Who cares if old millionaires leave the country? It's the smart young people we should worry about
The impact may be sorely felt by the estate agents and restaurants that line the streets of central London. But by the Treasury? Probably not.
Most of these people will have structured their affairs to be extremely tax-efficient, and shielded from the whims of an anti-wealth government.
These aren't the people we should be worrying about. Instead, we should be concerned by the trail of young, highly educated young people leaving the UK because they have no faith in a future on these shores.
They are moving to start their lives somewhere else – taking with them not only their taxes, but their everyday spending, property deposits and investment pots – not to mention lucrative skills and ideas.
They're not currently super wealthy, but they could be in the future. They are ambitious 'Henrys' – high earners not rich yet – who are ready to start businesses and create wealth.
There is no dataset to show the movement of these people, and it's worrying that they are essentially disappearing without a trace. We'll only see it in fewer home-grown millionaires making money and paying taxes, and a drop in the number of new companies – which create their own ecosystems of employment, wealth generation and tax receipts.
Some 28pc of British people aged 18-30 are either actively planning or have seriously considered emigrating, according to a survey by the Adam Smith Institute, a think tank.
Anecdotally, they started leaving a while ago – to Spain on a digital nomad visa in search of a lower cost of living, or the Netherlands, using a skilled worker visa and lured by huge tax breaks. Here, staff recruited from abroad receive a tax-free allowance worth 27pc of their salary every year for five years. Why can't we treat our home-grown talent to the same incentives?
One 20-something tech worker – a friend of a friend – who moved to Amsterdam earns less than he did in the UK, but makes a huge tax saving and, crucially for him, has a far better quality of life than he did in London. His plan is to start a business, qualify for Dutch citizenship and live his life (and spend his money) in the EU.
Another earns around £100k in Barcelona but pays just €500 (£432) rent a month, saving the rest in a quest to retire early (and not in Britain). And who can blame a couple moving to Dubai to see if they can double their salaries in Britain and actually live a little?
High taxes – not just on income but on property purchases and inherited wealth – are driving out many of these escapees. The tax system kills ambition and penalises aspiration, particularly for high-earning families with small children, who we should want to build their homes in this country.
But worse than the tax bills is the anti-rich rhetoric – the threat that everything you work for could one day be taken away from you, and the implication that wealth is dirty, and success is shameful. Who would want to stick around in a country that punishes people who work hard, save diligently and build anew?
This isn't helped by the growing feeling that nothing works here. A housing market that largely prohibits people from buying near where they work, especially in London and high-tech areas like Oxford and Cambridge. Terrible commutes, insane childcare costs and no doctors' appointments – all topped off by sluggish wage growth.
Even if these escapees earn less than they do in Britain, rents and mortgage rates are often much lower, and a better quality of life is simply more attainable.
Let's stop worrying about the odd multi-millionaire packing up and following his offshore wealth, and focus more on the future talent pouring away from Britain.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Asylum seekers 'move into' four-star Canary Wharf hotel under cover of darkness despite anti-migrant protests
People believed to be asylum seekers appear to have moved into a glitzy four-star hotel in London under the cover of darkness. A coach full of suspected migrants was seen arriving at the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf at around 1.40am on Saturday morning. Tower Hamlets Council confirmed the Government intends to use the hotel - which has around 500 rooms - for asylum seekers in a move that has angered anti-migrant protesters and guests whose bookings have been cancelled. Footage of the passengers getting off the coach showed they were all men, with the vast majority dressed in matching grey tracksuit tops and bottoms. They were helped by masked security guards, some of whom appeared to be wearing body cameras. Last week, workers were seen hauling beds and mattresses into the hotel in preparation for the arrival of 'hundreds' of asylum seekers. A barricade of metal fencing was placed around the hotel by the Metropolitan Police after anti-migrant demonstrators protested the plan for immigrants to be housed there. Met Police officers were called to the Britannia International Hotel last week amid warnings the 'discontent is real' in Britain. Footage on social media shows eggs were thrown, while a police helicopter was circling above as officers on the ground blocked the entrance to the hotel which has more than 500 rooms and is located on the waterfront of the South Dock. The Canary Wharf protest did not reach the violence seen in Epping, with YouTuber-types making up a large proportion of the crowd in preparation for any tension. However, there were still dozens of protesters - some wearing masks and others draped in St George's flags. One placard said: 'This is a peaceful protest to protect our own.' Counter-protesters also gathered outside the scene - and in one clip appeared to be escorted away from the hotel by police as protesters followed behind. Furious hotel guests have left damning reviews online, claiming they were told their stays were 'cancelled'. One wrote: 'My confirmed reservation was cancelled less than 24 hours before my stay via a brief phone call, citing a 'private hire' event.' Another said: 'Completely unprofessional company. Hotel cancelled my booking at last minute because they had a bulk booking.' And a third fumed: 'Booked in for three nights on 18th July. Told we couldn't stay on Sunday night no explanation but waiter said they were closing. Left to go to other hotel 1 hr away on Sunday. Waste of a day.' While guests claimed they were not given a reason for the cancellations, a spokesman for Tower Hamlets Council confirmed: 'We are aware of the Government's decision to use the Britannia Hotel in Canary Wharf to provide temporary accommodation for asylum seekers. 'It is important that the Government ensures that there is a full package of support for those staying at the hotel. 'We are working with the Home Office and partners to make sure that all necessary safety and safeguarding arrangements are in place.' Local residents group chief Maxi Gorynski is an IT worker renting a high-rise flat in Canary Wharf. He made clear he wanted to distinguish himself and fellow residents from far-right demonstrators, saying they were 'notably distinct'. However, he told the Financial Times he was concerned the suspected asylum seekers could bring 'bag theft and gig economy fraud, all the way up to robbery, arson, sexual assault, rape, even murder' to their area. Felicity J Lord estate agent John Costea also told the FT that clients from the UK and abroad had asked 'many questions' about what is going on, such as 'how is it going to reflect their property value'. The Daily Mail has contacted the Home Office for comment. Protests have broken out across the country this summer, with more than 150 gathering outside The Park Hotel, in Diss, Norfolk last week after the Home Office announced plans to change it from housing asylum-seeker families to single men. Trouble first broke out in Epping two weeks ago after Ethiopian asylum seeker Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in the town by attempting to kiss her. He denies the charges. The protest started peacefully, but descended into frenzied violence when anti-migrant demonstrators clashed with counter protesters and police. Essex Police has faced major questions after footage emerged of officers escorting pro-migrant activists to the hotel - despite the force initially denying this has happened. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage posted footage allegedly showing pro-migrant protesters being 'bussed' to the demonstration in police vans but Essex Police said this was 'categorically' untrue. However, after footage emerged of cops leading pro-migrant activists to the hotel by foot, Essex police admitted its officers had escorted the protesters. Farage had called for Chief Constable Ben-Julian Harrington to quit, saying it was 'absolutely disgraceful' and 'heads must roll'. But Chief Constable Harrington rejected claims his officers had given a higher level of protection to pro-migrant protesters. He said: 'The only protection that officers are doing is to those lawful and law-abiding people, whether they are in that accommodation, whether they are the people of Epping or whether they are people who are standing there with placards and banners wishing to make a very important and legitimate view, whichever your views about it. 'Where officers have intervened that is because there has been are not being partial in any way, shape or form.' When asked if he would resign, he said: 'No, I am not going to do that. This is not about me, this is about the communities of Essex... the issue is not about my resignation.' He said Essex Police made 10 arrests, adding: 'What has been unacceptable has been the people who have come to Epping and committed violence, who have attacked people who work at the hotel, who have attacked officers, who have damaged property and who have caused fear and disruption to the people of Epping. 'That is not tolerable, it will not be tolerated, and to that end, we have made 10 arrests.' In a warning to Farage and other politicians about their online posts, he added: 'It is not the police's job to clamp down on elected politicians... All I am asking is that people are responsible about what they say and they consider the real world consequences.' MPs and council leaders have raised fears that Britain could be heading for another 'summer of riots' - in a repeat of the street violence that followed the Southport murders last year. Deputy prime minister Angela Rayner warned that anger at high levels of illegal immigration is risking social cohesion in Britain's poorest communities and must be addressed. Her comments came after Sir Keir Starmer was warned by Epping Forest Council Leader Christ Whitbread that the UK is a 'powder keg' that could explode. Newly appointed shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly criticised the Prime Minister for a 'disconnect from reality' when it comes to housing asylum seekers.
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk's X says Online Safety Act that requires users to provide ID to show they are over 18 is 'putting free speech at risk'
Elon Musk 's X has warned that the Online Safety Act, which requires users to prove their age, is 'putting free speech at risk'. The new rules, seen by watchdogs as a way to protect children online, have sparked a furious backlash from thousands of users. The act forces platforms like Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and X, along with sites hosting pornography, to implement strict age verification measures to prove users are over 18. But critics are outraged, arguing that age checks are blocking access to large parts of the internet that have no business being grouped with adult content. To use platforms like X, users must surrender personal details such as credit card information, ID, or even facial scans, leading many to bypass the system altogether. X has now joined the chorus of criticism, warning that unless the act is amended to be more 'balanced', 'free speech will suffer'. The uproar has already seen nearly half a million people signing a petition demanding the act be scrapped as the n umber of users searches for VPN surged since the changes came into force. But a government spokesperson has dismissed these concerns, calling the claim that the law compromises free speech as 'demonstrably false,' insisting that it is 'not designed to censor political debate'. Critics argue that age checks are blocking access to large parts of the internet that have no business being grouped with adult content The dispute reached a fever pitch earlier this week when a senior Labour minister accused Reform's Nigel Farage of aligning with 'sick paedophiles' like Jimmy Savile during the ongoing clash over the law. Technology Secretary Peter Kyle went even further, accusing Farage of siding with 'extreme pornographers' over Reform UK's vow to scrap the act. Mr Farage labelled the comments 'disgusting' and demanded an apology, however Mr Kyle later doubled down on his remarks. Now X has joined the list of critics, saying: 'When lawmakers approved these measures, they made a conscientious decision to increase censorship in the name of 'online safety.' 'It is fair to ask if UK citizens were equally aware of the trade-off being made.' The platform claims the timeframe in which they were given to meet mandatory measures had been unnecessarily tight - and despite complying, sites still faced threats of enforcement and fines, 'encouraging over-censorship'. Adding: 'A balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children. 'It's safe to say that significant changes must take place to achieve these objectives in the UK.' Peter Kyle also accused the Reform UK leader Nigel Farage of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers' over the party's pledge to scrap the Online Safety Act Critics including Mr Farage claim that the law is being used to stifle free speech by blocking people from seeing some controversial political statements online Nearly half a million people have signed a petition against the Online Safety Act Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. It comes as Spotify users were left furious after they were told their accounts were at risk of being deleted if they fail to verify their age when trying to access videos marked 18+, with some urging users to stop using it. One user questioned: 'How old do you have to be to listen to music?', while another declared: 'I think I'm deleting payments to any company that ever sends me something like this.' Previously, campaign group, Big Brother Watch, also warned of the 'catastrophic effect on free speech online' that the Ofcom legislation could have with 'intrusive new age checks to access a range of websites'. Xbox have also followed suit, announcing they too will be investing in technologies and tools to ensure players have age-appropriate experiences on their platform, while sending notifications to UK users to verify their age. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.'
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
Neo-Nazi group is quietly buying up land across the UK in a bid to create white-only enclaves
A neo-Nazi group is quietly buying up land across the UK in a bid to create white-only enclaves, The Mail on Sunday can reveal. The Woodlander Initiative (TWI) has already purchased more than 20 acres of land in four different locations and plans to buy up plots in every county in the UK to establish 'white heartlands'. The fascist land-buying scheme owns a large plot of land near a secluded village in rural Wales that has been used by Britain's largest fascist group to host 'camping' and training weekends. The group has raised more than £160,000 from far-Right donors and recently bought a section of woodland near Rye in an attempt to establish a white-only enclave in the East Sussex town. Experts say that owning large swathes of land has been a longstanding ambition of the British far-Right and described it as 'concerning' that Woodlander has been able to do so under the radar. TWI is run by former BNP and National Front member Simon Birkett who is now linked to Britain's largest neo-Nazi group - Patriotic Alternative (PA) - and was a speaker at its last annual conference. In a recent article for TWI members Birkett invoked conspiracy theories including the 'Great Replacement' and said that Woodlander is part of attempts to 'create an elite, a vanguard, an alternative group who will actively do what's best for us'. PA leader Mark Collett - a former British National Party official - has repeatedly championed the land-buying scheme and his activists have camped on the TWI land in Wales. Writing in the neo-Nazi magazine Heritage and Destiny, Collett described TWI as 'a fantastic initiative that allows nationalists to pool their money in order to purchase land and property'. 'This is a long-term plan that will hopefully catch on and turn into the establishment of indigenous heartlands; places for our people,' he wrote. Dr William Allchorn, a senior research fellow at Anglia Ruskin University who is an expert on the British far-Right, said that buying land is part of a broader strategy for fascist groups. 'It's the idea of creating a separate white heartland or parallel society where they can be completely off grid,' he said. 'This is worrying because while these camps can look fairly innocuous they involve things like paramilitary training or training in martial arts.' Dr Allchorn said it was concerning that TWI appears to have 'progressed fairly far' and that it has parallels with groups in the United States, East Germany and South Africa where 'neo-Nazis have been buying up land in order to create white-exclusive towns or communities that live in the style of the Nazi past'. He said that British far-Right groups had previously 'flirted' with buying land but had largely been focussed on trying to enter electoral politics, but their focus has shifted since the pandemic. 'They view this as a key moment,' Dr Allchorn said. 'If they can find land or they can find a place to build this enclave, it fits neatly with the broader ideological vision which all far-Right groups are aiming towards, which is the erasure and exclusion of minorities and migrants.' Woodlander has purchased land near the village of Llanafan Fawr, in mid Wales, and recently bought three and a half acres of woodland near the village of Beckley, East Sussex. It is also planning to buy land near Alston, Cumbria, and advertised this to PA members in an attempt to raise cash to build 'villages' exclusively for white Britons. In a video posted earlier this month Birkett spoke of 'building a village' for TWI members and on its website TWI says its plan is to 'take back control of our land, our freedoms and our future' for 'British people as a distinct group comprising of the English, Welsh, Scots and Irish'.
