Delhi High Court's BIG ruling: Merely crying of woman cannot make out case of dowry harassment
According to the prosecution, the woman, married in December 2010, faced harassment and dowry demands from her husband and in-laws.
Her family claimed that they spent nearly ₹ 4 lakh on the wedding, alleging that later demands for a motorcycle, cash, and a gold bracelet were made by the husband and in-laws.
The woman, a mother of two daughters, died on 31 March 2014.
'Statement of the sister of the deceased under Section 161 Cr.P.C. was recorded wherein she also stated that on the occasion of Holi, she had called her sister and found her crying. However, merely because the deceased was crying, cannot per se make out any case of dowry harassment,' Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said.
She also observed that the father of the woman neither mentioned specific incidents nor did he provide proof of giving money to the accused.
'Such bald assertions, in the given situation, cannot be held to be even making out a prima facie case of harassment,' the judge added.
The trial court had discharged the accused noting that the death took place due to pneumonia, a natural cause.
The high court also emphasised that the post-mortem report attributed the cause of death to pneumonia, not cruelty.
'In the present case, to bring in the clause of cruelty leading to the death of the woman, it may be noted that the deceased had died not because of any act of cruelty but for natural reasons... Therefore, Clause (a) to the Explanation annexed to Section 498A IPC is not attracted,' the Court said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Tihar Jail, India's largest prison, under scanner for ‘extortion racket'
Long infamous for chronic overcrowding, India's largest and most high-security prison, Tihar Jail, is now under the scanner for an 'extortion racket' running within its four walls, allegedly involving officials and inmates. On August 11, the Delhi High Court, acting on a petition filed by a former inmate, directed the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to register an FIR and investigate what it described as 'very disturbing and startling' allegations. The case stems from a petition filed by businessman Mohit Kumar Goyal, who was lodged in Tihar Jail between June 4 and August 6, 2024, in connection with a cheating case before being granted bail. In his plea, Mr. Goyal alleged that during his two-month incarceration he was repeatedly coerced into paying 'protection money' by prison officials in collusion with certain inmates. The former inmate told the court about a senior official warning him that refusal to pay up would invite dire consequences. Mr. Goyal alleged that the threats included being grievously harmed or having his face disfigured with a blade. He alleged that certain officials introduced him to inmates, who acted as their operatives. In the petition, filed through advocate Sachin, the businessman said he was forced to pay nearly ₹15 lakh as extortion money. The modus operandi to extort money from the inmates is to have their family members transfer a fixed sum of money to the relatives of the other inmates who are part of the alleged racket, Mr. Goyal told the court. In return, the inmates are allowed unlimited use of videoconferencing facilities for 'eMulakat', online interviews with family members and legal representatives, as well as access to phones. An inmate who refused to pay up, the businessman claimed, exposed himself to harsh punitive measures and threats of bodily harm. Court-ordered probe Considering the seriousness of the allegations, the court on September 26 last year directed the Inspecting Judge of Tihar Jail to examine the allegations and submit a report. On May 2, the court perused the report, which was filed in a sealed cover. A Bench of Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela noted that 'very disturbing and startling facts have been revealed pointing not only to certain irregularities and illegalities in the functioning of Tihar Jail but also to issues touching upon even criminal activities going on there'. The report was based on a detailed inquiry conducted by the Inspecting Judge on examining the inmates, the prison authorities, and other individuals whose names were disclosed by the petitioner. The report also analysed the call detail records to examine calls made by inmates to people outside. It purportedly also highlighted 'how the official landline number in the jail was misused by vested interests for promoting nefarious activities'. While the report also questioned the conduct of the petitioner, it confirmed the existence of an extortion network operating in connivance with jail authorities. The court directed a two-pronged action — a preliminary probe by the CBI and an administrative inquiry by the Delhi government's Principal Secretary (Home), to identify officers responsible for the lapses. Upon examining the CBI's preliminary inquiry report, the High Court noted that the findings 'reflected various malpractices prevalent in jails' and indicated collusion between inmates and officials in corrupt activities. Meanwhile, in compliance with the court's earlier orders, the Delhi government informed the Bench that disciplinary proceedings had been initiated against nine jail officials. Some of them have been suspended and others transferred, with further action being pursued under the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, the government told the court.
Time of India
8 hours ago
- Time of India
High court upholds 6-month jail term in cheque bounce case
Chennai: Noting that a borrower cannot evade repayment merely on the ground that the loan amount was unaccounted for in the lender's income tax returns, Madras high court upheld the conviction of a man in a cheque bounce case. Justice G K Ilanthiraiyan dismissed a revision petition filed by E Dhatchinamoorthy, who challenged his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The prosecution said, Dhatchinamoorthy borrowed 3 lakh from complainant S Seenuvasan and issued a cheque towards repayment. The cheque was returned dishonoured for 'funds insufficient'. Despite a statutory notice, he failed to repay. The Tindivanam judicial magistrate sentenced him to six months of simple imprisonment and directed him to pay compensation equal to the cheque amount. The conviction was later confirmed by the II additional district judge, Tindivanam, in appeal. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai | Gold Rates Today in Chennai | Silver Rates Today in Chennai Before the HC, the petitioner argued that the loan was not accounted for in the complainant's tax returns and hence could not be considered a legally enforceable debt. He also questioned the admissibility of a photocopy of the cheque marked before the trial court. The court noted that the borrower admitted to taking the money and issuing the cheque. "Whether the loan amount is accounted or not is not the concern of the borrower. Once the money is borrowed, it has to be repaid," Justice G K Ilanthiraiyan said. Holding that both the trial and appellate courts rightly convicted him, the HC said the conviction 'does not require any interference' and dismissed the revision. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Mint
17 hours ago
- Mint
Delhi High Court's BIG ruling: Merely crying of woman cannot make out case of dowry harassment
The mere fact that a woman was crying cannot make a case of dowry harassment, said the Delhi High Court while dismissing a petition against the discharge of a husband and his family from charges of cruelty and dowry harassment. According to the prosecution, the woman, married in December 2010, faced harassment and dowry demands from her husband and in-laws. Her family claimed that they spent nearly ₹ 4 lakh on the wedding, alleging that later demands for a motorcycle, cash, and a gold bracelet were made by the husband and in-laws. The woman, a mother of two daughters, died on 31 March 2014. 'Statement of the sister of the deceased under Section 161 Cr.P.C. was recorded wherein she also stated that on the occasion of Holi, she had called her sister and found her crying. However, merely because the deceased was crying, cannot per se make out any case of dowry harassment,' Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said. She also observed that the father of the woman neither mentioned specific incidents nor did he provide proof of giving money to the accused. 'Such bald assertions, in the given situation, cannot be held to be even making out a prima facie case of harassment,' the judge added. The trial court had discharged the accused noting that the death took place due to pneumonia, a natural cause. The high court also emphasised that the post-mortem report attributed the cause of death to pneumonia, not cruelty. 'In the present case, to bring in the clause of cruelty leading to the death of the woman, it may be noted that the deceased had died not because of any act of cruelty but for natural reasons... Therefore, Clause (a) to the Explanation annexed to Section 498A IPC is not attracted,' the Court said.
