Donald Trump threatens extra 10% tariff for ‘anti-American' Brics policies, as trade war deadline approaches
Date: 2025-07-07T06:23:41.000Z
Title: Donald Trump threatens extra 10% tariff for "anti-American" Brics policies
Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets, and the world economy.
Donald Trump has targeted the BRICS group of developing nations in the latest salvo of his ongoing trade war, as the deadline to agree deals before the president's 90-day tariff pause looms.
Trump has warned overnight that he will impose a new 10% tariff on any country that aligns itself with the BRICS group, claiming they are 'anti-American'.
Writing on his Truth Social site, Trump declared:
Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS, will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff. There will be no exceptions to this policy. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Trump's attack comes after the Brics group — which was originally made up of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa but now includes other nations — met in Brazil at the weekend.
Brazil's president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, told the meeting in Rio de Janeiro that BRICS was the heir to the 'Non-Aligned Movement' – the bloc of countries who declined to ally with either side in the Cold War.
Lula criticised the move (driven by Trump) towards increased spending on the military rather than on international development, pointing out: 'It is always easier to invest in war than in peace'.
He told leaders they were witnessing 'the unparalleled collapse of multilateralism', before warning:
'If international governance does not reflect the new multipolar reality of the 21st century, it is up to BRICS to help bring it up to date.'
The BRICS group also condemned US and Israeli attacks on Iran and urged 'just and lasting' solutions to conflicts across the Middle East.
All of which appears to have stirred Trump into another tariff threat.
There's also confusion this morning about the status of the original 'liberation day' tariffs which Trump announced at the start of April, and then paused for 90 days after the markets slumped.
The president told reporters on Sunday that his administration plans to start sending letters later today to US trade partners dictating new tariffs.
But there's confusion about when these levies would kick in. Trump implied they would start on Wednesday, saying 'I think we'll have most countries done by July 9, yeah. Either a letter or a deal.'
But commerce secretary Howard Lutnick then weighed in to explain:
'But they go into effect on August 1. Tariffs go into effect August 1, but the president is setting the rates and the deals right now.'
Trump has subsequently posted that 'TARIFF Letters, and/or Deals' will be delivered from 12:00 PM (Eastern)' today, (that's 5pm BST)
7am BST: Halifax house price index for June
2pm BST: Eurogroup ministers meeting in Brussels
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Pete Hegseth is skirting law by bringing back Confederate names of army bases
Since Donald Trump returned to office this year, his secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has ripped the new names off a series of US army bases and brought back their old traitorous Confederate names. His actions have angered Democrats and even some Republicans in Congress, prompting a rare rebuke of the Trump administration by the Republican-controlled Congress last Tuesday. The GOP-led House of Representatives Armed Services Committee voted on 15 July to block Hegseth from renaming the bases after Confederates. Two Republicans voted with the Democrats on the committee to pass the measure, which was an amendment to the Pentagon's budget bill. 'What this administration is doing, particularly this secretary of defense, is sticking his finger in the eye of Congress,' said Don Bacon, a Nebraska Republican representative who voted to stop Hegseth. Hegseth's move elicited bipartisan anger because it flouted the law; Congress passed legislation in January 2021 to create a commission to choose new names for the bases named for Confederates and mandated that its recommendations be implemented by the Pentagon. That law was passed over a veto by Trump in the final days of his first term, and the name changes were later implemented by the Pentagon during the Biden administration. The law is still on the books, and so in order to return to the old Confederate names, Hegseth has openly played games with their namesakes. The secretary claims he has renamed the bases after American soldiers from throughout US history who were not Confederates. But they all conveniently have the same last names as the original Confederate namesakes of the bases. For example, Fort Bragg is now supposedly named for Roland Bragg, who was an army paratrooper in the second world war; Fort Benning is now supposedly named for Fred Benning, a soldier who served in the army in the first world war. Before the House vote, Hegseth's efforts to skirt the law were also challenged in the Senate. In a hearing in June, Angus King, a senator from Maine, told Hegseth that he was returning the bases to the names of 'people who took up arms against their country on behalf of slavery'. Hegseth insisted that the Pentagon had found non-Confederates with the same names to stay within 'the limits of what Congress allowed us to do'. But during the same hearing, Hegseth briefly dropped the pretense that he wasn't returning to the original Confederate names. He argued that 'there is a legacy, a connection' for veterans with the old names. King replied that Hegseth's actions were 'an insult to the people of the United States'. Above all, Hegseth's actions show a troubling ignorance of the lives of the original Confederate namesakes; their easily-researched backgrounds reveal what terrible role models they make for modern American military personnel. Braxton Bragg was one of the most incompetent Confederate generals of the civil war. His subordinates repeatedly and clandestinely tried to get him fired, with one writing to the Confederate secretary of war that 'nothing but the hand of God can save us or help us as long as we have our present commander'. Bragg finally lost his command after he was out-generaled by Union General Ulysses S Grant and his army was routed at the Battle of Chattanooga in 1863. One of the few biographies written about him is entitled Braxton Bragg, the Most Hated Man in the Confederacy. And yet Bragg lives on today as the namesake of the largest and most important military base in the United States Army. Fort Bragg, in Fayetteville, North Carolina was originally built in 1918, as part of a rushed effort by the army to construct new bases after the United States entered the first world war. The site offered the army cheap and abundant land, and it quickly built a base and surrounding military reservation totaling 251 sq miles. Eager to win local white support, the army agreed to name the new base after a Confederate; Bragg was chosen because he was originally from North Carolina. By the time the base was built, the civil war had been over for more than 50 years, yet the south was still in the grips of the 'the Lost Cause' theory of the war, which romanticized the civil war and held that the south had fought for state's rights, not slavery, and that the Confederacy had fielded better officers and men and had only lost because of the overwhelming resources of the north. By 1918, when Bragg's name was attached to the base, the generation of Confederate officers who hated him were gone, along with the memory of his military blunders. That pattern held for a series of major bases built throughout the south during the first and second world wars. Fort Benning was also built in 1918 near Columbus, Georgia. At the request of the Columbus Rotary Club, the army named it for Henry Lewis Benning, who was best known as a pro-slavery political firebrand from Columbus who helped draft Georgia's ordinance of secession. Benning was one of the pre-eminent white supremacists of his day, and he openly admitted that his state seceded because of slavery, not states rights. In one speech, he said that his state seceded because of a 'deep conviction on the part of Georgia that a separation from the North was the only thing that could prevent the abolition of her slavery … If things are allowed to go on as they are … we will have black governors, black legislatures, black juries, black everything. Is it supposed that the white race will stand for that?' Benning served in the Confederate army, but it was his political role as a proponent of a southern slavocracy that first brought him fame and prominence. By the 21st century, there were still 10 army bases that were named for Confederates, and the Pentagon repeatedly resisted efforts to change their names, arguing that tradition outweighed the fact that the bases were named for traitors who had fought to preserve slavery. The Confederate base names were finally changed after the 2020 George Floyd protests; Fort Bragg became Fort Liberty, while Fort Benning became Fort Moore, named for Vietnam War hero Hal Moore and his wife, Julia Moore. (Mel Gibson played Hal Moore and Madeleine Stowe played Julia Moore in the 2002 movie We Were Soldiers.) But those new names didn't survive Trump's return to office. Hegseth hasn't stopped with army bases. The Pentagon has announced it will strip the name off the US navy ship Harvey Milk, which was named for the gay rights pioneer who was assassinated in 1978, and rename it for Oscar V Peterson, a sailor who won the Congressional Medal of Honor during the second world war. But one thing is certain: Braxton Bragg's civil war contemporaries would be shocked to discover that a man so widely derided as a loser and a martinet during his lifetime is still at the center of a national debate 160 years after the war ended. During the war, one Confederate newspaper editor described him as a man with 'an iron hand and a wooden head'. Grant, the man who so badly beat Bragg during the war, took great pleasure in making fun of Bragg and his ridiculous behavior when he later wrote his memoirs. Grant recounted one infamous episode involving Bragg from the time before the civil war when both men served in the small, pre-war US army. 'On one occasion, when stationed at a post … (Bragg) was commanding one of the companies and at the same time acting as post quartermaster … As commander of the company he made a requisition upon the quartermaster – himself – for something he wanted. As quartermaster he declined to fill the requisition and endorsed on the back of it his reasons for so doing. As company commander he responded to this, urging that his requisition called for nothing but what he was entitled to, and that it was the duty of the quartermaster to fill it. As quartermaster he still persisted that he was right … Bragg referred the whole matter to the commanding officer of the post. The latter exclaimed: 'My God, Mr. Bragg, you have quarreled with every officer in the army, and now you are quarrelling with yourself!' In his memoirs, Grant wrote that Bragg was 'naturally disputatious'. So maybe Braxton Bragg would fit in perfectly with Donald Trump after all.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
Reeves ‘eyes £5bn windfall from sale of seized cryptocurrency'
Rachel Reeves is eyeing up a £5bn pre-Budget windfall as the government considers selling off seized cryptocurrency to plug a hole in the public finances. The Home Office is reportedly working with police forces to offload at least £5bn worth of Bitcoin and other currencies taken from criminals. It is planning to develop a storage system for the currencies to handle their sale, it has emerged, as concerns about Labour's spending plans mount ahead of the autumn Budget. Home Office plans for a 'crypto storage and realisation framework' would allow law enforcement to securely store frozen digital currencies and sell them, The Sunday Telegraph reported. Ms Reeves has been left with a gap of at least £5bn to fill when she sets out the government's spending plans this autumn, with the government's chaotic U-turn on planned benefit cuts raising the likelihood of tax hikes. The chancellor and Sir Keir Starmer have left the door open to a wealth tax to cover the shortfall. As well as the £5bn black hole left by the welfare climbdown, the impact of sluggish economic growth and Donald Trump 's trade war could leave the Treasury scrambling to find as much as £20bn in tax hikes or spending cuts elsewhere. It is not known how much cryptocurrency law enforcement agencies currently have, but one 2018 raid saw 61,000 Bitcoin seized from a Chinese Ponzi scheme. The value of Bitcoin has surged since Mr Trump's return to the White House, meaning the haul could be worth more than £5.4bn. Responding to the suggestion Ms Reeves could sell the reserves, Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf said: 'This would be a terrible decision. The UK should be implementing Reform's Crypto Bill and increasing its Bitcoin reserves. 'Selling now will go down as a far worse decision than Gordon Brown's fire sale of our gold. 'The Westminster class are dinosaurs who don't get the future.' But Aidan Larkin, the chief executive of seizure company Asset Reality, told The Sunday Telegraph: 'There is oil under our feet in terms of digital assets, from an illicit perspective, that could have hundreds of millions of pounds coming back into the UK each year.' Bitcoin investors have been spurred on by Mr Trump, who has lent his support to the market both by promising new legislation and regulatory changes, but also even launching his own digital currencies. The leading cryptocurrency reached $120,000, marking both an all-time high and an important landmark for those who believe that bitcoin is undervalued.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Watch Democrats squirm as they're grilled on who's REALLY leading their party as young 'communists' rise in ranks
As President Donald Trump has racked up a string of major policy wins in his six months, Democrats are stuck in a rut without a clear party leader, they admitted in interviews with the Daily Mail. Though House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer are technically the left's top lawmakers, Democrats on Capitol Hill shared that there is still no consensus on who is the party's head. In the absence of a clear frontrunner to lead the party in 2028, Democrats are left to tout their current efforts resisting Trump. 'It's a group leadership at this point in time, obviously Hakeem, obviously Chuck Schumer, a lot of governors,' veteran Democrat Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland told the Daily Mail in an interview. 'I think there are a number of leaders.' Hoyer twice served as House Majority Leader under former Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He has served on Capitol Hill for over 43 years since 1981 and is the longest tenured Democrat in the House of Representatives. It's safe to say he's been around a while to witness the party in and out of power. 'When you don't have the presidency...I can't remember a time when there was a leader,' he continued. 'So I think it's a collective leadership.' Other Democrats flat-out admitted there is no clear head of the party. Hoyer told the Daily Mail that there are a number of Democratic leaders, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. But his colleague, Rep. Moskowitz, said the party doesn't really have a leader at the moment A recent poll from Reuters/Ipsos found that 62 percent of Democratic voters want completely new leadership 'We don't have a counterpart in our party at the moment, because ... we're coming out of the last presidency,' Florida Democrat Rep. Jared Moskowitz told the Daily Mail. 'But no, we don't have a counterbalance at the moment.' The Floridian, known for his cool Air Jordan sneaker collection, noted that when Trump's term expires in 2028, both parties will be left searching for new leadership, ostensibly ignoring the platform JD Vance will have after serving as vice president. 'The Republicans, will be in the same boat, right?' Moskowitz said. Who will be the leader of the party? Because it won't be the president anymore.' In addition to Jeffries and Schumer, there are a number of Democrats who have been floated as the next party boss. On those lists are usually Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and occasionally, former VP Kamala Harris. Popular prediction sites Kalshi and Polymarket list Newsom as the most likely Democratic nominee for the 2028 presidential contest, AOC is listed as close second while former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg comes in third. Democrats have indicated they want new faces steering the party. According to a June poll from Reuters/Ipsos, 62 percent of self-identified Democrats agreed that 'the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people.' That could be why Democratic candidate for New York mayor Zohran Mamdani, a self-declared democratic socialist, has been surging in the polls and landing countless TV interviews. 'Zohran Mamdani, the new leader of the Democratic Party, supports 'the abolition of private property' and 'seizing the means of production,' Republican Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana wrote this week. 'But Washington Democrats are still cozying up to him. There's no doubt about it: the loon wing is running the show.' Mamdani, 33, embodies a political archetype akin to former presidential candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, also a self-declared democratic socialist. The young mayoral candidate has even caught the attention of the president. 'It's finally happened, the Democrats have crossed the line. Zohran Mamdani, a 100% Communist Lunatic, has just won the Dem Primary, and is on his way to becoming Mayor. We've had Radical Lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous,' Trump wrote recently on Truth Social. Mamdani met personally with AOC, along with about 40 other Democratic lawmakers this week in D.C. The meeting was an hour-long session on communicating and organizing hosted by AOC, the progressive leader of the 'Squad.' The venue had to change because of high demand from lawmakers to sit in on the session, a Mamdani spokesperson said. One longtime Democrat even likened Mamdani to Trump, saying they share a similar populist appeal. 'Donald Trump and he both get out and they talk to people and they listen to people and they understand how people feel. And he's using social media the way that Donald Trump has,' Rep. Debbie Dingell of Michigan said.
