Oil prices jump after US attacks Iran nuclear sites
The cost of oil has risen sharply since the recent Israel strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, with the US launching an aerial bombing on three facilities in Iran over the weekend, with investors worried over counter attack moves by Iran.
Iran can block oil being shipped through the all-important Strait of Hormuz, which analysts feared could send crude prices rocketing.
But the FTSE 100 Index in London was spared losses on Monday, thanks to gains from oil giants BP and Shell on the back of the crude price rise, with the two stocks up 1.1% and 0.8% respectively.
The wider FTSE 100 largely held steady, up 2.9 points at 8777.6.
Panmure Liberum experts estimated that Brent crude could peak at 100 dollars (£74.43) a barrel due to severe disruption of the crucial waterway route.
Soaring oil prices, if the Strait of Hormuz is closed, could spark a 'major' spike in inflation while seeing growth stall, which could have a severe knock-on effect on global stock markets, according to Joachim Klement at Panmure Liberum.
Closing the Strait of Hormuz could disrupt about a fifth of global oil and a fifth of global gas shipments, according to Panmure.
Mr Klement said it could be worse than the oil and gas shock seen in 2022 after Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the subsequent sanctions against Russian oil and gas exports.
Mr Klement said: 'If the Straits of Hormuz is shut, we expect a major stagflationary shock similar to 2022.
'In this case, a 10% to 20% correction seems likely and we could see a new bear market if the trade war escalates again in early July.'
But he said if the Strait of Hormuz is disrupted but not closed, 'the inflation shock will be significant, but not enough to derail markets and the economies of the US, the UK and Eurozone for too long'.
'In this scenario, we expect an initial correction of stock markets of 5% to 10%.
'Whether this correction lasts longer and becomes deeper depends very much on how the trade war unfolds in the next couple of weeks.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Leading US economists urge peers to fight Trump's attack on environment
Three leading US economists are urging their peers around the world to push back against Donald Trump's attack on environmental laws. In what amounts to a call to action to economists, the trio say rollback of environmental regulations is 'inconsistent or antithetical' to fundamental principles of economics over how to allocate the world's limited resources for the greatest possible value to society. The economists, Catherine L Kling, Stephen Polasky, and Kathleen Segerson, say the Trump administration, by focusing on tearing down environmental protections, is likely to reduce rather than increase economic efficiency, and its policies are a threat to Americans and the rest of the world. Writing in the journal Environmental and Resource Economics, they urge economists to challenge from an economic perspective the administration's undermining of science on climate and the environment. 'Now is a crucial time to push back against policy changes resulting in inefficient outcomes and the major reductions of funding for environmental research,' they write. 'Economists have a wealth of knowledge and expertise that can help to explain the importance of effective and efficient environmental policy and expose weaknesses in Trump administration policies. 'Economists can use their voice to educate the wider public on what is happening and what is at stake.' They urge economists to advise local and national NGOs on environment and climate, to make public statements, broadcast podcasts, and to inform the public. They identify key reversals of climate and environmental laws by Trump including: Withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement. Eliminating consideration in federal policy of the well-established effects of climate breakdown on public welfare. Executive orders to 'drill baby drill' giving priority to fossil fuel energy production. Ending research funding on environment and climate and the collection of environmental data. Reducing investments and regulations designed to tackle lead and forever chemicals in drinking water. 'By being tireless advocates for rigorous science and providing unbiased information, economists can help to overcome the current undermining of sound environmental policy and science and improve the odds that governments adopt efficient and effective environmental policies that improve health and welfare,' they say. The economists argue the environmental policies Trump has discarded are all backed by economic principles around the efficient application of resources to ensure the greatest good. Investment to remove lead in drinking water, for example, would generate benefits that far exceed costs, partly because economies of scale could be achieved by replacing entire water service lines in a neighbourhood, rather than individual households one at a time. The promotion of fossil fuels, they say, ignores their damage to biodiversity, air and water quality and the climate, which are of public benefit. Their promotion flies in the face of evidence that wind and solar energy have become the cheapest sources of electricity production in the US. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion 'Rather than being promoted as 'clean' and 'beautiful', coal should face a hefty tax for the damages associated with CO2 emissions and emissions of other air pollutants, including nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, and mercury,' they write. The economists are taking on Trump at a time when the administration is attacking academics who speak out against the president's policies, including threatening the funding of Harvard and other institutions. More than 1,000 scientists are to be sacked from the Environmental Protection Agency, which is eliminating its scientific research office, despite its mission to protect public health and the environment. Alistair Munro, a professor at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies in Tokyo and editor of Environmental and Resource Economics, said the Trump administration was the challenge of the moment. 'In the face of the anti-science actions of the current US administration, regulators and governments in the UK and Europe need to step up their support for science-based protection of the environment and human health,' he said.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
White House joins TikTok with video of Trump saying ‘I am your voice'
The White House has joined TikTok even though the social media platform is due to be banned in the US in under a month. Donald Trump's administration on Tuesday set up a verified account on the Chinese-owned video-sharing app on Tuesday, with the caption: 'Welcome to the Golden Age of America.' TikTok is controversial in the US amid accusations by the FBI and others, which the company fiercely denies, that it could be used by Beijing to harvest data and sow division among Americans. Mr Trump attempted to outlaw the platform in his first term in office, but reversed course before the 2024 election and pledged to halt a federal ban going into effect that had been passed in Congress. The White House posted its first, and so far only, TikTok video on Tuesday evening, accompanied by the caption: 'America we are BACK! What's up TikTok?' The 27-second clip quotes Mr Trump's acceptance speech to the Republican National Convention (RNC ) last year, when he officially became the party's candidate for president ahead of his election win in November. 'Every day, I wake up determined to deliver a better life for the people all across this nation,' the president says. 'I am your voice.' The video, which switches from black and white to colour at the climax of Mr Trump's speech, shows the Republican meeting workers and members of the military, addressing the RNC, and striding down a red carpet on the way to a podium. @whitehouse America we are BACK! What's up TikTok? ♬ original sound - The White House Congress passed legislation to ban TikTok last year, with Republicans overwhelmingly defying Mr Trump's plea to vote against the bill over national security concerns. The app briefly went dark in January, but on his first day back in the White House the same month, the president signed an executive order to delay the ban until April 4 while the administration searched for a buyer. Mr Trump subsequently signed another extension to the delay two months ago, which moves the deadline back until Sept 17. The order instructs the justice department not to enforce the ban until January. The president has previously credited his presence on TikTok to helping him win over the young voters who swung dramatically towards him in November's election, paving the way for a victory that saw him win all seven swing states. 'I have a warm spot in my heart for TikTok,' Mr Trump said in December, roughly a month before he returned to office.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
US treasury chief says status quo with China 'working pretty well'
WASHINGTON, Aug 19 (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Tuesday that the status quo situation with China was "working pretty well" as the world's two biggest economies have in recent days extended a truce in their bitter trade dispute surrounding tariffs. "China is right now the biggest revenue line in the tariff income," Bessent said in an interview on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" show. "We have had very good talks with China, I imagine we will be seeing them again before November," he added. "I think right now the status quo is working pretty well." Last week, Washington and Beijing extended a tariff truce for another 90 days to November, staving off triple-digit duties on each other's goods. The two sides initially announced a truce in their trade dispute in May after talks in Geneva, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Sweden in late July after which U.S. negotiators returned to Washington with a recommendation that President Donald Trump extend the deadline. Washington has also been urging Beijing to stop buying Russian oil to pressure Moscow over its war in Ukraine, but Trump said on Friday there were no imminent plans to impose retaliatory tariffs on China, in light of talks on ending the war. Trump held a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday and a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, as well as NATO and European leaders, at the White House on Monday. After those meetings, he said Zelenskiy and Putin will hold a bilateral meeting before a trilateral meeting that would also include Trump. Bessent was asked on Fox News about reporting that Budapest could be a possible city for the three-way talks. He said that "could be" the case but that the bilateral meeting needed to happen first.
