Rubio to make first visit to Asia for ASEAN meeting in Malaysia
By Daphne Psaledakis and David Brunnstrom
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio will visit Malaysia later this week to attend a meeting of Southeast Asian Nations in his first trip to Asia as America's top diplomat, the State Department said on Monday.
Rubio will travel July 8-12 and take part in meetings in Kuala Lumpur with the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations, whose ministers are gathering there, the State Department said in a statement. He is also scheduled to meet with senior Malaysian government officials.
Rubio will seek to firm up U.S. relationships with partners and allies in the region, who have been unnerved by President Donald Trump's global tariff strategy.
The trip is part of a renewed U.S. focus on the Indo-Pacific region and represents an effort by the Trump administration to look beyond the conflicts in the Middle East and Europe that have consumed much of its attention.
"Top topics that he's going to want to hit, obviously, are to reaffirm our commitment to East Asia, to ASEAN, to the Indo-Pacific, and not just ... for its own sake," a senior State Department official told reporters.
"I think a key message that the secretary likes to deliver is that we're committed, and we prioritize it because it is in America's interests, right? It promotes American prosperity and it promotes American security."
The official added that Rubio would be prepared to discuss trade, which is likely to come up during the trip, including reiterating that the need to rebalance the United States' trade relationships is significant and echoing any messages from the White House and United States Trade Representative.
ASEAN countries have been nervous about Trump's tariffs and have questioned the willingness of his "America First" administration to fully engage diplomatically and economically with the region.
"There is a hunger to be reassured that the U.S. actually views the Indo-Pacific as the primary theater of U.S. interests, key to U.S. national security," said Greg Poling, director of the Southeast Asia Program at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies.
TRADE PACTS
Trump on Sunday said the U.S. was close to finalizing several trade pacts and would notify other countries by July 9 of higher tariff rates. He said they would not take effect until August 1, a three-week reprieve.
He also sent a message to members of the developing nations' BRICS group as its leaders met in Brazil, threatening an additional 10% tariff on any BRICS countries aligning themselves with "anti-American" policies.
The BRICS includes ASEAN member Indonesia, as well as China and India.
Trump last week announced he reached a trade agreement with important Southeast Asian partner and ASEAN member Vietnam and could reach one with India, but cast doubt on a possible deal with Japan, Washington's main Indo-Pacific ally and a major importer and investor in the United States.
Rubio has yet to visit Japan, or neighboring South Korea, the other major U.S. ally in Northeast Asia, since taking office in January, even though Washington sees the Indo-Pacific as its main strategic priority given the perceived threat posed by China.
South Korea's presidential security adviser Wi Sung-lac headed to Washington on Sunday for trade and defense talks, with Seoul seeking an extension of a freeze on U.S. tariffs.
Wi's office said he would be in Washington until Tuesday and aimed to meet with Rubio and discuss a possible summit between Trump and President Lee Jae Myung, who took office last month.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
13 minutes ago
Trump Says Japan Changing Its Way in Tariff Talks
News from Japan Economy Jul 14, 2025 14:23 (JST) Washington, July 13 (Jiji Press)--U.S. President Donald Trump said Sunday that Japan is "changing" its way very rapidly in tariff negotiations with the United States. Trump was speaking to reporters at Joint Base Andrews near Washington, but he did not elaborate. Japan may have made concessions in the tariff talks. The president made the comments after criticizing Japan, saying, "We sell them no cars because they won't accept our cars, and they won't accept much of our agricultural stuff." Trump said in a letter addressed to Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba on Monday that his administration will impose a 25 pct reciprocal tariff on all imports from Japan, effective on Aug. 1. In response, Ishiba stressed that his government will not make concessions easily in order to protect Japan's national interests. [Copyright The Jiji Press, Ltd.] Jiji Press
The Diplomat
39 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
When Are State-owned Companies Not Interfering in the Affairs of Another Country?
There's a darkly waggish 'Family Guy' cutaway called 'Horton Hears Domestic Violence in the Next Apartment and Doesn't Call 911.' (For non-English readers, 'Horton Hears A Who' is a popular children's book by Dr. Seuss.) In the gag, there's clearly a case of wife-beating going on next door, but the eponymous, big-eared elephant sits unmoved, quietly reading a book. As the violence crescendos, he sardonically reflects, 'I'm sure there's two sides to this.' At its worst, this is how the principle of non-interference works. Yes, the regime in the country next door is brutalizing its citizens, but we're just not going to mention it. For all the reports of human rights violations and genocide, there are probably 'two sides' to what's happening. Of course, that's an extreme case, but not an uncommon one. Non-interference is pretty much the only norm that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) can agree on these days, and even then, it has been considerably eroded in recent months. The prime example came earlier this month, when Cambodia's ruling duopoly of Prime Minister Hun Manet and ex-Prime Minister Hun Sen quite explicitly called for regime change in Bangkok. 'I hope there will be a new prime minister in Thailand,' was just one of the regime-changist comments Hun Sen has made in the past weeks. Hun Manet followed this up by stating that 'We are waiting for someone with real power [in Bangkok], someone with the legitimate authority to open or close border checkpoints.' Thai Vice Foreign Minister Ras Chaleechan was only being slightly hyperbolic when he retorted, 'In nearly six decades since ASEAN's founding, there has never been an instance of one member state so openly aiming to destabilize the government of another member state.' Perhaps it has been done privately, but I haven't seen ASEAN or any other Southeast Asian government publicly rebuke Phnom Penh for violating the region's cardinal principle. Worse, Hun Sen's intervention worked: Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended on July 1. At the same time, Myanmar's junta is now trying to derail Timor-Leste's accession to ASEAN with claims that Dili has interfered in its affairs by allowing the anti-junta, shadow National Unity Government (NUG) to set up a representative office in Timor-Leste. But consider another example: In April, the state-run Myanma Oil and Gas Enterprise (MOGE), one of the main financiers of Myanmar's military junta, signed an agreement with Thailand's state-run energy group PTT to expand production of an offshore gas field. Thanks to this deal, MOGE will presumably increase its revenue, and the resulting profits will flow to the military junta and its war efforts. I would genuinely like to hear someone disprove how a Thai state-run company doing business with a state-run company run by one side in a civil war is not Thailand interfering in Myanmar's domestic politics. I have long thought that ASEAN making non-interference a higher-level principle was a mistake, as it's not only wildly imprecise but also mostly impossible to adhere to. There's an obvious violation when Cambodian leaders call for regime change in a neighboring country. But is allowing residence to an exiled politician from another country a form of intervention? (Interestingly, Hun Sen has recently accused Bangkok of doing that, despite Hun Sen having done the same with Thaksin Shinawatra years ago.) Most Southeast Asian states have claimed neutrality in the Myanmar civil war, yet almost all have sent ministers to discuss economic and trade relations with the junta's ministers. Subtly, Bangkok has intimated that the Cambodian government and the Myanmar junta's failures to tackle their vast scam industries (one of the root causes of the ongoing Thai-Cambodia border crisis) is a form of intervention in its affairs, given their inaction has resulted in a rise of transnational crimes (most human trafficking and fraud) within Thailand related to their scam industries. And this, Bangkok says, permits Thailand also to intervene, such as by cutting internet access to Myanmar border towns or closing off crossings on the Cambodia border. One could get even 'deeper' and question whether non-interference is even possible. On most occasions, inaction or neutrality supports the status quo, and thus, not intervening is an indirect form of intervention. If I were to walk down the street and see a 6-foot-4 man punching a 5-foot man, would I be maintaining societal peace by ignoring it and allowing the bigger man to continue delivering a beating? Or would I be passively intervening on the side of the bigger man by not trying to stop the attack? Perhaps it depends on whether I could alter the course of events, but that's only apparent after the fact, and the probable outcome should not influence the ethics. Yet we live in a world in which accepting the impossibility would be chaotic, for there would be too many things to intervene in. Instead, it requires some discrimination of importance and values. My point, then, is that one must be prepared to redefine definitions and perceptions of non-interference. If the Thai government were to give money to Myanmar's junta, that would be obvious interference. But wrap it up in a business transaction between two state-run companies, and suddenly it becomes perfectly acceptable. Moreover, tangible interference, such as financial benefits from state-run companies, appears less interventionist than abstract forms, but it shouldn't be the case. Imagine that an ASEAN state came out in direct support of the NUG but merely offered words of encouragement and solidarity. Realistically, that would change nothing on the ground in Myanmar, yet this might be seen as a clear example of interference (as the junta is now alleging against Timor-Leste). Yet Southeast Asia's state-run companies can boost the profits of the junta's businesses, thereby providing hard cash to the junta for its war machine, and nobody bats an eyelid (as in the case of Thailand's state-run firm). As the norm of non-intervention is being eroded, maybe now's a good time for a rethink about whether ASEAN sticks with the lowest-resolution definition, which has become: Don't criticize the sitting government of another country. It cannot merely be the bubble wrap slogan: if you haven't something nice to say, don't say anything at all.
Yomiuri Shimbun
an hour ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Tariffs Give the U.S.'S Only Native Caffeinated Plant a Shot at Stardom
When the Sons of Liberty dumped over 92,000 pounds of tea into the Boston Harbor in protest of the passage of the wildly unpopular Tea Act of 1773, colonial Americans knew the political performance wouldn't force them to kick their caffeine habit. While they still hadn't found a way to successfully cultivate their beloved Camellia sinensis – the scientific name for the tea plant- on American soil, they had another locally grown option: yaupon. Long used by Indigenous groups across the Southern United States, yaupon is North America's only native caffeinated plant. Known by many Indigenous and colonized names, including cassina, asi, Carolina tea and Christmas berry, the yaupon plant is a landrace, evergreen holly variety that can grow up to 30 feet tall, appearing from North Carolina to East Texas. But even as it grows right under their noses and in their backyards, most Americans have probably never heard about yaupon. That may start to change. Thanks to President Donald Trump's tariffs, the modern-day yaupon industry is ready and waiting for the plant's potential resurgence. Two and a half centuries ago, yaupon became part of a political movement. The Townshend Revenue Acts, which taxed a variety of common imports in the 1770s and allowed the British Parliament to meddle with the free market, brought colonial unrest to a boiling point. In that era of political boycott, colonists turned to tea alternatives made with a variety of herbs, fruits and indigenous plants, including yaupon. These 'liberty teas' proved perfectly acceptable substitutes, until the American Revolution ended, the global tea trade returned, and yaupon was suddenly out of style again. Starting in April 2025, the Trump administration rolled out a slew of steep protective tariffs on nearly all goods imported to the United States, including tea, which carried its highest tariff rate since the Tea Act of 1773. Although modern-day America is usually considered a coffee-drinking nation, we also import hundreds of millions of dollars worth of tea each year, largely from countries such as China and India. The United States can't grow tea to the scale it consumes. In a letter to Trump, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and other officials involved in trade decisions, Peter Goggi, president of the Tea Association of the USA, expressed deep concern over the impact of tariffs. 'The United States is not a tea producing nation,' Goggi writes. 'There is no commercially grown tea that requires protection via tariffs, nor are there any tea-related farm-based jobs that would be protected by these tariffs.' Meanwhile, with such a steady, sustainable supply grown right here in the United States, yaupon stands to be the only tariff-proof source of caffeine for American consumers. 'When I saw the news around tea and coffee,' says Christine Folch, cultural anthropologist at Duke University and author of 'The Book of Yerba Mate,' 'I thought, maybe this is yaupon's moment in the sun.' The modern-day yaupon industry includes a small, tight-knit group of farmers, producers and wild harvesters, known internally as 'yauponers.' Abianne Falla, owner of CatSpring Yaupon in Cat Spring, Texas, and founder of the American Yaupon Association, sources native-grown yaupon through partnerships with local ranches. 'It's a 20-million-acre problem in Texas,' says Falla, referring to the belief held by many Texas landowners that yaupon is a nuisance in need of fixing. Founded in 2011, CatSpring was one of the earliest yaupon producers on the market, offering dark and green roasts (similar to black and green tea flavor profiles) in loose leaf and bagged options. A few states over in Crescent City, Florida, Yaupon Brothers uses more traditional agricultural methods to grow yaupon on a 124-year-old organic citrus farm (the oldest in the state). Much like other crops, their yaupon grows in tidy rows, which helps the company scale production and maintain some control over the naturally occurring plant. Yaupon Brothers founders Bryon and Kyle White found that the methodologies for growing yerba mate, another caffeinated Ilex plant native to South America, work similarly for its botanical cousin yaupon. While Yaupon Brothers and other commercial farmers do not grow yerba mate in the United States, they rely on similar pruning and harvesting techniques. Their yaupon trees are capped at six to seven feet and harvested three times a year, after which it 'comes back in a matter of months,' says White. Much like traditional tea, yaupon tea is made with dried yaupon leaves that are chopped and roasted to suit different tastes, including the familiar green and black flavor profiles of the tea-drinking world. Unlike other traditional tea importers, Harney & Sons has embraced yaupon and sources the raw ingredient from CatSpring Yaupon. The company sells a loose-leaf blend as well as a ready-to-drink bottle sold exclusively at the popular salad chain Sweetgreen. But winning over the general tea-drinking public remains an issue for yaupon farmers and importers who might add yaupon to their offerings. 'America is an on-the-go culture,' says Ahmed Rahim, founder of traditional tea importer Numi Tea, adding that he's still 'trying to find ways to get the American mindset wrapped around tea.' Despite yaupon's long history in the region, a large part of the industry still revolves around educating the public about the plant and how to drink it. For many generations, yaupon was considered invasive and burned down to its hearty roots when land needed clearing. Its Westernized botanical name, Ilex vomitoria, has also spurred erroneous beliefs that yaupon induces vomiting if consumed and has flattened interpretations to the indigenous rituals to which it was once a central ingredient. The threat of tariffs spurred small-scale yaupon farmer Crystal Stokes to pivot to education. Through her organization Project CommuniTea, Stokes travels around and teaches her Richmond community about the history and benefits of yaupon, plant identification, and how to grow yaupon at home. 'I knew that changes in administration were coming and that consumers would be less likely to purchase a plant beverage that most would be trying for the first time,' says Stokes. Despite the tariffs, traditional tea purveyors aren't overly worried. According to Paul Harney of Harney & Sons, 'there's always some degree of chaos. It's always something, the pandemic, shipping, something.' The tariffs motivated Harney & Sons to find tea grown in countries with fewer trade issues, such as Mozambique and Kenya. For Numi, Rahim sources from dozens of countries, and much of the company's production process is in Canada. Numi is the largest fair trade importer of tea and herbs in the United States, but Rahim says he's not panicked or anxious about the impact of tariffs and plans to 'wait and see what's going to happen.' Darren Hartford, the owner of Oliver Pluff & Co., which sells history-inspired beverages, including 'the story of what was dumped in the Boston harbor,' is staying optimistic. The company is set to open its retail location in Charleston this summer and is busy prepping for collaborations related to the upcoming 250th anniversary of the founding of America. Understanding its historical relevance, Oliver Pluff & Co. tried yaupon, but it turned out to be 'a fringe item.' After the current tariffs started, another yaupon farmer reached out to Hartford, curious if he wanted to now incorporate more of the tea alternative in his offerings. Yaupon was never a big seller for Hartford, who remains hesitant to take a chance on the tea alternative again during a tumultuous market. While the yaupon industry's raw material is not impacted by tariffs, some producers' packaging and other materials are sourced from tariff-heavy regions. Most businesses, especially small ones, 'can't simply decouple from a global supply chain,' explains White. After the first wave of tariffs went into effect, the price of Yaupon Brothers' Chinese-made packaging doubled overnight. Nonetheless, the tense economic situation has spurred the company to pivot to find new packaging, switching to American-made materials, which they hope will eventually reduce consumer costs overall. CatSpring Yaupon already used packaging sourced from U.S.-based manufacturers, but is using this moment to rebrand and double down on its messaging that yaupon is made in America. With a growing push for American-grown products and production, the yaupon industry is poised for growth. CatSpring Yaupon has added manufacturing jobs back to their rural community in Texas and sends out so much mail they were able to keep their local post office open. CatSpring Yaupon collaborates with other small companies and restaurants across the nation. 'Anytime we're added to the menu, we're replacing an imported product,' says Falla. 'On paper, we're perfect for this administration.' As Duke University's Folch puts it, yaupon could benefit from the current turmoil. 'The tariffs give us an opportunity to ask really deep questions about who we are and what we bring to the table,' she said. If yaupon is indeed able to navigate the new realities of an American-made tea culture and, once again, help us rethink what 'made in America' really means, it would be an epic, 250-year comeback.
