logo
The Global Economy Is Powering Through a Historic Increase in Tariffs

The Global Economy Is Powering Through a Historic Increase in Tariffs

Hindustan Times22-07-2025
The global economy is sailing through this year's historic increase in tariffs, displaying an unexpected trait: resilience.
Faced with extreme uncertainty, businesses and households have surprised economists with their ability to hedge, finding a short-term path through as they await clarity on where tariffs will end up.
Global producers brought forward purchases and rerouted goods destined for the U.S. through third-party countries that are subject to lower tariffs. For the most part, households and businesses have continued to spend and invest despite the uncertainty, analysts say.
The world economy grew at a 2.4% annual rate in the first half of this year, around its longer-term trend, according to JPMorgan.
Trade volumes are buoyant, stock markets on both sides of the Atlantic have rebounded to record highs and growth forecasts from Europe to Asia are being raised.
Investment, manufacturing employment, spending and overall activity all held up globally, according to Goldman Sachs.
'What people have gotten wrong is the chaotic behavior [of trade policy] and the hedging that has introduced,' said Marcus Noland, executive vice president at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington, D.C.
In part, businesses are benefiting from reflexes learned and changes made during the Covid-19 pandemic, such as bulletproofing their supply chains, which compressed margins at the time, but is now paying off. Governments from the U.S. to Germany are also spending lavishly, helping to support confidence.
Some businesses may be building up inventory now in the expectation that tariffs will be higher in the future, said Angel Talavera, an economist at Oxford Economics.
'It seems that the uncertainty is weighing less on economic activity than we thought,' Isabel Schnabel, who sits on the European Central Bank's six-member executive board, said in an interview published in recent days on the central bank's website.
The political backlash against globalization that accelerated roughly 10 years ago has also long persuaded many international businesses to rely more on local production to serve their main export markets. Many say the tariffs have underlined the importance of such plans.
EBM Papst, a German manufacturer of fans with around €2.5 billion of annual revenue, equivalent to around $2.9 billion, is planning to build a third factory in the U.S. and is considering whether that factory should have an extension, said Chief Executive Officer Klaus Geissdoerfer. The company expects double-digit revenue growth in the U.S. for years to come, partly due to the construction of data centers supporting the artificial-intelligence boom.
Some American customers have asked the company to localize more production in the U.S. to replace suppliers from Asia who are facing higher U.S. tariffs, Geissdoerfer said. 'That would help us to grow 20-30% on top in the U.S.,' he said.
World merchandise trade volumes beat expectations in the first three months of this year, rising by 5.3% from a year earlier, powered by a surge in imports to North America, the World Trade Organization said in a recent report. The WTO increased its forecast for trade in goods this year to 0.1% growth, having previously forecast a 0.2% decline.
In Europe, the manufacturing industry has continued to improve in recent months, with forward-looking indicators for new orders, new export orders and future output all rising to three-year highs. 'This suggests that we're seeing more than just frontloading,' said the ECB's Schnabel.
Production in the continent's critical auto sector seems to be holding up well even though it is subject to a 25% tariff and exports to the U.S. have softened, said Adrian Prettejohn, an economist at Capital Economics.
'We expect that the previous stockpiling of goods and the impact of tariffs [will] weigh on eurozone exports, but it is not clear that there will be as dramatic a fall as may have been expected,' Prettejohn said.
Even in China, President Trump's chief antagonist on trade, the tariff tumult of the past few months hasn't been as damaging as feared.
Chinese exports to the U.S. were about 10% lower in the first five months of the year than the same period a year earlier as tariffs bit into direct trade between the two economic superpowers. But, over the same period, overall exports grew 6%, Chinese customs data show, helped by rising shipments to Asia, Europe and Africa. Chinese exports to countries including Vietnam, Thailand and Mexico have been especially strong.
Economists say that likely reflects some degree of rerouting of Chinese exports through those countries and on to the U.S. In the first four months of 2025, U.S. imports from Southeast Asia were up 28% year over year, Census Bureau figures show. U.S. imports from Asia overall increased by 10% in the first five months of the year from a year earlier, to $582 billion, despite declining trade with China.
In the U.S. itself, households' net worth remains high by historical standards as a share of disposable income, potentially allowing consumers to continue spending despite higher prices, Susan Collins, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, said in a speech Tuesday.
This resilience has allowed some exporters to the U.S. to pass part of the costs of tariffs on to their customers.
Retailers of Parmigiano-Reggiano, the Parmesan cheese produced in a designated area of northern Italy, increased prices in the U.S. to around $43 to $45 per kilogram from $42 this year, partly offsetting an additional 10% tariff applied since April. Sales have continued to surge in the U.S., rising by 9% in the first four months of this year, in line with previous months.
'Tariffs may eventually reduce the number of people that are able to afford [the cheese], but we haven't seen that yet,' said Nicola Bertinelli, president of the Parmigiano Reggiano Consortium. Cheese importers managed to offset part of the impact by importing more inventory before the tariffs kicked in.
Sales of Parmesan have continued to surge in the U.S. despite higher prices following President Trump's tariffs.
The cheese's producers recently stepped up their sales efforts in the U.S., sponsoring this year's Miami Open tennis tournament and unveiling a partnership with the New York Jets football team.
U.S. imports from Europe surged by 37% in the first five months of the year from a year earlier, to $421 billion, with moderate growth continuing in April and May, according to Census Bureau data.
Elevated profit margins at U.S. businesses suggest that they are able to bear some of the increased costs from tariffs, the Boston Fed's Collins said. 'As a result, the adverse impact of tariffs on labor market conditions and economic growth may be more limited,' she said.
To be sure, some of the strength in trade could unwind as firms slow their purchases in the coming months as payback for earlier hefty orders to beat the U.S. tariffs, economists say.
The global economic shrug also seems to have emboldened the Trump administration to press for even higher tariffs. And some economists say it is possible the shock will come with a delay.
'Probably, people did expect more immediate effects,' said the Peterson Institute's Noland. Brexit, which didn't cause the British economy to seize up when it happened but had a negative cumulative effect over time, could be a good analogy, Noland said.
The level of tariffs also matters. A 10% uniform levy on all U.S. imports might have a negligible economic effect, whereas rates of 30% or 50% could be much more problematic, Noland said.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen warned recently that such levels could cause trade between the European Union and the U.S. to freeze.
Write to Tom Fairless at tom.fairless@wsj.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US to initially impose ‘small tariff' on pharma imports, Trump says
US to initially impose ‘small tariff' on pharma imports, Trump says

Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

US to initially impose ‘small tariff' on pharma imports, Trump says

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that the United States would initially place a 'small tariff' on pharmaceutical imports before hiking it to 150% within 18 months and eventually to 250% in an effort to boost domestic production. 'In one year, one and a half years maximum, it's going to go to 150% and then it's going to go to 250% because we want pharmaceuticals made in our country,' Trump told CNBC in an interview. He did not specify the initial tariff rate on pharmaceuticals. Trump said last month that pharmaceutical tariffs could reach as high as 200%. He said in February that sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductor chips would start at '25% or higher,' rising substantially over the course of a year. Trump said on Tuesday that he plans to announce tariffs on semiconductors and chips in the 'next week or so,' but gave no further details. The United States has been conducting a national security review of the pharmaceutical sector, and the industry has been preparing for possible sector-specific tariffs. The administration has not announced when the results of that probe will be released. Several drugmakers have pledged multibillion-dollar investments in U.S. manufacturing as Trump threatens import tariffs, with AstraZeneca recently committing $50 billion to expand its American operations. PhRMA, the main lobbying group for the industry, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A framework agreement between the United States and the EU sets out that tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors are currently zero, but if the United States raises tariffs following its import investigation, they will be capped at 15%.

Trump says banks discriminate against his supporters while White House prepares order
Trump says banks discriminate against his supporters while White House prepares order

Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Trump says banks discriminate against his supporters while White House prepares order

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he believes that banks discriminate against him and his supporters, adding that Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase had previously refused to accept his deposits. 'They totally discriminate against, I think, me maybe even more, but they discriminate against many conservatives,' he told CNBC in an interview. 'I think the word might be Trump supporters more than conservatives.' Trump made the comments when asked about a report by the Wall Street Journal that said he planned to punish banks that discriminated against conservatives, but did not address the order specifically. The order instructs regulators to review banks for 'politicized or unlawful debanking' practices, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters. 'Well, they did discriminate,' Trump said of actions taken by JPMorgan Chase after his first term in office. 'I had hundreds of millions, I had many, many accounts loaded up with cash … and they told me, 'I'm sorry sir, we can't have you. You have 20 days to get out.'' Trump said, without providing evidence, that he believed that the banks' refusal to take his deposits indicated that the administration of former President Joe Biden had encouraged banking regulators to 'destroy Trump.' Trump said he subsequently tried to deposit funds with Bank of America and was also refused, and eventually split the cash among a number of smaller banks. 'The banks discriminated against me very badly,' he said. In a statement, JPMorgan did not address the president's specific claim that it had discriminated against him. 'We don't close accounts for political reasons, and we agree with President Trump that regulatory change is desperately needed,' JPMorgan said. 'We commend the White House for addressing this issue and look forward to working with them to get this right.' Bank of America also did not address Trump's specific claims in the CNBC interview. 'REPUTATIONAL RISK' ISSUE During President Joe Biden's administration, regulators could have asked the banks why they were providing banking services to Trump because of the 'reputational risk' issue, a source familiar with the matter said. Another source said that banks were under intense scrutiny and pressure with regards to what qualified as a reputational risk for banks and they needed to be careful due to Trump's legal entanglements. The source also added that at present JPMorgan continues to have a banking relationship with members of the Trump family that dates back to years ago and that they also bank a number of campaign accounts related to Trump. After President Trump took power, the Federal Reserve announced in June it was directing its supervisors to no longer consider 'reputational risk' when examining banks, scrapping a metric that had been a focus of industry complaints. The Wall Street Journal reported late Monday that the expected executive order would instruct regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions breach the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws by dropping customers for political reasons. It said the order could be signed as early as this week, authorizing monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures against violators. The White House had no immediate comment on the reported order. 'What the White House is doing is telling the banks not to hide behind regulations to deny loans or banking relationships,' said Wells Fargo bank analyst Mike Mayo. 'The banks can use their normal underwriting standards and deny services, but not blame regulators or use reputational risk as a justification.' Bank of America said it welcomed the Trump administration's efforts to provide regulatory clarity to banks. 'We've provided detailed proposals and will continue to work with the administration and Congress to improve the regulatory framework,' the bank said. Trump in January said the CEOs of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America denied services to conservatives. At the time, the two banks denied making banking decisions based on politics. 'This seems to be rhetoric that will likely be forgotten by lunchtime,' said David Wagner, head of equities at Aptus Capital Advisors. 'I don't see any material impact on banks, as there are many other drivers that will ultimately presage performance for banks, such as deregulation.' JPMorgan and Bank of America shares both fell over 1%, in line with a decline for the broader S&P Bank index. Banks have consistently argued that any complaints about 'debanking' should be aimed at regulators, as they argue onerous rules and bank supervisors policing firms can discourage them from engaging in certain activities. 'The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion,' the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement. 'The banking agencies have already taken steps to address issues like reputational risk, and we're hopeful that any forthcoming executive order will reinforce this progress by directing regulators to confront the flawed regulatory framework that gave rise to these concerns in the first place.'

iPhone 17, Air, Pro and Pro Max: Launch timeline and specs leak ahead of Apple event
iPhone 17, Air, Pro and Pro Max: Launch timeline and specs leak ahead of Apple event

Mint

time25 minutes ago

  • Mint

iPhone 17, Air, Pro and Pro Max: Launch timeline and specs leak ahead of Apple event

Apple's next flagship smartphone line-up, the iPhone 17 series, is expected to be officially unveiled on 9 September, according to a report by German The report, citing local mobile phone providers, claims that Apple will hold its next major launch event in line with its usual September timeline, a pattern the company has followed for several years. The iPhone 17 series is expected to include four models: the iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Air, iPhone 17 Pro, and iPhone 17 Pro Max. If the leaked schedule holds, pre-orders may open on 12 September, with deliveries and in-store sales likely to commence on 19 September. While Apple has not officially confirmed the date, the timing corresponds with earlier reports, including insights from Bloomberg's Mark Gurman, who had previously suggested that the event could fall between 8 and 12 September. In terms of hardware, the new iPhones are expected to feature upgraded internals. The iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Air are reported to be powered by the A19 chip, whereas the Pro models could be equipped with a higher-end A19 Pro chipset. Display sizes are also expected to vary: both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 17 Pro may feature 6.3-inch screens, the iPhone 17 Air could sport a 6.5-inch display, and the iPhone 17 Pro Max may come with a 6.9-inch screen. The iPhone 17, iPhone 17 Air, and iPhone 17 Pro are rumoured to be built with an aluminium frame, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max is tipped to continue using a titanium frame, similar to its predecessor. A modest price increase is anticipated, with all models except the base iPhone 17 expected to cost approximately $50 more than last year's iPhone 16 series, translating to an increase of roughly ₹ 4,000 in the Indian market. In addition to the iPhone launch, Apple is also likely to announce the third generation of AirPods Pro and updated Apple Watch models during the same event. As with previous launches, Apple is expected to release further details in the weeks leading up to the event.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store