Citizen alert: Hoist Malaysian flag at your own peril this 68th Merdeka Day 'unless we learn from China'
The fear of unforeseen repercussions from right-wing nationalists and public backlash online has prompted many to think twice about displaying their patriotism.
This was highlighted by a post on X by Annoyed Malaysian (@annoyedmalaysian) who hinted at selective persecution.
Advice to M'sian Chinese & Indians, from now onwards do not touch anything that has the Jalur Gemilang. Your flag got one small stain also UMNO gangsters will show up at your door & police will arrest you lol. 😊
— Annoyed Malaysian 🇲🇾 (@annoyedmsian) August 10, 2025
'Advice to Malaysian Chinese and Indians – from now onwards don't touch anything that has the Jalur Gemilang,' the self-confessed liberal secularist warned: 'Your flag got one small stain also UMNO gangsters will show up at your door and police will arrest you.'
The current affairs observer also highlighted several incidents that have gone unpunished. An image of an upside down Jalur Gemilang hoisted in the apparent vicinity of the Kota Damansara Mosque was attached.
The UMNO Youth Terengganu's gaffe in using a Jalur Gemilang that had the wrong number of stripes in a social media post was also appended.
Both were used by the poster to ask the seemingly pertinent question – 'why only the Chinese are accused of wrongly displaying the Jalur Gemilang?'
One commenter reflected his sense of unease at wanting to show his patriotism, claiming UMNO has 'kidnapped the flag'. Instead, he will keep his love for Malaysia in his heart for fear of reprisals.
This was a clever electoral ploy by UMNO, claimed one commenter, by painting the Pakatan Harapan (PH) coalition as weak and unable to react accordingly in protecting the non-Malays which forms a strong base for its support.
He predicts that this ploy is with the aim of challenging PH as direct rivals in the next general election.
However, one commenter asked why not encourage Chinese and Indian citizens to fly the flag correctly instead of asking to refrain from doing so.
Isn't the flag as symbol of unity? To which the poster conceded that this was, indeed, a great idea (though he has not modified his post to reflect this).
To put the current state of affairs into perspective, another poster shared on X how such a scenario was handled in a rather professional and sem fuss manner in China.
A short clip showed two policemen seeing a flag hoisted wrongly in front of a business premise. Instead of threats of arrest or some other brouhaha, the two officers simply corrected the flag and gave it a respectful salute once it was the right way up.
What to do if we found an upside down JALUR GEMILANG.
Peace, anas. pic.twitter.com/HPUnowZJmC
— Anas Zubedy (@AnasZubedy) August 11, 2025
One commenter pointed out that in Malaysia the priority was to viral the image or video while highlighting the absurdity of the situation – 'make accusations, hire lawyers, politicise the issue, organise peaceful protest in front of Sogo shopping complex, march to Istana Negara for audience with the Agong, before finally rectifying the upside-down flag'.
Lamenting that too many keyboard warriors were spreading messages of hate in Malaysia, one commenter argued that this would be a sensible and mature attitude to have.
As the fallout continues, one must wonder what does the Jalur Gemilang represent? Is it a symbol unity or has it been hijacked and weaponised by the right-wingers into a symbol of victimisation and oppression? – Aug 13, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
26 minutes ago
- The Star
Umno Youth chief leads group of over 200 in march on barricaded shop lots
KEPALA BATAS: Umno Youth chief Datuk Dr Muhamad Akmal Saleh led a group of over 200 people in a march towards barricaded shop lots here, saying the group came in peace. Chanting "Merdeka", "Sayang Malaysia" and "Pertahan Jalur Merdeka", the group marched about 1.4km to the location with many waving the Jalur Gemilang. "We are not here to bully anyone. We are here to make it clear that there cannot be such incidents as our flag is sacred. "We are here to send a clear message that we cannot accept any form of mistake like this. "It cannot be hung upside down," he said at the gathering along Jalan Datuk Haji Ahmad Badawi here on Thursday (Aug 14). The planned gathering followed a recent controversy, linked to an upside-down Jalur Gemilang incident at a hardware store here. Dr Akmal said the group represented Malaysians and not any political party. "It is not a question of politics or race but it about respect for our country, Malaysia," he said. The group of over 200 people, including representatives from Bersatu and PAS, then sang the national anthem. Just before the gathering ended, there was a war of words between the Umno representatives and Lawyers For Liberty (LFL) director Zaid Malek, who turned up with placards saying "Jangan Membuli" and "Jangan Bersikap Zionis". The group then needed to be calmed down and were told to disperse after Zaid's group put down their placards. Zaid said it was only fair that he was allowed freedom of speech like the Umno representatives. He said the fact that the group had turned despite the flag placement being an honest mistake was an act of intimidation. "His (Dr Akmal's) call to have the hardware shop owner charged amounts to bullying and harassment. 'They hurled all sorts of accusations at the hardware store owner about the upside-down flag incident. "Of course, the owner would be scared," he said. Zaid also asked why they did not gather in Terengganu where there was also an issue with the Jalur Gemilang. 'No one is free from committing mistakes. The store owner has apologised and had no intention to commit the mistake. 'We are here to defend him from any form of harassment,' he said. There was strong police presence throughout to control the crowd and the road leading to the store were also barricaded. Businesses were also forced to close early as a safety precaution. Meanwhile, local DAP leaders handed out Jalur Gemilang as they waited for Dr Akmal and his group to turn up. Penang DAP vice-chairman Datuk Yeoh Soon Hin, Penang DAP assistant secretary H'ng Mooi Lye and Penang Chief Minister's Special Coordinator Lay Hock Peng, among others, turned up early to distribute food and Jalur Gemilang to passers-by. On Saturday (Aug 9), hardware shop owner Pang Chin Tian, 59, was arrested by police following accusations that he had improperly displayed the flag in front of his shop. He has been released on police bail. Pang said he would accept any punishment over the case, which he described as unintentional and regretful. On Thursday, Bukit Aman advised all parties to cancel the planned gathering in Bertam, Kepala Batas to avoid conflicts and ensure safety. Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Mohd Khalid Ismail said the police viewed seriously any issue that could threaten public safety and well-being. "In the interest of preserving community safety and preventing confrontations between groups, we advise that the gathering on Thursday be called off," he said. The gathering is believed to be linked to a recent controversy over an upside-down display of the Jalur Gemilang that went viral on social media. The IGP said investigations are ongoing, with 38 reports lodged nationwide, 17 in Penang and 21 in other states. "The probe also covers action against individuals who recorded and shared the footage under Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. "The investigation paper was submitted to the Deputy Public Prosecutor on Monday (Aug 11) and is now under review," he said.
Borneo Post
26 minutes ago
- Borneo Post
Royal Malaysian Navy denies viral claim of standoff with Philippine Navy
The Royal Malaysian Navy has denied claims of a standoff between its forces and the Philippine Navy, as alleged in a viral social media video. — Screengrab via YouTube/InfoSpark Hub KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 14 (Bernama) — The Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) has denied claims of a standoff between its forces and the Philippine Navy, as alleged in a viral social media video. The RMN stressed that no such incident took place and described the YouTube video in question as an attempt to undermine the longstanding defence and diplomatic ties between the two countries. 'The spread of such false information has the potential to stir controversy and erode public trust in RMN's role, particularly in safeguarding the nation's maritime sovereignty. 'False information of this nature could threaten peace and stability in the region and may be seen as serving certain political or strategic agendas,' the RMN said in a statement. RMN reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring the continued security and sovereignty of Malaysian waters, and urged the public not to spread unverified information or engage in speculation that could cause confusion and jeopardise global peace. The 12-minute 51-second video showed several warships at sea and claimed that RMN and Philippine Navy vessels were in a standoff near Sabah waters. – Bernama
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Humility and fairness in leadership
When you're not busy with work or speaking engagements, what's your favourite way to unwind? A: I find great solace in quiet contemplation, often with a good book or by engaging in light physical activity such as walking. Spending quality time with my family, away from the demands of my former role, has also become a cherished way to unwind and reconnect. Do you prefer the city buzz or the calm of the countryside? A: While the dynamism of a city is undeniable and was certainly a part of my professional life, I have always found a particular tranquility and clarity of thought in the countryside. The calm of nature offers a welcome respite and a chance for reflection that is often difficult to achieve amidst urban activity. If you could have dinner with any historical figure, who would it be? A: That's an intriguing question. I would be immensely interested in having dinner with person who had changed China to what it is today. His insights into economics and moral philosophy laid the foundational principles that continue to influence global economic and financial systems. A conversation with him about economic development and the challenges of economic governance in the modern era would be truly fascinating. What's one thing people might not know about you? A: Perhaps the often perception of the serious nature of my past responsibilities, I have a deep appreciation for the arts, particularly traditional Malaysian music. I find it to be a beautiful expression of our culture and a reminder of the rich tapestry of our heritage. You led Bank Negara during a period of economic and political turbulence. How did you navigate decisions when the pressures came from all sides? A: Navigating periods of intense economic and political turbulence demanded a steadfast commitment to the central bank's core mandate; to maintain monetary and financial stability. The key was always to filter out the noise and focus on robust data analysis, sound economic principles, and the long-term interests of the nation. We built a strong, cohesive team that was dedicated to objective assessment. While pressures from various stakeholders were inevitable because of various views, our approach was always to base decisions on facts and a deep understanding of the potential implications, rather than succumbing to short-term political expediency. Transparent communication, as much as possible, also played a crucial role in building confidence and understanding. What personal values or guiding principles helped you stay grounded as a leader? A: Integrity and a strong sense of public duty were paramount. I always believed that leadership, especially in a public institution, carries an immense responsibility to act with fairness, impartiality, and an unwavering commitment to do the greater good. Humility was also essential; understanding that no single individual has all the answers, and that seeking diverse perspectives and counsel from experts was vital for effective decision-making. Lastly, a deep-seated belief in the resilience and potential of the Malaysian economy and its people provided a constant source of motivation and optimism, even in challenging times. Looking back, are there moments where you feel your leadership made the most impact, or where you wished you could have done more? A: Looking back, I believe the most significant impact stemmed from maintaining the credibility and independence of Bank Negara Malaysia. This was the legacy that I inherited from previous leaders of the central bank. In times of uncertainty, a central bank that is perceived as independent and principled provides a crucial anchor for the economy. Our efforts to strengthen financial sector resilience and to ensure the stability of the payment systems during challenging periods were also areas where I feel our collective efforts made a tangible difference. As for wishing I could have done more, there are always areas where one strives for continuous improvement. The complexities of economic management mean that perfect outcomes are rare. Perhaps more could always be done in terms of public education on complex economic issues, to foster a deeper understanding of policy objectives. One always reflects on how to better prepare for unforeseen global shocks, but overall, I am proud of the dedication and professionalism of the entire institution during my tenure. Central bankers often have to make tough, sometimes unpopular decisions. Could you share an example of a particularly difficult decision you made, and how you arrived at it? A: Central banking inherently involves making decisions that, while necessary for long-term stability, might not be immediately popular. A particularly challenging period involved navigating the impact of significant global economic shifts combined with domestic pressures. One such difficult decision revolved around the necessity of tightening monetary policy, specifically increasing the Overnight Policy Rate (OPR), during a period when the public and some sectors of the economy were advocating for more accommodative measures. We arrived at monetary policy decision after extensive analysis of inflation trends, capital flows, and the evolving global economic landscape. While we understood the immediate concerns of businesses and households regarding higher borrowing costs, the data clearly indicated that allowing inflationary pressures to persist would lead to more severe and prolonged economic hardship down the line, eroding purchasing power and undermining investment certainty. The process involved rigorous internal debates, detailed economic modeling, and consultation with various stakeholders to understand their perspectives. Ultimately, the decision was driven by the imperative to safeguard the purchasing power of the currency and to ensure the sustainability of economic growth over the medium to long term, even if it meant absorbing some short-term discomfort. Transparency in communicating the rationale, explaining the 'why' behind the decision, was crucial in managing public expectations, even if the decision itself remained unpopular with some segments. How do you strike the balance between long-term policy goals and short-term political or social pressures? A: Striking this balance is arguably the most critical and delicate aspect of central banking. The core of it lies in unwavering adherence to the central bank's mandate, which is inherently long-term oriented – price stability, financial stability, and promoting sustainable economic growth. The central bank approach had always been anchored in several principles: Data-Driven Decision Making, Strategic Communication, Institutional Independence, and Pragmatism within Principles. The balance is achieved by consistently prioritizing the long-term health and stability of the economy, knowing that short-term concessions can lead to greater problems in the future. It requires conviction, a deep understanding of economic principles, and the courage to make difficult choices for the nation's lasting benefit. And courage is an extremely important character of a central banker. How do you see fintech, digital currencies, and new financial technologies reshaping the Malaysian financial landscape? A: Fintech and new financial technologies are undoubtedly transformative forces that are already reshaping the Malaysian financial landscape, and this evolution will only accelerate. We've seen significant progress in areas like e-payments, which enhance efficiency and financial inclusion by reducing transaction costs and improving accessibility. Digital currencies, while still evolving, hold the potential to further revolutionize payment systems and even the very concept of money, bringing both opportunities for greater efficiency and significant challenges for regulators. The reshaping occurs on several fronts; increased efficiency, new business models and competition, enhanced data utilization, the emergence of digital currencies, and heightened cybersecurity risks. Overall, it's a dynamic and exciting space, demanding continuous adaptation from both financial institutions and regulators. What advice would you give to policymakers on maintaining financial stability while pushing for growth? A: This is the perennial challenge for policymakers, and the two objectives of sustainable growth and financial stability, while distinct, are inextricably linked. Sustainable growth cannot occur without financial stability. There are a few imperatives; Prudent Macroeconomic Management, Robust Regulatory Frameworks, and Targeted Structural Reforms for growth. Policymakers should also promote financial inclusion and literacy and establish proactive risk identification and mitigation systems. Ultimately, it requires building strong foundations – resilient institutions, sound policies, and a skilled workforce – that can withstand shocks and capitalise on opportunities to deliver sustainable and inclusive prosperity. Malaysia has recently been engaged in complex trade negotiations with the US. In your view, what are the trade-offs of these negotiations? Are we negotiating from a position of strength? A: Complex trade negotiations with a major economic power like the US always involve significant trade-offs. The primary benefit Malaysia seeks is continued access to a crucial market for our exports, but these benefits often come with demands for market liberalisation in areas that might impact sensitive domestic industries, policies or require adjustments to our regulatory frameworks. As for whether we are negotiating from a position of strength, it's a nuanced assessment. Malaysia has several strengths, including our strategic location and our role in global supply chains (especially in semiconductors) and membership of trade blocks. However, the sheer economic size and influence of the US mean that any negotiation will inherently involve power asymmetry. Our negotiating strength lies in our unity, our clear articulation of national interests, and our ability to demonstrate the mutual benefits of a robust trade relationship, rather than solely relying on our economic scale. The recent reports of impending tariffs indicate a challenging environment, but Malaysia's firm stance on protecting its core interests, even if it means drawing a 'red line,' shows a principled approach. How should Malaysia navigate tensions between the US and China while protecting its own economic interests? A: Navigating the escalating US-China rivalry is perhaps the most significant geopolitical and economic challenge not only for Malaysia but also for the whole world. Our approach must be one of active neutrality and economic pragmatism. This means diversifying our economic ties, focusing on multilateralism through platforms like Asean, and enhancing Malaysia's value proposition to both powers as a reliable partner. It's about maintaining good relations with both, seeking economic benefits from both, without taking sides in their strategic competition. Ultimately, the best defence is a strong, vibrant and resilient domestic economy.
