Washington, Baghdad agree on need to Reopen Oil Pipeline
The United States and Iraq have agreed on the need for Iraq to become energy independent, and to quickly reopen the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline (ITP), which can transport oil from Northern Iraq and Iraqi Kurdistan to the Turkish port of Ceyhan.
In an announcement following US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's call with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shiaa al-Sudani on Tuesday, the State Department added that the two agreed on the need for Iraq to honor contractual terms for U.S. companies working in Iraq to attract additional investment
Full statement from US State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce:
Secretary of State Marco Rubio spoke with Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shiaa al-Sudani today. The Secretary and Prime Minister Sudani discussed the U.S.-Iraq strategic partnership and the importance of Iraq's stability and sovereignty. The Secretary and Prime Minister also discussed reducing Iran's malign influence and continuing efforts to prevent ISIS from resurging and destabilizing the broader region. The two agreed on the need for Iraq to become energy independent, to quickly reopen the Iraq-Türkiye Pipeline, and to honor contractual terms for U.S. companies working in Iraq to attract additional investment.
The Secretary reaffirmed the importance of Syria not becoming a haven for terrorism or posing a threat to its neighbors. The Secretary and Prime Minister committed to continuing to consult on issues in the region and to advance the U.S.-Iraq security partnership.
(Source: US State Dept)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rudaw Net
an hour ago
- Rudaw Net
Germany concludes humanitarian support for Iraq, shifts focus to development
Also in World Seven Kurdish candidates competing in Norway's 2025 parliamentary vote Dutch-Kurdish director draws on father's legacy with new film Jamal US says Syria at a crossroads as 'terror' sponsor status under review US reviewing removal of Syria's 'Sponsor of Terrorism' status A+ A- ERBIL, Kurdistan Region - Germany has ended its humanitarian aid to Iraq as of 2023, citing the country's improved economic conditions and increased revenue from natural resources, the German foreign ministry told Rudaw on Thursday. According to the ministry, between 2014 and 2022, Germany provided €800 million ($933 million) in humanitarian aid and €2.6 billion ($3 billion) for stabilization efforts, particularly in the aftermath of the conflict with the Islamic State (ISIS). 'Following the fall of ISIS, Germany provided extensive support to Iraq and the Kurdistan Region through humanitarian, development, and stabilization measures,' the ministry said. This included psychosocial services and rehabilitation programs for survivors of ISIS atrocities. With the situation in Iraq now considered 'improved,' Berlin no longer sees a need for continued humanitarian assistance. However, Germany remains a 'close partner' to Iraq and the Kurdistan Region and will continue cooperation in key sectors such as economy and energy, the ministry asserted. 'Germany is currently supporting Iraq in the area of development and is pushing forward with civilian projects. We want to accelerate the pace of economic development and ensure energy security,' the ministry stated. Moreover, the German government has identified climate change as a growing threat to Iraq and is working with Iraqi authorities to help the country adapt to its consequences. 'We are supporting Iraq to adapt to the consequences of climate change,' the ministry noted. According to the ministry, Berlin's current approach now centers on transitioning from emergency humanitarian support to long-term development, with the aim of 'giving more responsibility to Iraqi parties,' the ministry concluded. Key German institutions such as the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) and the Kreditanstalt fur Wiederaufbau (KfW) development bank will continue to operate in Iraq to support this transition.
Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraqi airstrike hits ISIS hideouts in southern Kirkuk
Shafaq News – Kirkuk On Tuesday, Iraq's Air Force targeted ISIS positions in the Wadi al-Shay area, south of Kirkuk province, a security source told Shafaq News. Wadi al-Shay in southern Kirkuk is one of Iraq's most challenging terrains, characterized by dense vegetation, rugged hills, and interlinked valleys that provide natural concealment. Its location forms a vital corridor connecting Kirkuk to the Hamrin Mountains and extending toward Diyala and Saladin provinces, making it a key route for the movement of fighters, weapons, and supplies. The source revealed that the operation destroyed key targets and reduced the group's capabilities in the area. The strike was based on precise intelligence indicating movements of terrorist elements in the valley, the source stated, pointing out that security forces continue field operations to track remnants of armed groups and secure surrounding areas, with the situation under control and no immediate threats to civilians. Since early 2025, Iraqi security forces have stepped up operations against ISIS remnants, eliminating senior leaders and dismantling active cells. Supported by the US-led Global Coalition, authorities are using advanced intelligence and forensic tools, including DNA analysis, to identify militants and stabilize volatile areas.
Shafaq News
3 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Iraqi–Iranian Security MoU rekindles a decade of border deals—and old controversies
Shafaq News – Baghdad A new security memorandum of understanding (MoU) between Iraq and Iran has reignited debate over sovereignty, parliamentary oversight, and Iraq's vulnerability to regional rivalries. Signed on Tuesday under the auspices of Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani, the document upgrades an earlier security record into a broader agreement between National Security Advisor Qassem al-Araji and his Iranian counterpart Ali Larijani. Objectives and Security Provisions According to a senior Iraqi security source, the MoU aims to strengthen border protection, address the presence of Iranian opposition groups in the Kurdistan Region, and prevent the emergence of a PKK-style model in Iraq's frontier districts. It establishes mechanisms for intelligence sharing, joint patrols, counter-narcotics coordination, and monitoring ISIS movements along roughly 1,450 kilometers of border, about 600 kilometers of which lie inside the Kurdistan Region. Al-Araji said the accord builds directly on the March 2023 border security agreement, calling it its 'foundation.' That earlier deal focused on tightening control along the Kurdistan Region frontier, where Tehran has accused armed dissidents of staging cross-border attacks. Parliamentary Oversight and Political Reactions Kareem Abu Souda, a member of the parliamentary Security and Defense Committee, criticized the absence of legislative review, noting that the Council of Representatives had not been informed due to its current suspension. He told Shafaq News the committee 'rejects any external interference outside the framework of formal agreements,' and insisted any pact 'must be presented to Parliament in line with constitutional procedures.' Security expert Sarmad al-Bayati described the MoU as mutually beneficial for border management and threat reduction, linking it to the 2023–2024 withdrawal of armed Iranian opposition factions from Iraq. 'The memorandum does not contain secret clauses,' he stressed. MP Mukhtar al-Moussawi of the Foreign Relations Committee called Iran Iraq's 'strategic depth,' recalling Tehran's early military assistance against ISIS in 2014 and saying the agreement 'affirms that Iraq is not alone.' US Rejection and Regional Pushback The US State Department warned the MoU could weaken Iraqi security institutions and 'turn Iraq into a client state of Iran.' Spokesperson Tammy Bruce argued it undermined efforts to build independent Iraqi defense capabilities. Baghdad's embassy in Washington responded that Iraq is not subordinate to any state's policies, that its decisions reflect independent national will, and that it maintains balanced relations with both neighbors and the United States based on mutual respect and shared interests. Iran's Embassy in Baghdad also rejected Washington's position, calling it 'an unacceptable intrusion into the relations between two neighboring and sovereign states' and accusing the United States of pursuing a destabilizing approach in the region. The statement said such actions violate the UN Charter and international law. Domestic Political Divide Salah al-Zubaidi of the Iran-aligned al-Nasr Coalition said Washington has no right to dictate Iraq's security policy, though he acknowledged the possibility of US economic pressure to limit Iranian influence. Security analyst Ahmed al-Sharifi told Shafaq News that under the 2008 US–Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement, Washington can raise objections because Iran is a US adversary. 'For now, the MoU remains a security understanding, not a treaty, and therefore carries limited legal weight,' he said. Security expert Adnan al-Kanani described the memorandum as part of long-term cooperation but stressed political divisions over Baghdad's closeness to Tehran. He noted that distancing Iranian opposition elements—estimated at around 20,000 people, including families—remains a central goal. A Decade of Agreements and Flashpoints The 2023 accord, reaffirmed by al-Araji as the base of the current MoU, followed Tehran's September ultimatum to disarm and relocate armed Iranian Kurdish groups by the 19th of that month. Baghdad complied by moving them from border zones to designated camps. Those measures came after Iranian Revolutionary Guard missile and drone strikes in September and November 2022 against targets in the Kurdistan Region—operations Tehran framed as counter-terrorism, but which intensified pressure for formal border arrangements. Earlier milestones include the July 2017 military cooperation MoU, which expanded joint training and logistics but drew US concern over deepening Iranian military ties, and the December 2014 defense cooperation MoU signed at the height of ISIS's advance. The deeper legal backdrop is the 1975 Algiers Agreement, which settled land and river boundaries along the Shatt al-Arab—a reference point repeatedly revived in moments of crisis. Over the past decade—2014, 2017, 2023, and now 2025—each deal has been followed by cycles of coercion or escalation. The latest memorandum again seeks to codify border rules in hopes of reducing friction. Whether this MoU breaks that cycle will depend less on the language of the agreement than on transparent enforcement and Baghdad's ability to shield itself from the gravitational pull of competing regional powers. Potential spoilers, according to observers, include renewed Iranian strikes in Kurdistan, shifts in Iraq's domestic political balance, or US economic measures aimed at curbing Tehran's influence.
