Karnataka to unveil quantum action plan soon: Minister
A Quantum Task Force comprising leading experts in the field will be constituted to formulate the plan, he said.
Speaking at the curtain raiser of the 'Quantum India Bengaluru 2025' event here, Minister Boseraju highlighted the state's commitment to make Karnataka a frontrunner in the emerging field of quantum technology. He emphasised that under the leadership of CM Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar, the Congress-led Government of Karnataka is taking proactive steps to establish the state as a 'Quantum Capital of India'.
According to him, like in IT and aerospace, Karnataka is gearing up to make a strong mark in the quantum domain. Quantum technologies are already playing a transformative role in various sectors, contributing significantly to economic and social progress. 'Bengaluru, being the innovation capital of India, already possesses the necessary ecosystem to support quantum advancements. It is in this backdrop that the Quantum India Bengaluru Summit will be held on July 31 and August 1,' he was quoted as saying in a statement issued by his office.
The summit will feature keynote addresses by two Nobel Laureates in quantum physics—Prof Duncan Haldane (Nobel Prize 2016) and Prof David Gross (Nobel Prize 2004)—marking a proud moment for India and Karnataka, the statement said. Over two days, the summit will feature in-depth sessions and expert exchanges on themes such as quantum computing, finance, AI, healthcare, peripherals, and hardware. The event will also feature topics such as quantum in society, art, and security. 'Karnataka has made significant strides in the quantum space compared to other states.
The presence of world-class educational institutions, technological talent, and an advanced industrial base gives Karnataka the capability to become Asia's Quantum Hub. The upcoming Karnataka Quantum Action Plan will further boost this momentum,' it stated.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Should EC let dead people be in poll rolls, asks CEC
Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Thursday defended the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's electoral rolls, questioning whether the Election Commission should allow deceased persons, permanent migrants and duplicate voters to remain registered amid opposition allegations that the exercise would disenfranchise crores of legitimate voters. Should EC let dead people be in poll rolls, asks CEC Kumar's strident defence came as Congress leader Rahul Gandhi escalated his attack on the poll panel, claiming his party possessed definitive proof of electoral fraud in Karnataka and threatening consequences for election officials. Speaking in Parliament premises, Gandhi declared: 'Not 90 per cent, when we decide to show it to you, it is a 100 per cent proof.' He alleged the Congress had discovered thousands of unauthorised voter entries for people aged 50, 60 and 65 in a single Karnataka constituency, alongside deletions of legitimate voters above 18. 'We just looked at one constituency and we found this. I am absolutely convinced that constituency after constituency this is the drama that is taking place,' Gandhi said, claiming similar manipulation was occurring during Bihar's SIR exercise. 'I want to send a message to the Election Commission: If you think you are going to get away with it, you are mistaken. We are going to come for you,' Gandhi warned. The CEC, in his remarks aimed generally at political criticism with respect to the exercise in Bihar, invoked constitutional principles, asking whether the Election Commission should 'get misled by some people' and 'pave the way for some to cast fake votes in the name of deceased voters, voters who have migrated permanently, voters who have got their votes registered at two places, fake voters or foreign voters, going against the Constitution, first in Bihar, then in the entire country.' 'The Constitution of India is the mother of Indian democracy,' Kumar stated, arguing that authentic voter lists prepared through transparent processes formed 'the foundation stone for fair elections and strong democracy.' 'Perhaps the most appropriate time for this essential thinking for all of you has now arrived in India,' he added, urging citizens to think beyond political ideologies. In a Thursday press note, the Commission revealed that 99% of Bihar's electors had been reached in the revision exercise, with forms from 72.1 million voters—91.32% of the total—already received and digitised. But BLOs and BLAs reported significant irregularities, the panel claimed. Nearly 2.2 million on the rolls were deceased, 3.2 million had migrated permanently, 700,000 registrations were duplicate and another 100,000 were untraceable voters. Despite door-to-door verification, roughly 700,000 electors were yet to submit their forms – the deadline for which was set for July 25. The Commission shared booth-level lists of problematic entries with all political parties on July 20, allowing claims and objections until September 1, 2025. The draft electoral roll will be published on August 1 and distributed to all 12 recognised parties in digital and printed formats. An ECI spokesperson dismissed Gandhi's Karnataka allegations as 'unwarranted' and 'baseless,' noting that Congress had filed no appeals with the District Magistrate or Chief Electoral Officer under Section 24 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950. Of 10 election petitions filed in Karnataka, none came from losing Congress candidates despite available legal remedies under Section 80 of the RP Act, 1951. 'ECI is wondering as to why such baseless and threatening allegations are being made against the CEC—and that too now?' the spokesperson questioned. Kumar advised that if an election petition had been filed, Gandhi should 'wait for the verdict of Hon'ble High Court,' otherwise refrain from making 'baseless allegations.'
Hans India
21 minutes ago
- Hans India
Rahul alleges voter list fraud, warns EC of Oppn action
New Delhi: Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Thursday launched a scathing attack on the Election Commission of India (ECI), accusing it of enabling voter list fraud and warning that the opposition will not allow the Commission to go unchallenged over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process in Bihar. Speaking to reporters outside Parliament after proceedings were adjourned, Gandhi said, 'I want to send a message to the Election Commission: if you think you will get away with this, you are wrong. We will take action against you.' He alleged large-scale manipulation during the revision of electoral rolls in a constituency in Karnataka, claiming that the ECI had permitted fraudulent additions and deletions of voters. According to him, the irregularities include the removal of eligible young voters and the suspicious inclusion of thousands of new voters aged 50, 60, and even 65. 'Today we have 100 percent proof that the Election Commission allowed fraud in one seat in Karnataka. We've examined just one constituency and found this. I'm sure the same thing is happening in others too,' he said, though he did not provide evidence publicly. The opposition, including Congress and the Samajwadi Party, has strongly opposed the SIR process. They allege it is being used as a tool to disenfranchise marginalized communities ahead of the upcoming Bihar Assembly elections. Critics claim the process is unfairly deleting legitimate voters from the rolls. 'This is a very serious issue,' Gandhi added. 'The Election Commission is not functioning as a neutral constitutional body. Their latest statement is absolute nonsense. They are not doing their job.' Outside Parliament, Gandhi joined other opposition leaders, including Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav and DMK leader TR Baalu, in protesting against the Election Commission and the BJP-led NDA government. The MPs carried posters reading 'SIR is murder of democracy' and 'Nyay, Nyay, Nyay', voicing their disapproval of the ongoing voter verification drive. In response, the Election Commission defended the SIR exercise, saying it is essential for maintaining the integrity of the electoral rolls. The Commission, in an affidavit filed before the Supreme Court, asserted its right to verify citizenship and remove ineligible voters in the interest of electoral purity. The ECI also urged political parties to rise above partisan interests, stating, 'The Constitution of India is the foundation of our democracy. Should the Election Commission, under pressure from certain groups, ignore constitutional duties and allow fake votes in the names of deceased, migrated, or duplicate voters?' The clash between the opposition and the poll panel continues to escalate, with Bihar's 243-seat assembly election looming on the horizon. As political temperatures rise, both sides appear determined to shape the narrative around voter legitimacy and electoral fairness.
Hindustan Times
23 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC to hear plea by HC judge Varma next week
New Delhi: SC to hear plea by HC judge Varma next week A Supreme Court bench led by justice Dipankar Datta is set to hear next week justice Yashwant Varma's petition challenging the findings of an in-house inquiry panel that concluded there was 'strong inferential evidence' of his 'covert or active control' over a stash of charred currency recovered from his official residence in Delhi earlier this year. According to people familiar with the matter, Chief Justice of India Bhushan R Gavai assigned the case to the justice Datta-led bench on Wednesday evening, hours after Varma's legal team sought an urgent listing. The people cited above added that the CJI ordered the matter to be listed 'immediately' and that the petition is expected to come up for a hearing on July 28 or 29. Earlier on Wednesday morning, senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for justice Varma, mentioned the matter before the CJI and requested an expedited hearing. While agreeing to list the plea, CJI Gavai noted that it would be inappropriate for him to be on the hearing bench given his prior involvement in internal deliberations related to the case. The development comes even as the central government plans to bring an impeachment motion in Parliament to remove justice Varma from office. As the monsoon session of Parliament is underway and political momentum builds for his removal, 149 Lok Sabha MPs and 63 Rajya Sabha lawmakers submitted separate notices in their respective Houses for impeachment of justice Verma on July 21 – the first day of the current session. Since then, the resignation of former vice-president Jagdeep Dhankhar has overshadowed the impeachment notices but Parliament is expected to take it up soon. If the impeachment notices are admitted in a House, the chair or speaker will constitute a three-member panel of jurists to probe the charges. The entire process of impeachment must be completed in the monsoon session that ends on August 21. Justice Varma will get up to three opportunities to defend himself before Parliament. As reported first by HT, justice Varma moved the apex court on July 17, filing a writ petition challenging the May 3 report by a three-member judicial inquiry panel and the subsequent May 8 recommendation by then CJI Sanjiv Khanna urging Parliament to initiate impeachment proceedings against him. As an interim measure, the petition has also urged the top court to stay the operation of the May 3 report of the in-house inquiry panel as well as the May 8 recommendation of the then CJI to the President and the Prime Minister to initiate proceedings to remove justice Varma from office. Terming the panel's report 'unsustainable' and the process 'perverse,' the petition alleged grave violations of natural justice and accused the committee of functioning with an 'outcome-driven approach' based on a 'preconceived narrative.' The panel, justice Varma said, failed to investigate foundational facts such as ownership, authenticity, and actual recovery circumstances of the charred cash allegedly found on March 14 at his Delhi residence following a fire. While acknowledging that some currency may have been recovered from the outhouse, the judge maintained that further inquiry was essential to establish culpability. Instead, the panel concluded its proceedings hastily, the petition claimed, reversing the burden of proof and placing the onus on the judge to disprove misconduct. The inquiry committee, comprising then high court chief justices Sheel Nagu (Punjab & Haryana), GS Sandhawalia (Himachal Pradesh), and justice Anu Sivaraman (Karnataka high court), was formed on March 22 and submitted its findings to CJI Khanna on May 3. Justice Varma's petition also challenged the then CJI's May 8 recommendation, arguing that it was based solely on an inquiry report that violated constitutional protections afforded to sitting judges. The Supreme Court's May 8 press note confirmed that justice Varma had submitted a written response to the inquiry report, reiterating his denial of any wrongdoing and terming the allegations a 'conspiracy.' However, the top court noted that the judge had essentially restated his earlier stand. During the in-house inquiry, justice Varma was divested of all judicial work and transferred back to his parent high court in Allahabad. He was serving on the bench of the Delhi high court when the March 14 incident took place. The 64-page inquiry report cited 'strong inferential evidence' to conclude that justice Varma had 'covert or active control' over the charred cash. While admitting that no direct evidence linked him to the currency, the panel held that his conduct 'belied the trust' reposed in a constitutional judge and warranted impeachment proceedings. 'The burden shifted upon justice Varma to account for the money by giving a plausible explanation, which he failed to do, except projecting a flat denial and raising a bald plea of conspiracy,' the report said. The committee concluded that even if the money had been stored without his explicit knowledge, its presence in his official residence 'eroded public trust' and constituted judicial misconduct of a grave nature. As first reported by HT on June 18, justice Varma had earlier rejected CJI Khanna's suggestion to resign or opt for voluntary retirement. In a detailed letter dated May 6, the judge accused the panel of procedural violations and asked the then CJI to reconsider both the process and the outcome.
