
How America's AI boom is squeezing the rest of the economy
Fears of a slowdown abound in America, with high interest rates and tariff chaos weighing on most of the economy. But they are doing little to reduce the breakneck pace at which firms are building the infrastructure needed for AI. Something like a sixth of the 2% rise in American real GDP over the past year has come from investments in computer and communications equipment, including chips, and data centres. Add in the grid upgrades to power AI models, plus the intellectual-property value of the software itself, and one estimate puts the boom's contribution to real GDP growth at 40%. It is an astonishing figure for a sector that accounts for just a few percent of America's total GDP.
The AI buildout is not a normal investment boom. Until recently, big tech firms paid for most of it from their earnings and cash piles. Now the scale of construction is too great even for these giants, so they are turning to borrowing. They are building data centres in the belief that AI will drive explosive economic growth, and hence demand for computing power, within a matter of years. This is not like building houses or factories. It is a high-reward, winner-takes-all market, in which ordinary concerns such as the cost of borrowing are easy, and tempting, to wave away.
And that is just what the big tech firms are doing. In the face of their determination to build AI infrastructure at any cost, higher interest rates offer little deterrent. Neither does the cost of electricity: schemes for gigawatt-scale data centres, demanding as much power as a small city, are increasingly in vogue.
If the history of the dotcom boom in the late 1990s is anything to go by, the mania could have much further to run. Then, the rollout of costly technology required to build the internet continued for many years, with a much sharper impact on GDP than America has experienced so far from AI (see chart 1). If anything, the early enthusiasm for AI has been even greater than that in the internet's youth. For all the Y2K-era excitement, few expected the web to lead to mass automation or unprecedentedly fast economic growth. Both are now fairly mainstream predictions about AI among the Silicon Valley set.
The trouble is that the very sector powering so much of America's economic growth is squeezing the rest of its output. Housebuilders, for instance, cannot afford to be blithe about higher borrowing costs. Data centres have also constrained the rest of the economy by keeping energy prices high. Average American electricity bills have risen by 7% so far in 2025, at least in part due to the extra strain data centres have put on the grid.
Sure enough, look beyond AI and much of the economy seems sluggish. Real consumption has flatlined since December. Housebuilding has slumped, as has non-AI business investment (see chart 2). Both are highly sensitive to interest rates, and so act as bellwethers for output more broadly.
In other words, an economy-wide reallocation is under way: interest rate- and energy-sensitive sectors are contributing less to growth, while AI investment contributes more. And if it is to continue to do so, big tech firms must continue to increase spending. Any slowdown in capital expenditure—say, if constraints on power or chip availability bite—would mean less support for overall economic growth.
Should that happen, there would be the silver lining that interest rates and energy prices would probably fall, too, easing the pressure on the rest of the economy. History, though, carries a warning. After the dotcom boom came a ferocious bust. A similar drop in AI investment would remove a big source of America's growth just as the rest of the economy has begun to look fragile. If desire for data centres cools, it is not just Ashburn that might be in trouble.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump imposed ‘sanctions on India' to end war in Ukraine, says White House
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that US President Donald Trump took several actions, including the secondary tariffs on India, to bring the war in Ukraine to an end. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible.(AFP) This reiteration comes as a top US official said that India made "huge" profits on the sale of Russian oil during and after the war in Ukraine, and Trump said that his sanctions on New Delhi probably played a role in Russian President Vladimir Putin meeting him. Addressing a press briefing, Leavitt said, "The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war and he has rejected the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meetings takes place." She asserted that Donald Trump wants to move forward and bring the war in Ukraine to an end as quickly as possible. Earlier on Tuesday, Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House, with the former signalling his openness to a trilateral meeting with Putin to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. Trump said that he had a very successful day, while Zelensky noted that this was the "best conversation" he had with the US President so far. Scott Bessent on India tariffs US treasury secretary Scott Bessent, while speaking to CNBC, argued why China has not yet seen any penalties for buying Russian oil, while the case for India has been otherwise. He said that the treatment is different because India has been "profiteering" and "making billions" from its reselling of the oil. Bessent said India had "less than 1 per cent" of its oil from Russia "and now its up to 42 per cent". He added, "India is just profiteering, they are reselling... They made 16 billion in excess profits, some of the richest families in India." "This is a completely different thing. Indian arbitrage, which is buying cheap oil and reselling it, has just sprung up during the [Ukraine] war. This is just unacceptable," Bessent added. Top US advisor criticises India over Russian oil trade Meanwhile, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to "hit India where it hurts" to get New Delhi to change its policy. He termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to end the war in Ukraine and isolate the Russian economy. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' Navarro wrote in an opinion piece for the Financial Times. Before his meeting with Putin in Alaska last week, Trump had told a Fox News Radio show that his 'penalty' on India prompted the Russian President to meet him, saying that "everything has an impact". The US President said that when he told India about the doubled tariffs, it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia". He noted that India is the second largest purchaser of Russian oil and said it was getting pretty close to China, the largest buyer of oil from Russia. Before Trump doubled India's tariff to 50 per cent by imposing an additional 25 per cent levy on the previously announced 25 per cent, he said that India was "fueling the war machine" by buying oil from Russia.


Hindustan Times
37 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US accuses India of ‘profiteering' from Russian energy purchases
WASHINGTON: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday accused India of 'profiteering' by purchasing Russian energy cheaply and reselling refined energy products in global markets while defending Washington's decision not to punish China for similar trade with Russia. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent speaks to reporters at the U.S. Capitol (REUTERS) Bessent said in a television interview that Beijing's longstanding purchases of Russian oil were in contrast to India's rapid increase in imports after the war in Ukraine broke out. Bessent was asked why Washington had not placed tariffs on China for purchasing Russian energy, after imposing a 25% penalty, on top of a 25% reciprocal tariff, on India for the same. 'China importing Russian oil is sub-optimal. But if you go back and look, before the 2022 invasion, 13% of China's oil was already coming from Russia and now it's 16%. So China has a diversified input of their oil. If you go back and look back, India had less than 1% of their oil (coming from Russia) and now it's up to, I believe, 42%. So India is just profiteering,' Bessent said . 'They (India) made $16 billion in excess profits. Some of the richest families in India. This is a completely different thing. This is what I would call the Indian arbitrage — buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product, has just just sprung up during the war - which is unacceptable,' Bessent added.. Bessent's comments come just a day after White House trade advisor Peter Navarro levelled similar accusations against New Delhi. Navarro claimed India's purchases of Russian energy were 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to isolate Russia's economy. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' Navarro wrote in an opinion column for the Financial Times. The top trade advisor welcomed a 'two-pronged policy' of restricting Indian access to US markets and forcing India to reduce oil imports from Russia. 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one,' Navarro added. Tensions between India and the United States have risen considerably in recent weeks over deadlocked trade talks and Indian purchases of energy from Russia. A planned visit to advance trade negotiations by a team from the office of the United States Trade Representative was put off amid wider difficulties in the relationship. New Delhi has refused to grant greater market access for US companies to India's agriculture, dairy and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) sectors. It has also defended purchases of Russian oil as essential to guaranteeing national energy security. India has also called US tariff penalties 'unreasonable' and 'unjustified' by pointing to continued US and EU trade with Russia in energy and other sensitive materials.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Trump used trade in a very powerful way as leverage': White House again claims US President ended India-Pak conflict
White House said Trump used trade as leverage to end the conflict between India and Pakistan. The White House again claimed US President Donald Trump ended the conflict between India and Pakistan -- despite repeated rejection from New Delhi. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt detailed the conflicts that President Trump resolved in the past few months as she spoke at great length about Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and also the European leaders. 'We've seen it with the end of the conflict between India and Pakistan, which could have resulted in a nuclear war if we had not had a President who believed in the strength and the leverage that comes with the job of being the President of the United States of America,' Leavitt said, detailing the seven global conflicts. Leavitt was asked which peace deals Trump is most proud of. Leavitt said she would have to ask President Trump for the answer but she's certain that Trump is proud of each one of them. After mentioning Armenia-Azerbaijan and Rwanda and the Republic of Congo, the White House spokesperson mentioned India and Pakistan and said, "President Trump used trade in a powerful way as a leverage to bring that conflict to an end." Leavitt made another mention of India as she spoke about tariffs. 'The President has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He has taken actions as you seen sanctions on India and other actions as well. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo He has made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end,' she added. Trump imposed a 50 per cent tariff on India to be effective from August 27. A US team was set to visit India for negotiations, but it reportedly deferred the visit. US treasury secretary Scott Bessent also accused India of 'profiteering' by reselling Russian oil. In an interview with CNBC, Bessent said India is reselling and making a profit. "This is what I would call the Indian arbitrage -- buying cheap Russian oil, reselling it as product. They'sve made $16 billion in excess profits -- some of the richest families in India," he said.