Treasury minister fails to rule out hitting homeowners with capital gains tax
Such a move would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24% of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18% levy.
The Times reported that under the proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold.
The threshold is still under consideration but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973, the newspaper reported.
Treasury minister Torsten Bell declined to rule out hitting people selling their homes with CGT, insisting any potential changes were matters for the Chancellor and would be set out at a budget.
Asked to rule out the move, the pensions minister told broadcasters: 'Working people and people's living standards is what this Government is all about.
'We've seen wages rise more in the first 10 months of this Government than the first 10 years of the last Conservative government.
'But of course, as you know, questions for tax are for the budget and they're for chancellors.'
Ending primary residence relief could deter people from selling their homes, slowing the housing market and could have a particular impact for older people looking to downsize.
The Labour government has ruled out increasing income tax, employees' national insurance contributions and VAT, restricting Ms Reeves' options when it comes to raising money.
The scale of the challenge facing her in the autumn budget was illustrated by the NIESR economic think tank warning this month that Ms Reeves is set for a £41 billion shortfall on her self-imposed rule of balancing day-to-day spending with tax receipts in 2029-30.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How Labour can build a stronger British economy
If Rachel Reeves is serious about ensuring that Labour's second year in power is all about a stronger economy that rewards working people across the country (In our first year Labour fixed the foundations – now we must build a stronger economy for a renewed Britain, 13 August), she needs to rethink what your editorial called the UK's 'broken growth model' (6 August). The growth that Britain needs is an increase in economic activity that improves social and environmental infrastructure nationwide. This involves a huge increase in secure, well-paid jobs to rebuild a more resilient future economy. The last thing that is required is Reeves's obsession with more deregulation of the City and pressuring savers into investing in the stock market. What is needed instead is a massive increase in a socially and green-oriented bond market that will provide secure returns for savers. This will require intense pressure to be put on Reeves to shift her emphasis away from global financiers to recognising UK savers as saviours. She should make clear that in return for the tax breaks that those investing in Isas and pensions receive, a considerable percentage of such savings would be invested in green and social infrastructure projects. This would help tackle the climate crisis and rebuild our economy as well as the crumbling cohesion of our society. Colin HinesConvener, Green New Deal Group Rachel Reeves wants to solve Britain's productivity problem by kickstarting economic growth. Four decades ago, Britain decided to become a consumer economy when others chose to be investment economies. The mistake in tackling the fallout of the global financial crisis after 2008 was to slash capital spending at a time when money was cheap. The chaotic governments of Boris Johnson and Liz Truss created damaging uncertainty for investors. The world has become more uncertain, but political decisions also mean growth each year was on average twice as strong in the 16 years before the financial crisis than in the 16 years since, taxation as a proportion of GDP has reached historic highs and productivity is painfully weak. The chancellor needs to be bold and ambitious for Britain's economy. We must exploit the opportunities of the digital revolution, advance our skills base, join up government so that departments are all focused on growth and become a true investment economy at Stephen BarberUniversity of East London Rachel Reeves claims to have fixed the country's financial foundations in Labour's first year in office, but I am certain that the 4.5 million children still living in poverty, an increase of 100,000 from the previous year, wouldn't agree. At the same time, UK billionaires' wealth increased by £35m a day to £182bn, with Britain having the highest proportion of billionaire wealth derived from monopolies and cronyism among G7 Michael SymondsEmeritus professor, University of Nottingham No, you haven't 'fixed the foundations', chancellor. Where are the Labour values in 'renewal is our mission and productivity is our challenge'? Not a word about redressing the wealth gap between the rich and the poor; not a word about ending the two-child benefit cap; not a word about restoring the level of overseas aid. Rachel Reeves's article could have been written by George Osborne – and I for one fear what else that might entail for our dilapidated public space. It isn't good enough just to be wealthy – it's what you do with it and how fairly you spread it that counts. That is supposed to be the Labour D BryantPenarth, Glamorgan I find it disappointing that Rachel Reeves refers only to 'working people'. This indicates that she is not considering other groups such as pensioners, or those who cannot work either through disability or because of a lack of suitable jobs for which they are qualified. She refuses to target the super-rich, preferring to hit easy targets by keeping the two-child benefit cap, not raising tax thresholds (pushing more people into paying tax and higher tax) and targeting cash Isa allowances. Some people have had bad experiences with stocks and shares and are reluctant to risk their savings again. She has not learned at least two things from history: first, trickle-down economics does not work, as wealth floods into foreign tax havens, not to the less well off. And second, removing restrictions on the financial sector leads to people and financial organisations being overstretched and a banking EvesMold, Flintshire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Council statement over asylum seekers 'misinformation' as bids to buy student halls
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info A council has released a statement to address "misinformation" over its bid to buy up a block of student halls in Bangor. Cyngor Gwynedd is in negotiations about purchasing the Ty Glyn building in the city. The property was once a tax office but later became student halls. The 60 bedroom site has been on the market for £4.5m. It is currently marked as 'Sold STC' (subject to contract) although remains student accommodation at this time. Cyngor Gwynedd are reportedly the ones buying the site which has triggered rumours about their plans. This has led to social media reports that asylum seekers could be housed in the building in the future by the council. It comes at a time when UK Government is under intense pressure to reduce the use of hotels to house asylum seekers. Join the North Wales Live WhatsApp community group where you can get the latest stories delivered straight to your phone In a statement Cyngor Gwynedd said: "Cyngor Gwynedd is in negotiations to buy the Tŷ Glyn building in Bangor for the purpose of meeting the housing needs of Gwynedd residents. The Council has no intention of housing asylum seekers or refugees in this building. "We appreciate the questions residents have raised and remain committed to ensuring open and transparent communication. However, it is important not to speculate or spread misinformation in the community." About 200 hotels were housing more than 30,000 asylum seekers in England and Wales at the end of March 2025, although it is understood less than 100 of those migrants are housed in Wales. This compares to a peak of 56,000 asylum seekers in 400 hotels back in 2023 under the last Conservative government. Senedd member Sian Gwenllian said: "Misinformation of this kind is harmful and risks fuelling unnecessary tension within our community. I urge everyone to pause and think carefully before sharing unverified rumours. My thanks go to Cyngor Gwynedd for their clear statement." Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox Find out what's happening near you
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Reeves leaves no stone unturned as she mulls reforms for property tax
Rachel Reeves is in favour of radical tax reform – or at least she was in 2018. 'We need a radical overhaul of the tax system because our current system of wealth taxation isn't working,' she argued in her pamphlet The Everyday Economy. Seven years later, in her second year as chancellor, Reeves appears to be returning to some of the themes in that pamphlet, especially as it relates to the UK's convoluted and unpopular system of taxing property. The Guardian revealed on Monday the chancellor was considering scrapping stamp duty (used in England and Northern Ireland) and replacing it with an annual levy based on the value of someone's home and the time they bought it. On Tuesday, the Times reported that Reeves was also considering imposing the UK-wide capital gains tax on higher-value primary properties, even though the prime minister, Keir Starmer, ruled out doing so before the election. All this is part of what officials say is a wider examination of the UK's property tax system, which experts argue could be simplified and improved while also raising money to help fill Reeves' £20bn fiscal black hole. 'Reeves is so desperate to find money she is flying every kite going [floating policy suggestions] to see which ones get knocked down,' said Tim Leunig, an economist whose work Treasury officials have been studying. 'But there are important reasons to change the way our property taxes work, especially if you want to raise serious money.' Politicians have long looked at inflated property prices in parts of the UK and wondered how to squeeze more money from them. Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat former business secretary, proposed a mansion tax in 2009 that would have taxed properties worth more than £1m at 0.5%. The plan was dropped when his party entered government and faced opposition from their Conservative coalition partners. The idea was taken up by the then Labour leader Ed Miliband, who claimed in the 2015 election campaign that the policy would raise £1.2bn a year. Until recently, Treasury officials have scoffed at the idea of anything resembling a mansion tax, saying it would encourage wealthy people to move abroad. But they admit the UK's property taxation system is riddled with problems. An obvious one is stamp duty, which is a one-off lump sum charged to people when they buy a new property, set at different rates according to the value of the property up to a maximum of 12% for properties worth over £1.5m. The problem with such a charge is that it disincentivises property purchases, slowing the economy, and reducing the turnover of new properties. Leunig has suggested instead that property owners pay a smaller annual amount based on the purchase price of the home, payable in perpetuity. A rate of 0.54% with an additional supplement for properties worth more than £1m would raise the same amount as stamp duty does. A higher rate, or temptingly for the chancellor, a bigger supplement, could raise far more. Such a system would help those who move frequently, but penalise those who stay in their homes for a long time. Leunig argues this would incentivise people to move into smaller, cheaper properties towards the end of their lives, freeing up larger stock for younger families. Another problem which many have identified is with council tax, which is both unpopular and messy, with rates based on property valuations from 1991. Successive government have shied away from a full revaluation, which would create millions of losers, but Leunig has suggested levying a new charge only on properties worth less than £500,000 – with those over that threshold being covered by the replacement for stamp duty. While officials are looking into potential changes to council tax, this is likely only to come in if Labour wins a second term in office. Ministers are aware that polls suggest raising council tax would be one of the most controversial options they have. A third problem comes with capital gains tax, which is charged at a rate far below income tax. Officials are now looking at whether to levy CGT on primary properties for the first time, albeit only over a particular threshold. There are two problems with doing this, however. One is that Starmer explicitly promised not to before the election. And the other is that it would prove a major disincentive for people to move out of larger properties. 'No other countries does this without some form of exemption or rollover which allows sellers to pay it much later down the line,' said Ben Hopkinson, the head of housing at the Centre for Policy Studies. There is one further problem for the chancellor: British property is already more heavily taxed than that in most other countries. According to the OECD, the UK takes in more property tax as a share of its gross domestic product than any other developed economy. 'Property is inherently difficult to tax,' said Leunig. 'But we still manage to do so – at a rate three times higher than Germany.'
