&w=3840&q=100)
Govt outperforms on fiscal deficit, brings it down to 4.77% of GDP in FY25
The government has marginally improved its fiscal deficit for 2024-25 (FY25), bringing it down to 4.77 per cent over the revised estimate (RE) of 4.84 per cent, according to the data released by the Controller General of Accounts (CGA) on Friday.
With the provisional estimate of gross domestic product (GDP) FY25 of ₹330.68 trillion, showing an improvement over the RE of ₹324.11 trillion, the fiscal deficit calculated as percentage of GDP has come down.
'The government's fiscal deficit marginally exceeded the RE for FY25 by ₹77 billion, albeit led by a welcome overshooting in capital expenditure amid a less palatable miss on receipts being largely offset by considerable savings of ₹90,000 crore in revenue expenditure,' said Aditi Nayar, chief economist, Icra.
Capital expenditure for FY25, at ₹10.5 trillion, stood at 103.3 per cent of the RE for the year, the CGA data showed.
In line with its commitment to narrow the fiscal deficit to 4.5 per cent by FY26, the government had set the fiscal deficit target for this financial year at 4.4 per cent.
Experts say the upward revision in the FY25 nominal GDP number augurs well for meeting the deficit and debt for FY26.
The bumper dividend of ₹2.69 trillion announced by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is expected to ease the fiscal situation and help bring down the fiscal deficit in FY26 even further.
The Union Budget for 2025-26 has projected a dividend income of ₹2.56 trillion from the RBI and public-sector financial institutions.
'India's medium-term growth prospects appear to be robust with sound fiscal management. Emphasis on government capital expenditure appears to be leading the growth story from the policy side, with healthy supporting growth in private final consumption expenditure,' said D K Srivastava, chief policy advisor, EY India.
Net tax revenue, according to the CGA data, fell short of the RE at ₹24.99 trillion -- at 97.7 per cent.
Non-tax receipts, however, overshot the RE at 101.2 per cent at ₹5.8 trillion.
Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman in her FY26 Budget announced a new glide path with the debt-to-GDP ratio as the fiscal anchor, moving away from the current practice of targeting fiscal deficit.
The government now targets bringing down the debt-to-GDP ratio to 50 per cent by FY31 with a one percentage point deviation on either side.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
Fintechs in talks with RBI for easier provisioning for default loss guarantee-backed loans
Mumbai: Fintech companies and digital lenders are seeking easier provisioning norms for loan pools backed by their guarantees, even as the central bank has flagged inadequate provisioning for these loans, according to five industry experts. Fintechs believe the provisioning variance is due to the differentiated interpretation of Ind-AS accounting standards, which allow for a 'risk mitigant' like Default Loss Guarantee to be considered while calculating the expected credit loss (ECL) provisions. Unified Fintech Forum and self-regulatory organisation Fintech Association for Consumer Empowerment (FACE), in their representiations to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), have said that making full provisions against such loans will lead to 'double provisioning', with both the lending service providers (LSPs) like fintechs and regulated entities such as banks and non-bank lenders setting aside buffers for the same loan pool. Read more: RBI poised to cut rates as India eyes a steady takeoff Both the LSP and the regulated entities are provisioning for the same loan pool, thus impacting capital deployment efficiency, said Jatin Handoo, chief executive officer of UFF, formerly Digital Lenders' Association of India. It might also lead to a 'crowding out' effect where lenders will have less amount of money for lending because they have to take out the extra amount and provide for it separately, he said. 'RBI is open to listening to us and has asked us to come up with data-based use cases, and customer-level and market insights." Full provisioning by NBFCs Fintechs offer borrowers loans from multiple banks. These intermediaries usually provide a 'default loss guarantee' (DLG) to cover these loans for encouraging lenders to partner with them. However, in April, the central bank wrote to at least four non-bank lenders with high delinquencies in their DLG-backed loans. The regulator asked them to provide for all loan pools sourced through third-party digital platforms under the expected credit loss (ECL) accounting norms, regardless of whether these are backed by DLG arrangements. A senior industry official explained that if the loss on the loan pool was 7% and 5% was covered under a DLG arrangement, some NBFCs usually had a provision cover of 2-4%, depending on their internal modelling and calculations. Audits by RBI in January-February revealed this provision accounting, following which RBI reinforced that the entire provisioning has to be taken by the NBFC and any recoveries under DLG at the end of the loan tenure may be used to write-back the provisions. 'This is not a policy change, but a call-out for those NBFCs that were not doing enough provisioning. It's a prompt for NBFCs to appropriately provision against credit losses, and treat DLGs and recoveries separately," said Kunal Varma, chief executive officer and founder of digital non-banking finance company Freo. However, he said, this may lead to some NBFCs re-evaluating their First Loss Default Guarantee or FLDG-linked relationships in the short term. RBI's concerns stem from elevated delinquencies in some loan pools sourced by fintechs, leading to higher DLG payouts by them and a hit on the asset quality of a few partner NBFCs. Moreover, there have also been concerns around NBFCs using FLDG arrangements as an alternative to securitisation transactions, bypassing the guidelines of securitisation of loan pools. RBI's perspective seems to be that DLG arrangements were allowed to give capital comfort from a regulatory perspective and encourage 'skin in the game' for fintechs, but not dilute the accountability of underwriting by regulated entities. Point of contention Typically, each fintech—such as Paytm, PhonePe, MobiKwik—ties up with multiple regulated banks or NBFCs to offer multiple loan options to their customers. In turn, lenders can accept DLG arrangements in the form of cash deposits, fixed deposits with a lien marked in their favour, and bank guarantees. DLG arrangements for pools of small-ticket unsecured loans are generally used for consumption and lifestyle lending, emergency healthcare expenses, education finance for skill development or vocational degrees and diplomas, sustainable energy such as installing a solar roof and lending to small businesses and new-to-credit borrowers. Read more: How RBI is shaping the future of lending from Bengaluru's HSR Layout FLDG has been a point of contention since the first digital lending guidelines were issued in August 2022. Worried that these DLG loss absorptions were leading to inaccurate reflection of the credit quality of these borrowers, RBI in June 2023 issued the default loss guarantee framework, capping the value of such arrangements at 5% of the loan pool. It had then specified that regulated entities will be responsible for recognising non-performing assets of individual loans in the portfolio and the consequent provisioning as per current norms, regardless of any DLG cover at the portfolio level. Even then industry representatives had approached RBI seeking clarity on certain aspects of the guidelines such as treatment of NPAs given the differences with the ECL framework, and on the kind of different cohorts and structures that can be explored under the DLG framework. This had prompted RBI to issue an FAQ in November 2023 clarifying some of these aspects. However, these circulars were repealed when the consolidated Digital Lending Guidelines were issued on 8 May 2025, leading to some confusion on how provisioning for these loans may be interpreted. Fintech lenders believe that DLG is a form of credit guarantee or enhancement—the entire purpose of which is to provide capital comfort to the lender and help free up the lender's capital for additional on-lending. 'As per Ind-AS, NBFCs were considering the credit enhancement provided by an FLDG for purposes of computing the ECL on a loan portfolio (given that an FLDG qualifies as a credit enhancement intrinsic to the contractual terms of the arrangement, which is the requirement under Ind-AS 109)," said Shilpa Mankar Ahluwalia, partner, head-fintech, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. RBI's 8 May directions, however, suggest that the amount of the DLG cover cannot be adjusted to reduce ECL computation, which could alter the cost-benefit to NBFCs given the zero-provisioning benefit of DLGs, according to experts who believe it could also send 'mixed signals" to market participants, investors and new entrants in the LSP space and may lead to the opinion that fintechs are not to be trusted. Read more: Lenders concerned about education loans as US tightens curbs on student visas Already, DLG rules only allow lien-marked deposits or bank guarantees, which practically removes any performance risk on such guarantees, said Ahluwalia. 'The industry also claims that capping the DLG at 5% had already prompted NBFCs to implement strong credit underwriting and risk tools, and removing the provisioning benefit of DLG cover may increase costs of digital loans and reduce credit access."
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Fleet owners jittery as FinMin favours ₹100 crore value-based criteria for infra status to ships, ET Infra
Advt Advt By , ETInfra MUMBAI: The Ministry of Finance is pushing ahead with a value-based - vessels costing ₹100 crore and above - criteria for granting infrastructure status to ships, to implement a Union Budget announcement, a move that will exclude small ship owners or as much as 80 per cent of the Indian fleet from its scope and potentially be challenged in courts, multiple sources Ministry of Ports , Shipping and Waterways had endorsed that ships of 24 metres and above by length or 500 gross tonnage (GT) and above by capacity should be accorded infrastructure status to help fleet owners access long-term, low-cost years of lobbying by the local shipping industry due to challenges associated with securing long-term, low-cost funds, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced in her Budget speech to Parliament on February 1 that 'large ships above a specified size will be included in the infrastructure harmonised master list'.The shipping industry is miffed at the Finance Ministry 's stand on setting value-based criteria for granting infrastructure status to ships.'The government is supporting micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME's) from every side and here the Finance Ministry is advocating ₹100 crore and above as the eligibility criteria because the Finance Minister used the words 'large ships' in the Budget speech. If this sails through, then 80 per cent of our industry, which is less than ₹100 crore, will be left out of the infrastructure status,' said a ship owner.'The ₹100 crore value-based threshold will exclude the whole offshore fleet, ship owners mostly bring in second hand vessels which are less than ₹100 crore and the entire coastal shipping industry where you want to connect the hinterland through inland waterways and move the cargo along the coast, every vessel is less than ₹100 crore,' the ship owner new policies like the green tug transition programme where the ministry is nudging fleet owners to move to green ships, most of the vessels are less than ₹100 crores.'So, who are you trying to deny? You are trying to deny the whole medium-scale ship owners who are mainly catering to coastal movement of cargo which is a focus area for the government,' the ship owner stated.'More importantly, there is no revenue loss to the government by setting 24 metres by length or 500 GT by capacity as eligibility criteria for infrastructure status to ships. It will allow the Reserve Bank of India to include the defined ships in its master list of infrastructure sectors to facilitate long-term, low-cost funds from banks. Then, why this value based ₹100 crore system. If you see the sectors covered under infrastructure in the harmonised master list, hardly one sector may have some value associated with it, most of the sectors in the list have some kind of objective qualifying criteria. For ships, it should be length and gross tonnage, which is internationally accepted. It's an objective criterion,' he substantiate this point, a second ship owner referred to the shipbuilding financial assistance given by the government wherein shipyards are entitled to receive funds for constructing normal ships having length of 24 metres and above for domestic use. For hybrid and green vessels, a lesser length is accepted under the shipbuilding financial assistance scheme to handhold adoption of new stipulating a length of 24 metres and above for funding the construction of normal ships for domestic use under the shipbuilding financial assistance scheme, the government seeks to ensure that such ships comply with international conventions on load lines, tonnage infrastructure status, the ministry has endorsed setting 24 metres and above by length or 500 GT and above by capacity, the latter criteria will also comply with the Safety Of Life At Sea (SOLAS) convention of the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), a treaty that sets minimum safety standards for merchant ships.'Quality will be maintained with these parameters. There are different types of vessels with different shapes. GT is a function of volumes, so with a lesser length also you can have a higher GT,' the second ship owner said.'Now, if you put ₹100 crore as the criteria, there will be a difference between the vessels of ₹100 crore and the vessels of 24 metres and above or 500 GT and above in the funding mechanism. In the Indian context, if the government is only looking at bigger vessels, then what about the smaller ship owners. Are you trying to create a difference between the big and the small ships for the funding mechanism and denying the benefits associated with infrastructure status to the whole medium-scale ship owners which is the largest chunk of the domestic industry,' the second ship owner adopting the 24 metres length criteria would exclude vessels such as small boats, launches, ferries, wooden boats, passenger boats etc from the ambit of infrastructure status. 'These ships which are small will still not get infrastructure status,' he the Finance Minister mentioning the words 'large ships' for infrastructure status in the Union Budget, most likely to garner some eyeballs, the Finance Ministry is yet to come to terms with the needs of the shipping industry.'Somebody in the finance ministry wanted some colour to the Budget speech and gave infrastructure status a 'large ships' spin. Now they want to define large ships with a value of ₹100 crore. You are looking to benefit the local shipping industry and there is no revenue loss for the government if the infrastructure status is based on 24 metres and above by length or 500 GT and above by capacity. So, what is the problem?' the second ship owner asked.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
RBI likely to cut repo rate by 25 bps on June 6 amid low inflation, say experts
NEW DELHI: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is likely to announce a third consecutive 25 basis points (bps) rate cut on June 6, amid easing inflation and global economic uncertainty driven by US tariff actions. With consumer price inflation remaining below the 4 per cent median target, experts believe the move would support growth during a period of external volatility, according to a PTI report. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC), the RBI's rate-setting panel, will begin deliberations on the next bi-monthly policy on June 4. The decision is scheduled to be announced on Friday, June 6. Following 25 bps repo rate cuts in both February and April, which brought the key policy rate down to 6 per cent, the six-member MPC, led by RBI Governor Sanjay Malhotra, also changed its policy stance from 'neutral' to 'accommodative' in April. The central bank has now reduced the policy repo rate by a cumulative 50 bps in 2025 so far, prompting multiple banks to lower their External Benchmark Lending Rates (EBLRs) and Marginal Cost of Funds-Based Lending Rates (MCLR). "We do believe that given the rather benign inflation conditions and the liquidity situation which has been made very comfortable through various measures of the RBI, the MPC would go in for a 25 bps cut in the repo rate on the (June) 6th. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo The commentary on both growth and inflation will be important as there are expectations of revisions in their forecasts for both the parameters," said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist, Bank of Baroda. He also expects the RBI to provide detailed insight into global factors affecting the Indian economy, especially in light of the expiration of US tariff relief in July. ICRA's chief economist, Aditi Nayar, also projects continued monetary easing through the year, as CPI inflation is forecast to remain below 4 per cent for most of the fiscal. "A 25 bps rate cut is expected next week, followed by two more cuts over the subsequent two policy reviews, taking the repo rate to 5.25 per cent by the end of the cycle," she said. The RBI's annual report, released on Thursday reiterated the central bank's plan to manage liquidity operations in line with the prevailing monetary policy stance, ensuring sufficient liquidity for the productive sectors of the economy. The government has mandated the RBI to maintain CPI-based retail inflation at 4 per cent, with a flexibility band of plus or minus 2 per cent. Assocham Secretary General Manish Singhal also supported the case for easing, citing multi-year low inflation and overall positive macroeconomic indicators. "Though the INR is likely to come under depreciation pressure in the short term, especially if global interest rates (e.g. in the US) remain elevated, its impact will depend on the changes in global risk appetite, crude oil prices and the Fed's own monetary stance. We emphasize the importance of strategic patience over aggressive easing, given the current environment of steady growth and manageable inflation," said Singhal. Echoing similar sentiments, Signature Global founder and chairman Pradeep Aggarwal expressed hope that the RBI would offer relief to homebuyers with a rate cut. "Given that several scheduled commercial banks have been reducing their lending rates following the previous two RBI MPC outcomes, another rate cut at this juncture would act as a catalyst for increased housing demand across segments. As a result, both first-time homebuyers and investors are likely to be encouraged to enter the real estate market, further strengthening demand across the sector," Aggarwal said. Also read: RBI slaps Rs 54.78 crore in penalties on banks and NBFCs for compliance lapses in FY25 An article in the RBI's May Bulletin highlighted that domestic bond yields have declined to multi-year lows, aided by back-to-back policy rate cuts and liquidity-enhancing measures. The report noted that monetary and credit conditions are evolving in line with the RBI's accommodative policy approach, aiming to bring inflation in line with targets while bolstering growth. India's GDP growth is estimated to have dipped to a four-year low of 6.5 per cent in FY 2024–25. Meanwhile, retail inflation in April 2025 eased to 3.16 per cent- the lowest year-on-year print since July 2019. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
