
Govt halts capacity payments to 22 IPPs, saving Rs1.5 trillion
Listen to article
The National Assembly's Standing Committee on Power was informed that the government has ceased capacity payments to 22 Independent Power Producers (IPPs), resulting in an overall saving of Rs1.5 trillion and expected to provide relief to consumers by reducing electricity costs by Rs4 to Rs5 per unit.
The meeting was attended by Power Secretary Dr Muhammad Fakhre Alam Irfan, who briefed the committee on the cessation of capacity payments to 14 oil-based and 8 bagasse-based IPPs.
The secretary also mentioned that efforts are underway to terminate payments to additional IPPs. The discontinuation of these payments is projected to lead to substantial savings, with consumers set to benefit from lower electricity rates, he said.
Mustafa Kamal also raised concerns over some IPPs claiming that their agreements were terminated under duress.
The power secretary responded by saying that several IPPs had violated the terms of their contracts, and these violations were pointed out by the government teams. The IPPs were given the option to either comply or face a financial audit by NEPRA (National Electric Power Regulatory Authority).
He further stated that two IPPs refused to cooperate, prompting NEPRA to initiate audits, with advertisements for the audits now published for the non-compliant IPPs.
The meeting also discussed an issue concerning the additional 7.8 million units being burdened on LESCO (Lahore Electric Supply Company) consumers. The committee decided to form a sub-committee to investigate the matter further.
Committee member Rana Mohammad Hayat expressed concerns over rising bills and increasing WAPDA (Water and Power Development Authority) expenditures over the past three to four years.
He questioned the government's response to the growing financial burden on the public and called for clarification on when relief will be provided to consumers. He also raised the issue of local coal's cost-effectiveness in electricity generation, asking for transparency regarding the potential savings.
In response, power division officials revealed that the cost of generating electricity using local coal would be Rs4 per unit, compared to Rs16 per unit when using imported coal. Electricity produced from furnace oil costs between Rs30 to Rs32 per unit.
Kamal further questioned the long-term strategy, asking about plans for the future if coal-based plants face operational issues, particularly when hydel and thermal plants are phased out in favor of coal. The power secretary reassured the committee that coal plants can be installed within a short time frame.
Furthermore, the power division is conducting modern forecasting for the next 10 years, anticipating that many of the furnace oil-based power plants will be decommissioned within the next three years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
42 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Five private members' bills passed, 16 new introduced in ongoing NA session
ISLAMABAD: The National Assembly on Tuesday passed five private members' bills and introduced 16 new bills during its latest on-going session. The Lower House passed five bills: the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils (Amendment) Bill, 2025; the National Institute of Health (Re-organization) (Amendment) Bill, 2025; the Acid and Burn Crime Bill, 2024; the Reservation of Special Seats for Deserving Persons in Universities Bill, 2024; and the Zakat and Ushr (Amendment) Bill, 2025. According to the statement of objects and reasons for the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils (Amendment) Bill, 2025, 'Bar Councils play a pivotal role in upholding constitutional supremacy, the rule of law, and the independence of the judiciary. Therefore, it is deemed judicious to introduce a robust mechanism and transparent criteria for becoming office holders of Bar Councils. These amendments aim to ensure that candidates possess the requisite expertise and experience to fulfil these critical responsibilities effectively. Furthermore, the amendment allocates seats for the newly merged districts in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, as prescribed in the group of districts listed in the Schedule under sub-section (2)(b) of section 5 of the Act.' According to objects and reasons of another The Acid and Burn Crime Bill 2024, 'acid throwing and burn crimes are increasing year by year. Hundreds of women and children fall victim to this horrendous crime, with no possibility to seek justice and support. Due to the socioeconomic circumstances pertaining to victim, the fear and stigma they are facing as well as the highly complex nature of acid and burn injuries, a specific and comprehensive legislation is needed. This will result in perpetrators facing effective deterrent, victims accessing and obtaining justice, availing free relevant medical and psycho-social rehabilitation services.' The Reservation of Special Seats for Deserving Persons in Universities Bill, 2024 of Pakistan People's Party (PPP) described that the universities shall reserve at least 15 percent seats for poor students of undergraduate and postgraduate on merit base. The universities shall ensure the students enrolled against the special seats shall fulfil one of criteria; (a) financial need, (b) social or ethnic background, (c) disability status, (d) academic merit, where applicable and (e) other criteria as determined by the university's admission policy. According to objects and reasons of Zakat and Ushr (Amendment) Bill, 2025, 'the proposed amendment aims to remove outdated terminology and align the language of the Zakat and Ushr Ordinance, 1980.' The bills which were included the Islamabad Capital Territory Food Fortification Bill, 2025, the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill,2025) (Section 498D and Schedule II), the Public Interest Disclosures (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Articles 1, 51, 59, 106, 154, 175A, 198 and 218), the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Section 498D and Schedule II), the Elections (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Articles 140A and 160A), the Guardians and Wards (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Prevention of Obscenity and Indecency in Digital Media Bill, 2025, the Allied Institute, Multan Bill, 2025, the Service Tribunals (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the National Database and Registration Authority (Amendment) Bill, 2025, the Islamabad Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Bill, 2025, the Multi-Vendor Electricity Distribution Bill, 2025 and the Toll Plaza Rationalization and Equity Bill, 2025. The bills were introduced by Shaista Pervaiz, Shazia Marri, Dr Sharmila Faruqui, Muhammad Riaz Fatyana, Sahibzada Sibghatullah, Awais Haider Jakhar, Nosheen Iftikhar, Shahida Rehmani, Khawaja Izharul Hassan, Sohail Sultan, Sehar Kamran, and Syed Abrar Ali Shah in the House. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
42 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
NA, Senate: PHC halts appointment of new opposition leaders
PESHAWAR: Peshawar High Court on Tuesday restrained the speaker of the National Assembly and the chairman of the Senate from appointing new opposition leaders, following the disqualification of Omar Ayub and Shibli Faraz. A two-member bench comprising Justice Arshad Ali and Justice Khurshid Iqbal heard the petition filed against the Election Commission's decision to de-notify Omar Ayub and Shibli Faraz. Barrister Gohar, representing the petitioners, argued that the ECP could not invoke Article 63(1)(h) on its own without due process. Barrister Gohar argued that two petitions had been filed against the speaker of the National Assembly and the chairman of the Senate, adding that on August 5, the seat of the opposition leader in the National Assembly was declared vacant. The court inquired whether the Peshawar High Court had jurisdiction to hear the case. Barrister Gohar informed the court that the petitioner was disqualified under Article 63(1)(h), terming the Election Commission's move to disqualify members as unlawful and ineffective. He said that under Rule 67(2) of the Rules of Business, the opposition leader is elected, and that after 60 days, the Election Commission cannot disqualify anyone. He further stated that under Section 213, the Election Commission can only exercise administrative authority, and that disqualification requires a reference from the Speaker. He pointed out that there are 14 separate grounds on which a member can be disqualified. Continuing his arguments, Barrister Gohar suggested that if deemed appropriate, the court could refer the case to a larger bench, saying the Election Commission was making a mistake. PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar on Tuesday said that disqualifications would not solve any problem; this season of disqualifications should not now come to an end. 'We had won 180 seats, entered the assembly with 90 seats, which have now dropped to 76,' talking to the media here, the opposition party leader said. 'I will request all people to come to their senses,' the PTI leader said. He said, 'We held the party election, the election commission accepted intra party elections of other parties but didn't accept our elections.' 'We will celebrate independence on August 14th, and will also raise a voice for the release of the PTI's founder,' Barrister Gohar said. 'There must be dialogue and we have made efforts for it,' he said. 'There is no weakness in our team, we are being subjected to excesses,' he lamented. Referring to the May 9 incident, he said that 88 cases were registered in the Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) and that MNA Abdul Latif was sentenced to 10 years. Action against Omar Ayub and other leaders was based on Abdul Latif's case, which he claimed was an error by the Election Commission. He further argued that the Election Commission had misguided itself and misinterpreted Article 63(2), adding that the reference to the Syed Yousuf Raza Gilani case was irrelevant as the two matters were entirely different. He requested the court to stop the Election Commission from taking any further action. The high court issued notices to the Election Commission and other parties, seeking their responses by August 15. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025


Business Recorder
42 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
Parliamentary Budget Office: draft bill rejected
ISLAMABAD: The draft of the Parliamentary Budget Office Bill 2025, presented in the National Assembly's Sub-Committee on Finance for the establishment of a Parliamentary Budget Office, was rejected here on Tuesday. The government turned down the draft bill moved by committee member Rana Iradat Sharif, deciding instead that the Ministry of Finance and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) will prepare a fresh draft and present it to the sub-committee. The sub-committee, chaired by Dr Nafisa Shah, reviewed the proposal to set up a Parliamentary Budget Office. Finance Secretary Imdadullah Bosal informed the committee the bill granted excessive powers to the proposed office. He suggested the office should have an analytical mandate for the Standing Committee, and that budget proposals be shared with the Ministry of Finance through the committee rather than directly. He also recommended that, initially, the office's scope be limited to the National Assembly. FBR Chairman Rashid Langrial proposed that the budget office work with sectoral experts to guide parliamentarians, while officials insisted the office should not have direct authority to work with the Ministry of Finance on budget proposals. Special invitee Syed Naveed Qamar noted that many countries have similar offices to enhance parliamentary awareness. The rejected draft proposed a 30-member budget office, including the Speaker of the National Assembly as chairperson, the Senate chairman as deputy chairperson, the chairman of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), the finance minister, provincial assembly speakers and deputy speakers, chairpersons of the National Assembly and Senate finance committees, four senators, eight MNAs, and secretaries of both houses. The bill suggested establishing sub-offices in provinces, Azad Jammu and Kashmir, and Gilgit-Baltistan. The proposed office would review budget analyses, government spending, and revenue estimates; brief parliamentary committees; examine legislation for fiscal impact, and review tax policies, financial estimates, and national debt sustainability. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025