
US Fed: Jerome Powell-led FOMC holds key interest rates unchanged despite Trump's rate cut pressures
The July 2025 policy outcome marked the fifth consecutive time that the US central bank has decided to hold the lending rates since January 2025. Ever since US President Donald Trump took over the White House, the administration has been asking for a rate cut. However, the Fed seems to have a different plan mapped out for the nation.
1. Rates Held Unchanged: The July 2025 US Fed meeting outcome kept the interest rates unchanged at 4.25 to 4.5%, as the central bank positioned itself to review more economic data before cutting them.
'The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 4-¼ to 4-½%. In considering the extent and timing of additional adjustments to the target range for the federal funds rate,' said the FOMC.
The US Fed also cited that the country's inflation still remains at a 'somewhat elevated' level, but the unemployment rate remains low, with solid labour market conditions.
The Jerome Powell-led FOMC also highlighted that the indicators suggest that economic activity's growth moderated in the first half of the year. 'GDP rose at a 1.2% pace in the first half of this year, down from 2.5%,' said Powell in his address to the media.
2. Inflation Risks: The risk of inflation remains looming over the US economy, as the Fed's FOMC committee also highlighted concerns of a 'somewhat elevated' inflation data.
However, the US Federal Reserve reiterated its intentions to bring down the inflation rate to its 2% target while supporting maximum employment in the nation.
'The Committee is strongly committed to supporting maximum employment and returning inflation to its 2% objective,' said the US Fed's FOMC.
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics data showed that the US CPI inflation for the 12-month period ending June 2025 was at 2.7%, compared to 2.4% in May 2025, with the price of certain goods fueling the inflation rise in the nation.
According to the official data release, the prices of meat, poultry, and fish jumped 3.8%, while the cost of eggs jumped 27.3%.
3. Tariff-related Price Push: Fed Chair Powell also said that inflation has continued to ease in the US economy, while the increased tariff rates are pushing up prices in some categories of goods. Jerome Powell's words come days ahead of US President Donald Trump's 1 August tariff deadline for imposing import duties on the world's nations.
'Near-term measures of inflation expectations have moved up, on balance, over the course of this year, on news about tariffs as reflected in both market-based and survey-based measures beyond the next year or so. However, most measures of longer-term expectations remain consistent with our 2% inflation,' said US Fed Chairman Jerome Powell.
Powell also later mentioned during the press address that he thinks inflation is 'most of the way back to 2%,' highlighting how the composition of inflation in the economy has changed over time.
4. 'Modestly Restrictive' Policy Stance: Fed Chair Jerome Powell categorised the FOMC's current policy stance as 'modestly restrictive,' with the nation's inflation 'a bit' above 2%.
'I would characterise it as modestly restrictive. Inflation is running a bit above 2% as I mentioned, even excluding tariff effects, the labour market's solid, historically low,' said Jerome Powell.
Powell also highlighted that the unemployment and financial conditions are in an 'accommodative' position in the economy.
'So it seems to me and to almost the whole committee that the economy is not performing as a restrictive policy is holding it back inappropriately, and a modestly restrictive policy seems appropriate,' he said.
5. Economic uncertainty situation: In the June 2025 policy announcement, the committee and Powell both agreed that the uncertainties have diminished from their earlier levels, yet they remain elevated in the current market.
However, in the July 2025 policy meeting outcome, the FOMC did not mention the diminishing uncertainty, to which Powell said that the uncertainty was even in the economy at this this.
'So at the time of the last meeting, uncertainty had moved down a little bit, but it was more or less even this time. So we took out, you know, had diminished, because it didn't diminish further,' said Powell, responding to a question on the diminishing uncertainty in the US economy.
Read all stories by Anubhav Mukherjee
Disclaimer: This story is for educational purposes only. The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
China, Now Trump: Pakistan And The Art Of Somehow Finding Patrons
Since many Indians are upset about the latest oil deal between the US and Pakistan, this move has seemingly achieved its goal before the first drill even touches Pakistani soil. As the announcement is made, predictably on US President Donald Trump's social media handle, on the heels of 25% tariffs announcement for India, it is somewhat natural for New Delhi to feel jilted. Trump seems to have counted on this feeling. After announcing the India-Pakistan ceasefire in May, and never shutting up about it since then, Trump has been coddling both military and civil establishments in Pakistan. Whether it is the much-discussed hosting of Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir or this latest oil trade deal, the US and Pakistan appear to be inching closer, reminiscent of the War on Terror days. Since the Afghanistan war is officially over for the US, one may wonder why Islamabad has suddenly become relevant for Washington yet again. 'Just Do It' A quick answer could be Trump's idiosyncratic foreign policy, wherein what Trump thinks in any moment is what Trump does the next, irrespective of how outlandish the thought may be. A serious deliberation, however, may reveal some other factors in no particular order of importance. In 2023, Pakistan received USD 1.8 billion in Foreign Direct Investment, as opposed to India's mammoth USD 44.4 billion. What is more perplexing about these figures is that Pakistan received this sum mostly from China in the form of energy investments. This sum, although not significant, may have irked someone in Washington, prompting a reestablishment of the principal-agent relationship between the US and Pakistan. China's influence needs to be contained anyhow, especially if it involves an agent state. Even without Afghanistan in the equation, Pakistan remains an important box in the "Eurasian chessboard" - or so it wants everyone in the West to believe. Pride And Persuasion Pakistan has successfully lobbied Western capitals into believing in its indispensability in the regional strategic landscape. Portraying their country as a victim of terrorism, Pakistan's civil and military establishments have managed to elicit benefits from the West by playing on the latter's security anxieties. The US continues to buy this narrative for various reasons, not discounting the naivete among them. India may not be thrilled about the latest deal, but bigger maybe the disappointment of Pakistani dissenters. There are growing voices against this constant duping of the public by the establishment. With each such highfalutin 'deal' - like the China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) - there is an expectation of a socio-economic turnaround in Pakistan. With a beleaguered economy crumbling under massive international debt, Pakistan has very little going for itself at present. What Pakistan lacks in terms of state-building, it more than makes up for in the realm of being obsequious towards its principal states, be it China or the US. At Least Someone Is Happy Going by the public discourse, obtaining an International Monetary Fund loan is a cause for national celebration. Grant announcements from the Arab countries give Pakistan a sense of inflated importance. No hint of irony is lost here. When dissenters question this fiction, they are either killed or jailed. Pakistan's playing the vassal state to global superpowers doesn't translate into the country's development, but it keeps the political and military elite and their coterie well-fed. At this very moment, Pakistan's human rights activists are protesting alongside Baloch women in Islamabad against forced disappearances. After a violent crackdown on a similar protest in Karachi earlier this year, the Pakistan government is playing deaf this time. Fissures in Pakistan's socio-political structure are getting exacerbated by economic duress. It is, therefore, a question of Pakistan's survival to make outlandish promises, economic and strategic, to whomsoever it may concern. Keeping America Interested Since the CPEC has underperformed, partially due to the armed resistance it has faced in the Baloch areas and mainly because Pakistan doesn't have a substantial industrial base to take advantage of the corridor, there may be anxieties in Pakistan around exclusive reliance on China. It is important, therefore, to keep the US interested in the utility of Pakistan. In turn, the US may want to keep its non-NATO ally content with deal announcements, with an eye fixed firmly on China. Locked in an impasse over trade with China, the US has been exploring any and all avenues to check China's geopolitical influence. While Pakistan may not overtly defy China - especially after having used Chinese defence hardware and intelligence against India - its proclivity for the original principal state will lead to certain concessions for the US. Should this rekindling bother India? Definitely. Can India do anything about it? Very little, if at all.


NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
"In Securing Our Energy Needs...": India's Calm Reply To US' Russia Oil Fury
New Delhi: India has issued a measured reply to US' criticism of its continued Russian oil purchases. "In securing our energy needs, we are guided by what is on offer in the market and the prevailing global circumstance," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said Friday. The US has ramped up pressure on India to stop buying Russian oil, arguing it amounts to funding Vladimir Putin's war on Ukraine. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the purchases "a point of irritation" in comments this morning, as Delhi and Washington toil to secure a trade deal and scale down Donald Trump's 25 per cent 'reciprocal tariff'. Rubio acknowledged India's vast energy needs - analysts expect crude oil demand from the world's fourth largest economy to cross 6.6 million barrels per day by 2030 - and that it was buying oil and gas from Russia because the sanction-hit country is offering steep discounts. "But that, unfortunately, is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So, it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India," he told American broadcaster Fox News. Trump, he said, expressed "very clear frustration… with so many vendors available India continues to buy so much from Russia, which in essence is helping to fund the war effort…" Rubio's comments follow Trump's scathing remarks about Delhi still buying crude and gas from Moscow. The US President pointed out Russian oil accounted for 35 per cent of India's supply in the first half of the year, and demanded it, instead, buy from his country. On Thursday Trump decreed a 25 per cent 'reciprocal tariff' on Indian goods imported into the US and levied an unspecified penalty for buying Russian oil and weapons. NDTV Explains | The Story Behind Donald Trump's 25% 'Reciprocal Tariff' On India "... they (India) have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy... at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine. India will, therefore, be paying a tariff of 25 per cent, plus a penalty..." The new tariff - to which India will not retaliate, at this time - came into effect this morning. India has always said Russia is a 'close, all-weather friend", and that it will not be bullied, by any country, into re-defining decades-old foreign policies and current economic concerns. In the past - when faced with criticism over buying Russian oil - External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said, quite categorically, that India would prioritise its citizens' needs first. READ | US Penalty On Buying Russian Oil. What Is India's Stance This, he said, would mean buying oil from anyone who sells at the best possible price. "India is a big oil consumer... We are a big oil importer because we don't have oil. Now, it is not like there is a political strategy to buy oil... There is an oil strategy to buy oil... There is a market strategy," Mr Jaishankar said in August 2024. Prior to the war in Ukraine, India rarely bought Russian crude due to high freight costs. By 2023, though, Moscow was selling about 1.66 million barrels per day, up from less than 700,000 in 2022. India eventually became the biggest buyer of seaborne Russian crude since the West halted purchases and imposed sanctions against Moscow. In an effort to placate Trump, India committed, in February, when Prime Minister Narendra Modi met Trump in Washington, to buy more oil and gas from the US, which will also help, to some extent, hit the ambitious mark of $500 billion in bilateral trade within the next five years. However, the sheer volume of India's energy demands means the US cannot be the sole, or even a major, supplier. As of today, India's largest are Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Russia.

The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Markets extend losses on global sell-off amid U.S. tariff concerns; Sensex tanks 586 points
Equity benchmark indices Sensex and Nifty declined sharply for the second straight session on Friday (August 1, 2025), tracking deep losses in metal, IT and telecom stocks amid trade-related concerns and widespread selling pressure in global markets. Besides, persistent selling by foreign investors added to the gloom, according to experts. In a volatile trade, the 30-share BSE Sensex tumbled 585.67 points or 0.72% to settle at 80,599.91. During the day, it dropped 690.01 points or 0.84% to 80,495.57. The 50-share NSE Nifty declined 203 points or 0.82% to 24,565.35. U.S. President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping new tariffs on dozens of countries, including 25% duties for goods from India, marking a new era of American protectionism that triggered fresh tensions and concerns over a much wider disruption in the global trade landscape. From the Sensex firms, Sun Pharma tumbled 4.43% after the company reported a 20% year-on-year decline in consolidated net profit to ₹2,279 crore for the first quarter ended June 30, 2025. Tata Steel, Maruti, Tata Motors, Infosys, Bharti Airtel and Tech Mahindra were also among the laggards. However, Trent, Asian Paints, Hindustan Unilever, ITC, Kotak Mahindra Bank, and Reliance Industries were the gainers. The U.S. President signed an executive order on Thursday that raised tariffs for over five dozen countries, with Washington's negotiations for trade deals going down to the wire ahead of the August 1 deadline. In the Executive Order titled 'Further Modifying The Reciprocal Tariff Rates', Mr. Trump announced tariff rates for nearly 70 nations. A 25% "Reciprocal Tariff, Adjusted" has been imposed on India, according to the list released. The order, however, does not mention the "penalty" that Mr. Trump had said India would have to pay because it purchases Russian military equipment and energy. While August 1 was the tariff deadline, the new levies will come into effect from August 7. Foreign Institutional Investors (FIIs) offloaded equities worth ₹5,588.91 crore on Thursday, according to exchange data. In Asian markets, South Korea's Kospi, Japan's Nikkei 225 index, Shanghai's SSE Composite index and Hong Kong's Hang Seng settled lower. Equity markets in Europe were trading in the red. The U.S. markets ended in negative territory on Thursday. Global oil benchmark Brent crude declined 0.39% to $71.42 a barrel. On Thursday, the Sensex declined 296.28 points or 0.36% to settle at 81,185.58. The Nifty dropped 86.70 points or 0.35% to 24,768.35.