logo
Soft power, sharp strategy: How India is silently securing its interests in Central Asia

Soft power, sharp strategy: How India is silently securing its interests in Central Asia

First Post2 days ago

Unlike China's debt traps or Russia's heavy hand, India's pitch to Central Asia feels like partnership. If Delhi plays it right, it could carve out a niche as the region's trusted friend, not its overlord read more
On June 6, 2025, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar hosted the 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue in New Delhi, marking a significant step in strengthening India's ties with Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Beyond the talk of trade corridors and energy deals, there is a grand strategy as well.
Behind the handshakes and MoUs lies a high-stakes game for influence, as India counters China's Belt and Road and Russia's waning grip.
Strategic footholds in a region critical to Eurasian dominance. Imagine India securing a web of partnerships that bypasses Pakistan, deters Beijing, and locks in energy routes. That's the power play unfolding. Jaishankar isn't just building bridges. He's redrawing the strategy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
India's push into Central Asia isn't just another trade mission; it's a bold bid to reshape influence in a region that's been a geopolitical sandbox for great powers. Forget oil routes or export markets. Jaishankar's dialogues are about planting India's flag as a cultural force, using soft power—think Bollywood, yoga, and shared history—to win hearts where Beijing and Moscow wield wallets and weapons. India's not just chasing contracts; it's rewriting the rules of the game, proving it can lead without coercion.
Central Asia—Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, and Tajikistan—sits at the crossroads of empires, a landlocked prize where global powers jostle for control. For decades, Russia's military might and China's Belt and Road billions have set the tone. India's entry isn't new; it's been nibbling at the edges with trade pacts and small investments. But Jaishankar's recent talks signal a shift—a deliberate pivot toward influence that doesn't rely on chequebooks or threats. Why care? Because in a world where hard power often backfires, India's softer approach could redefine how nations compete in contested regions. It's a test case for whether culture can trump cash.
Let's start with the obvious: Central Asia matters. It's a treasure trove of gas, oil, and rare minerals, but more than that, it's a buffer zone between Russia, China, and the volatile Middle East. China's been pouring money into roads and railways, tying countries like Uzbekistan to its orbit with loans that often morph into debt traps. Russia, meanwhile, leans on old Soviet ties and military bases to keep its grip. Both play a zero-sum game—control or bust.
India's different. Jaishankar's recent meetings, like the India-Central Asia Dialogue, pushed practical stuff: trade corridors, energy deals, even counterterrorism. But scratch the surface, and you see something else brewing. India's not trying to outspend China— it can't. Nor is it muscling in like Russia. Instead, it's banking on something neither rival can match: cultural resonance.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Take Bollywood. In Almaty, Kazakhstan's biggest city, Indian films pack theatres, and stars like Shah Rukh Khan are household names. In Uzbekistan, Indian universities are setting up campuses, drawing students who see India as a gateway to affordable, quality education. Kyrgyzstan, with its Buddhist heritage, is ripe for India's pitch as a spiritual hub—think tourist trails linking ancient monasteries to India's Buddhist circuit. These aren't just feel-good stories; they're strategic. When a Kyrgyz teen watches Dangal or an Uzbek student studies in Delhi, they're not just consuming entertainment or education—they're buying into India's worldview.
Compare that to China's approach. Beijing builds shiny highways but leaves countries like Tajikistan drowning in debt—$1.2 billion owed by 2023, nearly 15 per cent of its GDP. Locals grumble about Chinese workers flooding their markets, building projects that feel more like occupation than partnership. Russia's playbook is even blunter: military drills and strong-arm tactics that remind Central Asians of Soviet days. Both powers get results, but they breed resentment. India's soft power—movies, music, shared history—slips under the radar, building goodwill without strings attached.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
History backs this up. India's links to Central Asia go back centuries, from the Silk Road to shared Buddhist and Sufi traditions. Jaishankar's not starting from scratch; he's tapping a vein of nostalgia and familiarity. In 2022, India hosted Central Asian leaders for a virtual summit, pushing cultural exchanges alongside trade. Small moves, like $1 million grants for community projects in Kyrgyzstan, show India's not just talking the talk. These gestures aren't flashy, but they're deliberate—seeds for long-term influence.
The gamble's not without risks. Central Asia's leaders are pragmatic; they'll take India's scholarships but still court China's cash. And India's own backyard—think Pakistan and Bangladesh—keeps Delhi distracted. But here's the edge: India's not seen as a bully. Unlike China's debt traps or Russia's heavy hand, India's pitch feels like partnership. If Delhi plays it right, it could carve out a niche as the region's trusted friend, not its overlord.
Jaishankar's Central Asia play isn't about outbidding China or outmuscling Russia—it's about outsmarting them. In a region where power has long meant money or might, India's betting on a different currency: ideas. Bollywood beats, Buddhist trails, and classroom exchanges might not make headlines like billion-dollar deals, but they're quietly shifting the board. Central Asia's not just a market—it's a proving ground for India's rise as a cultural great power. Watch closely: this is how you win a game without firing a shot.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The writer is a columnist. His articles have appeared in various publications like The Independent, The Globe and Mail, South China Morning Post, The Straits Times, etc. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Does India trust Donald Trump? EAM Jaishankar says national interest is the pivot, not personalities
Does India trust Donald Trump? EAM Jaishankar says national interest is the pivot, not personalities

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Does India trust Donald Trump? EAM Jaishankar says national interest is the pivot, not personalities

External affairs minister S Jaishankar NEW DELHI: Amid apparent differences with the Trump administration over critical issues like Pakistan's support to cross border terrorism, external affairs minister S Jaishankar said that India's aim is to advance the relationship with the US as it serves India's interests. During his ongoing visit to Europe, the minister also warned the Europeans that terrorism will come back to haunt them if they ignore it. "I take the world as I find it. Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests - and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y," said Jaishankar, responding to a question about whether India trusts Trump. Asked about the Pahalgam terror attack and the subsequent military conflict, Jaishankar recalled the presence of Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. "Why did he, of all people, feel safe living for years in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point," he asked. "I want the world to understand - this isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism. And that very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you," said the minister in an interview to Euractiv in Brussels. He also hit out at Europe for questioning India's ties with Russia, saying every country considers its own experience, history and interests. "India has the longest-standing grievance - our borders were violated just months after independence, when Pakistan sent in invaders to Kashmir. And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries," he said. 'If those same countries - who were evasive or reticent then - now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles', I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past," added Jaishankar. Asked about India's ties with China, the minister recalled his meetings with several European companies in India that have chosen to set up there specifically to de-risk their supply chains. "Many companies are becoming increasingly careful about where they locate their data - they'd rather place it somewhere secure and trustworthy than simply go for efficiency. Would you really want that in the hands of actors you don't feel comfortable with," he said.

Moldovan schools to keep teaching Romanian history
Moldovan schools to keep teaching Romanian history

Deccan Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Deccan Herald

Moldovan schools to keep teaching Romanian history

Moldova's education minister recently said that schools would keep teaching the subject "history of the Romanians," despite an official ruling that the term was unfair to the ex-Soviet state's ethnic Perciun issued his statement amid a debate over a history textbook denounced by pro-Russian opposition parties and Moldova's Jewish community on grounds it exaggerates Moldova's links with neighbouring Romania and whitewashes the actions of Romania's pro-Nazi wartime leader Ion Antonescu."We are continuing in the same vein as before," Perciun said in his weekly online address. "After 150 years of Russification, we believe that we can and must study the history of the Romanians in our schools."Perciun said he felt no need to be bound by a recommendation by the Council for the Prevention of Discrimination that the subject area's title be changed to a more neutral name to reflect Moldova's multi-ethnic 150 years before independence, Moldova was, in turns, part of the Russian Empire, "Greater Romania" and the Soviet census figures show 77.2% of the population to be ethnic Moldovans and a further 7.9% to be Romanians - though the distinction is often blurred as both countries speak Romanian. There are also large communities of ethnic Russians, Ukrainians and others and Russian is still widely president Maia Sandu, highly critical of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and what she says are attempts to destabilise her government, is pressing ahead with a campaign to join the European Union by historians and civil society groups are taking part in a country-wide debate on the new textbook, also entitled "History of the Romanians and General History."Alexander Bilinchis, chairman of Moldova's Jewish community, called for the textbook's withdrawal on grounds it downplays the extent of Nazi pogroms and mass deportations of ministry is to consider the findings of the country-wide discussions and decide whether to maintain the textbook in the school system or alter it.

India-EU Free Trade Agreement feasible by end of 2025: S Jaishankar
India-EU Free Trade Agreement feasible by end of 2025: S Jaishankar

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

India-EU Free Trade Agreement feasible by end of 2025: S Jaishankar

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel India places a high priority to its relations with the European Union, the centrepiece of which is the Free Trade Agreement negotiations that are making very good progress, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said here on a conversation with The Financial Times Brussels Bureau Chief Henry Foy at the German Marshall Fund (GMF) Forum, the external affairs minister expressed confidence that the year-end timeline set for the completion of the India-EU Free Trade Agreement (FTA) seems "feasible" following his in-depth talks with EU officials this also highlighted the strength of the two-way relationship that goes beyond trade to cover aspects of defence and security, mobility, talent flows and education."I would give it (India-EU ties) pretty high priority... right now you catch us at a very important moment," said Jaishankar."We had the (EU) College of Commissioners, very soon after they came into office, visit India collectively. We know that's a very unusual and very positive step, and we are really looking at deepening our ties," he said."So, the centrepiece is the FTA, which has been under negotiation for some time now but everything I have heard... I think we are making very good progress," he the backdrop of his talks earlier on Wednesday with MaroS Šefčovič, the EU Commissioner for Trade and Economic Security, Jaishankar was asked about the prospect of completing the FTA by the end of this year."A lot has been done, and everything that I heard on this trip gives me the confidence that it's within sight, that by the end of the year it is feasible to do this," he conversation session at the high-profile forum covered a broad spectrum of issues governing India's foreign policy perspectives, from its relations with the US and closer in its neighbourhood with China."We are conditioned to deal with situations and challenges, think it through for ourselves and essentially make decisions based on what capabilities we have and what we are able to leverage from the world. And that's because we have never been an alliance partner. So, by the nature of our foreign policy structure, our strategic choices, we sort of have that mindset and approach," Jaishankar this with Europe's history and experiences, the minister noted that India is accustomed to dealing with shifting geopolitical realities and any "trans-Atlantic divergences" in outlooks that emerge."We are objective about it. We value our relations with the US, as we do with the EU, we will deal with each one on terms which are best for both of us," he the issue of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Jaishankar highlighted India's stance favouring a negotiated settlement of said: "We have felt from the start that even if two countries, two neighbours, have differences, even very deep differences, it cannot be settled by recourse to war. If war has started, you are not going to get a solution out of the battlefield. If you're not going to get a solution out of the battlefield, then the answer is to negotiate."And if you are going to negotiate, it makes sense to negotiate directly, rather than through very convoluted signalling. So that's been our position. It wasn't necessarily widely accepted in 2022, but I think a lot of people have come around to that point of view right now... the United States today, under President Trump, also is an advocate of the fact that there has to be a negotiated solution."On China, Jaishankar reflected upon the "incredibly complicated matrix" with several different dimensions. Asked if the EU remains naive vis-a-vis China, he added: "I would point to a certain evolution in Europe's position and stance, but I would also make the point that it's a very differentiated picture."Not all of Europe is obviously moving at the same speed and on the same wavelength. So, there are some which have different views, some who are more hard-headed. I would make that distinction."Jaishankar has been holding a series of wide-ranging discussions in Brussels this week, including with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas for the first India-EU Strategic Dialogue.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store