraded during his first term, Trostel said. John F. Kennedy largely hid his love of the game as president, but he played on Harvard's golf team and nearly made a hole-in-one at California's renowned Cypress Point Golf Club just before the 1960 Democratic National Convention. 'I'd say, between President Trump and President John F. Kennedy, those are two of the most skilled golfers we've had in the White House,' Trostel said. Trump, Trostel said, has a handicap index — how many strokes above par a golfer is likely to score — of a very strong 2.5, though he's not posted an official round with the US Golf Association since 2021. That's better than Joe Biden's handicap of 6.7, which also might be outdated, and Obama, who once described his own handicap as an 'honest 13.' The White House claims Trump as a championship-level golfer but said he plays with no handicap.