
The True Story Behind Trainwreck: P.I. Moms
Butler had a proposal for Crooks: Take part in a ride-along with one of the mothers, watch them catch a philanderous man in the act, and write about it. It smelled like a great story and Crooks eventually hopped in a car with Denise Antoon, one of four moms Butler had employed. The mission went like clockwork. The man they were following met up with a young woman and began kissing her in a parking lot, all while Denise grabbed photos and video. Crooks understood why Lifetime was eager to turn this into a series.
But did everything go down a little too perfectly? Soon after returning home, Crooks got an email from someone named Ronald Rutherford that made him question everything. 'It would be a mistake to write a story on the P.I. moms and Chris Butler,' the email stated. 'Chris totally played you. The case that you sat in on was totally scripted. All the participants or employees are paid actors. I hope that publishing it is not in your plans.'
As chronicled in Netflix's new documentary Trainwreck: P.I. Moms, that mysterious message was just the beginning of a scandal that involved lying, cheating, wire-tapping, methamphetamines, and jail time, and would ultimately kill the Lifetime reality series before it ever aired. In this retelling, director Phil Bowman interviews a couple of the moms, Lifetime producers, and several others involved with the show to paint a better picture of how Butler's enterprise wasn't everything it seemed to be.
Reality show origins
When Butler started his investigation firm around 2000, the former police officer hired a lot of off-duty, law enforcement officers to work on cases, but he found that the men were all too competitive and impatient to be good investigators. 'Then, I hired a mom, and she was the best investigator I had worked with,' he told Crooks. 'She was patient and a good team player, and she could multitask."
Eventually, he hired moms Michelle Allen, Charmagne Peters, Denise Antoon, and Ami Wilt to fill out a team. Butler used their skills and inconspicuousness to perform undercover operations, stings, and other kinds of investigative work, which secretly included a 'Dirty DUIs' scheme in which they'd encourage men to drink alcohol, encourage them to drive, and then alert the police. (The doc doesn't interrogate this aspect of the business.) As the moms started getting media attention throughout the reality TV boom, Lifetime saw potential for a show—along with spin-offs in other cities—centered around them.
The network soon reached out to Lucas Platt about showrunning the series. The TV veteran liked the general concept of 'showing this group of women busting criminals together,' he says in the doc, but he also wanted to explore their lives outside the job. As Denise and Ami attest, the moms didn't want to be treated like a group on Real Housewives and create fake drama, so Platt agreed to share more personal and meaningful anecdotes about their lives.
Lifetime eventually gave Platt three camera crews and a four-million budget to produce eight episodes with Butler's group, which also included Carl Marino, a former law enforcement agent who helped with cases that needed a male presence. But Platt and the moms could tell there was something off about him—that he was eager to be a television star at any cost. 'It felt like egotism run amok,' Platt says. 'Its called P.I. Moms, and he's not a mom.'
Repeated sabotage
After Crooks received the anonymous tip about the staged ride-along, he reached out to Platt to share the information. 'If Chris did this to me, how could he not do it for TV?' he thought. The showrunner was confident in the veracity of the women and the cases they were pursuing, until their next sting operation, when their target told Denise that he'd been tipped off.
Now Platt was curious. He began investigating and soon discovered the tipster (and the man responsible behind the Rutherford email) was actually Marino. The show wouldn't work if employees were breaking up operations out of spite and jealousy, so Platt told Butler that his employee had been sabotaging the show. But instead of firing Marino, Butler told Platt not to worry about it—an odd reaction, especially for someone hoping to make bank from a reality series. 'Clearly he had other things that were happening that were taking precedence,' Denise says.
Marino knew all about those other things, and was willing to spill the information. He continued corresponding with Crooks and explained that Butler was involved in serious criminal activity, selling marijuana, prescription Xanax, and steroids that had been confiscated by a Contra Costa Country Task Force commander. Once in possession of the drugs, Butler would then give them to Marino inside the office. 'I have not sold any and don't want to,' Marino messaged Crooks. 'I don't want anything to do with this.'
At the same time, Marino continued to scheme, eventually using insider case files to solve a missing person's case that Platt and the P.I. Moms had hoped would be their opportunity to save the series. As both Ami and Denise remember, Marino was determined to have his 15 minutes of fame, even if that meant continuing to sabotage the show he was so desperate to be on. 'How dumb are you that they're going to push this out and you're going to be the star of the show?' Ami says.
The final sting
After Crooks reached out to Contra Costa D.A. Daryl Jackson with his information, Marino ultimately came forward and agreed to wear a wire for law enforcement, who was ready to bust Butler after discovering he had planned to sell three pounds of methamphetamines. They arranged a buy at the P.I. firm between the corrupt officer, Butler, and Marino, and as soon as the sale went through, authorities quickly arrested Butler.
The news officially sealed the show's fate. Lifetime cancelled P.I. Moms San Francisco and forced Platt to break the bad news to the women and crew. It was an emotional moment, especially for Ami, who had opened up over the course of the show's production and shared intimate details about losing her son at an early age. She hoped her testimony would help other women struggling with something similar. Instead, it would never air.
On May 4th, 2012, nearly two years after telling Crooks to write a story about him, Butler pleaded guilty to selling drugs, extortion, robbery and planting illegal wiretaps, and was later sentenced to eight years in prison. The fallout also impacted the P.I. moms themselves—they were called frauds and took heat from their community for collaborating with Butler. (Crooks eventually did write a 10,000-word story about his experience.)
Marino eventually got his moment in the sun, playing lead Detective Lt. Joe Kenda, on the Investigation Discovery TV show Homicide Hunter. But to everyone involved with P.I. Moms, he and Butler will always be known as the ultimate schemers that killed their TV careers. 'Chris and Carl just took it away from everybody,' Denise says. 'They put their desires above everyone else's.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
8 minutes ago
- Forbes
FBI Confirms Phantom Hacker Warning For All Android And iPhone Users
Beware the Phantom Hacker, FBI warns smartphone users. When the FBI issues a public service advisory, you'd be well advised to take note, in my never humble opinion. Whether the subject of that cybersecurity alert is an attack on routers, the latest ransomware threat warning, or involves a password-stealing, 2FA bypass. Of particular note, however, are the FBI warnings that relate specifically to smartphone users, given how ubiquitous the things are now. The latest has just been posted to the X, formerly known as Twitter, social media platform by the FBI Los Angeles, which warns that a series of phantom hacker attacks can see smartphone users losing their life savings. Here's what you need to know and do. The FBI Phantom Hacker Warning A July 15 posting to X, by the official FBI Los Angeles account, served to remind all smartphone users, be they of the Android or iPhone persuasion, to beware of so-called Phantom Hackers scams. These are the FBI warning outlined, 'where cyber criminals use a 3-prong attack against victims using tech support, financial institution, & government impersonation scams simultaneously.' The payout, if successful? Your life savings. That posting actually references a much older threat, one that was first flagged by the FBI public service announcement, alert number I-091223-PSA, way back in September 2023. Nothing, however, has changed since then, and the fact that the FBI has seen fit to bring the scam back into the public consciousness now should be all the warning that you need to take it very seriously indeed. So, what is a Phantom Hacker scam? Simply put, the FBI explained that the attack layers 'imposter tech support, financial institution, and government personas' in an effort to engender trust in the victim as well as to 'identify the most lucrative accounts to target.' Should you be on the end of such an attack, the FBI warned, victims face 'the loss of entire banking, savings, retirement, or investment accounts under the guise of protecting their assets.' The three-phase attacks comprise: The FBI has requested victims should report these activities to their local FBI field office and the FBI IC3 at
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What happens when stars say 'I don't?' Meet the people who help divorcing celebrities get their Hollywood ending.
Ever wonder how much strategizing goes into a celebrity divorce? A lot. Insiders tell us just how much is planned when famous figures announce they're calling it quits. Breaking up in Hollywood is an art form. It's not just about which half of the couple gets the mansions or the money — it's about who controls the narrative, who is spinning the breakup and who has the better professionals working overtime to make sure a star's image doesn't get caught in the cross fire. Beneath every headline and strategic statement from a celebrity's camp or exclusive source, there's a carefully choreographed dance going on that most people don't see. There's a high-powered divorce attorney, typically costing more than $1,000 an hour, managing the division of assets. There's a longtime publicist who's been by a star's side through highs and lows, ensuring the split is framed in the best possible light. Then there's the X factor: the media. No matter how prepared a famous figure thinks they are for the attention that comes with a big life change, some of the best-laid plans can still unravel in the face of public scrutiny. Celebrity divorces may seem like a personal matter, but in Tinseltown, they're a public spectacle. I spoke with a seasoned publicist, a top divorce attorney, a social media manager and an actress who've had front-row seats to these high-stakes splits. They took me behind the scenes of how these high-profile divorces are handled, because in the world of fame, it's never just about 'I don't' — it's about what happens after the vows fall apart. Step 1: It's over I talked to one actress whose divorce from another star made headlines in recent years. She preferred her name not be used but confirmed that one of the first calls she made was to her publicist. "Going through a divorce isn't fun, whether you're famous or not. But if you are a 'celebrity,' then you know when you file, it's going to be reported about in the press," she tells me. When a celebrity decides they are filing for divorce from their spouse, fans may or may not have caught wind of it in the press. Sometimes it's a slow trickle of reports that a split is imminent, like what happened as Tom Brady and Gisele Bündchen, Kim Kardashian and Kanye West, or Jennifer Lopez and Ben Affleck all respectively decoupled. Other times, it's a total surprise, similar to the 2016 shocker that Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie were going their separate ways. While those in the stars' inner circle may have had an idea of what was really going on beyond the headlines, what happens next is managed by professionals far beyond the realm of close friendships. 'You lean on your close friends for the emotional part," the actress says. "But you need a team to handle the business side of things." Step 2: Build your team A celebrity's team usually consists of a manager, agent and publicist. Depending on their level of fame, there might be assistants and in-house content creators to help with running their social media accounts. When a celebrity is going through a divorce, it's the publicist who takes the lead in navigating the incoming storm. Sarah Schmidt, a celebrity publicist who has handled multiple client breakups, tells me that ideally, any publicists working on the talent's account are "looped in early enough to plan the announcement and quietly craft the surrounding narrative." Schmidt, president of PR firm Interdependence, says if it's possible, a celebrity's publicity team is quietly crafting all of this before the public has any idea. They also work in tandem with the attorney chosen to represent the celebrity in the divorce. "When I get hired by a celebrity, 80% of the time, a handler of the celebrity calls me and they kind of vet me," divorce attorney Nancy Chemtob, from Chemtob Moss Forman & Beyda, tells me. "Then after that, I meet with my client." At that first meeting, Chemtob, who has represented stars like Mary-Kate Olsen, Tory Burch and Bobby Flay, says the first question she usually gets is, "Should I conflict out attorneys?" That means a star will go meet with other high-profile lawyers around town so that their soon-to-be ex cannot use that lawyer. In some cases, she will advise it, although it's rare. "What ends up happening is your spouse is left with mid-level attorneys who will say 'Wow, this is the biggest case in the whole world,' and just keep [proceedings] going," Chemtob says. "I want to be on a level playing field with [the opposing attorney], so that someone I work with would have respect for me, and I would have respect for them, making the case easier, more settleable and our clients would have less stress." With a lawyer in place, Schmidt says her staff then works on strategy. That includes crafting a "a clear, human-forward statement" for the celebrity to release. You've probably read many of those statements. The stars made the decision to part with 'thoughtful consideration.' If it's not too contentious, there will be a line about separating with 'love' and 'respect," and that it was an "amicable" joint decision. The former couple will request 'privacy' during the 'difficult' time, especially for their children, and focus on "co-parenting." Schmidt says they look to "identify trusted reporters or outlets" to disseminate the news "responsibly." Then it's go time. Step 3: File the papers, issue the statements With a PR plan in place and a lawyer hired, it's time to mobilize — and the celebrity will officially file for divorce. Once that paperwork is filed at the courthouse, the first place people typically read about it is on TMZ, usually within 24 hours. In an ideal world, Chemtob says, most of the settlement details are already hashed out before a star moves to dissolve the marriage. "If it's a celebrity divorce, and they're both celebrities, there's typically always a prenuptial agreement," she says. "That makes it very easy for us to say, 'This is what you get, this is what you don't get.' Those divorces work out well." Meanwhile, a star's publicity team goes to work. These days, statements are typically issued on social media. I talked to one former social media manager, who worked for an A-lister as they navigated a public divorce, who wasn't looped in until the last minute. "It's a conversation between the talent and their PR team," the woman, who asked to remain anonymous due to an NDA, tells me about how involved a social media manager is in terms of the messaging. "[Publicists] usually ask the social media manager to pull back or just stay quiet until further notice," she says. When it does come time to post the message, the publicist takes the reins. According to this social media manager, she was hands-off when it came to uploading the statement on the star's Instagram. "The talent will typically post this one on their own… It's too personal to ask a social media manager to handle," she says. If the divorce is between two celebrities and the stars are going the "amicable" route, there is typically some interaction between both publicity teams. For example, a joint announcement is made in an effort to show a united front. "We work behind the scenes to coordinate with the other party's team, choreograph timing, align on visuals and reinforce the client's humanity," Schmidt says. Celebrity divorces can sometimes be a real-life version of those Choose Your Own Adventure books. The ideal option is that the split really is peaceful, a prenup is in place and an easy custody agreement is worked out, if necessary. Option B: If it's contentious, the ugliness stays behind closed doors. There is a third scenario where the divorce absolutely erupts in the public arena, and the press is someone's best weapon. "The biggest nightmare that we all know of is Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie," Chemtob says. In 2016, Jolie filed for divorce, which was triggered by an alleged family dispute on a private plane. The highly publicized split turned contentious fast, with both parties battling over custody of their six children and details of their multimillion-dollar estate. A settlement was only finalized in December 2024. They are still set to face off in court later this year regarding the sale of their French vineyard, Château Miraval. Step 4: Control the narrative Now, it's time to shift gears and focus on managing the media firestorm. The first wave of attention can make or break how the public perceives the breakup, all of my sources tell me. The friendly celebrity divorce seems to be a rarity. Schmidt says shaping the story requires not just timing, but a sharp awareness of what information is shared and how it's presented. "Publicists are trained for both foresight and fast pivots," Schmidt says. "Once the news breaks, it's about controlling the first wave of media requests, aligning with legal on what cannot be said and monitoring sentiment minute by minute. The public forms opinions fast, especially on social media, so one misstep or disingenuous phrase, tone or look can spiral into another whole news cycle." In some cases, the other side may plant stories to their own trusted press list. "We prepare an internal outline about how to handle potential misinformation or backlash across platforms," Schmidt says. Chemtob urges her clients to keep their circle small. "I basically say that they can only have two best friends. And they have to tell me who those two best friends are, and they can't talk to anyone else," she says. This is such a crucial strategy because it underscores the immense pressure a celebrity faces during a divorce. In an era where any tidbit can end up on an anonymous gossip blog, confidentiality becomes more important than ever. Limiting the number of people involved in the process minimizes the risk of leaks or misinformation, essential for maintaining control over the narrative. Chemtob also emphasizes how important it is for her to be aligned with the star's PR team in terms of press strategy. In some cases, that could mean knowing her client wants the attention. "If my celebrity client wants privacy, they should get the privacy. But on the other hand, there are a lot of times in divorces that it's so salacious that people don't want the privacy. They want to show the world how they've been harmed," she says. Step 5: Prepare for curveballs One of Schmidt's most complicated cases involved a celebrity divorce where both parties were represented by the same publicity firm while simultaneously launching "a major co-branded product." 'In that particular case, we had to completely rework months of messaging, media planning and brand positioning to authentically reflect the new reality without losing momentum or breaking contractual agreements with the brand who had already invested significantly in the launch," Schmidt explains. 'You're not just managing a statement; you're managing perception, timing and often millions of dollars in brand risk.' Even once the dust settles, the work isn't over. When the headlines start to fade, there are still challenges. On the legal side, Chemtob says, the landscape can be just as complicated when children or complex financial assets are involved and a prenuptial agreement doesn't cover it all. Step 6: Rebuild Celebrity divorces rarely remain in the rearview mirror. The public continues to watch, and how a star handles the aftermath can affect their career, moving forward. Affleck, for example, handled things masterfully after his Aug. 2024 split from Lopez. He kept a low profile, focused on his work, and when it was time for his first big press tour in March 2025, he gave relatable quotes about parenting and personal growth, subtly shifting the narrative. Maintaining there was 'no scandal, no soap opera, no intrigue' behind their breakup, he further emphasized that by bringing her kids to his premiere of The Accountant 2. Then there is the blueprint of an amicable split, laid out by Chris Martin and Gwyneth Paltrow's 2014 'conscious uncoupling.' Their divorce was framed as a model of modern co-parenting, focusing on mutual respect and understanding. This approach allowed them to remain on good terms publicly and professionally, mitigating the tabloid circus that often follows a breakup. "The biggest misconception is that we're spinning fiction,' Schmidt says. 'In reality, we're protecting truth, privacy and long-term reputation. Divorce is personal, but in Hollywood, it's also public. How it's handled can define a legacy."


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Cartel 'Headed By Maduro' Added To US Terrorist List
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The U.S. has designed the Venezuela-based Cartel de los Soles as a terrorist group and said it is headed by the president of the South American country, Nicolás Maduro. The Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced it had sanctioned the cartel as a specially designated global terrorist organization. The OFAC statement said the group supports foreign terrorist organizations threatening the peace and security of the United States, namely Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel. Newsweek has contacted the Venezuelan foreign ministry for comment. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro celebrates the results of the parliamentary and regional elections at the Bolivar square in Caracas on May 25, 2025. Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro celebrates the results of the parliamentary and regional elections at the Bolivar square in Caracas on May 25, It Matters The Trump administration has pledged to crack down on drug trafficking, targeting in particular Latin American gangs. Around 250 Venezuelans were deported from the U.S. to a prison in El Salvador after President Donald Trump invoked a centuries old law intended for use in times of war, due to the "invasion" of alleged members of the Tren de Aragua gang named in OFAC's statement. The men were returned in a deal with the U.S. that saw the release of 10 Americans detained in Venezuela. The ruling on Cartel de los Soles may add pressure on Caracas and the regime of Maduro which the U.S. considers illegitimate, having already issued an outstanding order for his capture. What To Know In a statement on Friday, OFAC said it had sanctioned the Cartel de los Soles, which it described as a Venezuela-based criminal group headed by Maduro and other high-ranking Venezuelan individuals in his regime. The statement said the group provides support to foreign terrorist organizations threatening the peace and security of the United States, namely Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel—one of Mexico's most powerful groups that traffics drugs into the U.S. Thank you, @POTUS, @SecRubio, and @SecScottBessent, for granting my request to designate Cartel de los Soles as a terrorist organization. Americans are safer now that it's harder for this disgusting gang to terrorize our country by flooding it with deadly drugs. Read more:… — Rick Scott (@SenRickScott) July 26, 2025 The statement said that Tren de Aragua was involved in the illicit drug trade, human smuggling and trafficking, extortion, sexual exploitation of women and children, and money laundering, among other criminal activities. On February 20, 2025, the State Department designated both Tren de Aragua and the Sinaloa Cartel as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and Specially Designated Global Terrorists. It comes after the U.S. restored Chevron Corp.'s ability to pump oil in Venezuela, reversing an earlier decision when the Trump administration was seeking to exert more pressure on Maduro's regime. What People Are Saying Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent in a statement: "The Treasury Department will continue to execute on President Trump's pledge to put America First by cracking down on violent organizations including Tren de Aragua, the Sinaloa Cartel, and their facilitators, like Cartel de los Soles." Senator Rick Scott, (R-FL) on X: "Americans are safer now that it's harder for this disgusting gang to terrorize our country by flooding it with deadly drugs." What Happens Next The OFAC ruling will block all property and interests linked to Cartel de los Soles and was welcomed by Florida Senator Rick Scott who posted on X that "Americans are safer now." It could also add to international pressure against Maduro.