logo
US ‘lone wolf' diplomacy helps China win Asean hearts and minds

US ‘lone wolf' diplomacy helps China win Asean hearts and minds

The Wat Xieng Thong Buddhist temple in Luang Prabang, Laos, stands both as a spiritual sanctuary and a historical artefact. From 2011 to 2014, the US State Department helped fund the temple's restoration. When then US president
Barack Obama visited the site in 2016, he framed such efforts as part of America's 'profound moral and humanitarian obligation' to address the devastation still plaguing Laos from the US' largest per capita
bombing campaign in history.
Advertisement
Nine years later, US engagement in Southeast Asia has undergone a tectonic shift; there is little interest in moral obligation, let alone cultural preservation. During July's Asean meetings, US Secretary of State
Marco Rubio arrived in Malaysia armed not with aid, but in the wake of threats of
escalated tariffs against Thailand, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar and Laos. Soon after, the State Department eliminated its Office of Multilateral Affairs for East Asia, dismantling the institution tasked with managing relationships with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations' 10 member states.
Economic coercion, decoupling and a retreat from multilateralism are the pillars of 'America first' diplomacy. While China previously deployed '
wolf warrior ' tactics, with its diplomats responding aggressively to criticism of the nation, the second Donald Trump administration has spawned a different breed of diplomacy: the 'lone wolf' doctrine. Unmoored from alliances and indifferent to precedent, it is characterised by erratic, self-inflicted isolation.
Lone wolf diplomacy apparently seeks to weaken bonds between the US and its allies, framing traditional alliances as burdens rather than assets. The result is a diplomacy of perpetual volatility.
The Trump administration has weaponised tariffs as instruments of leverage, recently sending letters that threaten to impose punitive levies of 20 per cent to 50 per cent on over 20 countries on August 1.
Advertisement
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

In Trump's tariff deals with Southeast Asia, will there be any winners?
In Trump's tariff deals with Southeast Asia, will there be any winners?

South China Morning Post

time15 hours ago

  • South China Morning Post

In Trump's tariff deals with Southeast Asia, will there be any winners?

Now that Donald Trump's arbitrary July 9 deadline for negotiations on 'reciprocal' tariffs has come and gone, what are the implications for Southeast Asia? To date, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines are the only countries in the region to have secured so-called deals. Other countries are left with the previously announced April tariffs intact, although the negotiating deadline has been extended for three weeks to August 1. As things stand, there remain few winners in Southeast Asia in the ongoing saga. Details on the agreement with Vietnam are sparse, but it seems Hanoi has managed to get its initial 'reciprocal' tariff rate of 46 per cent reduced to 20 per cent. A 40 per cent tariff will be applied on transshipped products – without an exact definition of exactly what constitutes 'transshipment'. Trump posted on social media that Vietnam had granted the US 'TOTAL ACCESS' to its market, which seems to amount to a duty waiver on US products entering Vietnam. An artisan works on a pair of leather boots in Indonesia. Indonesian goods entering the US will face a 19 per cent tariff. Photo: AFP

Philippine court stops VP Sara Duterte's impeachment, raising ‘more questions than answers'
Philippine court stops VP Sara Duterte's impeachment, raising ‘more questions than answers'

South China Morning Post

timea day ago

  • South China Morning Post

Philippine court stops VP Sara Duterte's impeachment, raising ‘more questions than answers'

The Philippine Supreme Court has derailed the impeachment trial of Vice-President Sara Duterte-Carpio over a procedural flaw, a landmark ruling that legal observers warn avoids the substance of the allegations and risks leaving the public with more questions than answers. Advertisement In a unanimous 15–0 ruling delivered on Friday, the court found that the impeachment complaint endorsed by the House earlier this year violated the 'one-year rule' under the 1987 constitution, which prohibits multiple impeachment proceedings against the same official within a 12-month period. While both chambers of Congress said they would not appeal against the decision, the House of Representatives immediately vowed to refile the impeachment complaint early next year. The full ruling has yet to be released, but court spokeswoman Camille Ting said the justices concluded that due process 'applies during all stages of the impeachment process' and reminded the House that 'there is a right way to do the right things at the right time'. 'Our fundamental law is clear. The end of it does not justify the means,' Ting quoted the court as saying. Advertisement She did not elaborate on how the House had run afoul of the one-year rule, but said the violation meant the Senate 'could not acquire jurisdiction over the impeachment proceedings'.

Asean must act for peace in Thai-Cambodian clash or risk irrelevance
Asean must act for peace in Thai-Cambodian clash or risk irrelevance

South China Morning Post

timea day ago

  • South China Morning Post

Asean must act for peace in Thai-Cambodian clash or risk irrelevance

As border clashes erupt between Thailand and Cambodia, with soldiers exchanging fire and casualties confirmed on both sides, Southeast Asia is witnessing one of its most dangerous interstate confrontations in recent memory. These hostilities are not merely a skirmish over a patch of land – they are a threat to the peace and stability of the entire region and a direct challenge to the credibility of Asean. For decades, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations has prided itself on preserving peace among its members. Since its founding in 1967, no full-scale war has broken out between member states. The current escalation threatens to undo that singular achievement. If Asean fails to step up now, it risks becoming irrelevant – an organisation that talks about peace but cannot prevent war. Asean's principle of non-interference, intended to preserve harmony among diverse regimes, must not become an excuse for paralysis. This conflict is not a domestic affair – it is an interstate clash that violates Asean's Treaty of Amity and Cooperation , which binds members to peaceful dispute resolution and the renunciation of force. A silent and passive Asean is not being neutral – it is being complicit. Recent images and reports of fatalities along the Thai-Cambodian border underscore the urgency of the situation. This is not the time to hide behind protocol. It is time to act. For years, critics have described Asean as a talk shop – long on declarations, short on action. Yet defenders have pointed to one critical achievement: it has kept the peace among its members. If bullets and missiles continue to fly along the Thai-Cambodian frontier, however, that last pillar of legitimacy will crumble. What then does Asean exist for? If the organisation cannot even convene its members to prevent war between neighbours, how can it claim to lead regional cooperation in more complex matters like economic integration, cybersecurity, trafficking or climate change?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store