logo
Tánaiste insists EU green light for potential counter-tariffs on €93bn of US goods ‘not escalatory'

Tánaiste insists EU green light for potential counter-tariffs on €93bn of US goods ‘not escalatory'

European Union member states voted on Thursday to approve counter-tariffs on €93bn of US goods, which could be imposed should the bloc fail to reach a trade deal with Washington, EU diplomats said.
The 27-nation bloc's executive European Commission had said on Wednesday its primary focus was to achieve a negotiated outcome with Washington to avert 30pc US tariffs that US President Donald Trump has said he will apply on August 1.
The Commission said it would press on in parallel with plans for potential countermeasures, merging two packages of proposed tariffs of €21 billion and €72 billion into a single list and submitting this to EU members for approval.
No countermeasures would enter force until August 7. So far the EU has held back from imposing any countermeasures, despite Trump's repeated announcements of tariffs, the broadest of which have been postponed. EU member states authorised the first package of countermeasures in April, but these were immediately suspended to allow time for negotiations.
The EU and United States appear to be heading towards a possible trade deal, according to EU diplomats, which would result in a broad 15pc tariff on EU goods imported into the US, mirroring a framework agreement Washington struck with Japan. Trump would still need to take any final decision.
Under the outlines of the potential deal, the 15pc rate could apply to sectors including cars and pharmaceuticals and would not be added to long-standing US duties, which average just under 5pc.
There could also be concessions for sectors such as aircraft, lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, diplomats said.
Washington does not, however, appear willing to lower its 50pc tariff on steel.
The Tánaiste insisted the approval of the counter-tariffs was not escalatory.
"Throughout the negotiations we have been clear that while we would engage in good faith with the US, it was also necessary to prepare rebalancing measures should negotiations not be successful," Mr Harris said.
'This morning the 27 EU Member States have continued with that approach. This is not escalatory – it's a continuation of our calm, measured preparation. Our objective remains a mutually beneficial deal by 1 August," he added.
Mr Harris said "some key Irish sensitivities" have been removed from the list of countermeasures. However the Government anticipated the list, if used, would be impact Irish businesses.
'While we were successful in removing some key Irish sensitivities following intensive consultation with the European Commission, this package of rebalancing measures if implemented would have an adverse effect on European and Irish business," Mr Harris said.
'However let me be clear, while we do not wish to see this list ever come into effect, the EU must prepare for all eventualities and must be enabled to negotiate with the United States from a position of strength. That is why it is now long past time for a deal,' he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump sets Putin new deadline of '10 or 12 days' to end Ukraine war
Trump sets Putin new deadline of '10 or 12 days' to end Ukraine war

RTÉ News​

time8 minutes ago

  • RTÉ News​

Trump sets Putin new deadline of '10 or 12 days' to end Ukraine war

US President Donald Trump has said he has set a new deadline of "about 10 or 12 days" for Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine. Speaking alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at his golf club in Turnberry, Scotland, Mr Trump said: "I'm going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today. "There's no reason in waiting, we just don't see any progress being made." The US president had earlier announced he would bring forward a deadline for Russia to agree a ceasefire with Ukraine from 50 days. "I'm disappointed in President Putin," Mr Trump said earlier, ahead of his meeting with Mr Starmer. He said: "I'm going to reduce that 50 days that I gave him to a lesser number because I think I already know the answer what's going to happen." Mr Trump set the 50-day deadline earlier this month. The US president has repeatedly voiced exasperation with Putin for continuing attacks on Ukraine despite US efforts to end the war. Before returning to the White House in January, Mr Trump, who views himself as a peacemaker, had promised to end the three-and-a-half-year-old conflict within 24 hours. Mr Trump has threatened new sanctions on Russia and buyers of its exports unless an agreement is reached by early September. But the president, who has also expressed annoyance with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, has not always followed up on his tough talk about Mr Putin with action, citing what he deems a good relationship that the two men have had previously. "We thought we had that settled numerous times, and then President Putin goes out and starts launching rockets into some city like Kyiv and kills a lot of people in a nursing home or whatever," Mr Trump said. "And I say that's not the way to do it."

Trump demands Beyonce be prosecuted over fake payment claims
Trump demands Beyonce be prosecuted over fake payment claims

Extra.ie​

time8 minutes ago

  • Extra.ie​

Trump demands Beyonce be prosecuted over fake payment claims

U.S. President Donald Trump has called for Beyonce to be prosecuted over false claims that she was paid to endorse Kamala Harris in 2024. In posts on his social media, Trump claimed that Beyonce was paid $11 million (9.4 million) for endorsing Harris at a campaign event in Houston in October 2024. Trump also took aim at talk show host Oprah Winfrey and civil rights activist Al Sharpton, claiming that the Harris campaign broke the law by paying for celebrity endorsements and demanding all those involved be prosecuted. 'Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'All hell would break out! Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted!' However, there is no evidence to support the claim that Beyonce herself received any payment related to the Harris campaign. There is also no U.S. law barring a campaign from paying for endorsements, provided that expenditures are publicly disclosed. According to federal campaign spending records, the Harris campaign did pay $165,000 (141,000) to Parkwood Entertainment, Beyonce's production company, for a campaign event production expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline in 2024 that while they were required by law to cover costs connected to celebrity appearances, they did not pay the celebrities for their endorsements. Despite thorough investigation by media sources and fact-checkers, no evidence has ever been produced to support the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment. In a February interview with right-wing TV personality Mark Levin, Trump vaguely described his source on the number, saying, 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million… [for] an endorsement, I guess, because she didn't sing.' Claims that Beyonce was paid $10 million for her speech at the Houston rally circulated on social media shortly after the event, which were also disproven by fact-checkers. Tina Knowles, Beyonce's mother, took to Instagram in November to call the allegation a 'lie.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harriss (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. Beyonce's publicist, Yvette Noel-Schure, told fact-checking website PolitiFact in November that the endorsement payment claim 'is beyond ridiculous.' In May, Trump threatened to launch an investigation into celebrity appearances at Harris's campaign events, naming Beyonce and Oprah as well as Bruce Springsteen and Bono as 'unpatriotic 'entertainers'' on social media. None of the celebrities who endorsed Trump during his presidential run including Kid Rock, Jason Aldean and the recently deceased Hulk Hogan have faced calls for investigation.

'Devil is in the detail' of tariff agreement with US
'Devil is in the detail' of tariff agreement with US

Irish Daily Mirror

time8 minutes ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

'Devil is in the detail' of tariff agreement with US

A tariff rate of 15 per cent is 'challenging' but avoids a rate of 30 per cent – which would have 'closed the market' in the US, Ireland's enterprise minister has said. Peter Burke said that the EU-US deal avoids both a trade war and EU counter-measures, which would have had an effect on the north-south economy. He said 'the devil is in the detail' of the trade agreement finalised on Sunday by Donald Trump and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen in Scotland. 'We had a lot of modelling carried out on the various different options, and some were very perverse, that would have closed the market if you had over a 30 per cent tariff with a stacking mechanism,' Mr Burke told RTÉ Radio. 'The key thing is that there will be a number of carve outs. Obviously, aviation has been cited as zero-for-zero, but also in relation to agrifoods and potentially spirits.' Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment, Peter Burke (Image: Collins) The bloc is set to face 15 per cent tariffs on most of its goods, including cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals entering the US and 'zero for zero' tariffs on a number of products, including aircraft, some agricultural goods and certain chemicals – as well as EU purchases of US energy worth $750 billion over three years. Mr Burke said it was his understanding that the 15 per cent tariff on the pharmaceutical sector would be a maximum rate. He added: 'I think the president of the Commission has been very clear that 15 per cent will be a ceiling.' It is still unclear from the deal, agreed five days before Mr Trump's threat of a 30 per cent tariff would have come into effect, will mean Ireland will need to invest in US energy, he added. 'This all has to be worked out yet, as you can appreciate, I'm only hearing this for the first time last night, and we have nothing on paper.' Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris welcomed the agreement struck on Sunday, saying that while Ireland 'regrets' the baseline tariff of 15 per cent, it welcomed the certainty for businesses. Mr Harris said further detail was needed around how tariffs would affect sectors including pharmaceuticals. Ireland remains vulnerable to a slow down in trade with the US economy, due to exports of products such as alcohol, dairy and beef. The Irish government has also expressed concern at how tariffs could affect pharma multinationals based in Ireland, which employs about 45,000 people here, as Mr Trump had signalled he intended to target that industry. In addition, 65 per cent of all aircraft are leased through Ireland globally. Business group Ibec said although the uncertainty may be dissipating, the agreement was 'punishing' for Europe. The group's chief executive Danny McCoy said 'Europe has capitulated on this' and 15 per cent is 'very substantial'. 'I don't think it's a great deal if I'm really honest,' Simon McKeever, of the Irish Exporters Association, said. He said the deal was not a good one for Irish businesses and said the EU was negotiating with 'one if not two hands tied behind our backs' because of the EU's reliance on the US in relation to defence and security. He said questions remained about the effect it would have on Northern Ireland given the UK had a lower tariff of 10 per cent in place. 'There's a huge amount of this that is extremely uncertain,' he said. Last week, Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe said the Irish government would spend €9.4 billion on its budget in October, based on a zero-tariff scenario for next year. He and Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers said these estimates would need to be revised if there was a shock to the Irish economy. Mr Burke said it was not naive to base the government's economic scenario on a zero-for-zero trade agreement with the US. 'No it wasn't because we didn't know what we were to be faced with,' he said on Monday. 'We do need to find out what happens in other areas, because this is very complex. 'It depends what happens with China, that's a very significant market that a deal hasn't happened yet. 'It really impacts what happens with our exporters here in Ireland as well, because so much product is in danger of being redirected into EU market. 'We also don't know what separate carve outs are going to emerge for the different sectors that are so vulnerable from an Irish perspective. 'Until we get flesh on the bones and all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what budgetary parameters (we) will end up with.' Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store