Tesla approves $29 billion in shares to Elon Musk as court case rumbles on
The electric vehicle maker said in a statement it will award a distribution of 96 million Tesla shares to Musk as it "intends to compensate its CEO for his future services commensurate with his contributions to our company and shareholders."
The award comes as Tesla challenges a Delaware court ruling that struck down a 2018 package of about $55.8 billion. With that appeal dragging out, Monday's announcement marks an interim step while the company develops a "longer-term CEO compensation strategy," Tesla said in a letter to shareholders.
"We have recommended this award as a first step, 'good faith' payment," said the letter. "Retaining Elon is more important than ever before."
The move comes amid a fierce battle for top engineering talent as companies like Google and Meta compete for leadership on artificial intelligence.
The Tesla letter, signed by Tesla board members Robyn Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, described Musk as a "magnet for hiring and retaining talent at Tesla," noting that Tesla is transitioning from its electric vehicle focus "to grow towards becoming a leader in AI, robotics and related services."
Musk is viewed within the business world as a unique talent after his success with building Tesla and SpaceX into major global companies.
But his stewardship at Tesla has come under scrutiny in the last year as car sales and profits have tumbled.
This trend has been partly due to Musk's support for far-right political causes, but also is related to a sluggish rollout of new auto models after the polarising Cybertruck sold poorly.
In a July 23 Tesla earnings call, Musk warned of more potentially "rough" quarters ahead before the company's robotics and AI ventures pay off.
On the call, Musk reiterated his concern about the current framework in which he holds about 13% of Tesla shares prior to Monday's award.
"As I've mentioned before, I think my control over Tesla should be enough to ensure that it goes in a good direction, but not so much control that I can't be thrown out if I go crazy," Musk said.
Tesla's statement did not explicitly mention Musk's foray into politics, which has sparked consumer boycotts and vandalism. But the letter by Denholm and Wilson-Thompson alluded to concerns that Musk's attention had drifted from the company, calling the interim package a step towards "keeping Elon's energies focused on Tesla."
The massive pay package comes eight months after the judge in a Delaware court rejected Musk's even larger compensation at Tesla, denying an attempt to restore the pay deal through a shareholder vote.
Musk would be required to forfeit the new compensation package should the appeals court rule in his favor and grant him the full 2018 compensation, which at the time was valued at $55.8 billion.
The new payout is sure to fuel concerns about the compensation for Musk, already the world's richest man, and whether the Tesla board is placing a sufficient check on the company's chief executive.
Tesla shares rose 2.4% Monday in early trading.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Elon Musk, Tesla sued by shareholders over concealing Robotaxi risks
Elon Musk and Tesla have been taken to court by a group of shareholders who allege the company misled them about the safety of its self-driving technology, including the much-publicised Robotaxi. The lawsuit, filed as a proposed class action on Monday, accuses Musk and Tesla of concealing serious risks associated with autonomous driving, according to a report by Reuters. The legal action follows Tesla's first public test of its Robotaxi fleet, which took place in late June in Austin, Texas. During the demonstration, vehicles were reportedly seen speeding, braking sharply, mounting a curb, driving in the wrong lane, and dropping off passengers in the middle of busy multi-lane roads. Tesla's share price fell by 6.1 per cent over the two trading sessions following the test, wiping out approximately $68 billion in market value. Shareholders say Tesla overstated tech readiness The lawsuit claims Musk and Tesla exaggerated the readiness and potential of their self-driving systems, inflating the company's valuation and stock price. Shareholders cited remarks made during an April 22 conference call, where Musk said Tesla was 'laser-focused on bringing Robotaxi to Austin in June'. On the same day, Tesla asserted its autonomous technology would allow for 'scalable and safe deployment across diverse geographies and use cases'. Tesla has not yet responded to media requests for comment. Also named in the lawsuit are Chief Financial Officer Vaibhav Taneja and former CFO Zachary Kirkhorn. Robotaxi rollout central to Tesla's future Scaling the Robotaxi service is considered vital to Tesla's long-term strategy, particularly as demand for its core electric vehicle models slows and Musk's political activities continue to draw scrutiny. Musk, currently the world's richest person, has said he intends to make the Robotaxi service available to half of the US population by the end of the year. However, the company must first secure regulatory approval and prove the safety of its technology. Legal developments and fatal crash verdict The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Austin, Texas, by shareholder Denise Morand. It seeks damages on behalf of investors who held Tesla shares between April 19, 2023, and June 22, 2025. In a separate development, a Florida jury on August 1 found Tesla 33 per cent liable for a 2019 fatal crash involving its self-driving software. The accident killed a 22-year-old woman and seriously injured her boyfriend. The court ordered Tesla to pay approximately $243 million in damages. Tesla argued the driver was at fault and has said it plans to appeal the ruling.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
OpenAI, Google and Anthropic win US approval for civilian AI contracts
The US government's central purchasing arm is adding OpenAI, Alphabet's Google and Anthropic to a list of approved artificial intelligence vendors, opening the door to widespread adoption of the technology across civilian federal move by the General Services Administration, to be announced Tuesday, will speed up the adoption of AI tools in the federal government by making them available through its Multiple Award Schedule, a federal contracting platform with contract terms already set. Without that flexibility, agencies would ordinarily spend months negotiating their own terms for use of the technology. GSA officials said the models from the three companies — OpenAI's ChatGPT , Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude — were evaluated by several performance and security measures. The agency didn't immediately disclose the terms of the contracts. But it's used its buying power to negotiate deep discounts with software providers like Adobe Inc., Salesforce Inc. and Google. Other leading-edge AI companies would also be considered for the marketplace. The first three vendors were simply further along in the procurement process, the officials said. 'We're not in the position of picking winners or losers here. We want the maximum number of tools to provide to all federal government employees to make them as productive as possible,' said GSA Deputy Administrator Stephen Ehikian. 'There's going to be different tools for different use cases.' The move comes just days after President Donald Trump signed three executive orders aimed at reshaping the government's role in AI, including a mandate that federal agencies only procure language models 'free from ideological bias.' Enforcing the presidential ban on what Trump calls 'woke AI' would be an agency-by-agency process, according to the GSA. 'But at the same time, this is a race, right? And as the president said, we're going to win this race,' said Josh Gruenbaum, commissioner of GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Adding the three companies to the multiple award schedule — which makes commercial IT products more readily available to agencies — means federal bureaucrats can begin using large language models that had previously been restricted to smaller pilot projects or national security use. The Pentagon has already awarded AI contracts to OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI, which are separate from the GSA's announcements on Tuesday. Many agencies, including the Treasury Department and Office of Personnel Management, have already expressed interest in using the new platform, according to GSA officials. Under the previous presidential administration, federal agencies identified potential uses for AI such as processing patent applications, detecting tax fraud, reviewing grant submissions and copy-editing press releases. Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor said he envisions using AI to develop customer service chatbots and to summarize tens of thousands of public comments on rulemaking — a process that previously bogged down changes to regulations. But he said agencies will also have to hire savvy employees. 'We're probably missing people who are super conversant with very modern, AI-related stuff,' he said. 'Clearly, we can't just throw things against the wall and see what sticks,' Kupor said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
OpenAI, Google, Anthropic win US govt approval for civilian AI contracts
By Gregory Korte and Shirin Ghaffary The US government's central purchasing arm is adding OpenAI, Alphabet Inc.'s Google and Anthropic to a list of approved artificial intelligence vendors, opening the door to widespread adoption of the technology across civilian federal agencies. The move by the General Services Administration, to be announced Tuesday, will speed up the adoption of AI tools in the federal government by making them available through its Multiple Award Schedule, a federal contracting platform with contract terms already set. Without that flexibility, agencies would ordinarily spend months negotiating their own terms for use of the technology. GSA officials said the models from the three companies — OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude — were evaluated by several performance and security measures. The agency didn't immediately disclose the terms of the contracts. But it's used its buying power to negotiate deep discounts with software providers like Adobe Inc., Salesforce Inc. and Google. Other leading-edge AI companies would also be considered for the marketplace. The first three vendors were simply further along in the procurement process, the officials said. 'We're not in the position of picking winners or losers here. We want the maximum number of tools to provide to all federal government employees to make them as productive as possible,' said GSA Deputy Administrator Stephen Ehikian. 'There's going to be different tools for different use cases.' The move comes just days after President Donald Trump signed three executive orders aimed at reshaping the government's role in AI, including a mandate that federal agencies only procure language models 'free from ideological bias.' Enforcing the presidential ban on what Trump calls 'woke AI' would be an agency-by-agency process, according to the GSA. 'But at the same time, this is a race, right? And as the president said, we're going to win this race,' said Josh Gruenbaum, commissioner of GSA's Federal Acquisition Service. Adding the three companies to the multiple award schedule — which makes commercial IT products more readily available to agencies — means federal bureaucrats can begin using large language models that had previously been restricted to smaller pilot projects or national security use. The Pentagon has already awarded AI contracts to OpenAI and Elon Musk's xAI, which are separate from the GSA's announcements on Tuesday. Many agencies, including the Treasury Department and Office of Personnel Management, have already expressed interest in using the new platform, according to GSA officials. Under the previous presidential administration, federal agencies identified potential uses for AI such as processing patent applications, detecting tax fraud, reviewing grant submissions and copy-editing press releases. Office of Personnel Management Director Scott Kupor said he envisions using AI to develop customer service chatbots and to summarize tens of thousands of public comments on rulemaking — a process that previously bogged down changes to regulations. But he said agencies will also have to hire savvy employees. 'We're probably missing people who are super conversant with very modern, AI-related stuff,' he said. 'Clearly, we can't just throw things against the wall and see what sticks,' Kupor said.
