
Nvidia CEO Huang Emerges as Reluctant Emissary in US-China Clash
On his third trip to China this year, the world's ninth richest man announced this week that Nvidia Corp. will resume China sales of its H20 chips, an abrupt policy reversal from the Trump administration. He also opened a major supply-chain expo in Beijing — speaking briefly in Mandarin, as requested by his host, former Chinese Commerce Ministry official Ren Hongbin — with a clarion call for closer business ties.
The episode showed that Huang, 62, is becoming increasingly adept at pulling off a delicate diplomatic dance that is both benefiting his company and helping the world's biggest economies manage their differences.
The Nvidia boss has long been leery of politics. In January, he was among the few American tech tycoons who stayed away from Trump's inauguration ceremony, spending that week in China where his firm has some 4,000 staff, and Taiwan. Yet trying to keep Washington and Beijing from escalating a rivalry that's weaponized his technology has now become a key part of his job description — whether he likes it or not.
With Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping yet to set a date for an in-person summit that's expected in the coming months, a broader question is whether he could emerge as some sort of go-between. While Tesla's Elon Musk and Apple Inc. chief Tim Cook have fallen out of favor with Trump to differing degrees, Huang has maintained warm ties with the unpredictable US leader.
'Huang is obviously on good terms with Trump administration. Yet his chip business is one of the biggest flashpoints between Beijing and Washington,' said Feng Chucheng, founding partner of Hutong Research. 'It's possible the two leaders may want such a channel for messaging, but is he willing to?'
Nvidia didn't immediately reply to an emailed query outside of regular hours.
How much access Beijing will grant Huang remains to be seen. During this trip, the chip boss sat down with Vice Premier He Lifeng, who is spearheading China's trade war negotiations, and Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, but wasn't given an audience with the top echelon of leaders. 'It would be an honor to see President Xi,' Huang said. 'I just wasn't invited.'
Shuttle diplomacy has become de rigueur for corporate chiefs aiming to retain major business in the world's biggest economies, given the political sensitivities and suspicions in each capital city toward the other. Apple's Cook similarly has regularly visited China while seeking to engage with the Trump administration.
It's unclear how much sway such figures have, beyond smoothing a path for their own business operations. Expectations for Musk — whose EV giant has a significant presence in China — to become a back channel in US-China ties never materialized. The Tesla boss stayed quiet on matters involving Beijing this year, before leaving the Trump administration.
While Huang has little political ambition, he has argued to successive US administrations that tightening a chip-export ban would only incentivize China to foster a homegrown industry. His rationale is simple: Allowing Nvidia to compete with China's champion, Huawei Technologies Co., on its own turf is essential to America winning the AI race.
Huang, whose company became the first to hit a $4 trillion market valuation this month, brushed off speculation that he influenced Trump's recent U-turn. Speaking to a group of reporters in Beijing, he said: 'I don't think I changed his mind.'
Over the years, Huang has demonstrated himself to be well-versed in local Chinese culture and able to make himself popular on trips. Photos of him dancing in a vest with a flowery print — traditional to China's northeast — during his company's annual party last year went viral online in the Asian country.
Chinese state media outlets this week highlighted the good news on H20 chips, which still fall short of Nvidia's most cutting-edge products. For his part, the Taiwan-born naturalized American showered praise on Chinese tech researchers and entrepreneurs, name-dropping local AI companies, posing for photos with Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun and telling reporters it's the American people's 'misfortune' that Xiaomi electric vehicles aren't available in the US.
'He's a skillful CEO who, like the Apple CEO and others, must navigate the China and non-China technology ecosystems to the maximum extent possible,' said Kurt Tong, a former US consul general in Hong Kong and a partner at the Asia Group.
The Taiwan-born billionaire has steered clear of controversy. He was quick to clarify his remarks after referring to the self-ruled democracy as a 'country' last year while touring one of the island's night markets. That reference displeased Beijing, with a spokesperson at the office handling Taiwan affairs calling on him to 'read up on the history.'
Days later, Huang said: 'I wasn't making a geopolitical comment, but thanking all of our technology partners here for all their support and contributions to the industry.'
That stands in contrast to fellow tech titan Musk who publicly said Taiwan should effectively be under Beijing's control, aligning with Xi's view of the matter.
Huang has limited his comments on the Taiwan Strait to how US chip restrictions could influence Beijing's calculations on a possible invasion of the island where much of the world's semiconductors, including Nvidia's, are made. 'You got to ask yourself, at what point do they just say, 'F—- it. Let's go to Taiwan. We've got nothing to lose.' At some point they will have nothing to lose,' he told Bloomberg Businessweek in 2023.
Tech is a particularly sensitive sector for a CEO to act as a bridge between the two nations, because of a strategic desire on both sides to decouple in the long term, said Dominic Chiu, senior analyst at Eurasia Group. But there may still be a more immediate opening.
'In the short run, in the midst of these negotiations and transactional deals and back-and-forth, there could be some space for these tech firms to be bridges,' Chiu said.
With assistance from Ian King, Josh Xiao, Lucille Liu, Jessica Sui, Colum Murphy, Luz Ding and Alan Wong.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
US condemns Hong Kong's arrest bounties targeting overseas pro-democracy figures
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned Hong Kong's issuance of arrest bounties for 19 overseas pro-democracy activists, calling it 'transnational repression' and vowing that the Trump administration will defend American freedoms. read more US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Saturday condemned Hong Kong's offer of rewards for any information leading to the arrest of a select list of overseas activists, including some based in the United States. 'The extraterritorial targeting of Hong Kongers who are exercising their fundamental freedoms is a form of transnational repression,' Rubio said in a statement. 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on US soil.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Hong Kong police on Friday announced bounties for information leading to the arrest of 19 overseas activists, accusing them of national security crimes. Police said the activists were involved in what they called the 'subversive' Hong Kong Parliament – a pro-democracy non-governmental organization established in Canada. A reward of HK$200,000 ($25,500) each was offered for 15 of the activists, while the four others were already wanted for HK$1 million, the statement said. 'With this new round of arrest warrants and bounties, the Hong Kong government continues to erode the autonomy that Beijing itself promised to the people of Hong Kong following the 1997 handover,' Rubio said. 'Freedom of speech and political discourse are core American values, which the Trump administration will continue to defend.'


Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Hong Kong issues arrest warrants for 19 overseas activists accused of ‘subversion'; US reacts
The United States has criticised Hong Kong authorities for issuing arrest warrants for 19 pro-democracy activists based overseas. The move marks the largest number of such warrants issued under the city's national security law. The activists are accused of subversion for their involvement in an unofficial group known as the 'Hong Kong Parliament'. Hong Kong police allege that the group aimed to challenge the authority of the Chinese and Hong Kong governments. Several of the individuals are already subject to earlier warrants, and police say further action may follow. The 19 individuals are accused of being involved in the 'Hong Kong Parliament', an unofficial pro-democracy group that authorities claim sought to subvert state power. The group is said to have organised a mock election and promoted the idea of self-determination for Hong Kong, including plans to draft a new constitution. The Hong Kong police allege that these activities were attempts to unlawfully overthrow the government. The charges fall under the national security law imposed by Beijing in 2020 following large-scale protests in 2019. Police said anyone supporting, funding or participating in the group could also face legal consequences. Among those named are businessman Elmer Yuen, political commentator Victor Ho, and activists Johnny Fok and Tony Choi. These four were already subject to previous arrest warrants, each carrying a reward of HK$1 million (approximately £95,000). The other 15 individuals are also facing new warrants, with authorities offering HK$200,000 (£19,000) for information leading to their arrests. Some of them were reportedly involved in organising or running in the unofficial election, or taking oaths as councillors of the unofficial 'parliament'. One of those listed, Feng Chongyi, a professor at the University of Technology Sydney, dismissed the allegations. 'They've got the power, they've got the influence want to control everything even overseas,' he told The Guardian. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Reuters: 'We will not tolerate the Hong Kong government's attempts to apply its national security laws to silence or intimidate Americans or anyone on US soil.' He also said the move showed how the Hong Kong government 'continues to erode the autonomy that Beijing itself promised to the people of Hong Kong following the 1997 handover'. The UK's Foreign and Home Secretaries issued a joint statement, quoted in The Guardian, calling the warrants 'another example of transnational repression' and saying they damaged Hong Kong's international standing. 'The UK will not tolerate attempts by foreign governments to coerce, intimidate, harass or harm their critics overseas,' they said. Australia strongly objects to Hong Kong authorities issuing arrest warrants for pro-democracy advocates in Australia. Freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy. — Senator Penny Wong (@SenatorWong) July 26, 2025 Australia's foreign minister Penny Wong also objected, writing on X that 'freedom of expression and assembly are essential to our democracy'. She added: 'We have consistently expressed our strong objections to China and Hong Kong on the broad and extraterritorial application of Hong Kong's national security legislation, and we will continue to do so.' In response to the criticism, China's embassy in the UK said the British government was interfering in internal affairs. 'China urges the UK to abandon its colonial mentality, stop interfering in Hong Kong affairs and stop shielding criminals,' it said in a statement quoted by The Guardian. Hong Kong police reminded the public that national security offences carry extraterritorial effect. In a statement, they said those who turn themselves in or help investigations may be considered for reduced punishment. (With inputs from The Guardian and Reuters)


India.com
7 minutes ago
- India.com
India's friend has changed war strategy against China, the name is..., will include missile, advance fighter jets and...
Chinese President Xi Jinping Defence of Japan 2025 white paper update: In a significant development impacting the security situation in the Indian Ocean, Japan, known as the country of samurais has published its Defence of Japan 2025 white paper. Discussing about the details escalating threats from a more united bloc of authoritarian countries, specifically China, Russia, and North Korea, the white paper has been sanctioned by Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba's cabinet. Here are all the details you need to know about Japan's recent step against China. What does Defence of Japan 2025 white paper say on China? Cautioning about a swiftly deteriorating security landscape in the region caused by increasing military collaboration among these nations, the Defence of Japan 2025 white paper delivers a straightforward evaluation of China, labelling it as the 'greatest strategic challenge' facing Japan. In addition to this, the official white paper of Japan emphasises that China's military aspirations present an 'unprecedented and greatest strategic challenge' to both Japan and the global community. As per a report by the Eurasian Times, the document warns that China's expanding military presence, assertive maritime actions, and strengthening connections with other authoritarian governments could 'seriously impact' Japan's national security. This white paper scrutinises CRINK, a loosely connected bloc that some observers refer to as the 'Axis of Upheaval.' Although not a formal alliance, the rising diplomatic, military, and economic collaboration among these four nations is perceived as a significant threat to the rules-based international order, according to the Eurasian Times. What has Japan's Defence Minister said on China? Japan's Defence Minister Gen Nakatani expressed strong concerns: 'The current international order is being profoundly challenged, and Japan is in the most challenging and intricate security situation of the post-war period.' Notably, Japan has delivered its most severe warning to date regarding China's growing military footprint, stating in the white paper that activities from Beijing now pose a 'serious impact' on national security. (With inputs from agencies)