‘Too long': Plan to crack huge housing hurdle
Increasing tax breaks for investors in new properties is needed for Australia to meet its 'ambitious' 1.2 million home target by 2030 according to a new research paper by The McKell Institute.
Four tweaks to capital gains tax – including an increase to the 50 per cent discount for new units but a reduction on discounts for detached dwellings – are being put forward as a 'circuit breaker'.
The paper will be submitted to the federal productivity roundtable forum, which Treasurer Jim Chalmers is promoting as a way to build consensus on long-term economic reform.
'Labor has resisted change to the CGT discount for too long,' McKell chief executive Edward Cavanough said.
'The CGT tax discount is neither good nor evil, but it should be better calibrated to actually achieve our social aims.' Experts are split on the best way to build more houses. NewsWire / Flavio Brancaleone Credit: News Corp Australia
'Instead of encouraging property investors to bid up the price of existing housing stock we should be encouraging them to contribute to the construction of new dwellings.'
Capital gains tax is paid when you buy an asset and then later sell it for a profit; the profit you make is taxed as income.
The capital gains tax discount kicks in when, if you own an investment property for 12 months and then sell it, you only pay tax on half the profit you made.
The richest 10 per cent of Australians reap the benefits of more than half the capital gains tax discounts, government data shows.
Sale of the home you own and live in is exempt from capital gains tax. Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers will lead the roundtable meetings in Canberra next month. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia
The plan projects up to 130,000 extra new homes could be built by 2030.
'A key problem with our existing tax settings on property is they orient too much investment toward established dwellings at the cost of new supply,' Professor Holden said.
'There is nothing wrong with the commonly held desire of everyday investors to secure their future by investing in the housing market.
'But this desire should be harnessed to achieve our national objectives on housing supply.'
The federal government has set a lofty goal of 1.2 million new houses being built by 2030 that would require 220,000 new dwellings per year. About 160,000 new homes are built each year.
The monthly new home target has been met just once since the target was set in early 2023, and even the federal Treasury has suggested the target will not be hit under the current policy settings.
In tune with the McKell research, a group of rank-and-file Labor members has also thrown their voice behind a proposal to curb the tax discounts, with Labor for Housing saying a reduction in the discounts would help build more houses.
Mr Chalmers has billed the roundtable meetings as a chance to set in motion aspirational reform.
In June, Mr Chalmers said changes to capital gains tax was not something the government was 'looking at right now' but acknowledged there was appetite.
'I think it is really important we don't narrow that, limit that, those ideas people put forward. We've had a view about that in the past. I do suspect people will raise it, and we'll listen respectfully when they do,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
9 minutes ago
- West Australian
Robert Carruthers: WA merits a spot at Jim Chalmers economic reform roundtable
There's just over a month until Treasurer Jim Chalmers' highly anticipated economic reform roundtable. The guest list is still being finalised, and the agenda has evolved to tackle ever-growing 'pillars' of reform. Whatever the roundtable's name or shape, the problem statement is clear: Australia's prosperity is under the gun, and we need to become far more match-fit. That's precisely why more key players from WA's dominant resources sector should receive a call-up. Australia's largest exporters are clearly critical to Australia's prosperity. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has spoken of his Government's mandate to make lasting change. Indeed, alongside his Treasurer, there's the opportunity to become generational reformers in the mould of past Labor luminaries. But here's the rub: consensus-seeking cannot be the singular objective. We're right to be wary of well-choreographed, Canberra-centric thinking and an invite list that is too narrow. Without strong representation and leadership, we risk ending up with a well-rounded table but a flat agenda. WA has produced world-beaters across medicine, tech, and sport — and last week, a boy from the Wheatbelt ascended to the top job at Rio Tinto, one of the world's largest diversified mining companies. Yet of the 24 formal invites issued, to date only one has been summoned from WA. There is no doubt former WA treasurer Ben Wyatt will be a strong voice and wears many hats, including board roles with major resources companies. Still, a solitary voice is not sufficient from a State that contributes more than half of Australia's export earnings. Resources Minister Madeleine King deserves credit for convening sector leaders in a series of mini roundtables in Perth last week, with identified priorities to feed into the broader Canberra roundtable. It's a measure of the respect that Minister King has earned for her ongoing engagement and support for the sector. It just makes sense to extend more invitations to WA's industry leaders to accompany her in making the 3000km journey east. Successive governments have shied away from tackling broad-based tax reform. The net result is an overly complex system reliant on a proportionally narrowing base, akin to a death by thousand cuts labyrinth. The Albanese Government was elected with a mandate for lower taxes (with the notable exception of superannuation tax). Yet, concerningly, the Treasurer has taken to flying kites in recent weeks to test support for introducing new taxes. Any move to increase resources-based taxes should be called out for what it is: a shakedown on WA. The allure of low-hanging revenue measures must not substitute for meaningful rationalisation of the tax system across all levels of government. As former WA premier Colin Barnett argued, not even the GST distribution should be off-limits in the quest for meaningful reform. Ask global resources companies who have recently invested in North or South America what welcome mat measures were rolled out to secure their investment in those jurisdictions. You can bet it was streamlined and designed to incentivise investment and job creation — not a confusing queue of overlapping requirements. WA's mining leaders can share firsthand what Australia is getting right, and what we're getting dangerously wrong. Any serious economic reform agenda must tackle the red tape holding back major projects across the nation. This is fundamental not just for WA resources projects, but for the infrastructure and energy transition projects that are vital for future generations. It's noteworthy that Dr Ken Henry, architect of the last major template for tax reform, is now championing environmental regulatory reform as the single greatest opportunity to lift productivity and protect Australia's environment. It's a conundrum I'm equally passionate about. For two decades, there's been broad agreement on the need to reform the EPBC system which is contorted, cautious, and far from certain. New Environment Minister Murray Watt has taken an encouragingly proactive and pragmatic approach, openly acknowledging that not everyone can be happy with every aspect in the pursuit of meaningful reform. The proposed framework for streamlined environmental regulatory approvals — with standards set nationally and ideally implemented by the States under a single pathway — should have top billing at the roundtable. No conversation on productivity is complete without addressing industrial relations. It's the elephant in the room. The IR system had sizeable chunks re-jigged during the first term Albanese Government, but these reforms broke the link to productivity and international competitiveness. The roundtable presents an opportunity to hardwire productivity back into Australia's IR landscape. Past Labor governments have succeeded in striking accords between employers, employees, and unions to share responsibility for both delivering efficiency and sharing the benefits. Cyclical industries like the resources sectors need the flexibility to adapt to changing conditions. There are good global examples, including in US heavy industries, where these kinds of flexible workplace agreements have become a foundation for shared resilience and job security. We simply must get these settings right to secure Australia's competitiveness. It is puzzling that Australia's largest export industry did not make the first cut of invitations to the roundtable. The Prime Minister outwardly acknowledged the sector's central importance when he invited senior iron ore executives on his recent high-level state visit to China. WA's wealth-generating industry deserves more than a sideline role in shaping national economic reform. If the NSW Treasurer can secure a seat at the roundtable, surely our world-leading mining CEOs and WA's Premier warrant their place too. Robert Carruthers is Principal at CSA Ltd
Perth Now
39 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Penalty rates bill aims to protect millions of workers
A casual hospitality worker can expect to have weekend penalty rates of about $40 an hour protected under a bid to prevent take home pay for employees from being shaved. Measures to enshrine penalty and overtime rates in law will be introduced in the House of Representatives on Thursday by Employment Minister Amanda Rishworth. The bill aims to prevent variations to awards that would result in lower pay for workers. It will be among the first pieces of legislation introduced by Labor in its second term of power following the May 3 federal election. Workers can be entitled to higher rates of pay when they are required to work particular hours or days including weekends, public holidays or irregular hours. While rates can vary depending on an employee's specific award or agreement applicable to that industry, common pay rates for workers on a Sunday are double time (200 per cent) or time-and-a-half (150 per cent). A calculation of rates on the Fair Work Commission's website show for a casual hospitality worker, common penalties for a shift on Saturday to be $40.85 per hour, while a day's work on Sunday could bring in $47.65 per hour. Protecting penalty rates was an Albanese government election pledge. Ms Rishworth said the bill will ensure the wages of about 2.6 million modern award-reliant workers are protected. "If you rely on the modern award safety net and work weekends, public holidays, early mornings or late nights, you deserve to have your wages protected," she said. "Millions of hard-working Australians rely on penalty rates and overtime rates to keep their heads above water, which is why this bill is so critical and should receive the support of both the opposition and the Greens." Labor's planned changes came after peak retail and business groups put forward proposals for large companies to opt out of providing penalty rates for staff in exchange for a raise on base levels of pay. Opposition employment spokesman Tim Wilson said the coalition supported penalty rates. "We will work through the legislation to make sure we consult the businesses and those it's going to impact to get the best outcome," he told AAP. Mr Wilson said the absence of a regulatory impact statement, which lays out the potential impacts of the proposed changes, meant consultation was even more important to ensure it would be part of the future success of the economy. The coalition also wants to assess how the changes would interact with the Fair Work Commission, which would be required to apply the new rules in addition to the modern awards objective in making its determination.
Perth Now
39 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Calls for consumption tax to be off the roundtable menu
A push to raise the GST as part of the government's economic roundtable is being met with resistance, with the community services sector warning it would increase the burden on low-income earners. A number of prominent economists have advocated raising or broadening the 10 per cent GST to fund cuts to less-efficient levies such as income taxes. Australian Council of Social Service chief executive Cassandra Goldie objects to the proposal on the grounds it would increase inequality. "We need a fairer and more effective tax system that secures the revenue we need to fund essential services and safety nets while encouraging more productive investment to create jobs and lift living standards," she said. "This can be done with reforms that lift productivity and overall revenue without increasing the burden for people on low and modest incomes." While Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said increasing the tax on consumption does not fit with his agenda, Labor is pledging to overhaul Australia's tax system as part of an economic roundtable in August. The summit is aimed at kick-starting the nation's stalled productivity growth and living standards. Shifting from income to consumption tax would ease the burden on younger working Australians but it would also widen wealth inequality, deepen poverty and deliver only modest economic efficiency gains, a report produced by the council found. Broadly speaking, personal income tax is more progressive than the GST because people pay a higher rate the more they earn, whereas low-income earners tend to pay a higher proportion of their money on consumption taxes than people on higher incomes who save more. Instead, the government should take steps that reduce inequality while lifting productivity and revenue, report author Peter Davidson found. To that aim, they could tighten loopholes for family and corporate trusts, limit negative gearing, reduce tax concessions on superannuation and halve the 50 per cent discount on the capital gains tax. Changing the capital gains tax discount has been backed in by the Greens and Labor-aligned think tank the McKell Institute, which argued it could be tweaked to encourage new housing supply and make it easier for Australians to own their own home. Prospective homebuyers hoping for lower mortgage rates could get a clearer indication of the Reserve Bank's next move on Thursday when governor Michele Bullock speaks for the first time since a surprise surge in unemployment last week. Ms Bullock will talk about the RBA's dual mandate of maintaining low inflation and unemployment in a speech to the Anika Foundation in Sydney.
